Quantcast
Connect with us

Is Bill Barr trying to rewrite the conclusions of the Mueller report?

Published

on

Attorney General William Barr held a series of previously unreported meetings last spring with the prosecutor he tapped to review former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Department of Justice records obtained by watchdog group American Oversight and shared with CNN show that Barr met with U.S. Attorney John “Bull” Durham at least six times over a span of ten weeks, including during the black-box gap after Mueller filed his report and before Barr released it to the American public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Though Barr made his misgivings about the investigation clear even before he was nominated by President Donald Trump to replace Jeff Sessions, the documents could shine additional light on the scope and goals of Durham’s assignment, which remained murky until now.

One key difference between Mueller and Durham is that the scope of the former special counsel’s probe was shared with the public in an authorization memo from then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Mueller’s progress was regularly documented thereafter in financial expenditures and court filings.

Barr, however, has never published the guidelines for Durham’s investigation. With perhaps one exception last fall, when the department declared that Durham’s probe had at some point evolved into a criminal investigation, Barr has refused to disclose costs and other specifics of the probe itself.

That shadow now covers the Mueller investigation. Barr has continued to refuse to declassify redacted portions of the report, such as grand jury information, even to Congress. Though an appeals court ordered the Justice Department to turn over the secret grand jury evidence to the House of Representatives in March, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked that from taking effect order this week.

The first Barr-Durham meeting took place at a highly-sensitive and highly-consequential time — in the four days between when Mueller submitted his final report and Barr released a misleading summary about its findings. The move led Mueller to write a “scathing” letter to Barr, which accused him of misrepresenting his work.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the afternoon that Barr received the final report, he and advisers from the department’s management division met with Durham. Though the obtained records do not indicate what was discussed, the management division addresses logistics and funding, which suggests the crew was discussing resources.

“It seems likely that they were discussing a review of the Russia investigation, but I could only speculate as to what they were discussing, and I’m not sure there’s anything wrong with such discussions,” former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade told Salon.

Though it might be normal for an attorney general to meet with advisers, the timing is another matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rosenstein, who oversaw Mueller, did not attend the meetings, meaning Barr left out the official most familiar with the Russia probe. (American Oversight requested communications between Rosenstein and Durham, though none came back.)

Barr and Trump have since used the shrouded Durham probe to throw doubt on the propriety of the Mueller investigation and its conclusions. Trump has falsely crowed  that the report was a “Complete and Total EXONERATION!” Mueller, in fact, identified at least ten instances of possible obstruction by the president in his report.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barr told Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., that he believed government agents had been “spying” on Trump’s campaign during an April 2019 Senate hearing. That vow to look into the allegations as much as anything seems to have set the foundation for what the president now calls “Obamagate,” a baseless conspiracy Trump himself cannot define or explain.

Durham’s work has increased in profile since Barr called to drop the case against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn.

U.S. attorneys typically come to Washington every six weeks or so, and they typically meet with the attorney general, a senior Justice Department official told Salon, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal.

ADVERTISEMENT

But when U.S. attorneys descended on the capital in 2019 for their annual meeting with the attorney general, Barr only held one event, open to the media, where he played the bagpipes.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Former pal Piers Morgan blisters Trump for ‘hiding in his bunker’ as America burns

Published

on

British presenter Piers Morgan criticized President Donald Trump for "hiding in his bunker" instead of leading America out of a dark period in its history.

In an op-ed for The Daily Mail, Morgan addressed the police killing of George Floyd and the protests that followed.

"I understand the rage of the protesters," Morgan wrote. "Yet the one person who could most powerfully effect change is doing the complete opposite."

The op-ed continued:

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘We are leaderless right now!’ Trump supporters despair that he’s doing nothing as riots erupt across America

Published

on

Several supporters of President Donald Trump are very upset that he is not doing enough to crack down on the violence that has swept the country ever since the killing of George Floyd last week.

As reported by the conservative Daily Wire, many conservatives who have otherwise been supportive of Trump are growing exasperated that he spent the weekend hunkered down in the White House and only sending the occasional angry tweet.

"Does Trump have dementia or something?" asked pro-Trump political pundit Mike Cernovitch. "Because sitting on his fat ass right now isn't the right move."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Desperate and ‘out-of-control’ Trump might prompt violent insurrection to stay in office: columnist

Published

on

Writing for the Daily Beast, columnist Michael Tomasky made a strong case that Donald Trump has removed any doubt that he is "morally unfit" to be president and, faced with the possibility he may not be re-elected, could resort to encouraging his followers to take up arms in his defense.

"Naively, I always thought that even Donald Trump would stop short of actually inciting violence. I mean, he’s the president of the United States," Tomasky began before adding, "History means nothing to him, and the future means even less. Presidents—all presidents, even ones I didn’t like—think about the office, the future implications of their actions, the future of our institutions."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image