Mexico said Thursday it disagrees with President Donald Trump’s decision to restrict the right of Central Americans to seek asylum in the United States, a day after the Supreme Court allowed it to go ahead.
The US high court ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can declare migrants ineligible for asylum if they enter the country from the southern border without first seeking asylum in one of the countries they crossed to get to there.
The decision, which stayed a lower court’s temporary injunction, will be in effect while a broader case against the policy plays out in the courts.
Mexico could see asylum requests soar under the measure, which dramatically changes the rules for the thousands of Central Americans fleeing poverty and gang violence in their home countries in hopes of reaching the United States.
“Of course we disagree” with the restrictions, Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard told a news conference, speaking alongside President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
“We have a very different policy in Mexico, and we are not going to change it. Mexico’s refugee and asylum policy is a tradition here,” Ebrard said.
“What we need to do is create alternatives so that people don’t have to take these risks … (because) of the lack of options” in their home countries.
Saying that US migration policy was already “very tough,” he called the decision “unprecedented.”
“It certainly draws one’s attention. But it’s their decision,” he added.
He said Mexican officials would hold a series of meetings Thursday to evaluate the impact for Mexico.
Opponents argue the policy violates international law by forcing people fleeing for their lives to seek refuge in countries where they may also be in danger.
Despite his comments, Ebrard sought to send an upbeat message on US-Mexican relations, saying he had positive meetings in Washington Tuesday with Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to review Mexico’s progress in implementing a deal to reduce irregular migration.
Under the deal — signed in June to avoid Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Mexican goods — US migrant detentions on the southern border have fallen 58.7 percent.
Lopez Obrador, who spoke with Trump by phone Wednesday, said relations were “on very good terms.”
© 2019 AFP
Rick Santorum: ‘I have no problem’ with John Bolton testifying after ‘this impeachment thing’ is over
Conservative CNN contributor Rick Santorum asserted on Tuesday that former National Security Adviser John Bolton should wait until after President Donald Trump's impeachment trial ends to reveal what he knows about the president's scheme in Ukraine.
"The only thing I would question is sort of the timing of submitting the book for review," Santorum said during an appearance on CNN. "I mean, you're doing it at a time -- knowing the history of what goes on in this White House, that leaks are prevalent -- to submit this manuscript at this time, I think was bad judgement."
"I have no problem with John Bolton writing a book," he continued. "This is someone who deeply believes in his worldview and what is best for America and I think he felt compelled to write something about the state of foreign policy in America and where our country is going."
Trump-loving conspiracy nuts tout drinking bleach as a ‘miracle’ cure for coronavirus
A group of fringe Trump supporters has started promoting what the Food and Drug Administration describes as a "dangerous bleach" as a miracle cure for the coronavirus.
The Daily Beast's Will Sommer reports that Jordan Sather, a prominent proponent of the so-called "QAnon" conspiracy theory, recently told his followers to stock up on a liquid called the "Miracle Mineral Solution" that he claims will cure them if they become infected with the deadly virus that has spread from China to the United States.
GOP senators weren’t blindsided by Bolton — but their impeachment coverup got interrupted: columnist
John Bolton's explosive claims about President Donald Trump's quid pro quo scheme against Ukraine weren't surprising to anyone paying attention during the impeachment inquiry.
That's why Republican senators self-incriminated themselves by complaining they'd been blindsided by a leaked manuscript of the former national security adviser's upcoming book, reported the Washington Post.
"It’s deeply revealing about the true nature of the GOP coverup," wrote the Post's Greg Sargent.