Quantcast
Connect with us

Economist Paul Krugman: Trump’s ‘white nationalist regime’ is terrible for American Jews

Published

on

Most of President Donald Trump’s inflammatory speeches are designed to energize his hardcore MAGA base, but occasionally, Trump will try to persuade non-Republican, non-MAGA voters that no matter how much they dislike him, they have no choice but to vote for him — otherwise, “socialist” Democrats will harm them economically. Liberal economist Paul Krugman, in his December 9 column for the New York Times, notes that Trump made such an argument when he addressed the Israeli American Council on Saturday night, December 8. Not only was the speech anti-Semitic, Krugman asserts, but also, Trump failed to make a convincing argument for why Jewish voters in the United States should support him.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Was he peddling an anti-Semitic stereotype, portraying Jews as money-grubbing types who care only about their wealth?,” Krugman writes. “Of course he was. You might possibly make excuses for his remarks if they were an isolated instance, but in fact, Trump has done this sort of thing many times.”

Trump, during his Saturday night speech, argued that although many people in the audience were “not nice people at all,” they “have to vote for me” because the alternative is Democrats raising their taxes through the roof.

“It’s not news that Trump’s bigotry isn’t restricted to blacks and immigrants,” Krugman explains. “What is interesting, however, is that this particular anti-Semitic cliché — that Jews are greedy, and that their political behavior is especially driven by their financial interests — is empirically dead wrong. In fact, American Jews are much more liberal than you might expect given their economic situation. This is, by the way, a distinction they share with some other groups, especially Asian-Americans.”

Krugman observes that in 2018, only 17% of Jewish voters in the U.S. voted Republican, adding that although “almost all” American Jews “support Israel,” most of them “don’t support the policies of its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.”

The New York Times columnist (who is Jewish himself) goes on to explain that when American Jews make anti-racist assertions, they are not only standing up for other groups — they are also acting in their own interests because they’re smart enough to realize that “whenever bigotry runs free, we’re likely to be among its victims.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Trump Administration is, beyond any reasonable doubt, an anti-democratic, white nationalist regime,” Krugman stresses. “And while it is not yet explicitly anti-Semitic, many of its allies are: ‘Jews will not replace us,’ chanted the ‘very fine people’ carrying torches in Charlottesville, Virginia. You have to be willfully ignorant of the past not to know where all this leads.”

Similarly, Krugman observes, “Many Asian-American voters used to support Republicans, but the group is now overwhelmingly Democratic. Indian-Americans, in particular, are like American Jews: a high-income, high-education group that votes Democratic by large margins, presumably because many of its members also realize where white nationalism will take us.”

History, Krugman emphasizes, shows that those who turn a blind eye to bigotry and racism are likely to be targeted themselves at some point — and most Jewish American voters, thanks to their historic perspective, realize that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are wealthy Jews who are sufficiently shortsighted, ignorant or arrogant enough to imagine that they can continue to prosper under a white nationalist government,” Krugman writes. “But most of my ethnic group, I believe, understands that Trump is bad for the Jews — whatever tax bracket we happen to be in.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

WATCH LIVE: Trump holds mask-optional Mount Rushmore rally and fireworks celebration

Published

on

President Donald Trump left the White House during the COVID-19 pandemic on Friday to attend an Independence Day event in South Dakota.

Trump was told not to attend but did so anyway.

“Trump coming here is a safety concern not just for my people inside and outside the reservation, but for people in the Great Plains. We have such limited resources in Black Hills, and we’re already seeing infections rising,” the Oglala Sioux president, Julian Bear Runner, told the Guardian. “It’s going to cause an uproar if he comes here. People are going to want to exercise their first amendment rights to protest and we do not want to see anyone get hurt or the lands be destroyed."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump Jr’s girlfriend tests positive for COVID-19 in South Dakota ahead of the president’s event: report

Published

on

Yet another senior Donald Trump advisor has tested positive for COVID-19.

"Kimberly Guilfoyle, the girlfriend of President Trump’s eldest son and a top fund-raising official for the Trump re-election campaign, tested positive for the coronavirus on Friday before a Fourth of July event at Mount Rushmore, a person familiar with her condition said," The New York Times reported shortly before Trump's speech began.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump supporters shouted ‘go home’ at Native Americans protesting Mount Rushmore rally on their land: report

Published

on

Oglala Sioux protesters were arrested protesting against President Donald Trump's Independence Day event at Mount Rushmore on Friday.

The protesters argued that it is their land after the Ft. Laramie Treaty of 1868, which was ratified by the U.S. Senate.

The Black Hills of South Dakota, where Mount Rushmore is located, was among the lands the tribes received to bring about an end to Red Cloud's War, which is also known as the Bozeman Trail War.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image