Quantcast
Connect with us

Clint Eastwood slammed over ‘sex for stories’ portrayal

Published

on

Oscar-winning director Clint Eastwood was at the center of a firestorm Thursday over his latest movie depicting a reporter trading sex for stories — prompting legal threats over the “shocking” and “untrue” portrayal from her real-life newspaper.

“Richard Jewell” dramatizes the story of the innocent man who found himself targeted in a devastating media frenzy following a deadly blast at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jewell was initially hailed as a hero after he spotted the pipe bomb but was soon identified by journalists including the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Kathy Scruggs as an FBI suspect.

Scruggs, portrayed by Olivia Wilde, is depicted in the movie trading sex with an FBI agent in exchange for learning the suspect’s identity.

“The portrayal of our reporter is shocking, untrue and an obvious Hollywood trope,” editor Kevin G. Riley told AFP.

“The film commits the very sin that it purports to accuse the media of. It literally makes things up in telling the story.”

Never arrested or charged, Jewell was cleared by the FBI after 88 days. But TV networks camped outside his home for the duration, hounding Jewell and his family.

ADVERTISEMENT

He became the subject of wild speculation and ridicule.

Cox Enterprises, the newspaper’s owner, on Monday sent a letter to Eastwood and Warner Bros demanding it release a public statement stating “some events were imagined for dramatic purposes.”

The letter says the paper and its staff are “portrayed in a false and defamatory manner.”

ADVERTISEMENT

– ‘Rush to judgment’ –

It also demands a prominent disclaimer be added to the film to that effect.

ADVERTISEMENT

The film currently has a disclaimer, stating it is “based on actual historical events” but created some dialogue and events “for the purposes of dramatization,” at the very end of the credits.

“It doesn’t look like the kind of disclaimer that would be placed by a filmmaker who was seriously concerned about making the audience aware of the truth of the situation,” said Riley.

It is not the first time critics have raised eyebrows at the movies of 89-year-old Eastwood, who won Oscars for directing “Unforgiven” (1992) and “Million Dollar Baby” (2004).

ADVERTISEMENT

“Gran Torino” (2018) and “The Mule” (2008) were criticized for the frequent racial epithets spoken by their lead characters — both Korean War veterans played by the director himself — while “American Sniper” (2014) was dismissed by some critics as jingoistic propaganda.

Warner Bros has responded to the “Richard Jewell” letter with a statement insisting the film is based on “a wide range of highly credible source material.”

It is “unfortunate and the ultimate irony that the Atlanta Journal Constitution, having been a part of the rush to judgment of Richard Jewell, is now trying to malign our filmmakers and cast,” it says.

“The AJC’s claims are baseless and we will vigorously defend against them,” the statement concludes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jewell sued several news outlets for defamation, claiming their stories depicted him as someone with an odd personality who was probably guilty.

The Journal-Constitution never settled with Jewell, and a court later ruled its reports on the bombing investigation “in their entirety were substantially true at the time they were published.”

In 2007, Jewell died of natural causes, at the age of 44.

“The story of Richard Jewell is important,” said Riley. “It’s certainly worthy of film.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“In this telling of it, important truths of what really happened are simply lost.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Genocide expert breaks down how all of the ‘warning signs’ are present in Trump’s America

Published

on

Defense research scientist and genocide expert Brynn Tannehill laid out a terrifying warning on Thursday about President Donald Trump's administration.

As the United States Senate conducted an impeachment trial for the commander-in-chief, Tannehill posted an extended Twitter thread examining the situation in America from her perspective as a researcher studying the conditions that lead to genocide.

Here is what she wrote:

I study genocide. It's been a theme in my academic endeavours for nearly 30 years. More accurately, I study the conditions in the lead up to genocide, be they cultural, social, political, economic, etc... 1/n

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Year of Rat hails easy ride for Donald Trump — but bumps for Harry and Meghan

Published

on

As the world prepares to welcome the Year of the Rat, feng shui masters predict a lucky year for Donald Trump, but warn Harry and Meghan's futures are less certain as they make a bid for freedom.

Both the US President and the Sussexes have begun 2020 with a bang.

The former is facing down an impeachment trial -- and seeking re-election in November -- while the latter are beginning a new chapter in Canada after consciously uncoupling from the gilded but pressured career of being a working British royal.

But if experts in the field of Chinese horoscopes are to be believed, it is the US president that will have the easier journey this year.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

John Roberts caused a ‘crisis of democratic legitimacy’ — it’s ‘entirely fitting’ he has to preside over his mess: columnist

Published

on

Supreme Court Justice John Roberts was blasted in The Washington Post on Thursday for his culpability in creating the dynamics that resulted in President Donald Trump -- and his impeachment.

"There is justice in John Roberts being forced to preside silently over the impeachment trial of President Trump, hour after hour, day after tedious day," Dana Milbank wrote. "Roberts’s captivity is entirely fitting: He is forced to witness, with his own eyes, the mess he and his colleagues on the Supreme Court have made of the U.S. political system. As representatives of all three branches of government attend this unhappy family reunion, the living consequences of the Roberts Court’s decisions, and their corrosive effect on democracy, are plain to see."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image