Iraq’s media commission Monday slapped a three-month suspension on the US-funded Al-Hurra TV for airing a controversial report alleging corruption in the country’s powerful Sunni and Shiite religious institutions.
The 12-minute documentary broadcast on Saturday claimed that Sunni and Shiite Muslim authorities were misusing state funds and had suspicious ties to armed factions.
Iraq’s Communications and Media Commission said it found the report lacking professionalism, balance, and reliable evidence.
It ordered a “suspension of Al-Hurra Iraq’s license for three months and a halt to its activities until it corrects its position” and demanded that it broadcasts a formal apology.
“These steps are tantamount to a final warning to the station, and a tougher punishment will be taken in case this offense is repeated,” the statement said.
Founded in 2004, the channel is widely-watched in Iraq and part of the wider Al-Hurra network, which is funded by the US Congress and directed from Washington.
The controversy comes at a time of heightened tensions between Baghdad’s two main allies Washington and Tehran, with pro-Iran factions ratcheting up their discourse against the US.
Al-Hurra’s report prompted an avalanche of condemnations, with critics suggesting it showed the US was adopting an aggressive stance towards their country.
The Hashed al-Shaabi paramilitary force, which was founded in 2014 by an edict from the top Shiite religious authority in Iraq Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, accused Al-Hurra of having “a hostile news policy”.
Qais al-Khazaali, who heads the powerful Asaib Ahl al-Haq faction within the Hashed, slammed the report as “a dangerous indication of US foreign policy”.
Iraq’s Sunni religious establishment said the report was full of “lies,” and said it was preparing a lawsuit against Al-Hurra.
But the Journalistic Freedoms Observatory said the media commission’s decision was “rushed and illegal”.
“This is the first time in five years such a quick step has been taken against a media organisation,” said Observatory head Ziad Al-Ajili.
“The commission can give its opinion on the journalistic quality of a documentary, but it should have referred the case to the Iraqi judiciary,” Ajili told AFP.
Graft is endemic in Iraq, which is ranked the 12th most corrupt country according to Transparency International.
While Iraqis regularly criticise government figures, it remains taboo to speak ill of the country’s revered religious authorities.
Laughter breaks out inside hearing room as Dem mocks GOP’s attempts to downplay smear campaign against Yovanovitch
During the second public House impeachment hearing this Friday, Congressman Mike Quigley (D-IL) took a dig at President Trump in light of testimony from former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, who recounted how she became the target of a smear campaign orchestrated by Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, along with the help of the right-wing news media. After her ouster from her position, Yovanovitch returned to Washington and took up a role as a senior State Department fellow at Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.
"It's like a Hallmark movie -- you ended up at Georgetown. This is all okay," Quigley said sarcastically, prompting laughter from the room.
Press secretary claims Trump tweet ‘not witness intimidation’ because it is ‘not a trial’ — but president says it is
White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham says President Donald Trump did not engage in witness intimidation Friday morning when he, in real time, posted tweets attacking his former Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovich, during her testimony before a House impeachment inquiry hearing. Trump is being accused by Democrats and Republicans alike of witness intimidation or witness tampering, with even Fox News anchors saying Trump’s tweets constitute an additional article of impeachment.
GOP lawmaker ducks question after Yovanovitch asks why it was necessary to smear her reputation
Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) on Friday got more than he bargained for while questioning former American ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.
Toward the end of his questioning, Wenstrup argued that President Donald Trump has the power to hire and dismiss ambassadors as he sees fit in order to enact his preferred foreign policy.
"The president has the right to make their own foreign policy and to make his own decisions, and with that I yield back," he said.
Yovanovitch, however, was unwilling to let it end there and she asked to supplement her testimony.
"While I obviously don't dispute that the president has the right to withdraw an ambassador at any time for any reason, but what I do wonder is why it was necessary to smear my reputation?" she asked Wenstrup.