Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump is flexing his executive power to brazenly disobey the law — and it looks like he’s going to get away with it

Published

on

What can’t executive power do? If you ask the Trump administration, the answer seems to be almost nothing.

Consider just the news Monday night. We know that the acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire — who was only installed in his position because President Donald Trump forced the rightful successor, Sue Gordon, to resign — is withholding a whistleblower’s report that has been deemed by the inspector general to be both “credible” and “urgent.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Maguire is refusing to turn the report over to Congress, despite his legal obligations House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) has revealed. He claimed it is supposedly “confidential” and related to “potentially privileged communications.” Maguire said that he is taking his orders to withhold the material from a “higher authority.”

Well, the only person the DNI reports to is the president. Other evidence, as former DOJ official Harry Litman argued, suggests that the whistleblower’s claims relate directly to the president or his inner circle.

But Maguire doesn’t actually have a choice in the matter. The law requires, in these circumstances, that the whistleblower’s complaint goes to Congress. Litman said that this law has never been violated before, and it undermines the entire point of having both whistleblower protections and inspectors general. So apparently, under direction from the White House, the DNI is blatantly flouting written statute.

What could be so important that the White House would make such a demand and the DNI would comply? We don’t know, and we can’t. That’s the claim the Trump administration is making. That it has the authority to just deny to Congress what it has a legal right to — with no external review. Schiff has subpoenaed the whistleblower complaint, and he is seeking to force Maguire to be more forthcoming — but for now, we have no more insight into the matter, because that’s how Trump wants it.

At the same time, the White House has directed Corey Lewandowski, the president’s former campaign manager who never worked in the administration, “not to provide information about such communications beyond the information provided in the portions of the [Mueller] Report” as the House Judiciary Committee prepares to interview him in its de facto impeachment inquiry. This is an absurd and baseless demand.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The White House has no legal authority to ‘direct’ a private citizen who has never served in the Administration to refuse to answer any questions from Congress about anything,” said Daniel Jacobson, a former lawyer in the Obama White House. “This is lawless.”

The White House has already pushed executive privilege to outrageous limits, using the claim to block testimony from numerous witnesses in relevant in the House Judiciary Committee’s investigation with little justification. But by trying to claim the president’s conversations with someone outside the administration are privileged, the Trump administration has truly descended into preposterous territory.

The upshot of all these moves is simply to leave the president and his conduct unreviewable. People inside the administration can be silenced; subpoenas of outsiders who witnessed presidential misconduct can be rendered moot. Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to have real power to challenge the authority of the president, but he never even tried to subpoena Trump for an interview, and ultimately he decided he was barred from even concluding that Trump had committed a crime. That determination, Mueller said, is Congress’s responsibility. But the Trump administration thinks it can use its power to block lawmakers from fulfilling that responsibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s not just the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees getting stymied. The House Ways and Means Committee, which has sought Trump’s tax returns — returns it has every legal right to see — has been blocked by the administration claiming even more executive discretion, again flouting the written law.

Democrats are fighting this stalling tactic through the courts — though not particularly hard. And they believe that Trump will be able to delay the release of his tax returns until well after the 2020 election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimately, the courts do still have the power to constrain Trump. The Supreme Court thwarted his attempt to warp the 2020 census to benefit Republicans by including a citizenship question. But the courts are slow, and the White Hosue continues to use this fact to its advantage.

And what happens if Trump prevails in 2020, and is thus further emboldened? Republicans will still refuse to impeach, of course, so his power grabs and claims to authority could become even more brazen. He won’t be worried about re-election anymore — just preserving and protecting his power.

It’s a disturbing pattern to watch unfold, and it sets dangerous precedent for the future, even if Trump himself is undone.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘You cannot expect anything but fascism’: Pedagogy theorist on how Trump ‘legitimated a culture of lying, cruelty and a collapse of social responsibility’

Published

on

The impeachment of Donald Trump appears to be a crisis without a history, at least a history that illuminates, not just comparisons with other presidential impeachments, but a history that provides historical lessons regarding its relationship to a previous age of tyranny that ushered in horrors associated with a fascist politics in the 1930s.  In the age of Trump, history is now used to divert and elude the most serious questions to be raised about the impeachment crisis. The legacy of earlier presidential impeachments, which include Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, provide a comparative historical context for analysis and criticism. And while Trump’s impeachment is often defined as a more serious constitutional crisis given his attempt to use the power of the presidency to advance his personal political agenda, it is a crisis that willfully ignores the conditions that gave rise to Trump’s presidency along with its recurring pattern of authoritarian behavior, policies, and practices.  One result is that the impeachment process with its abundance of political theater and insipid media coverage treats Trump’s crimes as the endpoint of an abuse of power and an illegal act, rather than as a political action that is symptomatic of a long legacy of conditions that have led to the United States’ slide into the abyss of authoritarianism.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Virginia capitol staff will be forced to confront armed protesters because of official’s ‘bravado’: strategist

Published

on

Gov. Ralph Northam has declared a state of emergency after white supremacists threatened to come to the state capitol in Richmond, Virginia, with weapons to protest new gun laws. Northam gave a "mandatory" order for every staffer in the executive branch and General Assembly to telework for safety.

The problem, according to Virginia-based political strategist Ben Tribbett, elected officials are still planning to go to the Capitol to attend committee hearings, putting other Capitol staff in danger.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump is trying Middle East Peace plan 2.0 after the first one flopped

Published

on

President Donald Trump is scheduled to submit his second Middle East peace plan after the first one senior son-in-law Jared Kushner came up with didn't go over very well.

"We will get this done," Trump claimed in May 2017.

“We'll start a process which hopefully will lead to peace,” Trump said. “Over the course of my lifetime, I've always heard that perhaps the toughest deal to make is the deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Let's see if we can prove them wrong, okay?”

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image