Quantcast
Connect with us

Bill Barr is gearing up for a major clash in his own department over the Russia probe: report

Published

on

- Commentary

Attorney General Bill Barr does not agree with a central conclusion of the forthcoming report from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz about the Russia investigation, according to a new report from the Washington Post.

As I discussed previously, Horowitz — who has gone out of his way in the past to harshly criticize President Donald Trump’s enemies — nonetheless appears ready to release a report concluding that the Russia investigation that focused on members of the Trump campaign was opened properly, according to multiple reports. It will also reportedly find some wrongdoing and sloppiness on the part of the FBI in the course of the probe, but nothing that supports the Trump theory that the whole effort was a “hoax” or a politically motivated plot from the top to bring him down.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as the inspector general, Horowitz operates independently from Barr’s oversight, meaning both that he can’t change the investigation’s findings — and also that he won’t have any personal ownership over them. So the report suggests that DOJ is heading for a serious clash.

“[Behind] the scenes at the Justice Department, disagreement has surfaced about one of Horowitz’s central conclusions on the origins of the Russia investigation,” the Post reported. “The discord could be the prelude to a major fissure within federal law enforcement on the controversial question of investigating a presidential campaign.”

It’s not clear what public form this disagreement will take or how contentiously it will play out, but it is likely to be a stunning turn of events.

Matthew Miller, a former Justice Department spokesperson under President Barack Obama, said the potential clash was “unreal.”

“It is not uncommon for an AG to disagree with an IG finding because it is too tough on DOJ,” he said on Twitter. “I have never heard of an IG confirming the department did things correctly and an AG disputing it. Just shocking partisan behavior.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Jonathan Adler, a conservative legal scholar, similarly called the Post report “bizarre.”

“AG Barr apparently objects to IG conclusion there was sufficient evidence to open investigation into Trump campaign in 2016, but not because information wasn’t sufficient. Rather b/c IG didn’t adequately consider other info,” Adler wrote. “If the story is accurate, it’s as if AG Barr doesn’t understand the relevant question. Key is whether threshold sufficiency of evidence to open investigation existed, not whether other exonerating evidence might also exist.”

It may even be worse than that.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report indicated that Barr believes “other U.S. agencies, such as the CIA, may hold significant information that could alter Horowitz’s conclusion on that point.” This seems to point to a right-wing conspiracy theory, which holds that U.S. intelligence agencies worked with foreign intelligence services to somehow set up the Trump campaign.

There’s never been any credible support for this theory — and in fact, there’s good reason to believe it’s false. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a top ally of the president, led the CIA before he took his current post. And according to a Politico report from July, Pompeo aggressively grilled officials in the agency about its conclusions from the Russia probe.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Pompeo also asked about CIA’s work with the FBI on the Russia probe in 2016. Two U.S. officials further confirmed to POLITICO that the interview occurred and was robust,” Politico reported. “Additionally, a congressional official said Pompeo and his deputies never gave any indication to lawmakers, even behind closed doors, that the CIA had acted improperly or drawn incorrect conclusions about Putin’s desire to help Trump get elected.”

So another ally of the president apparently came up dry when trying to tap the well of Trumpist conspiracy theories. Horowitz appears primed to knock them down. And former Special Counsel Robert Mueller gave no indication of wrongdoing by U.S. intelligence in the investigation.

But Trump wants a preordained conclusion, and Barr seems determined to give it to him. And he’ll have another bite at the apple. Barr has also directed U.S. Attorney John Durham to review the intelligence community’s conduct during the Russia probe, and that review has reportedly turned into a criminal investigation. Unlike Horowitz, Durham does report directly to Barr. It’s not clear what will happen if Durham doesn’t give Barr the answers he wants to hear.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump announces Rudy Giuliani ‘wants to go before Congress’ and testify about his Ukraine dealings

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, wanted to testify before Congress.

Speaking to reporters as he departed for a Republican fundraiser in Florida, Trump praised the former New York City mayor.

"Rudy, as you know, has been one of the great crime fighters of the last 50 years," Trump said of his lawyer, who is reportedly under federal investigation for breaking the law.

"And, he did get back from Europe just recently and I know -- he has not told me what he found, but I think he wants to go before Congress and say, and also to the attorney general and the Department of Justice," Trump said.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP governors are refusing to do Trump’s bidding and ducking him on the campaign trail: report

Published

on

On Saturday, Maggie Haberman of The New York Times profiled how President Donald Trump is having less luck whipping Republican governors into line than Republican senators, including governors who arguably owe their election to his support.

"In Florida, Mr. Trump’s aides helped save the flailing candidacy of Ron DeSantis in the 2018 Republican primary, and then the general election," wrote Haberman. "Also last year, in Georgia, Mr. Trump helped pull Brian Kemp over the finish line in both the primary and the general election. In both cases, Mr. Trump’s advisers implored him to stay out of the primaries, and he agreed to — only to surprise his aides by jumping in to support Mr. DeSantis and Mr. Kemp."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Courts have avoided refereeing between Congress and the president — Trump may change all that

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s refusal to hand over records to Congress and allow executive branch employees to provide information and testimony to Congress during the impeachment battle is the strongest test yet of legal principles that over the past 200 years have not yet been fully defined by U.S. courts.

It’s not the first test: Struggles over power among the political branches predate our Constitution. The framers chose not to, and probably could not, fully resolve them.

Continue Reading