“Missouri politicians have gone too far. Tracking patients’ periods is government overreach at its worst and a major violation of privacy.”
In a revelation Tuesday that Planned Parenthood Advocates in Missouri described as “deeply disturbing,” the state health director Dr. Randall Williams testified at an administrative commission hearing that he kept a spreadsheet to track Planned Parenthood patients’ menstrual periods.
Williams’ testimony came as part of a contentious legal battle over the Missouri Health Department’s refusal to renew the license for Planned Parenthood’s clinic in St. Louis, which is the state’s last remaining abortion care provider.
We’ve learned deeply disturbing information: Randall Williams, the director of @GovParsonMO’s Dept. of Health & Senior Services, “kept a spreadsheet to track the menstrual periods of women who visited Planned Parenthood.” https://t.co/B9nFAaJqvi #ShowMeAccess #StandWithPP #MoLeg
— Planned Parenthood Advocates in Missouri (@PPMO_Advocates) October 29, 2019
The Kansas City Star reported that Williams, an OB-GYN appointed to his position in 2017, “said the spreadsheet was made at his request by the state’s main investigator to identify patients who had undergone failed abortions.”
According to the newspaper:
Williams testified that the investigation of Planned Parenthood began after state inspectors found evidence of a failed abortion that didn’t have a corresponding complication report logged with the state.
The spreadsheet, which was based on the medical records the investigator had access to, also included identification numbers and the date of the last menstrual period of each patient.
The investigation eventually found four patients that had to return to Planned Parenthood more than once to have a successful surgical abortion. The “failed” abortions led the department to have “grave concerns” that caused it to withhold the St. Louis clinic’s license.
Responding to Williams’ testimony in a series of tweets Tuesday, Planned Parenthood Advocates in Missouri declared that “Missouri politicians have gone too far. Tracking patients’ periods is government overreach at its worst and a major violation of privacy.”
“This is more evidence of how [Gov. Mike Parson] and his health department have weaponized the licensing process to attack Planned Parenthood and end abortion access in Missouri,” the group added. “Health officials clearly took advantage of the licensure process to access patient records and use that information to conduct a witch hunt with one goal: to end abortion access.”
Pro-choice advocates and political commentators responded with outrage to The Kansas City Star‘s report on social media:
The government keeping a spreadsheet to track when women have their periods in an effort to control their reproductive health is some dystopian shit. https://t.co/HBJvDA1XEi
— Alex Witt (@alexandriajwitt) October 29, 2019
The headline speaks to the gross and desperate tactics that some politicians will resort to take away our access to #abortion care: https://t.co/YJkSNDHBcR#Missouri #Roe #reproductivejustice #reproductivehealth #healthcare #privacy #periods #patients
— RHAP (@RHAP1) October 29, 2019
From unnecessary, invasive, pelvic exams to accessing patient records and tracking patients’ periods, it’s clear the goal isn’t the health and safety of women, but control over women’s reproductive choices. #ShowMeAccess https://t.co/r0wIuMtEBi
— Missouri Democrats (@MoDemParty) October 29, 2019
Look we can snark about conservatives and tracking periods but the reality is enforcing abortion bans means the government is going to have to know who is pregnant and who is *potentially* pregnant and period tracking is one way that happenshttps://t.co/Nu6JMmHJbx
— Jessica Mason Pieklo (@Hegemommy) October 29, 2019
After Planned Parenthood filed suit against the state health department in June, a state court judge referred the case to the Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission. The first hearing before the independent arbiter was Monday.
“Missouri would become the first state since 1974, the year after the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, without a functioning abortion clinic if the license revocation is allowed,” The Associated Press noted in its reporting on the hearing Monday.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, faced with the prospect of Missouri patients losing access to abortion care across the state, Planned Parenthood announced “the opening of a new, large facility in neighboring Illinois—construction of which was done in secret to avoid protests.” It is located less than 20 miles from the St. Louis clinic.
Trump’s India rally turnout far lower than his prediction of seven million
Emerging in a stadium to the appropriate strains of the Village People's "Macho Man" as 100,000 people cheered on, US President Donald Trump looked like he was at a campaign rally in America's Midwest.
But the US leader was thousands of miles away, sweltering under India's scorching heat as he kicked off his first official visit to the nation with a lavish extravaganza at the world's largest cricket stadium.
Five months after being feted by 50,000 people at a mass rally in Houston, Trump revelled in pomp and pageantry once more as Prime Minister Narendra Modi went all-out to welcome him in his home state of Gujarat.
Trump is only visiting India ‘because he’s obsessed with crowd sizes’: Bollywood Star
A famous Indian filmmaker took a jab at President Trump on Twitter this Sunday, saying that his trip to India likely satiated his need for large crowd sizes after Trump addressed an audience in the Motera stadium in Ahmedabad in Gujarat, the home state of India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Indian director and producer Ram Gopal Varma started out by wondering if the money India spent by welcoming Trump would be reciprocated by Americans.
"We Indians spent thousands of crores in welcoming @realDonaldTrump," Gopal tweeted. "but will Americans spend even thousands of rupees in welcoming @narendramodi to the US? That says about America and not India ...Just saying!"
In extradition bid, US accuses Assange of endangering sources
A lawyer for the United States on Monday accused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of risking the lives of intelligence sources by publishing classified US government documents, as his extradition hearing opened in a London court.
Assange faces charges under the US Espionage Act for the 2010 release by his whistleblowing website of a trove of files detailing the realities of US military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Assange spent much of the past decade holed up in Ecuador's London embassy to avoid separate legal proceedings in Sweden, but Washington is now seeking his transfer from Britain to stand trial.