Quantcast
Connect with us

MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes praised for denouncing ‘path of least resistance’ taken by network executives

Published

on

Issuing a harsh rebuke to his own employers for taking “the path of least resistance” by declining to report on allegations of sexual assault against movie producer Harvey Weinstein, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes on Monday night was widely applauded for taking a different path.

In his closing monologue on his show “All In with Chris Hayes,” Hayes compared NBC News executives with hundreds of Republican lawmakers and government officials who refuse to speak out publicly against President Donald Trump amid reports that they privately express grave concerns about his policies and decision-making.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The insidious destructive force of the path of least resistance is everywhere you look,” Hayes said. “Heck, I feel the tug of it myself as my own news organization is embroiled in a very public controversy over its conduct.”

Hayes’s former NBC colleague, journalist Ronan Farrow, spent months reporting on allegations against Weinstein in 2017—allegations which would help spark the worldwide #MeToo social justice movement.

But, Farrow suggests in his new book, Catch & Kill, the network refused to air the reporting out, correctly predicting that the Weinstein story would lead to scrutiny of one of its own longtime anchors—former “Today Show” host Matt Lauer.

“In Farrow’s view, he was unable to break through what was effectively a conspiracy of silence from NBC News management,” Hayes said.

Watch:

ADVERTISEMENT

While NBC has claimed Farrow’s reporting was not adequately sourced to air, the reporter went on to publish an explosive article in The New Yorker about the Weinstein allegations just two months later.

ADVERTISEMENT

After leaving NBC News, Hayes said, Farrow was able to do “the kind of journalism that you want to do as a journalist, that everyone who works in this business should want to facilitate.”

On social media, Hayes won applause for taking what many media critics called a brave stance against his powerful employer.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Journalism professor and media critic Jay Rosen wrote that Hayes’s statement could mark the beginning of a reckoning at NBC—through a possible change in leadership or an independent investigation into Farrow’s departure from the network.

After Hayes’s monologue, Rosen wrote, “status quo won’t hold.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Warren criticized for conciliatory remarks on post-coup Bolivia

Published

on

Top-tier 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren is under fire from progressives and Indigenous activists for her comments Monday about the recent coup in Bolivia—remarks her critics called too conciliatory to the right-wing un-elected government that seized power after President Evo Morales was forced to resign and flee the country.

"The Bolivian people deserve free and fair elections, as soon as possible," Warren tweeted Monday afternoon. "Bolivia's interim leadership must limit itself to preparing for an early, legitimate election. Bolivia's security forces must protect demonstrators, not commit violence against them."

Continue Reading

Facebook

Rep. Ilhan Omar asks judge to ‘show compassion’ for man who threatened to put bullet in her head

Published

on

After a man accused of threatening her life pled guilty to the crime in a U.S. District Court, Rep. Ilhan Omar on Tuesday released publicly a letter she wrote asking the federal judge presiding over the case to "show compassion" in his sentencing.

Patrick W. Carlineo Jr., a 55-year-old man from upstate New York, pled guilty on Monday on gun charges and for threatening to murder Omar in phone calls he made to her congressional office in March of this year. But in her letter to Judge Frank P. Geraci Jr., Omar said that while the charges were quite serious she did not think that an overly punitive sentence was the answer.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Why saying ‘OK boomer’ at work is considered age discrimination – but millennial put-downs aren’t

Published

on

The phrase “OK boomer” has become a catch-all put-down that Generation Zers and young millennials have been using to dismiss retrograde arguments made by baby boomers, the generation of Americans who are currently 55 to 73 years old.

Though it originated online and primarily is fueling memes, Twitter feuds and a flurry of commentary, it has begun migrating to real life. Earlier this month, a New Zealand lawmaker lobbed the insult at an older legislator who had dismissed her argument about climate change.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image