Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump has one habit that absolutely infuriates evangelicals — here’s why they’ll vote for him anyway

Published

on

For a long time, white evangelical voters have faced the conundrum of how to support a president who lies, commits adultery, and essentially opposes all of their stated values — even while delivering core goals of their movement, like a new bench of radically anti-abortion judges.

One of the biggest pet peeves of many evangelical supporters of Trump, according to Julie Zauzmer of the Washington Post, is that he consistently breaks the Third Commandment: He takes God’s name in vain. In one recent example, at Trump’s speech to Republicans in Baltimore this week, he referred to alternative energy as “those goddamn windmills.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Even many of Trump’s firmest supporters consider this blasphemy. “I certainly do not condone taking the Lord’s name in vain. There is a whole commandment dedicated to prohibiting that,” said Texas megachurch pastor and Trump spiritual adviser Robert Jeffress. “I think it’s very offensive to use the Lord’s name in vain. I can take just about everything else, except that.”

Meanwhile, one West Virginia state Senator received a bunch of angry messages from his pro-Trump constituents after the rally in Greenville, North Carolina — not because Trump sat idly by as his supporters chanted “Send her back!” of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), but because Trump said that ISIS will “be hit so goddamn hard,” and recounted warning a businessman, “If you don’t support me, you’re going to be so goddamn poor.”

Former psychology professor Timothy Jay, who has extensively studied how people swear, told the Post that this is not at all unusual. “I’ve done surveys where I ask people: What’s the most offensive word?” he said. “Some [religious] women would say the word ‘f*ck,’ but they wouldn’t say ‘Jesus Christ.’ Some of my interviewees have said, ‘We could say ‘f*ck’ and ‘sh*t’ at home, but we weren’t allowed to use profane language.” (Profane language being misuse of religious words, as opposed to obscene language, which describes body functions, like sex or excrement.)

But none of this is likely to make Jeffress or other evangelical supporters of Trump lose their support for him — for reasons that Jeffress himself put best.

“He enjoys a tremendous amount of support from people of faith not because of his language, but in spite of his language,” said Jeffress. “Most Americans did not oppose the salty language of General Patton. All they cared about was that he led us to victory. Many Christians believe we are in a war … for the culture, a war for the soul of America.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

#PresidentPelosi Trends After Sondland Testimony Implicates Pence in Trump Ukraine Scheme

Published

on

The hashtag #PresidentPelosi was trending Wednesday as Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified to the House Intelligence Committee in the impeachment hearings on President Donald Trump's Ukrainian schemes for assistance in the 2020 election and implicated Vice President Mike Pence in the effort.

If Trump and Pence are both removed from office over their involvement in the plot, the next in line for the presidency is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

"I'm fine with Pelosi serving as interim president until we hold an election," tweeted activist Bree Newsom. "Both Trump and Pence are implicated in this conspiracy to extort Ukraine."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump claims not to ‘know’ Gordon Sondland very well — but the evidence suggests otherwise

Published

on

President Donald Trump attempted to distance himself Wednesday from his hand-selected European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland. At the same time, Trump claimed that Sondland’s stunning testimony, which alleged that the president had ordered a “quid pro quo” with Ukraine, in fact, vindicated him.

“Was there a ‘quid pro quo’?” Sondland said in his testimony to the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday. "The answer is ‘yes.’”

Sondland further claimed that “everyone was in the loop” and all actions were “directed” by the president.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

The latest GOP defense of Trump crumbles in impeachment hearing

Published

on

It was a day of blockbuster day of testimony from E.U. Ambassador Gordon Sondland, in which Sondland — who once gave Donald Trump a million dollars for his inauguration — decided to save his own hide by ratting out not just Trump and his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, but seemingly half the senior staff of the White House.

Continue Reading
 
 

Happy Holidays!

As a special thank you from all of us at Raw, we're offering Raw Story ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. Now 'til Dec. 31st.
Offer Expires In:
close-link