Conservative CNN contributor Ben Ferguson suggested on Thursday that Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg’s “masculinity” was inferior to that of President Donald Trump.
After Rush Limbaugh recently attacked Buttigieg’s sexual orientation on his radio show, Ferguson appeared on CNN to defend the right-wing radio host.
“I don’t think it matters that he’s gay,” Ferguson said of Buttigieg. “I think that the thing that you are talking about here is two different issues. One, is anyone going to look masculine next to Donald Trump on stage? I think the only Democrat would be Joe Biden.”
“Do I think it should matter on the issue of his sexuality? No,” he continued. “Does it matter that he is an openly gay man? There was a surprising number of Democratic voters [on my radio show] that said that it was an issue for them.”
Ferguson, however, once again insisted that he had “no problem with him being a gay man.”
“There are Democrats sitting there worried that this is going to be a bigger issue,” he insisted.
CNN host Jim Sciutto took issue with Ferguson’s premise.
“What’s more manly? Volunteering for military service as Pete Buttigieg did or avoiding it?” Sciutto asked.
Ferguson seemed caught off guard.
“I’m talking about appearance,” he explained.
“What about the substance?” the CNN host interrupted. “You said the president appears more manly for I don’t know what reason — I’m citing an issue of the record here. Buttigieg volunteered for military service, the president took great pains to avoid it. I’m talking about the substance. Which is more manly?”
For his part, Ferguson declined to say that Buttigieg was “more manly” because he had volunteered to serve.
“If you asked 100 Democratic voters which candidate looked more masculine, Joe Biden or Mayor Pete…” Ferguson opined as he was interrupted by CNN co-host Poppy Harlow.
“Ben, I don’t understand in what world is the definition of the qualification for being president of the United States how manly someone appears?” Harlow wondered.
“I did not say it was a qualification,” Ferguson stuttered in response. “When you put two different candidates on stage and there are people that make millions of dollars on both sides of the aisle that talk about what you wear for goodness sakes — men and women — what you say.”
“We don’t,” Harlow shot back.
“It seems to me you’re justifying bigotry,” Sciutto told Ferguson.
“Not at all,” the conservative pundit replied.
“Are you not?” the CNN host pressed. “Because here’s the thing, consultants might have said it’s a negative to be a person of color, you might have heard that. This is the year 2020. I’m just curious what you’re justifying here.”
Watch the video below from CNN.
WATCH: Trump supporter short circuits after CNN proves that he got fooled by a doctored Biden video
A supporter of President Donald Trump on Friday found himself befuddled after a CNN reporter proved to him that he had been fooled by a doctored video of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
During an interview with CNN's Donie O'Sullivan, the Trump supporter claimed that he'd seen a video of Biden falling asleep in the middle of a television news interview.
However, as O'Sullivan showed him, that video had been completely doctored by splicing footage of Biden at a time when he happened to have his eyes closed into a local TV news interview of another guest who had fallen asleep on the set.
WATCH: Trump’s chief of staff starts shouting when grilled about president’s refusal to accept election results
On Thursday, CNN's Wolf Blitzer pressed White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows about President Donald Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transition of power after the election, and became visibly agitated and raised his voice under questioning.
"He said he's not sure the election could be honest here in the United States," said Blitzer. "Is he saying if he wins, he'll accept the results, if he loses, he won't commit to a peaceful transition?"
"I haven't heard him say that," said Meadows. "I can tell you what I have heard him say, Wolf, is really overwhelming concern about mail-in ballots ... we're seeing some activist judges across the country interpret the law that really is not on the books. They're actually making the law. I think that's what most of this is about, making sure that as long as it's free and fair. If it's free and fair, we'll accept the will of the American people. We believe that will be the re-election of Donald Trump."
Trump apologist thinks president made ‘huge mistake’ by admitting he won’t peacefully give up power
A conservative who usually defends President Donald Trump admitted to CNN on Thursday that the president made a "huge mistake" when he refused to commit to having a peaceful transfer of power should he lose the 2020 election.
During a panel discussion on the president's latest controversial remarks about the upcoming election, liberal guest Bakari Sellers argued that Americans should be "very terrified" about Trump implicitly encouraging violence in the event that he loses.