Quantcast
Connect with us

How to take down a cult leader

Published

on

- Commentary

Do you focus on shaming them for the damage they’re doing? Do you try to expose their lies and hypocrisies? Do you remind them of our common values? Do you try to prevail with your values? Do you try to prove that they’re factually incorrect? Do you curse them for being bad people?

Any of these moves could be useful for swaying onlookers to resist the cult, but that’s a different matter. The question here is how to cut them, making the cult and its leaders show blood.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not once in Trump’s entire political run has he shown blood, been left speechless, stunned, or stalled. Remember Dan Quayle’s face when Lloyd Benson told Dan Quayle, “You’re no John Kennedy”? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYAZkczhdMs)  or Reagan’s “there you go again”? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN7gDRjTNf4) Or Chris Christy’s cut of Rubio over his “25 second sound bite”? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkdpzRDxTXU) Or the classic, Joseph McCarthy cut by Joseph Welch’s “Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?”

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llS0ZkLVGA)

That’s what cutting looks like. In each case, the cut bled support. Trump has yet to be cut.

Our inability to cut Trump is his cult’s core appeal. We know that he’s a loser, but look at his track record through the eyes of someone who doesn’t follow politics, or has views so aligned with Trump’s pandering that they fall for it, or the education-deprived citizen who doesn’t have well-trained political BS detectors. From their perspectives, Trump is a winner. He hasn’t lost a single argument. At most he’s suffered a tie. He remains uncut. He swaggers away from all dust ups, never apologizing, always accusing, always playing umpire declaring himself winner, always getting the last word. That’s the essence of cult charisma: The appearance of invincibility through proud incorrigibility.

That’s what cutting looks like. In each case, the cut bled support. Trump has yet to be cut.

ADVERTISEMENT

The appearance of invincibility can be maintained on the cheap: If you never apologize, always accuse more relentlessly than your challengers, the gullible will think you’re a saint and then you can get away with anything. A cult leader needs no more strategy than that. Just run it as long as you can get away with it. So long as you are holding or gaining power, your cult members will think you’re invincible. That alone is sufficient to explain the Trump cult’s rise.

So how do you cut someone who has achieved that cult status? If their sole strategy is never apologize always out-accuse, none of the options above will work.

Do you focus on shaming them for the damage they’re doing? They’ll deflect, deny and accuse you of doing the damage. Do you try to expose their every lie and hypocrisy? They’ll deflect, deny and accuse you of lying and hypocrisy. Do you remind them of our common values? They’ll deflect, deny and accuse you of betraying common values.Do you try to trump them with your values? They’ll deflect, deny and accuse you of having bad values. Do you try to prove that they’re factually incorrect? They’ll deflect, deny and accuse you of being factually incorrect. Do you curse them for being bad people? They’ll accuse you of being upset, irrational, hurt, angry and immoral and then curse you for being bad people.

ADVERTISEMENT

It doesn’t take much imagination to predict their responses. That’s the point. Cult leaders are one-trick ponies: Never apologize, always out-accuse, get as far as you can and don’t get cut.

So how do you cut them?

ADVERTISEMENT

By exposing their one-trick: Never apologize, always accuse. Pretend to be infallible and thus become incorrigible.

How would they respond? More of the same, since it’s all they know. Their responses will confirm your accusation, so don’t let up; don’t get distracted. Control the debate and keep it focused on their one trick.

Of course, they won’t back down. They’ll just deny, deflect, never apologize, always accuse, saying in so many words, “no, you’re the one who never apologizes and always accuses.” To which you respond “there he goes again.” Over and over, never following their lead into the weeds and distractions.

ADVERTISEMENT

You’ll lose the folks who think they’re above it all, people who say all politicians are idiots since all they do is bicker. You’ll lose the nihilists too who say that everyone’s a hypocrite so the trick is just to be the more convincing hypocrite.

Still, I don’t see an alternative. Our best shot at cutting a cult leader is a relentless focus on exposing their whole MO, not pulling moral rank on it, just pointing out that that’s all they’ve got.

I’ve become a litmus-test voter for 2020. I’m looking for a candidate who can cut Trump. To his face, in his presence. So he bleeds. So people realize that their surefire winner cult leader isn’t surefire.

His opponent would have to be razor sharp – sharp-minded, sharp-tongued, sharp-witted, irreverent, entertaining, fiery enough to cut through the pileup of candidates and the endless attacks on their character to climb into a position to even get a chance to cut Trump to his face.

ADVERTISEMENT

And then, to his face, using that sharp tongue to lash him not at the minutia but the whole MO, the whole generic never-apologize, always-accuse one-trick phony cult leader strategy.

Because that’s all he’s got. And despite us scrambling to counter it in the minutia, it’s still working. His fake-infallibility run is still running strong.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Dead wrong’: House Dems release scathing rebuttal to White House’s widely panned legal brief

Published

on

The Trump White House's latest defense of the president ahead of his impending impeachment trial has been widely panned, and has even sparked speculation that Trump himself had a hand in writing it due to its low-grade legal analysis.

A legal brief filed by President Donald Trump's lawyers late last week called impeachment proceedings "constitutionally invalid," even though impeachment is literally a part of the Constitution, and also accused Democrats of engaging in a "brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election," even though Vice President Mike Pence would take over in the event that Trump was removed by the Senate.

Continue Reading

Activism

White nationalist speaker heckled for denying Holocaust at Virginia gun march: ‘You are literally a neo-Nazi’

Published

on

A white nationalist speaker who has been affiliated with neo-Nazi rhetoric was caught on video denying the Holocaust at a pro-Second Amendment march in Richmond, Virginia.

The remarks were made by former Proud Boy Jovanni Valle, who goes by the name Jovi Val. Video clips of Valle's speech were shared on Twitter by writer Robert Evans.

"You wear a swastika and walk down the street," a man can be heard telling Valle. "You took it off and now you are like, oh no. You are denying the existence of the Holocaust."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Not supposed to be that way!’ Bitter Trump whines about Senate possibly letting John Bolton testify

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Monday whined about the Senate potentially letting former national security adviser John Bolton testify during his impeachment trial.

"They didn’t want John Bolton and others in the House," the president wrote on Twitter. "They were in too much of a rush. Now they want them all in the Senate. Not supposed to be that way!"

In reality, the House impeachment investigators tried to get Bolton to testify during their inquiry, but he refused to appear unless he got legal clearance to do so. However, Bolton has now offered to testify before the Senate even though he did not comply with House requests to do the same.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image