Quantcast
Connect with us

In extradition bid, US accuses Assange of endangering sources

Published

on

A lawyer for the United States on Monday accused WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of risking the lives of intelligence sources by publishing classified US government documents, as his extradition hearing opened in a London court.

Assange faces charges under the US Espionage Act for the 2010 release by his whistleblowing website of a trove of files detailing the realities of US military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.

ADVERTISEMENT

Assange spent much of the past decade holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy to avoid separate legal proceedings in Sweden, but Washington is now seeking his transfer from Britain to stand trial.

Making the US government case on the first day of the extradition hearing in London, lawyer James Lewis denied the prosecution was motivated by embarrassment over the WikiLeaks release.

“It is solely where risk of harm is caused,” he told Woolwich Crown Court as Assange, who is being held in the high security Belmarsh prison next door, listened attentively in the dock.

“The United States is aware of sources whose unredacted names and /or other identifying information was contained in classified documents published by Wikileaks who subsequently disappeared.”

– ‘Journalist activities’ –

ADVERTISEMENT

WikiLeaks initially worked with a string of high-profile newspapers to publish details from the leaked State Department and Pentagon files, which caused a sensation — and outrage in Washington.

One video from 2007 showed an Apache helicopter attack in which US soldiers gunned down two Reuters reporters and nine Iraqi civilians in broad daylight in Baghdad.

But after falling out with their editors, WikiLeaks released hundreds of thousands of documents in their original form — including the secret identities of diplomats and local sources.

ADVERTISEMENT

AFP / DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS Nina from Amsterdam, a supporter of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, joins pro-Assange protest outside Woolwich Crown Court in southeast London for the opening of the full hearing into a US request for Assange’s extradition.

Assange and his supporters claim the prosecution is politically motivated, and the case has alarmed free speech advocates.

The Australian’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, told the court that the details in the US indictment were “misleading” and insisted his client was undertaking “journalist activities”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We do not accept that this constitutes an extradition crime,” he said.

Protesters gathered outside court holding up banners saying “Free Assange”.

The Committee to Protect Journalists has previously warned that “for the sake of press freedom, Julian Assange must be defended”.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Lewis, for the US government, told the court, “Julian Assange is no journalist.

“It is inconceivable that any member of the press would disclose any of the names of their sources.”

– Years of legal battles –

AFP / Sophie RAMIS Julian Assange

Assange, 48, could be jailed for 175 years if convicted on all 17 Espionage Act charges and one count of computer hacking he faces.

It is the most serious phase of a long-running legal saga that has seen him detained in some form for most of the last decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2010, Assange was accused of sexual assault and rape in Sweden and after a legal battle, was ordered by a British judge to be extradited there.

He always denied the Swedish allegations and the investigation has since been dropped.

To avoid extradition, he claimed asylum in Ecuador’s London embassy, where he spent seven years until Quito gave him up last year following a change in government.

He has since served a jail term for breaching his UK police bail but remains in Belmarsh prison awaiting the US extradition case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some US legal experts think Assange has a case.

“Use of the Espionage Act has a very checkered history in the century since Congress passed it,” University of Richmond law professor Carl Tobias told AFP.

Many think “extradition and US prosecution would have a chilling effect on press efforts to expose government information that is important to the public interest.”

Assange’s father John Shipton, who attended the hearing with Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton, decried the “ceaseless malice” of the authorities against his son.

“We’re all here to vigorously and firmly support Julian in this 10-year long oppression and political action,” he told reporters.

ADVERTISEMENT

– Trump claim –

In a new twist last week, Assange’s defence team claimed US President Donald Trump promised to issue a pardon if Assange denied Russia leaked the emails of his 2016 election rival’s campaign.

“In August 2017, Donald Trump’s administration tried to pressure Julian Assange into saying things that would be favourable to President Trump himself,” defence coordinator Baltasar Garzon said.

“When Julian Assange refused, he was charged and an extradition request was issued alongside an international arrest warrant.”

The White House called the allegation “another never-ending hoax and total lie” but a judge agreed to add it to the case file.

ADVERTISEMENT

First Image: John Shipton (R), father of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and Gabriel Shipton (L), Assange’s brother, arrive at Woolwich Crown Court in southeast London for the opening of the full hearing into the US request for Assange’s extradition. AFP / DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump ignored advice to tell country the coronavirus pandemic was ‘bad and could get very worse’ in early March: report

Published

on

According to a day-by-day examination of the White House efforts to get up to speed on dealing with the growing coronavirus pandemic that has now brought the country to an almost complete standstill, Politico reports that Donald Trump was advised in early March to warn the public things were about to get worse and chose to ignore that advice.

The report notes that the final realization about the dangerous spread of COVID-19 preceded the president's rare prime time address to the nation.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Why the novel coronavirus became a social media nightmare

Published

on

The biggest reputational risk Facebook and other social media companies had expected in 2020 was fake news surrounding the US presidential election. Be it foreign or domestic in origin, the misinformation threat seemed familiar, perhaps even manageable.

The novel coronavirus, however, has opened up an entirely different problem: the life-endangering consequences of supposed cures, misleading claims, snake-oil sales pitches and conspiracy theories about the outbreak.

So far, AFP has debunked almost 200 rumors and myths about the virus, but experts say stronger action from tech companies is needed to stop misinformation and the scale at which it can be spread online.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Hospitals turn to snorkel masks to ease respirator overload

Published

on

As hospitals face an overload of COVID-19 patients struggling to breathe, innovative medical staff are turning to snorkeling masks from sports stores to stop their lungs collapsing.

The idea started in Italy, the European country worst-hit by the coronavirus pandemic, with hospitals in other nations taking note and adding their own specific medical parts to make it work.

One such is the Erasme Hospital on the outskirts of Belgium's capital Brussels. It is attached to the city's ULB university -- and through it to a private spin-off, Endo Tools Therapeutics, whose know-how in 3D printing for medical use has proved invaluable.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image