Quantcast
Connect with us

Donald Trump, white supremacist violence, and American surrender: The connections are painfully clear

Published

on

- Commentary

Another day, more angry young white men, more mass murders by gun, and all enabled and encouraged by a racist violent man named Donald Trump, his Republican Party and their news media.

This article was originally published at Salon

On Saturday, a 21-year-old white supremacist drove nine hours from Dallas to El Paso, Texas with the goal of committing mass murder against Hispanics and Latinos who, like Donald Trump, the Republican Party and the right-wing media, he believes are “invading” and “poisoning” “his country.” The alleged white supremacist terrorist accomplished his goal by killing 20 people and wounding 26 others in an attack on a Walmart and a nearby mall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then on Saturday night, a 24-year-old white man wearing body armor and armed with an assault rifle and a “double drum magazine” holding 100 bullets attacked a bar in Dayton, Ohio. He allegedly killed 9 people, including his own sister, and wounded 27 others. A motive for this rampage has still not been determined. Of note: six of the people slaughtered are black, 3 others are white.

The Sunday prior, a 19-year-old man who had shared white supremacist views on social media attacked the Gilroy Garlic Festival in Northern California. His attack left 3 people dead and 12 others wounded.

America is beset by a wave of white supremacist terrorism which has killed 23 people and wounded 38 others over the course of a week.

These are not mysterious happenings forced upon mere mortals by the gods. These are events which are knowable.

Violence is a force that gives the New Right meaning. Across Europe, the United States and other parts of the world this fascist movement has taken control of presidencies, parliaments and governments on both the local and national level. The New Right also deploys paramilitaries and street hoodlums to enforce its will against multiracial and multiethnic democracy in the name of “populism” and “nationalism.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When the New Right and its various supporters howl “race war!” (either those explicit words or its more “polite” variants that are used to make such sentiments palatable for “mainstream” consumption) they are not kidding. During the last eight years white supremacists have killed at least 175 people in attacks around the world.

It is clear that if dozens of Americans had been killed over the course of a week by ISIS, “leftists” or “black identity extremists” instead of by white supremacists that the full weight of the United States government would be brought down upon the terrorists. Instead, “hopes and prayers” are deployed against the evil-doers — largely because they are white right-wing terrorists.

In many ways this is predictable and expected: Donald Trump has shown himself through his words, deeds, and policies to be a white supremacist. Trump’s closest advisers such as Stephen Miller share his beliefs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The white supremacists and other members of the New Right who have been involved in lethal rampages across the United States are the “very fine people” Trump gave moral support to after their lethal attacks in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017. The affection is reciprocal: these white supremacists and other members of the New Right adore Donald Trump.

It is also obvious that if the alleged El Paso mass murderer had been black or brown he would have been shot dead by the police. Unarmed black men and boys are viewed by America’s police — and many white Americans en masse — as supernatural super villain-like threats which must be destroyed immediately. By comparison because whiteness is understood by White America to be inherently benign, good, safe, friendly and harmless, white men and boys who commit mass murder by gun are arrested with minimal if any force — even while the dead bodies still lay nearby. That both the Dayton and Gilroy shooters were shot by police is a rarity. Whiteness truly is the complexion for the protection.

ADVERTISEMENT

Donald Trump and his movement are part of the New Right. By implication and association violence is a force that gives Donald Trump and his movement meaning as well.

Violence is a type of social pathology. A country’s leaders can encourage the spread of violence or they can instead choose to try to stop it. Donald Trump and his regime have consistently chosen to do the first thing and not the second.

Donald Trump, his Republican Party and their news media use scripted violence and stochastic terrorism to encourage political violence against their “enemies” — usually nonwhite people, Muslims, Democrats, liberals and progressives, as well as reporters and journalists who are not affiliated with Fox News or other parts of the right-wing propaganda machine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump supporters are especially compliant foot soldiers. Throughout Trump’s campaign and now time in office, from the so-called “MAGA bomber” to now the alleged El Paso white supremacist terrorist, they have internalized the logic of weaponized white identity politics and then acted upon it with often lethal results.

The data does not lie: there has been a large increase in right-wing hate crimes since Donald Trump’s campaign and now through to the third year of his presidency; counties which hosted Trump rallies saw at least a 200 percent increase in hate crimes, many of which have resulted in serious injuries and even death; in incidents across the United States Donald Trump’s name and slogans have been summoned during hate crime attacks against nonwhites, Muslims, Jews, gays and lesbians and other marginalized groups; the FBI and other law enforcement agencies continue to report that terrorism by white supremacists and other right-wing groups and individuals is the greatest threat to the country’s domestic security.

