Quantcast
Connect with us

Former US attorney questions whether the judicial system can survive Trump rewriting the Flynn case

Published

on

Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade is concerned about whether the judicial system in the United States can handle President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr’s attempt to rewrite the Michael Flynn case.

Writing for USAToday, McQuade explained the case against Flynn has suddenly become part of a “deep state conspiracy” because Trump and his supporters believe that the FBI forced Flynn to lie to them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ordinarily, when a prosecutor seeks to drop a case, the motion to dismiss is unopposed and the judge grants the motion without a hearing,” wrote McQuade. “Perhaps that’s what Attorney General William Barr was counting on. In Flynn’s case, though, a series of unusual facts have sparked a different response from Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. As a result, we are about to see whether our independent judiciary can withstand the dark arts of the Trump administration.”

It was under special counsel Robert Mueller that Flynn was charged for lying to the FBI about his conversation with the Russian ambassador. The conversation between the two was monitored by the intelligence committee, so they knew what was said. Flynn still lied, and it’s still not clear why.

“This is not the first time Barr has taken action to unwind Mueller’s work,” said McQuade. “DOJ dismissed charges against two Russian shell companies indicted for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 election. Barr also overruled career prosecutors in their sentencing recommendation of Trump associate Roger Stone to advocate for a more lenient punishment. Now, despite Flynn’s guilty plea, Barr seeks to dismiss the case against him altogether.”

But instead of granting the motion from the DOJ, Judge Sullivan paused and appointed an “amicus curiae”, a friend of the court, in this case a retired judge tasked with trying to make sense of the DOJ’s new move.

“Sullivan has also indicated that he plans to issue an order permitting outside interested parties to weigh in with amicus briefs,” she explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

The motion to dismiss from the DOJ doesn’t argue that Flynn didn’t lie to the FBI, rather it argues that his lies didn’t matter because the FBI didn’t have any jurisdiction over the case for which Mueller hadn’t yet been appointed.

“This is where the logic starts to contort,” McQuade wrote. “DOJ argues that the lies cannot be material because the investigation was not properly predicated, that is, based on facts to support a crime or national security threat. And so, without a legitimate investigation, the argument goes, no lie arising under the investigation could ever be material. Poof! No materiality, no crime, and the case must be dismissed. This argument contradicts the conclusion of DOJ’s Inspector General, who found that the Flynn investigation was, in fact, properly predicated.”

She went on to call the logic twisted and a “short-sighted strategy” from Barr that may help Flynn but would have a huge impact on the ability of law enforcement to do their jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, it has become clear that Trump is using the Office of the President to reward his friends, she said. Sullivan could use his position to deny the motion from the DOJ, which would likely end up in a lengthy court battle, or Sullivan could find Flynn committed perjury when he gave conflicting accounts of lying to the FBI.

“Sadly, DOJ has made it necessary to bring in outside advocates to protect the judiciary from being seen as aiding and abetting corruption. But we can be grateful for an independent judge who will not allow himself to be fooled by smoke and mirrors,” McQuade closed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Read the full editorial at USAToday.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

White House decided to violate social distancing guidelines for journalists because it ‘looks better’: reporters

Published

on

President Donald Trump held a press briefing in the White House Rose Garden on Friday — and according to an official statement from the White House Correspondents Association, the event was inconsistent with the administration’s own social distancing guidelines.

WHCA President Jonathan Karl explained: “Today, the White House press office positioned seating for the president’s Rose Garden’ ‘news conference’ in a way that violated the federal government’s guidelines on social distancing and needlessly put reporters’ health at risk.”

WHCA statement on today’s press conference—at which Trump took no questions—where seats were initially placed far apart but were moved closer together before the event started. The press office told WHCA that decision was made because "it looks better.” pic.twitter.com/KEXbHxfLh5

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump supporters desperately grasp at a new ‘gotcha’ to discredit a national social justice uprising

Published

on

Unable to defend the extrajudicial killing of black people by the police or the viciousness of police assaults on peaceful protesters, conservatives are grasping desperately at a new gotcha to discredit the recent national uprisings: Liberals are a bunch of hypocrites. This time, however, it's got a coronavirus twist, as progressives are being accused of hypocrisy for supporting the protests while allegedly opposing all other social gatherings in the name of "public health."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

One out of three Americans used bleach ‘in non recommended high-risk practices’ to battle coronavirus: CDC report

Published

on

One third of Americans used bleach or other household disinfectants "in non-recommended high risk practices" in attempts to reduce the spread of the deadly coronavirus, a new CDC survey finds.

Among the non-recommended practices were using “bleach on food products, applying household cleaning and disinfectant products to skin, and inhaling or ingesting cleaners and disinfectants,” the CDC says, as The Daily Beast reports.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image