Amnesty International on Friday accused Hong Kong police of using excessive force against pro-democracy protesters, in some cases amounting to torture, allegations that were rejected by a commanding officer.
In a report based on interviews with nearly two dozen activists, most of whom were hospitalised after their arrests, the global rights watchdog said that officers routinely went beyond the level of force allowed by local law and international standards.
“In an apparent thirst for retaliation, Hong Kong’s security forces have engaged in a disturbing pattern of reckless and unlawful tactics against people during the protests,” said Nicholas Bequelin, East Asia Director at Amnesty International.
“This has included arbitrary arrests and retaliatory violence against arrested persons in custody, some of which has amounted to torture.”
The rights group backed calls for an independent inquiry into police brutality, a key demand of protesters but one that has been rejected by government officials and the police top brass.
The Hong Kong police force dismissed Amnesty’s findings and rejected allegations that it had used excessive force.
In a statement issued on Friday, police said their officers “exercise a high level of restraint at all times in the use of force”.
On specific allegations in the report, police said they “do not comment on individual cases” and that those alleging abuse should register a complaint with the police watchdog instead.
The report came out hours before a senior officer met foreign journalists for a briefing on the protests that have battered the city for the last three months.
Anti-government protesters have hurled rocks, bottles and petrol bombs as well as used slingshots in their battles with police, who have responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannon.
Videos of police baton-charging and beating protesters have frequently gone viral online.
The commander, speaking on condition of anonymity, said his force felt they were being subjected to a “smear campaign” by protesters and opponents who spread footage of hard arrests but ignored the increased levels of violence by hardcore protesters.
“Our officers are worried that the level of violence has got to such a level that they might have to kill someone or be killed themselves,” he said.
“We have been so restrained but in the face of such violence this pressure has become extremely dangerous.”
The commander said officers sometimes had to continue hitting arrested protesters with batons because they were still not complying “even when they have three or four officers on top of them”.
“I would be dishonest if I told you that no one had overstepped the line.”
But the commander added he felt few police forces around the world would show the same levels of restraint in such circumstances.
– ‘Batons and fists’ –
Amnesty’s assessment was less charitable.
It interviewed 21 people who had been arrested, 18 of whom were later hospitalised for injuries.
“Almost every arrested person interviewed described being beaten with batons and fists during the arrest, even when they were not resisting and often already restrained,” the report said.
Most interviewees reported the violence stopped once in custody.
But one detainee said he was assaulted for being uncooperative and another described seeing police shine a laser into the eye of a young detainee — a tactic protesters have employed against police.
Two defence lawyers also claimed their clients were beaten.
Multiple suspects described lengthy delays in receiving medical attention or access to defence lawyers.
The police denied those allegations, saying officers “respect the privacy, dignity and rights” of those arrested.
Hong Kong’s protests were sparked by a now-abandoned plan to allow extraditions to the authoritarian Chinese mainland.
But after Beijing and local leaders took a hard line, the protests snowballed into a wider movement calling for police accountability and universal suffrage.
Amnesty’s Bequelin said he believed the city’s police “is no longer in a position to investigate itself and remedy the widespread unlawful suppression of protesters” and called for an independent inquiry.
© 2019 AFP
Australian diplomat tells Bill Barr’s anti-Russia prosecutor he wasn’t part of any secret plot against Trump
As the impeachment proceedings continue into President Donald Trump, Attorney General William Barr is hard at work on trying to discredit the Russia investigation and potentially prosecute federal officials involved in it, as U.S. Attorney John Durham helps him conduct a criminal probe into how the FBI began looking at the Trump campaign.
But if Barr is hoping that this investigation helps his boss, he may be in for a disappointment. According to the conservative Washington Examiner, Durham recently interviewed the former Australian diplomat whose warnings to U.S. officials triggered the Russia investigation, and his response did not support the GOP narrative.
Trump trying to fire inspector general is a confession he ‘did something criminal’: Nicolle Wallace
MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace on Tuesday explained why President Donald Trump attempting to fire inspector general who validated the White House whistleblower complaint.
"We’re back with breaking news from The New York Times that could have implications for Donald Trump’s impeachment," Wallace reported. "Donald Trump, based on a new report in The Times has considered firing the inspector general -- the one who looked at the whistleblower’s complaint on Donald Trump’s Ukraine conduct and deemed it credible and urgent."
Wallace read from the new report.
"President Trump has discussed dismissing the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, because Mr. Atkinson reported a whistleblower’s complaint about Mr. Trump’s interactions with Ukraine to Congress after concluding it was credible, according to four people familiar with the discussions," The Times reported. "Mr. Trump first expressed his dismay about Mr. Atkinson around the time the whistleblower’s complaint became public in September. In recent weeks, he has continued to raise with aides the possibility of firing him, one of the people said."
Russian official mocks Trump for wanting to go back to Syria for the oil
President Donald Trump withdrew from Syria abruptly and against the advice of those on the ground in the region. It left American Kurdish allies high-and-dry as Turkey began a bombing campaign against them.
Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov mocked Trump for the move and then his bizarre decision to go back into Syria "for the oil."
“We’re keeping the oil — remember that,” Trump told a group of Chicago police officers last month. “I’ve always said that: ‘Keep the oil.’ We want to keep the oil. Forty-five million dollars a month? Keep the oil.”