Quantcast
Connect with us

Boris Johnson suffers another humiliating defeat as court rules his Brexit moves illegal: report

Published

on

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson suffered a fresh blow Wednesday when a Scottish court ruled that his controversial decision to suspend parliament in the run-up to Brexit was unlawful.

The decision came as the government was forced to release documents revealing that preparedness for a no-deal Brexit remained “at a low level”, with logjams at Channel ports threatening to impact drug and food supplies.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Operation Yellowhammer documents also warned of “a rise in public disorder and community tensions” in such a scenario.

The government stressed that it was “updating the assumptions” in the document, and that it was “neither an impact assessment, nor a prediction of what is most likely to happen.

“It describes what could occur in a reasonable worst case scenario,” wrote minister Michael Gove.

But the release, after MPS voted last week to compel the government to publish, fuelled lawmakers’ fears that a disorderly divorce would be hugely disruptive to the UK.

The government meanwhile appealed the Scottish court ruling, with the case set to be heard in the Supreme Court next Tuesday, and parliament will for now stay shut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Johnson says that suspending — or proroguing — parliament until October 14 is a routine move to allow his government to launch a new legislative agenda.

Critics accuse him of trying to silence opposition to his plan to leave the European Union on October 31, even if he has not agreed exit terms with Brussels.

Johnson argues that while he is working to get a deal, Britain must leave the bloc regardless, three years after the referendum vote for Brexit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before it was suspended on Tuesday, the House of Commons rushed through legislation to force Johnson to delay Brexit if there is no deal by an EU summit on October 17.

Wednesday’s court ruling sparked calls for parliament to be recalled, and a group of MPs protested outside the building, saying they were ready to resume their seats.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I urge the prime minister to immediately recall parliament so we can debate this judgement and decide what happens next,” said Labour’s Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer.

However, a government source told AFP that “nothing is changing” until the case was concluded.

Later, Johnson took questions from the public in a live address on Facebook, where he was asked if he was the “leader of an authoritarian regime”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I must respectfully disagree with you,” he replied, adding: “What we’re trying to do is to implement the result of the 2016 referendum.”

‘Stymying parliament’

The Scottish court challenge was brought by 78 British lawmakers, who said it was unlawful for Johnson to advise Queen Elizabeth II to prorogue parliament if the aim was to limit consideration of Brexit.

A lower court last week ruled that the advice was a matter of political judgement — but this was overruled by the Inner House, Scotland’s supreme civil court.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a summary judgement released Wednesday, the court added that Johnson’s advice “was motivated by the improper purpose of stymying parliament and that it, and what has followed from it, is unlawful”.

A spokesman for Johnson’s government said it was “disappointed” by the decision and would appeal to the Supreme Court.

“The UK government needs to bring forward a strong domestic legislative agenda. Proroguing parliament is the legal and necessary way of delivering this,” he said.

A separate challenge to prorogation at the High Court in London failed last week, on the basis that it was not a matter for the courts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Election pact rejected

Johnson took office in July promising to finally deliver on the referendum decision by leaving the EU on October 31, no matter what.

But he has no majority in the Commons, and MPs will not let him leave without a deal — or allow him to call an early election that might bolster his position.

Johnson wants to renegotiate the divorce terms struck by his predecessor Theresa May, which MPs have rejected.

But EU leaders accuse him of offering no alternative.

ADVERTISEMENT

Johnson, whose EU adviser David Frost is currently in Brussels, insisted his government was making “great progress” towards getting a deal.

“The ice flows are cracking, there is movement under the keel of these talks,” he said.

However, he denied speculation that he was softening his opposition to the most contentious aspect of May’s deal, the so-called backstop.

This is a plan to maintain an open border between British Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland by keeping Britain within the bloc’s customs union — something eurosceptics find unacceptable.

ADVERTISEMENT

If Brexit is either secured with a deal or delayed next month, Labour has said it would then accept an election — pointing to a possible November poll.

Johnson’s Conservative party on Wednesday rejected an offer of an electoral pact with Nigel Farage’s eurosceptic Brexit party.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

George Conway: GOP senators are right to fear John Bolton’s ‘devastating’ testimony

Published

on

President Donald Trump's lawyers made no mention of John Bolton in their opening statement -- but his testimony could blow up their impeachment defense.

Bolton submitted the manuscript for his new book to the White House last month for review, which likely means that at least some of the president's legal team were aware of the former national security adviser's claims, wrote attorney George Conway for the Washington Post.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Legal experts: Donald Trump cannot use ‘executive privilege’ to block John Bolton testimony

Published

on

It remains to be seen whether or not Republicans in the U.S. Senate will vote to include testimony from witnesses in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, including former National Security Adviser John Bolton — who has said that he would testify if subpoenaed. Trump has asserted that he will invoke executive privilege if Bolton or any other national security officials are called to testify. But according to an article for Just Security written by six contributors (Harold Hongju Koh, Rosa Hayes, Annie Himes, Dana Khabbaz, Michael Loughlin and Mark Stevens), U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts “should reject any such executive privilege claim” and “require Bolton’s testimony.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

GOP Sen. Ron Johnson: ‘My guess’ is John Bolton is telling truth about Trump and Ukraine

Published

on

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), who once personally lobbied President Donald Trump to release the hold on military aid to Ukraine, seemed to give former national security adviser John Bolton some credibility while talking with reports on Monday.

Politico's Kyle Cheney reports that Johnson said that "my guess is John Bolton tells the truth," although he said he still wanted to hear the Trump administration's full case and also questioned the "exquisite" timing of the leak about Bolton's upcoming book, in which he reportedly says Trump told him he was holding up military aid to Ukraine until it agreed to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image