Attorney General Bill Barr was called out by a CNN panel on Tuesday after he incorrectly said that the FBI ignored evidence that would have exculpated President Donald Trump’s campaign regarding allegations of Russian collusion.
As Barr spoke live to The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday afternoon, a panel of CNN analysts commented on the attorney general’s utterances.
“In general, he said, from day one there was evidence that was exculpatory evidence that there was no collusion and the FBI ignored that,” CNN’s Dana Bash announced. “Let’s just start with that. True or false?”
“It’s just not true,” justice correspondent Evan Pérez said. “What he’s talking about in his summation of the entire [Inspector’s General] investigation, I think that’s not true. There was a lot of information still coming in, there was information coming in after the election that gave the FBI more reason to say, okay, let’s look at that.”
Pérez agreed that in hindsight there are some things the agency should have done differently.
“There’s was activity obviously coming from the Russians,” correspondent Pamela Brown pointed out.
“Before he talked about the Inspector General’s report, he talked about impeachment,” New York Times writer Julie Hirschfeld Davis explained. “And this idea that there has been this group of people inside the government trying to take President Trump down, since before he was president.”
“It’s really critical to the president’s defense of himself in the impeachment context and [Bill Barr] is picking up on that he’s sort of viewing all of that — he viewed the Mueller report, he views this IG report through that lens and that is sort of through the prism that he is sharing all of this with the public.”
“You get kind of a distorted view of what the findings are based on [Barr’s representation],” she added.
Pérez said that one statement Barr made about Ukraine in a recent NBC interview was “damaging” to U.S. voters.
“And he’s asked point blank, do you believe Ukraine interfered in the election?” Pérez recalled. “And’s he’s like, ‘I don’t know.'”
“You’re the attorney general!” Pérez added. “This is the attorney general and he knows exactly what the answer is but he cannot say it — it appears to me — he cannot say it because it would go against what the president believes.”
“He has a right to his opinions,” the CNN correspondent noted. “But you cannot as attorney general, frankly, fuel these crazy ideas that are coming from Twitter if you know better.”
“He doesn’t have a right to his own opinions,” Bash replied, “to say in public when he’s the sitting attorney general and it comes down to a very real report that done by real intelligence agencies that both parties agree with.”
Watch the video below from CNN.
Scrambling Trump promises to ‘save’ social security after threatening to cut it — but it’s seniors who will pay for his recklessness
It used to be said that cutting Social Security was politics’ third rail, a fatal taking of positions.
If that’s still true, you wouldn’t know it from the emerging attention that cutting Social Security is getting.
Indeed, look at Trump’s handling of Social Security, and you may find real flaws in the armor of a Best-of-All-Time economy cloak that Trump tries to wear.
Even as Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden mix it up over whether Biden did or did not say something supportive about a Republican plan in 2008 by then-Rep. Paul D. Ryan for spending reductions, here comes Donald Trump to promise that he is open to revamping entitlement programs towards the end of the year.
White House lawyers were desperate not to talk about Rudy Giuliani — or Trump’s other conspiracy theories: CNN analyst
On Saturday, CNN analyst Gloria Borger noted a key piece of the timeline that was conveniently missing from the defense presented by President Donald Trump's legal team: The involvement of Trump's private lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
"The one person that Jay Sekulow didn't mention is Rudy Giuliani, because this is Rudy Giuliani's theory of the game here," said Borger. "They were very careful not to bring up Rudy Giuliani because they know that he is not well regarded in the United States Senate, but if you again look at this summary of the transcript of the president's phone call, the president talks about CrowdStrike, he talks about a lot of things that went on. 'I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people, I would like to have you get to the bottom of it,' this whole nonsense, he talked about Bob Mueller and said a lot of it started with Ukraine."
Pompeo ridiculed by CNN panel for his ‘phony mock outrage’ response after being outed as a foul-mouthed bully
Responding to a statement from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued through the State Department accusing an NPR journalist of being "shameless" for going public with an encounter she had with him in his offices where he cursed at her, a CNN panel all but rolled their eyes at his "phony" outrage.
Speaking with host Anderson Cooper, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called out the blustery Pompeo as well as many Republicans who took "umbrage" at Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) mentioning a report that the Donald Trump would have their heads on "on a pike" if they crossed him.