Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Want to know what a worker’s life is worth in America?’ Trump’s OSHA fines meat company just $13,494 for infecting 1,294 employees with COVID-19

Published

on

Meat packing plant workers

“$13,494 is a bug splat on the windshield for this massive company, apparently just like those workers’ lives were.”

The Trump Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration on Thursday announced a fine of just $13,494 against a major meat processing company whose persistent and egregious failure to protect South Dakota factory employees from Covid-19 caused at least 1,294 infections, 43 hospitalizations, and four deaths.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Want to know what a worker’s life is worth in America?” HuffPost labor reporter Dave Jamieson tweeted in response to the meager fine against Smithfield Foods, whose Sioux Falls, South Dakota plant was in April dubbed “the country’s biggest coronavirus hot spot.”

The fine against Smithfield amounts to around $10 per infected employee, a penalty the Democrat-controlled House Committee on Education and Labor denounced as “a total failure to protect workers.”

As Jamieson pointed out, “$13,494 is the maximum OSHA can issue for a ‘serious’ violation. The max for a ‘willful’ or ‘repeated’ violation is $134,937. Of course, those amounts are rounding errors for a company of Smithfield’s size.”

“Many companies routinely fight OSHA citations even when the fines are this small, with the litigation dragging on for years,” Jamieson noted. “Decent chance the final tab gets negotiated down or wiped out entirely.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Pearce, national correspondent for the Los Angeles Timestweeted that “$13,494 is a bug splat on the windshield for this massive company, apparently just like those workers’ lives were.”

The Labor Department’s fine is the product of a months-long investigation into Smithfield, which attempted in July to quash an OSHA subpoena for the company’s Covid-19 test results, characterizing the document request as an invasion of privacy and violation of the company’s due process rights.

ADVERTISEMENT

The meat processing giant has come under fire from workers and union leaders for failing to swiftly establish adequate safety precautions at its Sioux Falls plant, which at one point in April accounted for 44% of all of South Dakota’s positive coronavirus cases. That same month, Smithfield offered Sioux Fall employees a $500 “responsibility bonus” for showing up to work amid growing health concerns.

“I feel like they’re bribing us with money to come to work sick,” one unnamed worker told the local Argus Leader. “That’s how you know they don’t care, because they’re forcing people to come to work. People are forcing themselves to come to work even when they’re sick.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Kooper Caraway, president of the Sioux Falls AFL-CIO, blamed the deadly Covid-19 outbreak at the South Dakota pork factory on the inaction of Smithfield management in the face of pleas for stronger protections.

“Because management drug its feet and didn’t act quickly, that’s why it’s a hot spot,” Caraway said in April. “And we’re seeing the cases go up every day. No matter what the latest numbers are, I promise you there’s more than that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Lincoln Project drops new ad slamming Trump’s claim that COVID-19 ‘affects virtually nobody’

Published

on

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump threatens to block stricter COVID vaccine standards — declaring ‘tremendous trust’ in big Pharma

Published

on

With the Food and Drug Administration reportedly planning to propose stricter guidelines for emergency approval of a coronavirus vaccine, President Donald Trump late Wednesday threatened to block the agency's push for tougher standards because he trusts for-profit pharmaceutical corporations to conduct adequate safety testing.

"Trump's White House must not block or water down this guidance and must allow scientists and public health officials, not Trump's political interests, to guide this vaccine approval process."—Eli Zupnick, Accountable Pharma"I have tremendous trust in these massive companies that are so brilliantly organized in terms of what they've been doing with the tests. I don't know that a government as big as we are could do tests like this," Trump said during a press briefing, minimizing the central role the federal government has played in coordinating and providing much of the funding for vaccine trials.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘You could die!’ CNN’s Camerota shocked when Trump supporter tells her he won’t take any vaccines

Published

on

CNN host Alisyn Camerota expressed shock on Thursday when a supporter of President Donald Trump told her he didn't want to take any vaccines, regardless of whether the president gave him their seal of approval.

During a voter panel discussion about the president's response to the novel coronavirus, Camerota asked a group of three Biden voters and three Trump voters if they would be comfortable taking a vaccine that was released this year -- and five of them said that they would not.

While some of the panelists said they were simply worried that the vaccine was being rushed out the door to help with the president's election, Florida Trump supporter Sean Roberts said he didn't take any vaccines.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE