Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s violent rhetoric further illustrates what a weak coward he is: Yale psychiatrist

Published

on

On September 15th, President Donald Trump tweeted that America was “locked and loaded” to aid U.S. ally Saudi Arabia after reports surfaced that their oil supply was attacked.

“Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked,” Trump tweeted. “There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!”

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics pointed out that this was yet another instance of the president deferring to the violent regime.

Raw Story spoke with Dr. Bandy X. Lee about the president’s militaristic rhetoric and his fitness for office.

Lee is a forensic psychiatrist at Yale School of Medicine. She has been consulting with the World Health Organization on violence prevention since 2002, has taught at Yale Law School since 2003, and is author of the textbook, “Violence.” In 2017, she held an ethics conference that led to the public-service book, “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump,” and the World Mental Health Coalition. She also convened a panel to assess the president’s mental capacity and chairs a working group on a panel for performing presidential fitness-for-duty tests. Later this week, she will host a discussion on the public health effects of silencing experts at the Yale Schools of Law and Medicine (her Twitter handle is: @BandyXLee1).

ADVERTISEMENT

Raw Story: You are building a reputation as “the Trump translator”! What is your interpretation of the “locked and loaded” rhetoric?

Lee: It is very ominous. People may not realize that weakness and cowardice predispose to violence, not strength, and Donald Trump is a high risk for violence. He is a danger also because he lacks a steady core and can be manipulated into all kinds of nefarious ends, including endless wars.

His suggestion of a strike is consistent with what we have been warning against all along. We predicted that his dealings with North Korea would have a worse outcome than if he weren’t involved, as has turned out to be the case, and the same is true with Iran. Psychological predispositions run deep, and Mr. Trump is war-prone, no matter the momentary embracing of summit talks or withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. When the avenues for accolade are spent, he will likely reach for war. John Bolton’s recent ouster was not a positive sign, since instability means that one could turn even more violent than the most hawkish ideologue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Raw Story: What do you say to those who accuse you of breaking medical ethics by making these interpretations?

Lee: I started “translating” Mr. Trump’s tweets as a public service. In mental health, we look at underlying patterns and outcomes rather than what people literally say. I entered into this with the hope to decrease some of the victimization of people who are “gaslighted” and toppled in their sense of reality and morality because of his relentless reshaping of reality. I follow a standard process of assessing reliability, reality testing, and matching formulation with evidence to arrive at my assessments, and am applying the ethics of reducing harm.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ethics in our day has been used as a weapon for silencing, just as the law can be for subjugation. But an open book is an open book, and it is unethical to pretend you do not know something when you do, especially when that knowledge could be critical to the protection of society. There is error of omission, not just commission.

Nowadays, our diagnostic practices have changed completely—from introspection to external observation—telemedicine requires remote diagnosis all the time, and there has perhaps never been a presidency so transparent, not only from national affairs deriving directly from his personality, but also near-hourly, unrestrained and unfiltered reports of what he is thinking. Television programs, rather than being the staged events they used to be, are often free-flowing, continuous access to a person’s behavior, speech, and expressions in real time in real-life situations. Seldom do we ever have such copious, detailed information on our own patients! A personal interview would accomplish far less, especially in the area we are concerned about—danger to the public—since a person can sit with you but lie throughout.

Raw Story: You have described yourself as a conservative. Can you explain that?

ADVERTISEMENT

People are surprised when I say I am both liberal and conservative. But healthy organisms seek both preservation and innovation; restriction to either would compromise life. So I consider it not only natural but healthy to be both. Our nation is that way: being conservative in this country means to safeguard the Revolutionary ideals that fought off tyranny. Being Christian means to follow the example of a figure who was radically revolutionary for his time. I am very proud of my family heritage—I come from a family of doctors—but consider it my duty to fight for justice, just as my grandfather and my mother have.

What I do not do is use the term “conservative” to mask an opposite agenda, such as radically overturning this nation’s founding principles to suppress free thought, equality, and civil society for the benefit of the few. To call these anti-republican policies “conservatism” is reaction formation—naming oneself the opposite of what one truly is, to deny the truth and ease the anxiety that comes from it. Of course, you can use it as a clever tactic, also, but this dynamic is more powerful when it is unconscious.

Raw Story: So when you are commenting on a political party, you are not being partisan?

Lee: I never cared much for partisan politics. Governing should be based on evidence and consensus, and there are enough studies to bring about consensus in solving just about every problem. It is the denial of science and of reality that should concern us; it is actually a sign of pathology. When one party engages blatantly in deceit and outright brainwashing techniques, pointing that out is not being partisan. My study of 110 years has shown that only one party is consistently destructive, while the other is generally constructive, even if not perfect. If one party consistently worsens the state of societal health, then we should examine that party, not try to say the same of “both sides.” To say that they are the same would be scientifically inaccurate and politically influenced, instead of accurately reflecting the data.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Rudolf Virchow considered politics to be nothing else but medicine on a large scale, and I would agree. Politics is not a doctor’s direct business, but it should not be malpractice, spreading harm rather than healing. If it starts harming societal health, then doctors should have something to say about it.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Jeanine Pirro pushes conspiracy theory 2016 election interference ‘apparently’ started in Ukraine

Published

on

The United States intelligence community is united in the conclusion that it was Russia that interred in America's 2016 presidential election.

But Fox News personality Jeanine Pirro said that 2016 election interference "apparently" started in Ukraine.

The conspiracy theory underlying the false claim resulted in President Donald Trump seeking foreign election interference from Ukraine, the scandal at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Pirro also said Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Geoge Kent is a "bozo."

Watch:

Continue Reading

2020 Election

WATCH: Pete Buttigieg surges to first place in ‘gold standard’ poll of Iowa caucuses

Published

on

South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg surged in a poll of Iowa released Saturday night.

The poll, by Des Moines Register, CNN and Mediacom, showed major movement in the race.

"Since September, Buttigieg has risen 16 percentage points among Iowa’s likely Democratic caucusgoers, with 25% now saying he is their first choice for president. For the first time in the Register’s Iowa Poll, he bests rivals Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who are now clustered in competition for second place and about 10 percentage points behind the South Bend, Indiana, mayor," the newspaper reported.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Turkey launches ‘massive attacks’ on the Kurds — US military are ‘sickened’ by Trump’s betrayal: report

Published

on

Turkey launched a new offensive against the Kurds in Northern Syria, NBC chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel reported Saturday evening.

Engel hashtagged his update with #AmericanBetrayal.

"Massive attacks underway against the kurds in northern syria. No ceasefire. Total nonsenses there is," Engel reported.

President Donald Trump reportedly greenlighted the operation against the Kurds during a phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an.

"US military officials tell me they are ashamed, 'sickened.' It’s cold now outside. What about the families, and kids, out of their homes?" he wondered.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image