Quantcast
Connect with us

Stunning NYT report reveals new details about US spy extracted from the Kremlin — who reportedly gave key intel on 2016 election interference

Published

on

Following up on the CNN’s bombshell report about a U.S. source in the Kremlin who was extracted in 2017 due, in part, to fears that President Donald Trump might expose the spy, the New York Times confirmed the basic facts of the incident and built out many more of the details in the story Monday night.

The Times, however, seemed less convinced about the most explosive element in CNN’s report — the idea that Trump himself posed a risk to the source and thus was a motivation behind the exfiltration effort.

ADVERTISEMENT

The decision to extract the informant was driven “in part” because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence, CNN reported. But former intelligence officials said there was no public evidence that Mr. Trump directly endangered the source, and other current American officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency’s sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.

It’s not entirely clear if the Times is partially confirming CNN’s claim here. The assertion that “there was no public evidence that Mr. Trump directly endangered the source” is particularly perplexing because it’s not clear why there would be such “public evidence,” and regardless, it is still consistent with CNN’s original finding.

The fact that there are conflicting reports about whether Trump’s mishandling of intelligence influenced the extraction wouldn’t necessarily indicate that CNN’s report is completely false. It’s possible it was a concern in the minds of some officials but not others. It’s also possible that Trump’s infamous Oval Office meeting — in which he revealed classified information to the Russian foreign minister — prompted discussions about whether to exfiltrate the source, without actually being the final justification for the decision.

The Times report suggests another potential interpretation. It says that the source was initially offered exfiltration from Russia by the U.S. government in late 2016, but they turned down the suggestion. Only in 2017, after the Oval Office meeting, did the source agree to be extracted. It’s possible that even if worries about Trump’s handling of classified intelligence didn’t motivate the CIA’s decision to carry out the extraction, these concerns may have motivated the source to go along with it. The report explained:

ADVERTISEMENT

Some former intelligence officials said the president’s closed-door meetings with Mr. Putin and other Russian officials, along with Twitter posts about delicate intelligence matters, have sown concern among overseas sources.

“We have a president who, unlike any other president in modern history, is willing to use sensitive, classified intelligence however he sees fit,” said Steven L. Hall, a former C.I.A. official who led the agency’s Russia operations. “He does it in front of our adversaries. He does it by tweet. We are in uncharted waters.”

If this is the correct interpretation, it would explain the CIA’s statement to CNN:

ADVERTISEMENT

CNN’s narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false. Misguided speculation that the President’s handling of our nation’s most sensitive intelligence—which he has access to each and every day—drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.

However, this oddly circuitous statement is hard to parse, and it’s not clear exactly what it is denying in the first place. The first sentence doesn’t seem to contradict anything in the story, despite it referring to CNN’s “narrative” as “simply false.”

The Times story also adds fascinating context for the story. It says the source, who had been secretly recruited by the U.S. decades ago and rose in the ranks to become close to President Vladimir Putin, was actually key in the American intelligence community’s assessment of Russia and Putin’s intentions in interfering in the 2016 election. Indeed, it says this source confirmed that Putin “affirmatively favored Donald J. Trump’s election and personally ordered the hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Officials reportedly became worried after the source refused exfiltration in 2016 that they may have been tricked. The source, some feared, may have been a double agent feeding the U.S. bad information, which could have cast doubt on the CIA’s conclusions about the 2016 interference. However, the doubts were allayed in 2017 after the successful extraction, the report said. The identity of the source and source’s current location have not been revealed for continuing safety concerns.

The source’s extraction “effectively blinded American intelligence officials to the view from inside Russia,” Times reported. However, some noted that this could be spin from the CIA, which would benefit if Russia falsely believed U.S. intelligence capabilities were worse than they actually are.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump flip-flops on meeting with Iran with ‘no preconditions’– then blames it on the media

Published

on

President Donald Trump went off on the "fake news media" yet again, after his own appointees announced he was willing to meet with Iran.

"The Fake News is saying that I am willing to meet with Iran, 'No Conditions.' That is an incorrect statement (as usual!)," Trump tweeted.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1173371482812162048

In an odd twist, Trump announced just three months ago he'd be willing to meet with no preconditions.

“Not as far as I’m concerned – no preconditions,” the president said in a Meet the Press interview. At another point in the interview, he also said: “I think they want to make a deal. And my deal is nuclear.”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Internet fears Trump’s ‘locked and loaded’ tweet about oil field bomb means he’s gearing up for war with Iran

Published

on

the largest U.S. oil producer can be brought to its knees with a drone carrying a bomb. President Donald Trump responded to intelligence that the drone didn't originate in Yemen, but rather from Iraq or Iran, by saying he was "locked and loaded."

"Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked. There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!" Trump tweeted Sunday.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1173368423381962752

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

3 out of 9 companies in one state have filed for bankruptcy since Trump promised to ‘bring back coal’

Published

on

Donald Trump in coal hard hat thumbs up

President Donald Trump's promises to coal miners have fallen along with his other broken campaign promises. Another state is facing the harsh reality that Trump is not riding in on a white horse to save them.

According to Axios, three out of the nine coal companies in the Powder River Basin in northeastern Wyoming have filed for bankruptcy and another two companies are consolidating. Kentucky coal miners have been protesting Blackjewl, which filed for bankruptcy in July, withdrawing payroll dollars from miners' accounts. Little has been heard about the Wyoming workers as those companies crumble, however.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image