Even though he’s made hundreds of thousands of dollars in income, Michael E. Bowman hasn’t filed a federal income tax return since 1999. According to prosecutors, the Oregon man did so because he “disagrees with the law,” The Oregonian reports.
Additionally, prosecutors say Bowman paid someone 20 years ago to file fraudulent returns for him starting in 1999 through 2001. But according to his defense attorney, Bowman isn’t a criminal; he’s a devout Christian who doesn’t want to give his money to a government that will use it to fund abortions.
Attorney Matthew Schindler said his client isn’t “some kind of mumbo jumbo tax protester,” but is instead a man who “reasonably believed” that the IRS should accommodate him under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the First Amendment and the Oregon Constitution.
Bowman is currently on trial for four misdemeanor tax charges.
From The Oregonian:
Among those watching the case from the courtroom’s public gallery were two other men facing similar charges who are set for trial at the end of September and Oregon refuge occupier Kenneth Medenbach. Schindler successfully represented Medenbach in 2016 on charges stemming from the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
In 2017, The Oregonian shared a video featuring Bowman detailing his motives for not paying taxes.
“The problem isn’t me breaking the law,” he says in the video. “You can spin things certain ways — but the real problem here is this ladies and gentlemen: This woman has the right to choose, and the government has said accordingly, ‘It’s your body, you have the right to choose.’ … Now the government just said I have to pay taxes, and the government can do whatever it wants to do. This is where we start getting into the heart of this matter.”
When Bowman was indicted in 2017, he hadn’t filed a federal income tax return in 18 years — a fact his lawyer says is indicative of his intent, since the IRS “did nothing” in those 18 years.
“It never collected a single dime from him during those 18 years,” Schindler said. “That inaction, that failure, convinced him that he was right.”
While Bowman’s case may be unique, the ‘religious freedom’ defense isn’t, and hasn’t been all that successful when used in the past. As The Oregonian points out, case law shows that the government can collect taxes regardless of any religious or anti-war objection.
Even the Republican witnesses make Donald Trump look like a depraved criminal
The second half of Tuesday's hearing offered something new in the Donald Trump impeachment inquiry: Witnesses called by the Republican minority on the House Intelligence Committee. It's understandable why Republicans would want these two men.
One of them was Tim Morrison, a former National Security Council aide who is among the few people directly exposed to Trump's famous phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky who claims to believe there was nothing wrong with it. The other was Kurt Volker, a former special envoy to Ukraine, who appears to have been a major actor in Trump's extortion scheme in that country. Indeed, Volker was deemed one of the "three amigos" — along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Trump donor/EU ambassador Gordon Sondland — who Trump entrusted with Ukrainian relations as he exerted increasing pressure on the country's leaders to give into his extortion scheme.
Impeachment: Trump’s ‘hearsay’ defense just crashed and burned
In the panoply of contradictory and incoherent defenses of Donald Trump, a favorite of Republicans has been to harp on the claim that witnesses to Trump's extortion scheme against Ukraine were all "second-hand" or "third-hand." This has always been confounding, as the official summary readout of the famous phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shows Trump clearly conditioning military aid and U.S. support on Zelensky giving a public boost to Trump's conspiracy theories about former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democratic leaders. The witnesses so far have simply affirmed what the written record demonstrates amply.
Jim Jordan’s attacks on Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman at impeachment hearing badly backfire
Republicans tried to raise doubts about Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s credibility and loyalty during Tuesday’s impeachment hearing. Their attacks appeared to backfire.
Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council and an Iraq war veteran who earned a Purple Heart after being wounded in combat, faced questions from the House Intelligence Committee in full uniform.
This piece first appeared at Salon.com.Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who was transferred to the Intelligence Committee specifically for the impeachment hearings, attempted to discredit the witness during his questioning.