During Wednesday’s Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings Democrats will call three expert witnesses and Republicans will call one. George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley is the constitutional expert chosen by Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-GA) to represent the Republicans’ point of view, to oppose impeachment and to defend President Donald Trump.
Turley has released his 53-page opening statement, which some have already observed is more than twice as long as the combined statements of the Democrats’ three legal experts.
Just received the testimony for witnesses testifying at the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry hearing:
Noah Feldman (Harvard) 6 pages
Pamela Karlan (Stanford) 6 pages
Michael Gerhardt (UNC) 10 pages
The GOP witness:
Jonathan Turley (GW) 53 pages
— Alex Moe (@AlexNBCNews) December 4, 2019
In it, he makes this statement that is getting a great deal of attention:
“I get it. You are mad. The President is mad. My Democratic friends are mad. My Republican friends are mad. My wife is mad. My kids are mad. Even my dog is mad . . . and Luna is a golden doodle and they are never mad. We are all mad and where has it taken us? Will a slipshod impeachment make us less mad or will it only give an invitation for the madness to follow in every future administration?”
Turley will argue that Trump should not be impeached, despite writing in that same statement: “The use of military aid for a quid pro quo to investigate one’s political opponent, if proven, can be an impeachable offense.”
But that same Jonathan Turley had a very different position on impeaching a sitting president when that president was a Democrat. Professor Turley, in a statement written November 9, 1998, declared that impeaching President Bill Clinton was necessary to literally protect the “existence of the government,” and to prevent “contempt for law” and “anarchy.”
Professor Turley literally suggested that were President Clinton not impeached, anarchy would rain down on the nation.
“Allegations of criminal acts in office by a president are perhaps the greatest threat to the perceived legitimacy of a government,” Professor Turley wrote back in 1998. “When there is compelling evidence of criminal acts in the Chief Executive, an entire system of laws is undermined and demands some form corrective action.”
Turley did not stop there. He continued:
In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker; it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.
The allegations against President Clinton go to the very heart of the legitimacy of his office and the integrity of the political system. As an individual, a president may seek spiritual redemption in the company of friends and family. Constitutional redemption, however, is found only in the company of representatives of all three branches in the well of the Senate. It is there that legitimacy, once recklessly lost, can be regained by a president.
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice.
His actions are dwarfed by what is charged in both the Mueller report and in the just-released House Intelligence Committee impeachment report, which spans 300 pages.
Professor Turley is getting some appropriate criticism on social media.
Jonathan Turley is a bad-faith hack and always has been.
Remember, this “civil libertarian” spent eight years attacking Obama for fairly routine executive orders, and is now defending Trump for trying to commit bribery with military aid appropriated by Congress. What a crock. https://t.co/3lY6np8LQx
— Matthew Chapman (@fawfulfan) December 4, 2019
Turley argues Trump shouldn’t be impeached because the House hasn’t heard from witnesses who’ve refused to testify in concert with Trump’s obstruction of the inquiry. This isn’t a constitutional argument, it’s a roadmap for corrupt presidents to nullify the impeachment power. https://t.co/RiocDqpwm0
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) December 4, 2019
Mr. Turley took a very sharp right turn several years ago. Some of his positions are baffling. By his logic, even Nixon should not have been impeached. He was an effective commentator several years back. Now, he seems to be another GOP hack. https://t.co/yXEa4nTOXe
— David Saliba (@salibalaw) December 4, 2019
Fox News floats conspiracy theory that Biden is using listening devices at Tuesday’s debate
Fox News reported that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden may be planning to use listening devices during Tuesday night's debate.
During a discussion with Fox News anchor Bret Baier, host Bill Hemmer relayed information from one of his colleagues, which was likely planted by the Trump campaign.
"The Trump team asked to inspect the ears of each debater for electronic devices or transmitters," Hemmer announced. "The Biden team has not consented to that."
"The Biden team wanted a break every 30 minutes, the Trump team said we will not have that," he added.
Watch the video clip below.
Children of Missouri Republican say he molested them when they were young
The children of a Missouri Republican are telling voters that their father molested them when they were children, they said in the Kansas City Star.
Rick Roeber is running to replace his wife Rebecca, who passed away last year, but his adult children from a previous marriage are coming forward to tell voters about their abuse from him.
Roeber's adopted daughter Anastasia recalled the sexual advances he made toward her when she was just 9 years old.
Trump spokesperson resorts to insulting CNN host in off-the-rails interview over president’s tax scandal
A CNN interview with Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh quickly turned into a shouting match after host Jim Sciutto peppered him with questions about the president's federal tax avoidance that was comprehensively covered in a New York Times report.
Ostensibly brought on to discuss Tuesday night's debate between Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden, Sciutto attempted to get answers from Murtaugh to questions his colleague Poppy Harlow couldn't get a Trump White House spokesperson to answer on Monday in an equally contentious interview.