Immigrant rights advocates along with Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his supporters responded with alarm to reporting this week that Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to President Donald Trump, is plotting how to "rev up Trump's restrictive immigration agenda" and is ready to "unleash executive orders deemed too extreme for a president seeking reelection" in the event of a Biden loss next week.
NBC News reported Friday that Miller, speaking as an adviser to the president's campaign, laid out four top priorities in a 30-minute call Thursday: "limiting asylum grants, punishing and outlawing 'sanctuary cities,' expanding the so-called travel ban with tougher screening for visa applicants, and slapping new limits on work visas." Implementing these policies would require a mix of legislation and executive action.
And it's so, so cruel. https://t.co/F74e2UfY9f— Muslim Advocates (@Muslim Advocates) 1604121660.0
Biden's director of Latino media Jennifer Molina responded by declaring, "We are going to win this election so that people like Stephen Miller don't get the chance to write more xenophobic policies that dishonor our American values."
The former vice president, for his part, said in a statement Friday that the agenda outlined by Miller represents "four more years of hateful rhetoric and division" and policies that demonstrate "cruelty and exclusion" rather than hope.
"This agenda is designed to do one thing only: divide our communities with cheap, xenophobic rhetoric, and demonize those seeking to make legitimate asylum claims in the United States to find a life of safety for themselves and their children," Biden said.
NBC News national political reporter Sahil Kapur shared on Twitter an unsolicited comment from Miller, reacting to the Biden campaign's comments:
A portion of this immigration agenda that struck me: The U.S. already screens visa applicants for ties to extremist… https://t.co/QI1zC1rB5I— Sahil Kapur (@Sahil Kapur) 1604066325.0
His initial phone call with Miller—in which the Trump adviser said a broad goal of the administration is "raising and enhancing the standard for entry" to the United States—elicited concern from far more than just the Biden campaign, which has been challenged to reckon with the Obama administration's track record on immigration policy, particularly deportations.
Look closely: Miller doesn't answer @sahilkapur's question about whether he'll support more separations. He pivots… https://t.co/z9A5eCnCwC— Jacob Soboroff (@Jacob Soboroff) 1604066412.0
As of Saturday afternoon, an estimated 90 million Americans, including more than nine million voters in the key battleground and border state of Texas, had already cast ballots in the November 3 election.
Kapur's interview with Miller was among multiple recent reports in the lead-up to Election Day that have reflected on Trump's immigration policies and detailed what could come if he wins another term.
From the Muslim ban to the family separations at the U.S.-Mexico border, President Donald Trump’s harsh immigration… https://t.co/j7BYZajNAn— HuffPost (@HuffPost) 1604004060.0
Before outing himself on Wednesday as the author of an anonymous 2018 New York Times editorial claiming that "many of the senior officials" within the Trump administration formed a "resistance," former Homeland Security Department Chief of Staff Miles Taylor had mentioned the planned executive action on immigration during a September interview with the Lincoln Project.
Taylor's revelation about the editorial drew fresh attention to his remarks last month that an adviser, widely presumed to be Miller, had told him that "the second term would be shock and awe ... and he had a list of executive orders in his drawer."
"He had a locked drawer that had executive orders that he'd worked on with the White House Counsel's office and a very small group of people," Taylor said, "and they were things that were unacceptable to issue at a first presidential term because they knew they would lose voters because they would be so extreme."
Former Trump DHS official @MilesTaylorUSA in a recent interview on Trump’s second term — he’s clearly hinting that… https://t.co/cQ7APCD9lu— Hamed Aleaziz (@Hamed Aleaziz) 1601397888.0
Tying Taylor's warning to Miller, the Guardian noted Wednesday that "the 35-year-old has managed to keep his position as a senior adviser to the president after being exposed for having an affinity for white nationalism and becoming synonymous with unpopular Trump administration policies such as family separation."
Although the president was ultimately pressured to formally end the family separation policy, which critics including Physicians for Human Rights condemned as "torture" and "state-sanctioned child abuse," the U.S. government is still unable to find the parents of 545 migrant children. Biden said Thursday that if he is elected, he will form a task force to reunite those families.
Jean Guerrero, the author of the Miller biography Hatemonger, told the Guardian that "there's a number of things they have been cautious about because of the legal and political risks in the first term and I think that in a second term you would see Stephen Miller get much freer rein when it comes to his wishlist of items."
During Trump's first term, "Miller wanted the leadership to constantly have immigration and border issues as their top priority, and he ensured that happened by manipulating the bureaucracy, by constantly invoking Trump's demands, Trump's desires," Guerrero said. "The cabinet secretaries are aware of Stephen Miller's relationship with the president."
The Guardian's report generated concern among immigrant rights organizations and advocates, with the Texas-based group RAICES tweeting: "We beg you, #DontLookAway."
Stephen Miller has a bunch of executive orders waiting, too scary to be used BEFORE an election but not after: elim… https://t.co/VBb26FIH03— viet CALL ME DR. nguyen (@viet CALL ME DR. nguyen) 1603888122.0
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, less than a week before Election Day, a U.S. House committee released a scathing report which said that "the Trump administration's family separation policy lasted far longer than is commonly known and was marked by reckless incompetence and intentional cruelty."
The report, said Amnesty International refugee and migrant rights researcher Denise Bell, "only confirms what this administration's immigration policies have shown: cruelty was always the point."