Quantcast
Connect with us

The right-wing smear campaign against Elizabeth Warren kicks into gear — with a little help from the left

Published

on

That didn’t take long.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren has risen impressively in the Democratic presidential primary polls recently, so even as President Donald Trump continues to press his bogus and hypocritical smear about former Vice President Joe Biden in Ukraine, some branches of the right wing are setting their sights on the Massachusetts lawmaker.

Of course, there’s been long-simmering questions about the fact that she previously identified as Native American, citing family lore, though she has admitted that was a mistake and has apologized. But it’s not clear that scandal has or will damage her enough for conservatives’ likings, so they needed to find something else. First, fraudster Jacob Wohl launched a bizarre and obviously fake attack on Warren that was regarded as a joke from start to finish.

ADVERTISEMENT

But on Monday, the conservative site Washington Free Beacon launched a new attack that is more likely to have staying power, even though it is, at least for the moment, completely baseless.

Reporter Collin Anderson claimed that:

The Riverdale Board of Education approved a second-year teaching contract for a young Elizabeth Warren, documents show, contradicting the Democratic presidential candidate’s repeated claims that she was asked not to return to teaching after a single year because she was “visibly pregnant.”

The only problem with the story is that the documents Anderson provided show no such thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

He reported that the board approved Warren for a second-year contract on April 21, 1971. Then on June 16, two months later, the documents show that the board accepted her resignation “with regret.”

Never once in the article does Anderson actually explain how these findings contradict Warren’s story. Which make sense, because they don’t. The only mystery that remains is why an editor, even at a conservative publication, would let the story have a headline and a lead paragraph that are unsupported by the story itself.

As Ryan Grim, D.C. bureau chief for the Intercept observed: “I used to be a substitute teacher and I never went before the board of education. I’m sure they just submitted my name and it was approved. At that level, the boards just rubber-stamp principals’ decisions. And principals don’t tend to write ‘fired for pregnant’ on the forms.”

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s no reason to think the principal in question couldn’t have discovered Warren was pregnant after her second-year contract was approved and then pressured her to resign. That is completely consistent with the Beacon’s findings, yet the story confidently declares that its records contradict her claims. They just don’t. It’s true that the records don’t say she was asked not to return because she was having a baby, but no one should have expected that they would.

As Anderson himself explained, this attack on Warren’s past actually first came from the left wing, not the right. Journalist Meagan Day from Jacobin magazine claimed that Warren’s story of why she left teaching was different when the then-law professor recounted it in a 2007 interview. Warren explained at the time:

I was married at nineteen and graduated from college after I’d married, and my first year post-graduation I worked in a public school system with the children with disabilities. I did that for a year, and then that summer I didn’t have the education courses, so I was on an “emergency certificate,” it was called. I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, “I don’t think this is going to work out for me.” I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, “What am I going to do?” My husband’s view of it was, “Stay home. We have children, we’ll have more children, you’ll love this.” And I was very restless about it.

ADVERTISEMENT

But again, this story isn’t inconsistent with her story of being dismissed for being pregnant. Perhaps you might find it odd that she didn’t mention that fact in this interview, but people emphasize different parts of stories in different settings and for different reasons.

Conservatives are clearly read to run with the smear against Warren. White House counselor and chief Trump battering ram picked up the narrative quickly, apparently without any scrutiny or interest in accuracy:

ADVERTISEMENT

Now, it’s certainly possible Warren lied about her past. I don’t have evidence that supports her story. And one of the problems with smears is that, even by addressing them, you leave readers with some questions in their minds about whether the smear might be true.

But I can say this confidently: The Washington Free Beacon, despite its bold claims of finding contradictory evidence to Warren’s story, found nothing of the sort. It found some records, and simply asserted that they were at odds with her narrative, when in fact they are entirely compatible. On its face, this supposed news story is a contemptible and deceptive hit job.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

GOP giving up trying to reclaim House seats as 2020 wipeout looms: report

Published

on

Faced with a ticket likely headed by an unpopular president and watching the Democrats rake in campaign cash ahead of the 2020 election, the Republican Party is conceding they will not win back the House by reclaiming seats they lost in the so-called 2018 "blue wave" election.

According to a report from Politico, Democratic candidates have been stockpiling massive amounts of cash to wage war in what is expected to be a high turnout election with Donald Trump as the face of the Republican Party and seats that the GOP thought they might have a shot at now appearing unattainable.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump impersonated a CNN anchor — and a US president — during epic meltdown at Texas speech

Published

on

President Donald Trump offered multiple impersonations during a campaign rally in Dallas, Texas on Thursday.

Trump showed the crowd his impersonation of a president of the United States -- and a CNN anchor.

"No guns. No religion. No oil. No natural gas," Trump said. "Abraham Lincoln could not win Texas under those circumstances. Couldn’t do it."

In fact, Abraham Lincoln could not win Texas when he ran for president as the state refused to print any ballots with his name.

He then showed the audience two impersonations as part of his 87-minute speech.

"I used it to say, I can be more presidential. Look," Trump said, as he shuffled awkwardly on stage.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

WATCH LIVE: Beto O’Rourke holds ‘Rally Against Fear’ to counter Trump’s re-election rally

Published

on

While supporters of President Donald Trump gathered on Thursday in the American Airlines Center Dallas, former Rep. Beto O'Rourke held a "Rally Against Fear" less than 15 miles away in Grand Prairie.

O'Rourke's presidential campaign said the rally was to "directly confront Donald Trump’s dangerous hatred and division on the night he tries to spread it across the battleground state of Texas."

"We will not be defined by this president’s fear, his hate, or the differences between us that he tries to exploit but instead by a renewed sense of hope and a unified vision for the future of our country. In this moment of smallness, paranoia, and division, Texas is going to lead the way with our strength, our courage, our diversity, and the big, bold, ambitious things we want to achieve together," the campaign said.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image