Quantcast
Connect with us

Good riddance to very bad rubbish: Here are 5 of the ugliest moments in the Steve King Hall of Shame

Published

on

- Commentary

On, Tuesday, June 2, there was a major bombshell in Iowa politics: far-right Rep. Steve King, in Iowa’s 4th Congressional District, lost a GOP primary battle to Iowa State Sen. Randy Feenstra. It remains to be seen whether a Republican or a Democrat will win that seat in November, but one thing is for sure: it won’t be King, whose history of racism, homophobia and religious extremism is so disturbing that even GOP voters in a conservative district in Iowa finally rejected him.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 71-year-old King has been a fixture in Iowa politics, serving in the Iowa Senate in the late 1990s and early 2000s before first being elected to a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2002. King was reelected time and time again, but this week, even white GOP voters finally had enough of him.

Here are 5 of the most appalling moments in the Steve King Hall of Shame.

1. King defended white nationalism

In a January 2019 interview with the New York Times, King asserted, “White nationalist, white supremacist, western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” King, during that interview, made it clear that he didn’t consider white nationalism a bad thing. Moreover, he slammed the Democratic Party for its diversity, saying, “You could look over there and think the Democratic Party is no country for white men.”

2. King equated Mexican immigrants with drug traffickers

ADVERTISEMENT

King has often failed to make a distinction between legal and undocumented immigrants from Mexico. In a July 2013 interview with Newsmax, the congressman said of Mexican immigrants, “For every one who’s a valedictorian, there’s another 100 out there who weigh 130 pounds — and they’ve got calves the size of cantaloupes because they’re hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert.” The comments were so offensive that even then-House Speaker John Boehner and then-House Majority Leader Eric Cantor called him out. Cantor denounced King’s comments as “inexcusable,” Boehner as “hateful” and “ignorant.”

3. King described Mexican immigrants as ‘dirt’

Democrats enjoyed a net gain of 40 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2018 midterms, achieving a House majority and providing some desperately needed checks and balances against Donald Trump’s presidency. But King, sadly, was reelected that year despite describing Mexican immigrants as “dirt” on a campaign stop. When the conservative Weekly Standard reported what he said, King denied saying it — and the now-defunct Standard responded by post an audio recording showing that, in fact, he did.

ADVERTISEMENT

4. King equated Barack Obama with radical Islam

It was under President Barack Obama’s watch that one of the world’s most vile and evil terrorists, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden — the mastermind of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks — was killed by U.S. forces. Obama gave the order that gave the green light for the May 2011 raid in which bin Laden was killed in Pakistan. Regardless, King equated Obama with radical Islam and jihadism; never mind the fact that Obama repeatedly make a clear distinction between extremists like al-Qaeda and ISIS (Islamic State, Iraq and Syria) and mainstream non-violent Islam and viewed al-Qaeda as a disgrace to Islam.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2008, during Obama’s first presidential campaign, King told KICD Radio, “When you think about the optics of a Barack Obama potentially getting elected president of the United States — I mean, what does this look like to the rest of the world? What does it look like to the world of Islam? I will tell you that, if he is elected president, then the radical Islamists, the al-Qaeda, the radical Islamists and their supporters, will be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on September 11.”

Actually, Obama scared the hell out of jihadists. When an African-American man is president of the United States and draws a clear distinction between honorable Muslims and murderous extremists, that is the last thing that jihadists want to see.

5. King accused Obama of favoring blacks over whites

ADVERTISEMENT

Although Obama has a populist rhetorical style that draws heavily on the tradition of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the African-American church, he was quite centrist during his eight years as president. Many liberals and progressives wished that had been more left-of-center in his policies. Regardless, King viewed Obama (whose mother was white) as a militant black nationalist — which is quite laughable to the millions of African-Americans who would see a huge difference between an Obama speech and a speech by Minister Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.

Anyone who went to a heavily African-American area in the United States — North Philly, South-Central Los Angeles, the West Side of Chicago, wherever — and insisted that Obama and Farrakhan were identical in their views would be laughed out of the area. But when King appeared on G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show in 2010, King insisted, “The president has demonstrated that he has a default mechanism in him that breaks down the side of race — on the side that favors the black person.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace chuckles after Times reporter explains why Trump has no hope of pivoting to an empathetic campaign

Published

on

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace struggled to stifle a chuckle in a conversation about President Donald Trump's struggle to run a campaign that can contend with most Americans' needs in a horrific pandemic.

"I think to Nick [Confessore's] point earlier, there should be a sense of nervousness in Trump's camp," began Democratic strategist Basil Smikle. "You don't see -- you talked about enablers. You don't see Republicans engaged in their behavior with respect to the president at this juncture. You're starting to see them not nationalize he's the president of the United States. They should be more allied with him, but instead, they're focused on local campaigns. The president has lost several cases at the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act case notwithstanding. There's a lot of things they should be rallying around, but they can't."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here’s how bad things are for Trump after the Supreme Court ruling: columnist

Published

on

In a piece for Vanity Fair, columnist Eric Lutz addressed the degree to which President Donald Trump is in trouble after the ruling by the Supreme Court on his financial records.

Trump has spent the better part of four years fighting any transparency about his finances and taxes, which many have suspected might reveal illegal activity.

"He's not going to release his tax returns," said senior adviser Kellyanne Conway in 2017. "We litigated this all through the election. People didn't care."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump gets advice from golfing buddies and right-wing Twitter as America faces a ‘crisis of truth’: op-ed

Published

on

Writing in the Washington Post this Thursday, columnist Michael Gerson contends that President Trump is running the country through the prism of the "right-wing information bubble."

"Trump is not only using this right-wing information bubble to exploit his supporters," Gerson writes. "He also seems, increasingly, to have taken up residence there. As his failures have multiplied, his hold on political reality has loosened. Trump has become our boy in the bubble, with an intellectual immune system too weak for him to survive exposure to reality."

All sources of dissent and critical thinking have been removed systematically removed from his administration -- — posts formerly held by Rex Tillerson, James Mattis and Dan Coats, have now been replaced by sycophants, according to Gerson.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image