CNN host Fredricka Whitfield did battle with President Donald Trump’s official apologist on the network, Jim Schultz.
Schultz quoted Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who said that if Democrats want witnesses, then all witnesses should be available to be called. The problem is that Republicans want to call people that weren’t even involved in Trump’s obstructions of Congress. Republicans want to call Vice President Joe Biden and his son, there are likely some Republicans who want to call Hillary Clinton to talk about Benghazi again, and they’ll likely search for reasons they can randomly call Democratic officials in Congress, who also had nothing to do with Trump’s actions.
“Well, even Adam Schiff, right, how did this investigation begin? How credible was this investigation? All of those things factor into relevancy because it goes to the credibility of the investigation,” Schultz claimed.
Republicans have wanted the whistleblower to appear so that they can legally out him and attack his life and his family. Generally, in a court, a witness is not on trial. An example some legal scholars have used is that when a person calls the fire department to report a fire, they are generally not attacked in an arson investigation for making the call to authorities.
Whitfield asked if it was even realistic to propose something like that, which Schultz conceded didn’t appear likely.
Schultz then tried Trump’s talking point that Democrats couldn’t first-hand witnesses and documents for their trial. The reason, of course, is that the president is obstructing Congress. By attacking Democrats for not having the witnesses and documents, Republicans are admitting that the president is obstructing the proceeding.
“But they are claiming obstruction of Congress, which means the White House barred people who were being subpoenaed to show up or documents that were subpoenaed from being handed over. So, hence, the Article of Obstruction of Congress,” Whitfield hit back.
“That’s a made-up crime, quite frankly,” said Schultz.
“That is what happened, though, right? One of them did stop testimony from people who were subpoenaed?” Whitfield hit back.
Schultz floundered from there.
Watch the full video below:
Here’s all the evidence you need that the tax code wasn’t written for you
The New York Times reported that Trump only paid $750 in taxes in 2016 and again in 2017, and documented how much of his lavish lifestyle he could write off. I have no proof that this travesty is actually true. But there is plenty of evidence that his tax code is definitely not written for you, the average reader. It’s designed to do exactly what The New York Times is reporting.
You’ve probably read stories about how Warren Buffett realized his secretary was paying more in taxes than he was. Well, it’s hardly an isolated tale.
How low will Trump go?: Jake Tapper wonders how Joe Biden will escape Trump’s bad behavior
CNN host Jake Tapper noted that for "months and months" President Donald Trump's team has been diligently working to set the bar so low for Vice President Joe Biden that they're finally realizing their horrific mistake.
With the expectations that Biden is mentally unfit, suffering from dementia, or being controlled by "people in dark shadows," Biden has a strong chance of out-performing President Donald Trump, who puts himself on an untouchable pillar of "stable genius."
Trump spokesperson resorts to insulting CNN host in off-the-rails interview over president’s tax scandal
A CNN interview with Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh quickly turned into a shouting match after host Jim Sciutto peppered him with questions about the president's federal tax avoidance that was comprehensively covered in a New York Times report.
Ostensibly brought on to discuss Tuesday night's debate between Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden, Sciutto attempted to get answers from Murtaugh to questions his colleague Poppy Harlow couldn't get a Trump White House spokesperson to answer on Monday in an equally contentious interview.