Quantcast
Connect with us

Will Donald Trump leave the White House if he loses?

Published

on

- Commentary

Welcome to another edition of What Fresh Hell?, Raw Story’s roundup of news items that might have become controversies under another regime, but got buried – or were at least under-appreciated – due to the daily firehose of political pratfalls, unhinged tweet storms and other sundry embarrassments coming out of the current White House.

It isn’t unusual for denizens of the fever swamps to predict that a sitting president will refuse to leave office if defeated. We heard murmurs to that effect in the latter days of both George W. Bush’s and Barack Obama’s presidencies. But those concerns have been voiced by more serious people since Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former fixer, told Congress that he personeally feared “that if he loses the election in 2020, that there will never be a peaceful transition of power.” Trump, who contested the results of an election that he won and is already teeing up claims of fraud should he lose next year, has done nothing to allay such fears.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wisconsin Republicans—in the state’s legislature and on its highest court—offered a hint about how it might go down if the election is close and Trump loses a close race in a red state or two. You’ll recall that when Republican Scott Walker lost his gubernatorial race last year, his colleagues in the legislature rushed a series of bills through the lameduck session that stripped some of his Democratic successor’s powers. The laws had been ruled unconstitutional by a circuit court judge earlier this year but this week, on a 4-3 vote, the state Supreme Court’s conservative majority upheld the laws. One of the liberal justices wrote in her dissent that the Legislature had “violated the plain constitutional text, and this court must act as a check.” They did not.

So let’s say Donald Trump loses by a handful of Electoral College votes. States select the electors who actually choose the president, and there’s nothing in the U.S. Constitution that requires them to do so based on the popular vote. So if Trump claims that millions of zombies or undocumented immigrants tilted the results, a Republican-run state where he lost the popular vote could say that because the results of the popular vote are in dispute they will assign electors to vote for Donald Trump.

There would obviously be outrage and angry protests across the country but the conservative media would effectively muddy the waters around what was happening, Republican politicians in and out of Congress would almost certainly continue their obsequious idolatry of Trump, the mainstream press would cover it as a controversial “Constitutional crisis” and the matter would ultimately end up before the Supreme Court, where a particularly shameless conservative majority indebted to this president* would be likely to sign off on the power grab.

Most authoritarian leaders are first elected in legitimate contests and then manipulate the system to remain in power. Trump has already politicized the courts and the Justice Department, among other federal agencies, and Republicans are going to pull out all the stops to suppress the Democratic vote next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

This isn’t a likely scenario, especially if the margin isn’t close, but it’s not one that can be dismissed.

And with that sunny thought, we move onto this week’s roundup.

*****

ADVERTISEMENT

Rolling Stone got its hands on a previously unreported membership list for the Trump Leadership Counsel, a group of corporate honchos that Trump put together before the election and which has been pushing his extreme anti-regulatory agenda hard behind the scenes. The piece quotes Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, saying, “With Trump, we’ve had a corporate takeover of government with no parallel in American history… the seeds were planted early on in the campaign.”

*****

ADVERTISEMENT

Likely related…

Again, we are left to wonder if these people think their own children will be immune to the catastrophe they seem intent on bringing about.

ADVERTISEMENT

*****

Donald Trump pocketed $41 million from his gaudy DC hotel last year as lobbyists and foreign dignitaries and Republican organizations paid exorbitant rates to curry favor with the Trump Crime Family (Ivanka also took in $4 million from the hotel).

In two weeks, Trump will channel Kim Jong Un and celebrate a very partisan, taxpayer funded July 4th celebration with military fly-bysm, a campaign rally presidential speech and a big parade, and he’s going to make a small fortune off of it.

Rooms were sold out for July 3 and July 4 by mid-June, according to the Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, an advocacy group that targets government corruption. Rooms for July 5 were still available Thursday from $964 a night to $4,200 a night for a “premier one-bedroom suite.” [via: Huffington Post]

ADVERTISEMENT

*****

Experts, including some within the regime, say that cutting aid to the Northern Triangle will only hurt those countries’ economies, worsen their security situation and cause more refugees to flee toward the US border.

The caravans that will result are part of Trump’s re-election campaign. It didn’t work in 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT

*****

Republicans are giving this guy a lifetime appointment as a federal judge. He’s 42.

Lots of President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees have records of opposing LGBTQ rights and abortion rights; indeed, it is essentially a requirement at this point. But [Matthew] Kacsmaryk, the deputy general counsel for First Liberty Institute, a right-wing Christian advocacy group, has drawn particular criticism for his extreme views on both fronts.

He has fought against protections for LGBTQ people in employment, housing and health care. He has called including protections for LGBTQ people in the Violence Against Women Act “a grave mistake.” In 2015, when Utah passed nondiscrimination protections, Kacsmaryk called the law ”a bad idea” because it suggests that discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity should be taken as seriously as other forms of discrimination. He signed on to a 2016 letter that called being transgender “a delusion.

