Quantcast
Connect with us

GOP lawmaker smacked down after suggesting impeachment is only for capital crimes

Published

on

On Thursday’s edition of MSNBC’s “All In,” Rep. Tom Reed (R-NY) tried to argue that impeachment is only intended for when presidents commit capital crimes — and was immediately corrected by anchor Chris Hayes.

“I saw an earlier interview you gave to Chuck Todd where you didn’t think this was, so far, from what you’ve heard of, the level of impeachable behavior,” said Hayes. “I’m curious what you view the standard as the Constitution sets out for you as being high crimes and treason and misdemeanor.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Crimes that are subject to the penalty of death is essentially what the Constitution is to me indicating with impeachment,” said Reed. “And this whole claim of bribery, the American people aren’t stupid, Chris. This is not going to sustain the review of the American people, and they’re the ultimate ones who are going to judge this because I don’t see this becoming an impeachable subject to the removal of the president.”

“Bribery, treason or other high crimes and misdemeanors, a category which has been used for all other impeachments,” said Hayes. “Like you think Nixon should have been impeached, right?”

“I recognize it. We’re talking about a burglary charge there directed by the president. Pretty clear where that was going to go and the president resigned,” said Reed, immediately contradicting his statement that only capital crimes are impeachable. “You should learn a lesson of impeachment in the sense of how many times has this been utilized and we should learn from the Clinton proceedings and I didn’t support the Clinton impeachment. Impeachment is a very historic action and the American people are looking at this in my humble opinion, and some have already made up their minds. You clearly have made up a conclusion, but at the end of the day this is about trusting the people, and I think it’s going to be turned over to the election at the end of the day.”

Watch below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

North Korea conducts ‘crucial test’ at Sohae launch site: report

Published

on

North Korea has conducted another "crucial test" at its Sohae satellite launch site, state media reported Saturday, as nuclear negotiations between Pyongyang and Washington remain stalled with a deadline approaching.

The announcement comes a day before US Special Envoy on North Korea Stephen Biegun is set to arrive in Seoul for a three-day visit, and after the United States tested a medium-range ballistic missile over the Pacific Ocean on Thursday.

"Another crucial test was successfully conducted at the Sohae Satellite Launching Ground from 22:41 to 22:48 on December 13," a spokesman for the North's National Academy of Defence Science said in a statement carried by the official KCNA news agency.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

US-China trade deal gets tepid reception

Published

on

US officials announced a truce in the trade war with China with much fanfare, but economists and trade experts call it largely a victory for Beijing.

After a dispute that raged for close to two years, with several fumbled efforts at a resolution, the US agreed to cancel planned tariffs and rollback others immediately, without a similar commitment from China to lift tariffs it imposed on the US.

"Pardon me if I don't pop champagne, but aside from a cessation of continued escalation, there is not much worth cheering," leading China expert Scott Kennedy said in an analysis of the agreement.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Is Donald Trump a supporter of Israel? Sure — he’s also an anti-Semite

Published

on

On Wednesday, Jared Kushner, who is both a White House senior adviser and President Trump's son-in-law, published an op-ed article in The New York Times defending the president's recent executive order supposedly meant to combat anti-Semitism. The controversial measure will establish that "Title VI of the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition against discrimination based on race, color or national origin covers discrimination against Jews" and defines anti-Semitism using the language of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.

Continue Reading