We spent the Obama administration’s first months monitoring attempts to cap the source of BP’s toxic oil spill. We have spent all of Trump’s administration trying to cap the source of his toxic spill. We fret and rail over the damage it’s causing, the many ways it’s weakening everything in its path, especially the resistance.
For all that, we haven’t located the source, the Deep Horizon of his toxic sludge – the root of all his evil. We try to staunch the flow wherever it affects us or we spot it. That has us scrambling, our efforts diluted. He likes us scattered. As Trump Insider Cliff Sims notes, Chaos is Trump’s friend. He can handle it better than anyone.
The closest social scientists get to describing the root of Trump’s evil is the term “dark triad,” the triple-threat of psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism. The term “dark triad” simply indicates that he’s ruthless, cunning and self-aggrandizing to a clinically diagnosable degree.
Psychopathy in particular, is the ability to stay comfortable, calm, and confident while causing havoc. That may be part of his appeal. Many wouldn’t like that ability to remain above the chaos they cause? It’s as alluring as the fountain of youth, the secret to a long happy life making your enemies miserable.
So how does Trump stay above the chaos, never dragged under?
The secret could be called “self-refereeing.” Trump always pretends he’s the official referee calling “fair” on his own plays, the supreme judge presiding over his own case and declaring himself absolved, the pope who’s papal bull pronounces himself a saint. He poses as the supreme authority, affirming his own deeds. He talks as though the world awaits his decision on whether we can trust his word.
Self-refereeing is a simple trick. Any unscrupulous idiot can employ it. It comes easy to psychopaths. It’s the simplest, most efficient kind of closed circular logic:
As the supreme judge I absolve myself. Absolved, I can be trusted to serve as supreme judge.
It’s the same circular logic employed by defenders of sacred texts:
This text is infallible. It says so right in the text which is infallible.ADVERTISEMENT
For people made anxious by uncertainty, such closed circular logic can be irresistible. They clamor to enter the closed circle, safe and free from all uncertainty forever more. Self-refereeing is the authoritarian leader’s core appeal to authoritarian followers.
A leader who can sustain a self-refereeing air of authority holds a trump card. No matter what critics say, he gets the last word on his virtue. There’s no deed he can’t declare fair.
Self-refereeing is enhanced by judging all fouls as challenges to one’s authority. When Elizabeth Warren says that Fox News is a “hate-for-profit racket,” she doesn’t mention why hate would be profitable. Unbound outrage at critics is like blaring a police siren so loud you don’t have to hear your own self-doubt and anxiety. It’s not just righteous indignation, it’s indignation that purges all self-doubt — leaving you feeling nothing but righteousness.
Rather than thinking of the dark triad as three parallel traits, think of them as made possible by the closed-circle logic, wildcard Machiavellianism justified by a trump card narcissism and psychopathy.
Trump’s self-refereeing divides the nation. It makes loyal fans trust him more and the resistance trust him less.
Think of it as siblings’ response to a step-father’s self-reported goodness. A trusting sibling says “Look, he says he’s good, so why don’t you believe him?” The distrusting sibling says, “Because he says he’s good, I trust him less.” When Trump says “Believe me,” the people who don’t believe him hear him saying “I know you don’t believe me, but believe me, you should believe me” — which only makes them more skeptical.
Or think of it this way. If you had evidence that your partner is cheating on you, would their insistence that they aren’t cheating put you more at ease or less?
Being president is the ideal position for a self-refereeing psychopath. Those of us trying to sustain cultural norms try to show deference to the office of the president, which the psychopath can use as evidence of his supreme authority. The threat of being ousted from the press corps keeps the media respectful of the office from which the psychopathic referee-in-chief can systematically call fair on all his plays and foul on all critics.
The media end up in the role of petitioner, awaiting the president’s authoritative decision on the merit of the president’s decisions. The resistance ends up playing lawyer petitioning in the court he rules.
There’s no way to stop a self-refereeing psychopath short of relentlessly exposing his self-refereeing. Truth is, nobody asked him whether he agrees with his actions. The media should stop asking him and his lackeys to referee their own virtue.
Jared Diamond believes America is ruining itself in 4 different ways
Diamond has been elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, and the National Academy of Sciences. He has been awarded a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship as well as the National Medal of Science. His bestselling book "Guns, Germs and Steel" won the Pulitzer Prize.
How the New York Times creates credibility for Trump
There’s a good reason why the Times decided against running on its front page news of the latest woman to accuse the president of rape. The Times still does journalism the way it always has. It gives people in power the never-ending benefit of the doubt.
When you are willing to give people in power the benefit of the doubt no matter how many times they have proven they are unworthy of that benefit, it’s not all that important when the 16th person comes forward credibly to accuse Donald Trump of anything, even if, in the case of columnist E. Jean Carroll, the allegation is rape.
This irrational self-deception is what prevents many economists from embracing a Green New Deal
Dutch economist Servaas Storm, co- author of a widely-read 2018 study on climate change, “Why Green Growth is an Illusion,” talks to the Institute for New Economic Thinking about where we are today.
Lynn Parramore: In 2018, you and your colleague Enno Schröder warned that economists promoting “green growth” are fostering illusions. Why can’t we have economic growth and development without destroying the planet?
Servaas Storm: In our work, Enno Schröder and I look at the historical record on economic growth around the world, along with human energy use and the resulting CO2 emissions. Then we construct a growth path for the global economy during the period 2015-2050. Our model path is based on optimistic, but still feasible, assumptions concerning future energy efficiency improvements and reductions in carbon emissions.