Quantcast
Connect with us

‘We’re not supposed to say that’: Ex-Republican presidential adviser calls out Trump’s ‘mentally instability’

Published

on

During his Wednesday show, CNN host Don Lemon addressed President Donald Trump’s recent feud with Fox News, which has largely been a supporter of the president in the past.

ADVERTISEMENT

Media critic Brian Stelter noted that liberals have criticized the network for the past several years for being “state-run television,” similar to those run in China or North Korea.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He gets very angry when the network talks about the Democrats,” Stelter said of Trump. “He hates seeing Bernie Sanders and other democratic candidates on Fox. Today he hated seeing a democratic spokesperson on Fox. It’s as if he believes that Fox only exists to promote him. The highest-rated shows do promote him. The highest-rated shows do support him. There are news shows that get a lot less attention. This is going to go on for many more months. The president, you know, he’s lashing out because he wants this network to be incredibly loyal. It’s kind of a version of working the refs, Don.”

Peter Wehner, who worked in three Republican administrations and now works with a conservative think tank, said that this is simply “another manifestation of Trump’s narcissistic personality disorder.”

“That is, this is a person who demands total fealty, total loyalty, total allegiance, and when he doesn’t get it, he freaks out, and he lashes out,” Wehner continued. “Now, what you’ve seen through the arc of the Trump presidency, it seems to me, is not that this is completely anomalous, but that it’s accelerating. All of his tendencies are getting worse. It will be interesting to see how Fox handles it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Stelter agreed, saying that he was raising an uncomfortable but important point. Lemon noted Trump apologists tend to say is that the president’s critics aren’t psychologists and haven’t examined the president, so they can’t diagnose him with any mental disorders.

“Well, number one, you don’t have to be just a psychologist, you can be a citizen, you can be a sentient human being and say what is obvious before your eyes,” countered Wehner. “This man is not psychologically well. I’m sorry if we’re not supposed to say that, but you can’t deny the obvious. He has all these tendencies and all these traits that point in the right direction. I’ve worked for — in three administrations. I worked closely with a president in the White House for seven years. I’m telling you when you combine the power of the presidency with a person who has a disordered personality, that’s dangerous stuff. Now so far it’s been kept in check in terms of no catastrophe happening, but this is not what you want. And, you know, it’s — Trump defenders are asking people essentially to, you know, are you going to believe me?”

“To look away!” interjected Stelter.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Or your lying eyes,” Wehner agreed.

“These things are happening, and it’s perfectly reasonable for responsible citizens to draw conclusions from empirical facts, from empirical statements and these behaviors that we see,” Wehner concluded.

Watch the full discussion below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

Trump’s attack on congressional legitimacy ‘boggles the mind’: Ex-Whitewater counsel

Published

on

On Monday's edition of CNN's "OutFront," former Whitewater senior counsel Paul Rosenzweig and anchor Erin Burnett discussed how Alexander Hamilton warned about leaders like Trump in his writings — and the president's stunning declaration of the impeachment probe as "crap" and "illegitimate."

"Historian Ron Chernow, whose biography on Hamilton is the biography, the one used for the Broadway musical, wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post," said Burnett. "He says Hamilton, who was a defender of executive power, would have supported impeaching Donald Trump. He cites one of his Federalist Papers, where Hamilton writes, in part, 'When a man unprincipled in his private life, desperate in his fortune, bold in his temper ... when such a man is seen to mount the hobby horse of popularity to take every opportunity of embarrassing the general government and bringing it under suspicion, it may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into confusion that he may ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.' Hamilton warning such a leader will become a demagogue and a tyrant ... Does it sound like Hamilton, even so long ago, could have been warning about a person like President Trump, Paul?"

Continue Reading

CNN

Senate Republicans are ‘frustrated’ that Mulvaney has ruined everything: CNN reporter

Published

on

On Monday's edition of CNN's "The Situation Room," reporter Phil Mattingly noted that there is tremendous "frustration" among Senate Republicans over President Donald Trump's acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, for acknowledging a quid pro quo and throwing a wrench in the president's defense against impeachment efforts.

"The Republicans we're talking to tonight are not nearly in the same place that Mitt Romney is on most things, but on Mick Mulvaney, there is an agreement and broad frustration," said Mattingly. "Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) saying he believed if you ask Mick Mulvaney, he would acknowledge it wasn't his best performance over the last couple of interviews. Sen. John Thune (R-SD), the number two ranked Republican said it is, 'a rough patch for Mick Mulvaney.'"

Continue Reading
 

CNN

Republicans will do everything except ‘stand up and defend the Constitution’: Judiciary Democrat blasts GOP for shielding Trump

Published

on

On Monday's edition of CNN's "The Situation Room," Rep. Ted Deutch (D-FL) excoriated his Republican colleagues for staging stunts on the House floor to try to shield President Donald Trump from accountability in impeachment proceedings.

"Your Republican colleagues have taken President Trump's advice and going to try in the next hour or so to censure the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff," said anchor Wolf Blitzer. "There will be a vote we're told. Maybe a procedural vote. First of all, set the scene. Tell us what will happen and is this appropriate?"

"Well, of course it is not appropriate," said Deutch, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee. "What would be appropriate would be for my Republican colleagues to do two things, Wolf. And it is what everyone has a right to expect of them. One, is to answer the question whether they think it is appropriate for the president of the United States to use his office to pressure a foreign government for political gain, to ask them to interfere in our elections, number one. And second, perhaps to go to the White House and tell the president that if he really thought that he did nothing wrong and if he thought that he had nothing to hide, then they would stop stonewalling Congress and try to prevent people from coming up here to speak with us. That is where their focus ought to be."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image