In total, right-wing political violence at present in America is a function of a feedback loop where what were once considered the extreme ideologies and beliefs of Nazis, white supremacists and other racial fascists have been mainstreamed by Donald Trump, the Republican Party, and the right-wing news media. State-sponsored violence is part of this feedback loop as well. Trump’s ban on Muslims entering the United States, cruelty and thuggery by ICE and his other enforcers, and of course concentration camps for nonwhite refugees and migrants have long been the dream-nightmares of Nazis and other white supremacists. Trump’s regime has made these dream-nightmares a reality.

We know that the mainstream news media, and too many reporters, opinion writers, and other political observers owe Hillary Clinton an apology. During the 2016 presidential contest she was hammered for daring to tell an uncomfortable truth about Donald Trump and his legion of “human deplorables” and the danger they represented to the United States and its multiracial democracy. Three years into Trump’s regime it now appears that Hillary Clinton was too kind and modest in her assessment of Trump’s character and that of his supporters.

ADVERTISEMENT

America is exhausted by Donald Trump’s regime and the political violence he has provoked and ultimately given permission for. America is also very sick in ways that predate Trump — but instead of trying to cure those social and political and cultural ills, Trump has chosen to make them much worse.

Through this state of collective exhaustion American fascism and authoritarianism take hold as a new type of normal. As part of that society-wide disease process, malignant reality replaces empirical reality. Surrender is made to feel rational. Thus, political fatalism about the present and future of American democracy gains a tighter grip on the minds and hearts and imaginations of the American people.

Historian Timothy Snyder describes this spiral in his book “The Road to Unfreedom” as, “To break the spell of inevitability, we must see ourselves as we are, not on some exceptional path, but in history alongside others. To avoid the temptation of eternity, we must address our own particular problems, beginning with inequality, with timely public policy. To make of American politics an eternity of racial conflict is to allow economic inequality to worsen. To address widening disparities of opportunity, to restore a possibility of social advance and thus a sense of the future, requires seeing Americans as a citizenry rather than as groups in conflict.”

Snyder concludes with: “America will have both forms of equality, racial and economic, or it will have neither. If it has neither, eternity politics will prevail, racial oligarchy will emerge, and American democracy will come to a close.”

ADVERTISEMENT

What must good Americans do during this national emergency?

They must take a moral accounting of themselves. Are they resisting Donald Trump and what he represents? Or are they aiding and abetting it? Sides must be chosen. To be neutral is not a realistic or correct option.

They must understand that Trumpism — like other manifestations of fascism and authoritarianism — is both a moral and political crisis. Both emergencies must be addressed together.

They must know that to support Donald Trump and what he represents is to further stain the country’s national character, and to choose to be the worst and not the best of what America can and should be. There are better angels and worse demons whispering in the ears of the American people. Will the American people choose the cruelty of the latter or the encouragements and exaltation of the former? This is the choice that the Age of Trump has repeatedly forced on the American people.

But perhaps there is an even worse possible outcome. It could simply be that many Americans in the Age of Trump have lost the ability to distinguish right from wrong, civic virtue from civic rot, a humane society from one that is cruel, good and evil from one another. If so then Donald Trump and his movement are the symptom of a much bigger problem in America — and not the root cause.

ADVERTISEMENT

Who are the American people really? What will they do?


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Commentary

Desperate conservatives unleash a torrent of misogyny to undermine Pamela Karlan’s devastating testimony

Published

on

As soon as Pamela Karlan, a constitutional law professor at Stanford who specializes in voting rights, opened her mouth during Wednesday's impeachment hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, I knew she would become the prime if not exclusive focus of the entire right-wing response to the hearing.

This article was originally published at Salon

Republicans were desperate to do anything to keep voters from paying attention to the actual substance of the testimony from the three law professors summoned to explain why Donald Trump should be impeached for his crimes, since the substance of their testimony is irrefutable. And while all three were articulate, intelligent and crystal clear in their arguments, only Karlan was female.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

This conspiracy actually exists: Trump and the GOP are waging a war on reality

Published

on

Words have actual definitions. Conspiracies do in fact exist.A conspiracy consists of two or more people acting in private to advance their own interests against and contrary to those of other people.

Donald Trump and his agents’ bribery and extortion plot to withhold congressionally approved military aid to force the government of Ukraine to “investigate” Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, with the goal of helping Trump win the 2020 presidential election, is a textbook example of a very real conspiracy.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress schooled in the Constitution: Impeachment hearing was less about the answers than about the questions

Published

on

The Judiciary Hearing Probably Changed No Minds, But, Yes, the Democrats Had the Better Questions

The opening of the new round of impeachment inquiries before the House Judiciary Committee was less about the answers than about the questions.

If you were a Democrat, you asked questions that prompted the constitutional scholars present to pin the available evidence about Team Trump to a rogue plot to trade Ukrainian recognition and military aid for Donald Trump’s personal political gain.

If you were a Republican, you asked about anything else, from historical precedents about elapsed time, about the meaning of bribery in the 18th Century, about non-existent testimony about Joe and Hunter Biden.

Continue Reading