A campaign in support of jailed Russian demonstrators gained momentum Wednesday, with celebrities, priests and teachers calling for their release and more than 200 people protesting outside the presidential administration.
This month, six people received jail terms ranging from two to four years following a wave of anti-government protests in Moscow.
The sentencing of young actor Pavel Ustinov caused particular outrage, sparking a rare solidarity drive among popular actors and other Kremlin-friendly celebrities.
Dozens of stars with millions of followers on social media who usually steer clear of politics took to Instagram, saying Ustinov, who was sentenced to three and a half years in prison for violence against police, was simply an innocent bystander.
On Wednesday, the campaign grew bigger as scores of people including popular actors staged one-man pickets outside the offices of President Vladimir Putin’s administration in central Moscow.
It is the only kind of demonstration Russians are permitted to hold without giving prior notice to the authorities.
One by one, the protesters held a placard calling for Ustinov’s freedom while others waited their turn in a long line.
– ‘Something went wrong’ –
Some said all the jailed protesters should walk free, brandishing a placard “I am/We are the entire country.”
“There’s a feeling that something went wrong,” popular actress Alexandra Bortich said at the protest.
“We want Pavel and other wrongfully convicted people to be released,” theatre director Dmitry Sobolev told AFP.
Musician Anton Sevidov of synthpop band Tesla Boy suggested Russian society was slowly waking up.
“It’s cool that people come out in support of Ustinov,” he told AFP.
“Unfortunately, politicians did not learn anything from the history of our country.”
Opposition leader Lyubov Sobol also appeared at the protest, sporting a T-shirt in support of one of the jailed activists.
Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the Kremlin would take the solidarity campaign into account and stressed that the actor’s defense planned to appeal the verdict.
“Perhaps we should wait for the results of this appeal,” he said.
Ustinov’s lawyer, Dmitry Cheshkov, said a court date had yet to be set.
The celebrities have compared Ustinov’s case with that of journalist Ivan Golunov, detained in June on trumped-up drug charges.
He was freed after an unprecedented solidarity campaign, which saw three major newspapers publish the same front page with the headline “I am/we are Ivan Golunov”.
– ‘ Perjury is sin’ –
Over the summer, tens of thousands of people took part in protests demanding a fair vote after allies of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny were barred from standing for the Moscow parliament in polls earlier this month.
More than a dozen people faced prison time on charges of mass unrest and attacking policemen after the protests.
Seven people were jailed, including a man who was sentenced to five years in prison over a controversial tweet.
This month, investigators dropped the mass unrest charges against five men.
A court on Wednesday returned the case of one protester, Aidar Gubaidulin, to the prosecutors and released him from custody.
In an unprecedented move, more than 70 Orthodox clerics have joined the campaign.
In an open letter published by the news site Pravmir which covers religious and other issues, the priests said the court rulings were apparently aimed at “intimidating” society.
The priests warned riot police and others against perjury, referencing the Bible.
“A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall perish,” they said.
In another open letter, nearly 800 teachers slammed “egregious lawlessness” and called for punishment for those who violated the law and jailed the protesters.
In a new twist, the ruling United Russia party joined the chorus of support, with Andrei Turchak, secretary of its general council, defending Ustinov.
The actors and comedians to have joined the celebrities’ campaign include Oleg Menshikov, who starred in French director Regis Wargnier’s film East/West.
© 2019 AFP
Watergate’s John Dean thinks Trump wrote part of his legal team’s brief — because it’s so terrible
Former White House counsel for Richard Nixon, John Dean, explained that the legal brief out of President Donald Trump's White House was so bad that it had to have been dictated by Trump himself.
Saturday evening, Trump's legal team, chaired by Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House counsel Pat Cipollone, filed their own form of a legal brief that responded to the case filed by Democrats ahead of Tuesday's impeachment trial.
The document called the proceedings “constitutionally invalid” and claims House Democrats are staging a “dangerous attack” with a “brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election.”
WATCH: Prince Harry explains why he and Meghan are leaving the royal family — but promises ‘a life of service’
Prince Harry posted a video from an HIV/AIDS fundraiser his mother once supported, where he explained his methodology for leaving his profile role as a royal.
"I will continue to be the same man who holds his country dear," said Harry.
He went on to say that he doesn't intend to walk away and he certainly won't walk away from his causes and interests. "We intend to live a life of service."
In the speech, he thanked those who took him under their wing in the absence of his mother
"I hope you can understand that it's what it had come to," he said for why their family intends to step back.
‘You cannot expect anything but fascism’: Pedagogy theorist on how Trump ‘legitimated a culture of lying, cruelty and a collapse of social responsibility’
The impeachment of Donald Trump appears to be a crisis without a history, at least a history that illuminates, not just comparisons with other presidential impeachments, but a history that provides historical lessons regarding its relationship to a previous age of tyranny that ushered in horrors associated with a fascist politics in the 1930s. In the age of Trump, history is now used to divert and elude the most serious questions to be raised about the impeachment crisis. The legacy of earlier presidential impeachments, which include Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, provide a comparative historical context for analysis and criticism. And while Trump’s impeachment is often defined as a more serious constitutional crisis given his attempt to use the power of the presidency to advance his personal political agenda, it is a crisis that willfully ignores the conditions that gave rise to Trump’s presidency along with its recurring pattern of authoritarian behavior, policies, and practices. One result is that the impeachment process with its abundance of political theater and insipid media coverage treats Trump’s crimes as the endpoint of an abuse of power and an illegal act, rather than as a political action that is symptomatic of a long legacy of conditions that have led to the United States’ slide into the abyss of authoritarianism.