Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s infrastructure tantrum backfires immediately — and Senate Republicans know it

Published

on

- Commentary

The day after Republicans lost control of the House of Representatives following last fall’s midterm elections, President Trump took to both Twitter and a podium at the White House to warn Democrats not to investigate his administration or else he would use the power of the presidency to stop any new federal legislation.

“If that happens,” Trump said of Democratic investigations leading to subpoenas for members of his administration, “then we’re going to do the same thing, and government comes to a halt. And I would blame them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, Trump made good on his threat.

Triggered by growing calls for his impeachment, the president stormed out of a planned White House meeting with congressional Democratic leaders on a bipartisan plan to improve the nation’s crumbling infrastructure.

As Trump described it: “I walked into the room and I told Senator Schumer, Speaker Pelosi: ‘I want to do infrastructure. I want to do it more than you want to do it. I’d be really good at that, that’s what I do. But you know what? You can’t do it under these circumstances. So get these phony investigations over with.”

The president is trying to use his proposed (and entirely hypothetical) $2 trillion infrastructure deal as a bargaining chip to get Democrats to stop their oversight of his presidency. In effect, he is trying to blackmail the nation, allowing communities that need roads replaced, bridges fixed, broadband access and lead-free pipes to suffer until congressional investigations into his administration are halted. It is the clearest form of extortion Trump has exhibited since taking office. But beyond the galling selfishness of these antics, they hurt his own party more than his political opponents.

ADVERTISEMENT

“To watch what happened in the White House would make your jaw drop,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters, minutes after Trump stormed out of their brief encounter. “We went to the White House to talk to President Trump about infrastructure, but he threw a temper tantrum and walked out of the meeting.”

As Schumer pointed out, “It’s clear this was not a spontaneous move on the president’s part. It was planned.” There were pre-printed signs for Trump’s “impromptu” Rose Garden address blasting Democrats. Two hours earlier, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had claimed the White House wanted to see Trump’s replacement NAFTA deal passed first, before claiming Democrats have no infrastructure plan of their own. But Schumer said Democrats came to the White House on Wednesday “prepared to give [Trump] a 35-page plan detailing … all the areas I mentioned and more that had the broad support of Senate and House Democrats.”

Trump’s stunt was calculated to goad Democrats into an uncomfortable and ultimately untenable position. For weeks, the media has repeated the familiar “Democrats in disarray” frame to paint House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as out of control, atop an increasingly impatient caucus hellbent on impeachment. After Pelosi accused Trump of engaging in a “cover-up” on Wednesday, noting his blockade of congressional investigations, the president attempted to deflect onto her the lack of progress on an issue he has long claimed to care about intensely. But as Trump continues to dodge House investigations, leaving lawmakers spinning their wheels, they aren’t falling for his trap.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, Democrats are calling Trump’s bluff over his feigned outrage about Pelosi’s comments, pointing to his incessant tweeting attacks on Democrats every single day.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., taunted Trump by saying that he felt intimidated by Pelosi:  “I don’t think he does well with smart, strong women.”

A growing number of congressional Democrats, most notably moderate members of the rank and file, have publicly announced their support for impeachment. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, who ousted GOP Rep. Dave Brat last fall in a Virginia district that Trump carried by seven points, said the prevailing wisdom that Democrats in swing districts fear impeachment proceedings is incorrect. “I generally reject the notion that, like, districts like mine don’t believe in the rule of law and constitutional values,” Spanberger told Roll Call.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rep. Katie Hill, a freshman Democrat who flipped a Southern California seat last fall and has been slow to embrace impeachment, made a full-throated argument in favor of the move after Trump’s stunt on Wednesday.

Whether or not they impeach, Democrats are committed to investigating and legislating at the same time. While the impeachment versus infrastructure drama was playing out at the White House on Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee passed the Dream Act, a bill to provide permanent protection and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.

While the bill is unlikely ever to make it to the president’s desk, this movement on immigration for Democrats comes exactly one week after Trump was in the White House Rose Garden to reveal his own so-called immigration plan — which, like his infrastructure plan, was declared dead on arrival by Republicans in Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s why Trump’s latest Rose Garden stunt hurts Republicans most.

Vulnerable Republicans up for re-election in swing states next year understand that they still have an entire must-do list to accomplish this year, investigations or not. Still to come this year includes a host of important work that requires bipartisan support: avoiding an automatic sequester of the Pentagon’s budget, a debt ceiling hike, and a disaster relief bill to aid flooded military installations and farms in the key electoral states of Florida, North Carolina and Iowa. As even the White House admits, Trump’s new trade treaty is a top priority this year. But as the president threatened months ago, nothing gets done if he isn’t left unaccountable. As he has made loud and clear, he puts the personal over party and patriotism.

Republicans, for their part, appeared jolted by Trump’s move. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana took to the floor on Wednesday to blast the GOP-led Senate for failing to accomplish anything legislatively so far this session.

“We need to do more, by we I mean the United States Congress,” he said. “Other than the nominations, which are important, we have done nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada.” He said that “there are issues where our Democratic friends and my Republican friends have more in common than we don’t. We need to bring the bills to the floor of the United States Senate.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether under threat of impeachment or just continued investigation, it is clear that Democrats have Trump rattled — and that hurts congressional Republicans the most. The Republican Senate is where House Democratic bills go to die. Despite Trump’s claims to the contrary, it is Republican intransigence, not Democratic efforts to investigate the executive branch, that have obstructed progress. As Sen. John Cornyn of Texas proudly stated last month: “We are the firewall.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Historians demolish John Yoo for claim Founding Fathers wouldn’t want Trump impeached in an election year

Published

on

Comments made by attorney and law professor John Yoo on Fox News on the Founding Father's intentions about impeachment received a brutal debunking by two historians -- including one of his colleagues at UC Berkeley.

Appearing with Fox News personality Laura Ingraham, lawyer Yoo -- who is infamous for providing President George W. Bush's administration with legal justifications for the torture of prisoners of war -- claimed that the Founding Fathers would object to the president being impeached in an election year.

According to Yoo, Democrats are getting it all wrong when they say the Constitution compels them to hold impeachment proceedings against Trump just one year before the election.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

McConnell drops a surprise on Trump — calls for an even stronger resolution to rebuke him

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) indicated he opposes the bill out of the House to denounce President Donald Trump's military withdrawal in Syria because it isn't tough enough, reported Bloomberg's Steven Dennis.

https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1184840222846148608

"My first preference is for something stronger than the House resolution," McConnell said according to Bloomberg's Laura Litvan.

She went on to say that McConnel wants a bill that outlines what action should take place in Syria.

McConnell said the House version was "curiously silent on the issue of whether to actually to sustain a U.S. military presence in Syria."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Mad dog Trump and his Bible-thumping kennel pals: White House theocrats may be the biggest danger of all

Published

on

“I have done nothing to harm these people but they are angered with me, so what do they do, doctor up some income tax, for which they have no case… to harass a peaceful man.”

You could be excused for thinking that Donald Trump spoke these words of self-pity. In fact, they’re from Robert de Niro, playing that other gangster, Al Capone, in the 1987 movie The Untouchables, written by David Mamet.

Like Trump, a would-be dictator madly claiming the overwhelming support of the populace, the real-life Capone insisted that his criminal acts satisfied “a public demand.” He declared, “I am just a businessman, giving the people what they want.” And a certain percentage of the civilian population—Capone’s “base,” if you will—thought he was just swell.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image