Quantcast
Connect with us

Former US attorney questions whether the judicial system can survive Trump rewriting the Flynn case

Published

on

Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade is concerned about whether the judicial system in the United States can handle President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr’s attempt to rewrite the Michael Flynn case.

Writing for USAToday, McQuade explained the case against Flynn has suddenly become part of a “deep state conspiracy” because Trump and his supporters believe that the FBI forced Flynn to lie to them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ordinarily, when a prosecutor seeks to drop a case, the motion to dismiss is unopposed and the judge grants the motion without a hearing,” wrote McQuade. “Perhaps that’s what Attorney General William Barr was counting on. In Flynn’s case, though, a series of unusual facts have sparked a different response from Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. As a result, we are about to see whether our independent judiciary can withstand the dark arts of the Trump administration.”

It was under special counsel Robert Mueller that Flynn was charged for lying to the FBI about his conversation with the Russian ambassador. The conversation between the two was monitored by the intelligence committee, so they knew what was said. Flynn still lied, and it’s still not clear why.

“This is not the first time Barr has taken action to unwind Mueller’s work,” said McQuade. “DOJ dismissed charges against two Russian shell companies indicted for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 election. Barr also overruled career prosecutors in their sentencing recommendation of Trump associate Roger Stone to advocate for a more lenient punishment. Now, despite Flynn’s guilty plea, Barr seeks to dismiss the case against him altogether.”

But instead of granting the motion from the DOJ, Judge Sullivan paused and appointed an “amicus curiae”, a friend of the court, in this case a retired judge tasked with trying to make sense of the DOJ’s new move.

“Sullivan has also indicated that he plans to issue an order permitting outside interested parties to weigh in with amicus briefs,” she explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

The motion to dismiss from the DOJ doesn’t argue that Flynn didn’t lie to the FBI, rather it argues that his lies didn’t matter because the FBI didn’t have any jurisdiction over the case for which Mueller hadn’t yet been appointed.

“This is where the logic starts to contort,” McQuade wrote. “DOJ argues that the lies cannot be material because the investigation was not properly predicated, that is, based on facts to support a crime or national security threat. And so, without a legitimate investigation, the argument goes, no lie arising under the investigation could ever be material. Poof! No materiality, no crime, and the case must be dismissed. This argument contradicts the conclusion of DOJ’s Inspector General, who found that the Flynn investigation was, in fact, properly predicated.”

She went on to call the logic twisted and a “short-sighted strategy” from Barr that may help Flynn but would have a huge impact on the ability of law enforcement to do their jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, it has become clear that Trump is using the Office of the President to reward his friends, she said. Sullivan could use his position to deny the motion from the DOJ, which would likely end up in a lengthy court battle, or Sullivan could find Flynn committed perjury when he gave conflicting accounts of lying to the FBI.

“Sadly, DOJ has made it necessary to bring in outside advocates to protect the judiciary from being seen as aiding and abetting corruption. But we can be grateful for an independent judge who will not allow himself to be fooled by smoke and mirrors,” McQuade closed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Read the full editorial at USAToday.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

How Rudy Giuliani went from ‘America’s mayor’ to self-serving Trump sycophant

Published

on

After the al-Qaeda terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Republican Rudy Giuliani was widely praised for the leadership he showed as New York City’s mayor during one of the darkest times in the city’s history. But these days, many of the people who were praising Giuliani as a take-charge leader after 9/11 have become blistering critics — for example, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough. And journalist Seth Hettena, in Rolling Stone, takes an in-depth look at Giuliani’s journey from “America’s mayor” to self-serving Trump sycophant.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Pompeo is helping Trump destroy US credibility around the world — according to a former assistant secretary of state

Published

on

President Donald Trump has made it abundantly clear that he prefers loyalists in his administration. And Trump has no greater loyalist than Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, whose unquestioning devotion to the president is the focus of a scathing op-ed by Michael H. Fuchs (former deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs) for The Guardian.

“Donald Trump’s disdain for the people, country and values his office is supposed to represent is unmatched in recent memory,” Fuchs asserts. “And he has found in the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, a kindred spirit who has embraced his role as Trumpism’s number one proselytizer to the world.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump ‘completely blindsided party officials’ by threatening to pull GOP convention out of Charlotte

Published

on

This Memorial Day, President Trump took aim at North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper and threatened to pull the Republican National Convention out of Charlotte, saying that Cooper couldn't guarantee that the venue would be filled to capacity.

In a series of tweets, Trump said that although he loves the state of North Carolina so much that he "insisted" on having the convention there.

"Unfortunately, Democrat Governor, @RoyCooperNC is still in Shutdown mood & unable to guarantee that by August we will be allowed full attendance in the Arena," he wrote. "In other words, we would be spending millions of dollars building the Arena to a very high standard without even knowing if the Democrat Governor would allow the Republican Party to fully occupy the space."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image