*****

Last week, we mentioned that the senior leadership in Trump’s Labor Department had effectively barricaded themselves in their executive suite and freezed out the agency’s career employees.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is the kind of thing they’re doing largely out of sight of the American public.

*****

Reuters reports that the regime continues to whitewash the crimes of their Saudi benefactors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has blocked the inclusion of Saudi Arabia on a U.S. list of countries that recruit child soldiers, dismissing his experts’ findings that a Saudi-led coalition has been using under-age fighters in Yemen’s civil war

*****

TPM reports that as part of his goofy trade war, “Trump is threatening to withdraw from the international body that oversees global mail delivery, putting at risk the stability and reliability of the current system of sending and receiving mail internationally.” Tierney Sneed points out that this could impact the overseas vote, and may effectively disenfranchise some Americans living abroad.

*****

ADVERTISEMENT

Bullshit…

Reality

U.S. Steel announced it will temporarily halt production at two domestic plants despite the boost from the Trump administration’s tariffs, as a steel industry singled out for federal support shows signs of weakening.

On Tuesday, U.S. Steel said it would temporarily halt operations at a blast furnace near Detroit as well as one in Gary, Ind., on the shore of Lake Michigan. U.S. Steel will be idling a third plant in Europe, the company said…

The moves come amid broader concerns about a slowdown in the steel industry, which threatens to derail a key economic priority of the Trump administration. Despite initially surging under the tariffs, steel prices have fallen dramatically amid weakening demand from key consumers, including the auto, energy and agricultural industries…

ADVERTISEMENT

*****

Having become bored with Venezuela and (thus far) fucked up his contrived war with Iran, Trump’s going back to his favorite distraction, with ICE conducting a series of high-profile immigration roundups in a number of cities this weekend.

Meanwhile, the regime was in court this week arguing that they shouldn’t be forced to comply with an earlier settlement requiring that immigrants and asylum-seekers locked up in their concentration camps have to be held in “safe and sanitary” conditions.

Lawyers for the Department of Homeland Security don’t want to provide children with blankets, toothbrushes or soap.

Earlier this month, The Washington Post reported that the regime “is canceling English classes, recreational programs and legal aid for unaccompanied minors staying in federal migrant shelters nationwide.”

Some people pretend to be offended by calling them concentration camps…

Four toddlers were so severely ill and neglected at a U.S. Border Patrol facility in McAllen, Texas, that lawyers forced the government to hospitalize them last week.

The children, all under age 3 with teenage mothers or guardians, were feverish, coughing, vomiting and had diarrhea, immigration attorneys told HuffPost on Friday. Some of the toddlers and infants were refusing to eat or drink. One 2-year-old’s eyes were rolled back in her head, and she was “completely unresponsive” and limp…

The lawyers feared that if they had not shown up at the facility, the sick kids would have received zero medical attention and potentially died.

These serious human rights violations should be a central part of the debate over impeachment.

*****

We’ll leave you with some good news this week. The Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Virginia Republicans of a lower court ruling that their state district map was blatantly drawn to limit African Americans’ voting power, which means that a new and fairer map can be used in 2019. The Richmond Times-Dispatch has more on that.

And we will see where this goes…


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

GOP ridiculed for hyping Ohio anti-impeachment protest — and only a handful of Trump supporters showed

Published

on

The official Twitter of account of the Republican National Committee was buried in mockery after hyping up a video of anti-impeachment protesters in Youngstown, Ohio, where it appears only a handful of people showed up.

According to the tweet, "Ohioans are sick and tired of the Democrats’ impeachment charade. It’s time to STOP THE MADNESS!"

However, in the video from WKBN, which can be seen below, few people chose to show up for the cameras.

As one commenter noted with tongue-in-cheek, "Thought Ohio had a few more people than that."

That was the general consensus in the comments.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

McConnell bluntly defends working with Trump to undermine impeachment: ‘We’re on the same side’

Published

on

Speaking in Kentucky on Friday afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) blithely blew off concerns about coordinating with Donald Trump's White House on how to handle the president's defense in the expected impeachment trial.

One day after admitting on Fox News that he was working hand-in-hand with the White House on impeachment tactics, McConnell was very blunt about his motivations when asked about his admission.

In a clip shared by MSNBC, the Senate leader was pressed about his plans.

"You told Sean Hannity last night you were coordinating with the White House when it comes to impeachment. Why is that appropriate?" McConnell was asked.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

We should look closely at Britain’s decision to elect a man so renowned for his untrustworthiness

Published

on

In previous British elections, to say that trust was the main issue would have meant simply that trust is the trump card – whichever leader or party could secure most trust would win. Now, the emerging question about trust is whether it even matters anymore.

This is at least partly because Brexit has deepened the crisis of trust. The 2019 election was always going to be about Brexit – and not only because some people would vote according to where they stood on the matter. It was also because the emotional turbulence initiated by the 2016 referendum continues to dominate national politics in a more general way.

Continue Reading