Quantcast
Connect with us

Amy Coney Barrett’s threat to Social Security and Medicare is ‘what right-wing extremism is all about’: Progressive senator

Published

on

Judge Amy Coney Barrett (screengrab).

In keeping with her evasive answers on other key issues—from voting rights to reproductive rights to climate change—President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett on Wednesday refused to say whether she believes Social Security and Medicare are constitutional, prompting progressive advocacy groups and lawmakers to warn the judge’s confirmation could pose an existential threat to the programs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Social Security has been law of the land for 85 years, Medicare for 55,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in response to Barrett’s comments. “Tens of millions are dependent upon these programs for retirement security and healthcare. And Judge Barrett doesn’t know if they are constitutional. Really? That’s what right-wing extremism is all about.”

“This is Republicans’ end game: confirm conservative judges who will undermine overwhelmingly popular programs like Social Security and Medicare and rip away healthcare from millions.”
—Sen. Ron Wyden
Questioned by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) during Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Barrett would not say whether she agrees with a right-wing scholar who has argued that Medicare and Social Security are unconstitutional because they exceed the spending powers of Congress. The Supreme Court deemed the Social Security Act of 1935 constitutional in a series of rulings in 1937.

“I’m not familiar with that article,” Barrett said, referring to a 2015 essay by University of San Diego School of Law professor Mike Rappaport, “so I don’t know what reasoning he advances.”

When pressed further on whether she agrees with so-called originalists who argue that Medicare is unconstitutional, Barrett said she “can’t answer that question in the abstract… I also don’t know what the arguments would be, though I assume Professor Rappaport lays out a case. But it’s not a question I’ve ever considered before.”

“It’s hard for me to believe that that’s a real question,” Feinstein responded, “because I think the Medicare program is really sacrosanct in this country.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The senator then moved on to a different topic.

Watch the exchange:

Progressive advocacy group Social Security Works warned that Barrett’s remarks show she represents “a threat to our earned benefits,” a sentiment echoed by Democratic members of Congress following the final day of questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Barrett’s record “makes it clear that she’ll vote to rip away healthcare. In fact, she won’t even say that programs like Medicare are constitutional.”

“Seniors—and all Americans—should be worried about Barrett tipping the scales of the court,” Warren continued.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adding to lawmakers’ concerns is the fact that Barrett was nominated by a president who has repeatedly threatened to cut Social Security and Medicare if reelected in November.

“This is exactly what we would expect from a justice handpicked by Trump and McConnell: A corporate judge who will help them gut Social Security and Medicare,” tweeted Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) added that “this is Republicans’ end game: confirm conservative judges who will undermine overwhelmingly popular programs like Social Security and Medicare and rip away healthcare from millions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Make no mistake: your earned benefits are on the chopping block,” Wyden said.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Senate Republicans preparing for ‘potentially catastrophic’ election blowout with 12 seats now in play: report

Published

on

What was once four or five Republican seats in the Senate that appeared endangered or already lost on November 3rd has grown to a dozen, reports Politico as top GOP officials find themselves on their heels on multiple fronts.

According to the report, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) could be looking at his last days controlling the Senate that has been notable more for packing the courts than passing legislation that helps the country during his tenure.

While Republican Senate seats in Maine, Colorado, North Carolina and Arizona already appear to be lost causes for the GOP leadership, Politico's James Arkin reported that more GOP senators are finding themselves "scrambling" in more states than the party had planned for.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Fox News report crushes Hunter Biden smear after network investigation ‘found no role for Joe Biden’

Published

on

A Fox News investigation "found no role for Joe Biden" in the business dealing of his son, Hunter, the network said on Sunday.

The admission was made by Fox News reporter Griff Jenkins.

Jenkins explained that the news organization had been provided documents by Tony Bobulinski, Hunter Biden's former business partner.

"You're talking about a business venture with the Chinese energy company in 2017 at a time when Joe Biden was not vice president," Jenkins explained. "But Fox's review of Bobulinski's documents, which were given to us, found no role for Joe Biden in that business venture."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Trump has revealed that ‘truth and reason’ don’t matter to politics: political scientist

Published

on

Public opinion polls and other data show that Joe Biden has a double-digit lead over Donald Trump, with just over a week to go until the election. Biden's campaign also has substantially more money. As judged by conventional standards, Biden won the two presidential debates. Nate Silver's much-cited FiveThirtyEight site gives Joe Biden an 87 percent chance of defeating Trump.

This article first appeared in Salon.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE