Thanks to some nudging by the newsletter Popular Info, Facebook has taken down yet another Trump campaign ad for violating the social network’s advertising policies.
A screenshot of the ad shows a crowd of women with the caption, “The Women for Trump Coalition needs the support of strong women like you!” The ad violates a Facebook policy that states ads “must not contain content that asserts or implies personal attributes.”
“This includes direct or indirect assertions or implications about a person’s race, ethnic origin, religion, beliefs, age, sexual orientation or practices, gender identity, disability, medical condition (including physical or mental health), financial status, membership in a trade union, criminal record, or name,” the policy states.
Speaking to Gizmodo, Facebook confirmed that they notified the Trump campaign about the violation and warned that the ad “cannot continue to run unless fixed.”
Facebook blamed the ad’s slipping through the cracks on the fact that “machines and human reviewers make mistakes,” adding that “the ad review system and enforcement aren’t perfect and we won’t catch every ad.” But according to Popular Info’s Judd Legum, the Trump campaign has a whole litany of ads that are in violation of Facebook’s policies.
One ad falsely claimed that Democrats want to “repeal the Second Amendment,” which violates Facebook’s policy prohibiting “deceptive claims, offers, or methods.” In another ad, Facebook allowed the Trump campaign to mislead supporters by claiming there was a midnight deadline to enter a contest to win the “1,000,000th red MAGA hat signed by President Trump.” According to Legum, the ad was allowed to run for weeks.
The problem isn’t going away any time soon, and Legum says that the situation is “likely to get worse.”
“The Trump campaign is learning that it can get away with nearly anything on Facebook. As election day approaches, its tactics are likely to become more brazen.”
Earlier this month, The New York Times pointed out how the Trump campaign is using Facebook to disseminate some of Trump’s most inflammatory claims.
Since January, Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign has posted more than 2,000 ads on Facebook that include the word “invasion” — part of a barrage of advertising focused on immigration, a dominant theme of his re-election messaging. A review of Mr. Trump’s tweets also found repeated references to an “invasion,” while his 2016 campaign advertising heavily featured dark warnings about immigrants breaching America’s borders.
Legum writes that Facebook’s poor track record is setting the stage for a repeat of the problems we saw in 2016.
“An informed public is the cornerstone of a functioning Democracy. Facebook’s neglect is putting us at risk of a 2016 repeat.”
Featured image via Gage Skidmore/Flickr
Trump’s latest and most ludicrous con job
Donald Trump is con artist in chief of the United States. His many apparent and impeachable crimes, such as the Ukraine scandal, collusion with Russia and violations of the Emoluments Clause, flow from that fact. Of course, Trump’s long con involves millions and perhaps even billions of dollars. But Trump’s big score, his ultimate goal, is permanent control of the presidency of the United States and the power for him and his family and allies to engage in legal theft indefinitely.
This article first appeared on Salon.
I was an impeachment skeptic. Here’s why I’m now convinced Trump must be removed
Despite all the uncertainty surrounding impeachment, we can capture the current moment succinctly: President Trump’s fate hinges on whether Republican senators are more fearful of losing in a primary or in the general election. Now that the live impeachment hearings are about to fuel nationwide prime-time programming, those senators’ fears are likely to intensify.
While that dynamic will determine whether Trump will be removed from office, it doesn’t tell us whether he should be. I am generally an impeachment skeptic. My recent book—Impeaching the President: Past, Present, Future—argues that impeachment should be regarded as a last resort that, as a general proposition, is inappropriate in a president’s first term. The American people are capable of rendering judgment and should be given the first crack.
Nicolle Wallace tells Colbert why she cursed at Fox News host Laura Ingraham — and that she left the GOP
MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace appeared on Stephen Colbert's "Late Show" Wednesday after spending hours analyzing the impeachment hearings that began that morning.
One of the first things Colbert asked about was the recent smackdown from Wallace about Fox News host Laura Ingraham and her guests going after Col. Alexander Vindman. Ingraham proposed that because Vindman was born in Ukraine that he was somehow a traitor to the United States for coming forward about President Donald Trump's admitted crimes.