Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump spokesman complains that impeachment doesn’t ‘put food on the table’ — after the administration moved to cut food stamps

Published

on

There’s been no shortage of hypocrisy and irony in the age of President Donald Trump, but White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley still stood out on Friday with a galling comment about impeachment to Fox News.

As usual, his defense of Trump against the charges in the Ukraine scandal was staggeringly dishonest. Gidley claimed the president “didn’t press [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky on anything other than getting to the bottom of corruption in his country” — an assertion unequivocally contradicted by the facts as confirmed by the White House itself. Rather than mentioning anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine on two separate phone calls earlier in the year, as his aides had advised him to, Trump instead pressed Zelensky to investigate his own U.S. political opponents. Trump didn’t even mention the word “corruption.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Somehow even more repugnant than this blatant lie, though, was Gidley’s attack on the Democrats’ impeachment efforts. While it’s legitimate to ask about how important impeachment should be relative to other priorities, Gidley made the jaw-dropping claim: “As you head into Christmas, and you head into the holiday season, people are going to want results from Congress. And right now, all they’re getting is hatred, vitriol, and a sham impeachment hearing that doesn’t do anything to put food on the tables of the Americans people.”

Now, the idea that a Trump spokesman would complain about others spreading “hatred, vitriol” when the president himself calls his critics “human scum” is ridiculous enough on its own. But Gidley’s claim that impeachment “doesn’t do anything to put food on the tables of the Americans people” crosses into new levels of hypocrisy in the wake of the administration’s effort to cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — what we call “food stamps” — that could affect around 700,000 families. The Guardian reported:

Hundreds of thousands of Americans who rely on the federal food stamp program will lose their benefits under a new Trump administration rule that will tighten work requirements for recipients.

The move by the administration is the latest in its attempt to scale back the social safety net for low-income Americans. It is the first of three proposed rules targeting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as Snap, to be finalized. The program feeds more than 36 million people.

The plan will limit states from exempting work-eligible adults from having to maintain steady employment in order to receive benefits.

Gidley may even have realized his grotesque error as he was speaking. In the clip, his voice briefly catches on the word “food” — perhaps realizing in the moment how colossally ironic his claim was.

Democrats have, in fact, worked to push legislation that to affect the lives of Americans — but Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell champions overseeing a “legislative graveyard” where all these efforts die. Meanwhile, the White House uses its powers to make peoples’ lives worse while claiming to defend the forgotten man and woman.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the clip below:

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Law professor slams Trump team’s ‘distortions of facts’ as they try to shoot down congressional subpoenas

Published

on

Writing for The Atlantic, University of Missouri Law professor Frank Bowman excoriated the White House legal team for their rationale against honoring congressional subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry.

"On Saturday, Trump’s lawyer Pat Philbin tried to extinguish any flickers of enlightened self-interest among Republicans by arguing that Trump was entitled to stonewall the House because the House hadn’t properly authorized its own subpoenas," wrote Bowman. "Like so many contentions of the president’s defenders, this is malarkey thinly draped with plausible-sounding distortions of facts, rules, court opinions, and the Constitution itself."

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trump’s frustrated lawyers wanted Jared and Ivanka booted from the White House: new book

Published

on

According to the new book A Very Stable Genius, members of President Trump's legal team saw Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, as "problems" during the early days of the Mueller investigation because they talked "openly" about it and made it "impossible for the White House to function in a normal way," Newsweek reports.

Some of Trump's legal team were scared to speak out, however, fearing that they'd become "roadkill" if the pair ever found out.

According to the book, key members of the legal team held a meeting on June 13, 2017, where they discussed whether or not Jared and Ivanka should remain in the White House as senior staffers.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump has been mysteriously ignoring Melania’s initiatives in his major speeches: report

Published

on

According to a report on Politico, an analysis of Donald Trump's State of the Union addresses shows that the president has neglected to boost his wife's most notable achievement in her three years as first lady -- apparently at the urging of aides who feel it is best not to bring it up.

Traditionally, first ladies take on a cause after settling in and Melania Trump has been no different, launching her "Be Best" campaign aimed at halting online bullying. However, that campaign has been ignored by the president in all of his major speeches where he has touted his administration's accomplishments.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image