Quantcast
Connect with us

Sean Hannity has consistently lied to viewers about public health and needs to be fired: Columnist

Published

on

Fox News' Sean Hannity. Image via screengrab.

On Monday, writing for the Washington Post, media critic Erik Wemple laid out the case for why Sean Hannity must be fired by Fox News.

As Wemple noted, the network has just terminated Fox Business pundit Trish Regan, just after her “Coronavirus Impeachment Hoax” stunt — but Hannity has done far worse than that, repeatedly, and not been held to account for it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“On Friday afternoon of last week, Fox disclosed that the network had ‘parted ways’ with Regan. There was no good explanation. ‘[W]e thank her for her contributions to the network over the years and wish her continued success in her future endeavors,'” wrote Wemple. “Those hollow words come in lieu of any Fox reckoning with some of the coronavirus programming that has come from its opinion hosts. In particular, franchise prime-timer Sean Hannity.”

Wemple laid out Hannity and Regan’s commentary side by side, and pointed out they had said almost the same thing: “Hannity, Feb. 27: ‘They’re now sadly politicizing and actually weaponizing an infectious disease, in what is basically just the latest effort to bludgeon President Trump.’ Regan, March 9: ‘Many in the liberal media using, and I mean using, coronavirus in an attempt to demonize and destroy the president.'”

In late February, Wemple noted, the rest of the media was documenting the exponential growth of the virus and the United States’ lack of preparedness in testing. “It was right in the midst of this bad-news plume that Hannity offered his ill-informed takes on the virus — just as the president was coming under attack and needed someone on cable news to defend him. On Feb. 26, Hannity blasted Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) for using ‘coronavirus to bludgeon President Trump, not telling the truth as usual — shameless politicizing of health and the well-being of Americans.’ The next night, he kept it up. Only after a backlash managed to place him within roaming distance of reality did he begin to change his tone.”

Wemple also noted that other sources have reported Regan had displayed insubordination and violations of journalistic ethics, which was also a factor in her dismissal. But Hannity, too, has a long and ugly track record.

“As reported in this blog, he once earned a public rebuke from the network for participating in a video promotion for Trump’s 2016 campaign,” wrote Wemple. “He earned another public rebuke when he appeared onstage with Trump at a 2018 rally, at which he called assembled media ‘fake news’ even though staffers from his own network were in attendance. He attacked his own network’s polling, even though that unit at Fox News is widely respected. He has cited bogus polling in defiance of news-side standards. He has used the same lawyer — Michael Cohen, now serving a federal prison sentence — as Trump. And who could forget the Seth Rich episode?”

ADVERTISEMENT

The only real difference, Wemple concluded, was that Hannity enjoys much higher ratings. But the fact that his misinformation reaches more people ought to be even more damning for him.

“In a column last week, Ben Smith of The New York Times placed the responsibility for this mess precisely where it belongs — in the inboxes of Fox Corp,” wrote Wemple. “CEO Lachlan Murdoch and Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott. Opinionators like Hannity, argued Smith, respond to cues from the boss in the White House, not to their ‘nominal bosses’ in the company. That those ‘nominal bosses’ moved to ‘part ways’ with Trish Regan while leaving Hannity unscathed only fortifies Smith’s argument. It’s time. Hannity must go.”

You can read more here.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Maddow reveals how one state stood up to Trump’s USPS cuts — and won

Published

on

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow's opening segment on Friday focused on a positive story of political pressure stopping one of the Trump administration's attacks on the U.S. Postal Service.

Maddow reported how NBC Montana reporter Maritsa Georgiou had doggedly reported on the removal of postal boxes in Missoula, where she is based. Missoula has been a long-time Democratic Party stronghold.

Montana has a competitive U.S. Senate election in 2020, with Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock challenging first-term Republican Sen. Steve Daines.

As Georgiou chased the story, she learned there were also plans to remove boxes in the battleground of Billings. And more planned for the blue town of Bozeman. And other towns.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Pepsi joins the chorus of people dunking on Tucker Carlson over Kamala Harris

Published

on

The Pepsi soda company mocked Fox News personality Tucker Carlson on Friday evening.

On Tuesday, Carlson flipped out after a guest attempted to teach him how to pronounce the name of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who is running for vice president on Joe Biden's ticket.

Video of the exchange was posted on Twitter by Nikki McCann Ramirez, a researcher at the watchdog group Media Matters for America.

Tucker Carlson loses it when a guest corrects his pronunciation of Kamala Harris's name pic.twitter.com/1fHIrPGuwN

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Chad Wolf’s authority is ‘illegitimate’: Hispanic Caucus chairman demands DHS chief ‘resign in disgrace’

Published

on

Immigrant rights groups and Texas Democrats are urging a review on the legality of Trump administration immigration policies after a government watchdog found two of the White House’s top immigration officials are not legally eligible to serve in their respective positions.

The Government Accountability Office on Friday determined that Chad Wolf, acting Department of Homeland Security secretary, and Ken Cuccinelli, a senior official performing deputy secretary duties, aren’t legally qualified to hold those posts.

United We Dream, an advocacy group pushing for immigration reform, said the GAO’s conclusion calls into question the latest guidance from the DHS on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program that was initiated in 2012.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image