Quantcast
Connect with us

CNN conservative zaps every Trump supporters’ argument against impeachment

Published

on

Republican-turned-Independent David Gergen served in four presidential administrations, two of which were impeached. When he heard one of President Donald Trump’s shills on CNN Wednesday evening, he was quick to flatten the argument.

Scott Jennings argued that what Democrats were doing was unprecedented, but CNN commentator Kirsten Powers said that former President Bill Clinton was nearly thrown out of office for lying about an affair, something she argued was far less important than extorting a foreign power to sway a presidential election.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The first thing you’re saying that it’s so unprecedented,” Powers recalled. “This is exactly what the Republicans wanted to do to Bill Clinton. So, this doesn’t even make sense. I mean you think it’s so egregious for this to happen and if the Republicans had control of the Senate, they would have thrown Bill Clinton out of office over far less bad behavior. So I don’t really understand why you find this to cross some line that’s never been crossed before.”

“I find it unprecedented that we’d throw an American president out of office, just because we’ve never done it,” Jennings said, chuckling.

“But you tried to do it,” Powers said.

“Well, I didn’t. I was in college then,” Jennings dodged.

“She means Republicans,” host Don Lemon cut in.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So, do you think it was a mistake?” Powers asked.

“They stopped short,” Jennings said of the GOP.

“They stopped short because they didn’t have the majority in the Senate,” Powers explained. “So, it’s not that they stopped it because they impeached him in the House.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Look, we’ve never thrown a president out of office, and I don’t think Republicans think this warrants that,” Jennings said.

“But, Scott, if Republicans controlled the Senate at that point, at that time, they would have thrown the president out of office,” Lemon explained. “It’s hypocrisy. That’s her point. Am I wrong, Kirsten?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Well, it’s hypocrisy, but it doesn’t make sense,” she said. “Bill Clinton, really if you compare the two things, compare lying about an affair versus, you know, trying to get a foreign government to interfere in an American election. I don’t think it’s really even a competition, right?”

Jennings then argued that the president shouldn’t be impeached and that Democrats should have considered censure instead because they might actually get Republican cooperation. It was a comment that CNN commentator David Gergen honed in on, noting that if Republicans believe the president did something bad enough to be censured, then they are admitting that he did something wrong. There aren’t any Republicans willing to do that, however.

“But, Scott, the problem with that that I’ve seen is we have virtually no Republicans — I can’t think of more than five Republicans who have said that the president did anything inappropriate,” said Gergen. “You know, they have defended him right down the line on that, and I think you think it was inappropriate, and I think there are other people like you who are fair-minded people who agree with that. But I don’t understand this party never even conceding that point or acknowledging that point.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Gergen then recalled the Republicans who stood up during the Nixon impeachment and said that what he did was wrong and that they became respected as a result of that. There are no such Republicans in this case willing to stand up, even if they agree the president committed an impeachable offense. He recalled Republicans in the House who were willing to break with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on impeaching Clinton for the sex scandal.

“That’s what leadership is about,” Gergen said.

Jennings’ next argument was that no president has been thrown out of office in the history of the United States. As constitutional law professor Michael Gerhardt explained to Congress, “If what we’re talking about is not impeachable, then nothing is impeachable.”

Watch the full segment in the video below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

Legal analyst rips senators for ‘getting the vapers’ and using Schiff ‘being mean’ as an excuse to vote against witnesses

Published

on

Senators are already trying to come up with an excuse not to support calling witnesses for the impeachment trial and CNN legal analyst Jeff Toobin thinks they found it.

According to CNN's Manu Raju, Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John Barrasso (R-WY), Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Jim Risch (R-ID) freaked out about a CBS News report cited by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) that a Trump confidant said if the Republicans vote against Trump their "head will be in a pike."

Continue Reading

CNN

Susan Collins denies CBS report that a Trump friend threatened Republicans’ heads ‘will be on a pike’

Published

on

CBS News reported this week that a friend of the president's threatened U.S. senators if they were thinking of voting in support of witnesses.

“Vote against the president and your head will be on a pike," the Trump confidant said.

https://twitter.com/CBSEveningNews/status/1220491412854185984

According to Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), however, it was a lie and no one ever said it.

CNN's Manu Raju revealed after the Senate adjourned that Collins audibly disputed Schiff's quote of the story during the trial.

"She shook her head and said, 'No they didn't. No, that's not true,'" Raju reported.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Here’s why Trump and McConnell can’t hold up impeachment witnesses during the Senate trial: Ex-special counsel

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has been threatening senators that if they voted for witnesses to appear and be questioned, then it would turn the impeachment into an overwhelmingly long and drawn-out process. It's an argument that President Donald Trump's legal team has also argued. The problem is that it is legally incorrect, according to a former special counsel to the Defense Department.

In a panel discussion with CNN, Ryan Goodman said that there's no legal basis for this claim.

"In fact, the Senate can decide the matter and it wouldn't be litigated," Goodman explained. "If the Senate decided to issue the subpoenas and the Chief Justice, in fact, sent those subpoenas, it would be the final word. There's a Supreme Court case about this, Nixon v. United States, Judge Nixon, which said the Senate sets the rules and the courts review it. So, it's not like it will be litigated in a way. They are the final word."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image