Quantcast
Connect with us

For Cubans — a day at the beach is no easy task

Published

on

Cuba’s constitution guarantees its people access to its beaches, but many locals are unable to enjoy the island’s pristine white sands and crystal clear blue waters.

While foreign tourists flock to such paradisiacal Havana sites as Varadero, which was this year named the second most-beautiful beach in the world by American travel website TripAdvisor, Cubans are typically found elsewhere.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Not many tourists come here,” said 43-year-old Rey Gonzalez, who was enjoying a day at Guanabo, a beach east of the capital.

Guanabo’s sand isn’t as white and the water not quite as clear as Varadero’s, but that mattered little to Gonzalez, who was there with his family.

“For me, all the beaches are the same: sand, the sea … you don’t see the difference when you’re swimming,” said Gonzalez.

Sitting on a stretch of beach where numerous stray beer cans were visible, 34-year-old Lazaro Palomino added: “We like the beach, whether it’s clean or dirty.”

Even so, Palomino recognizes that Varadero is on a different level.

ADVERTISEMENT

“All Cubans would love to go. I went once and I came back in shock” at its beauty, Palomino said with a chuckle.

– Beach politics –

Like everything else in communist Cuba, beaches are a political issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In Cuba, there are only Cuban beaches, which are part of the nation’s heritage,” insists Jose Luis Perello, a tourism expert.

He quotes article 23 of the constitution, which asserts that the country’s 271 beaches are “socialist property belonging to everyone.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s been that way since the communist revolution led by Fidel Castro in 1959.

Before that, the coast was covered by private beaches reserved for members — who were mostly whites.

Even the former dictator Fulgencio Batista, who reigned twice, first from 1940 to 1944 then from 1955 to 1959, was unable to get a membership card because he was mixed race.

ADVERTISEMENT

But while the revolution established universal beach access, the shoreline remains a place viewed with suspicion.

“It was linked to the illegal exodus” of people trying to flee the island’s communist rulers “and was the entry point to the country of little groups with certain interests,” Perello said, alluding to the failed United States-backed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.

Despite the official party line, dissidents like the late writer Reinaldo Arenas complained that they couldn’t go to certain beaches that were reserved for members of trade unions.

Likewise, for many years, Cubans were banned from hotels, and today they’re still not allowed to board boats.

ADVERTISEMENT

– Much-needed cash –

Another reason Cubans are kept off their island’s beaches is tourism.

Last year’s 4.75 million visitors brought in $3.3 billion — money the Cuban government sorely needs as it struggles under crippling United States sanctions.

At least one hotel in Varadero advertises an exclusive beach, and locals say over-zealous security guards kick them off hotel beaches.

ADVERTISEMENT

The law prohibits such practices, but Perello acknowledged that, “undoubtedly, the hotels represent a business that’s trying to put pressure on” the government.

For locals, just getting to the beach can often be a challenge.

Most don’t own a car, and can’t afford the bus fare to take them to the shore.

Laura Yanis, 21, has been to Varadero only once in her life.

“It’s very beautiful, the water is very blue, the sand is amazing,” she said. “But it’s really very far for me and I don’t have any transport.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Sitting on the tiny Bacuranao beach, around 30 kilometers from Havana, she insists that “all Cubans really do have access to all beaches, they’re not private or reserved for certain people.”

“That’s important because it’s us, the people, who are taking the country forward,” she added.

Caridad Vidangel, 48, managed to get to Bacuranao but only after taking a bus and then a horse-drawn carriage.

“If we could, we’d go somewhere else,” she said of the beach, the closest one to her home. “I’ve never been to Varadero. I’d like to … but it’s impossible.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

How corporate lawyers made it harder to punish companies that destroy electronic evidence

Published

on

In the early 2000s, a series of civil lawsuits against giant corporations illustrated the disastrous consequences that could ensue if a defendant failed to provide electronic evidence such as company emails or records. In one suit against tobacco giant Philip Morris in 2004, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler concluded that the company deliberately deleted troves of emails that contained incriminating information. She fined the company $2.7 million for the breach, levied $250,000 fines against each of the company supervisors found culpable and barred them from testifying at the trial.

Big corporations rallied for changes and got them. In 2006, the rules that govern federal litigation were changed to create a “safe harbor” that would protect companies from consequences for failing to save electronic evidence as long as they followed a consistent policy and, when put on notice of imminent litigation, preserved all relevant materials.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

John Bolton had concerns about Donald Trump’s favors to autocrats: report

Published

on

Former national security advisor John Bolton privately told the US attorney general last year about concerns that President Donald Trump was essentially granting favors to autocrats, The New York Times reported Monday.

It said the revelations, concerning the leaders of China and Turkey, come in an unpublished book manuscript by Bolton.

The same manuscript says Trump told Bolton that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security aid to Ukraine until officials there helped to investigate his political rivals, the Times previously reported.

Those allegations have roiled Trump's impeachment trial that is ongoing in the US Senate.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Fox News host scolds Mike Pompeo for scuffle with reporter: ‘Don’t be such a baby!’

Published

on

Fox News host Steve Hilton scolded Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for being a "baby," a "bully" and an "embarrassment" after NPR reporter Mary Louise Kelly reported that he berated and cursed at her for asking questions about the Ukraine scandal.

"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo got into an ugly dustup with an NPR reporter this week, and I've got something I want to get off my chest," Fox's Steve Hilton told his viewers on Sunday.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image