Despite being one of the world’s biggest contributors to plastic pollution, the U.S. has so far shown no signs of joining an international treaty aimed at stopping plastics from flowing into the world’s oceans and other natural habitats—leaving the country in a small minority as more than two-thirds of United Nations member states signal that a treaty is forthcoming.
At a virtual conference attended last week by the U.N.’s working group on ocean pollution and microplastics, countries in Africa, the Pacific, the Baltic region, and throughout Europe confirmed that they are open to signing a treaty aimed at sharply reducing marine plastic pollution and potentially all plastic waste.
Yet again, with an environmental agreement – this one on #plasticpollution – it is the US that is the holdout. Although I have heard that the UK is trying to get Kenya to drop its ban on single use plastics in order to develop a trade deal. https://t.co/h6Ms5Lm3WI #ClimateAction
— Simon CHIN-YEE (@SimonChinYee) November 16, 2020
The U.S. was joined by the United Kingdom in declining to participate in the treaty, although the two countries are the biggest per capita plastic polluters in the world. British environmental minister Zac Goldsmith is expected to announce soon whether the country is open to a new treaty or to strengthening the existing international framework governing plastic pollution, while the Trump administration has indicated it is not open to a global treaty on plastics.
— Hannah Rudd (@hannahsrudd) November 16, 2020
“Support for a global treaty on plastic pollution is a critical action that the Biden administration can take to correct the wrongs of the Trump era,” Tim Grabiel, senior lawyer at the Environmental Investigations Agency (EIA), told The Guardian on Monday. “Over the last four years, we have continually encountered opposition from the Trump administration to truly address plastic pollution, slowing down progress and watering down international efforts. We are hopeful that, with a change in leadership at the top, the U.S. will join its allies and support a global treaty on plastic pollution at [the U.N. Environmental Assembly’s 5th conference].”
The EIA has called for a legally binding global agreement including four pillars to combat plastic pollution from all sources. The group says any treaty ultimately agreed upon by U.N. countries must include:
Monitoring and reporting on the state of plastic pollution and each nation’s progress toward a “circular economy” in which plastic leakage into the environment is kept to a minimum
Prevention of plastic waste through bans on single-use plastic products and restrictions on plastic production
Coordination between existing anti-plastic pollution frameworks including the 2001 Stockholm Convention, under which countries agreed to limit or ban the use of certain toxic chemicals including some used in plastics, and the 1989 Basel Convention, which aimed to reduce hazardous waste production and the transboundary movement of such waste
Technical and financial support for developing countries from wealthier countries
The U.N. Environmental Assembly concluded in 2017 that the Stockholm and Basel Conventions are “fragmented and ineffective” as they are currently implemented, according to The Guardian. The U.S. is only a party to the Basel Convention.
The assembly is currently expected to meet in Kenya in February 2021 for its fifth conference, or in 2022 if the summit is postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Even without the participation of the U.S. and U.K., the EIA called the commitment of a majority of U.N. countries to a new treaty “heartening.”
“Maintaining the status quo is not only untenable, it would have catastrophic implications for planet Earth,” Christina Dixon, senior ocean campaigner at EIA, told The Guardian.
Global plastic pollution efforts implemented so far are expected to reduce plastic pollution by just 7%, while the oceans are expected to be inundated with 29 million metric tons per year by 2040—triple the amount the currently flows into marine habitats annually.
As the U.N. working group was meeting last week, the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) circulated a petition—signed by two million people so far—calling for a global anti-plastic pollution treaty.
🥤More than 11 million metric tons of plastic is flowing into the ocean each year. We are drowning in plastic, but we can resurface. World leaders urgently need to vote for a UN treaty to tackle this crisis. Now is the time to call for a #PlasticPollutionTreaty. pic.twitter.com/aYvHclpBiC
— WWF (@WWF) November 10, 2020
“We are drowning in plastic, but we can resurface,” the WWF tweeted. “World leaders urgently need to vote for a U.N. treaty to tackle this crisis.”
If the GOP thinks Trump is ushering in a crisis — why did they support him for the last year?: Bulwark editor
Veteran newsman Carl Bernstein revealed that there are 21 Republicans too scared to reveal they think President Donald Trump should have reached the end of his options to fight the 2020 election. Still, most of them aren't speaking out publicly and they spent the past year enabling Trump, knowing full well that this is who he is.
Writing for the Bulwark on Monday, Jonathan V. Last cited editors of the National Review who are calling Trump's behavior “disgraceful” and “the most outlandish and irresponsible performance ever by a group of lawyers representing a president of the United States.”
‘You can’t vote no’: GOP canvasser gets schooled at Michigan certification meeting
A Republican member of Michigan's Board of State Canvassers was confronted by a former state elections director over attempts to delay certification of the state's election results without a vote.
"I think, first of all, the answer is, of course, you can't vote 'no,'" Chris Thomas told Board member Norm Shinkle. "There is no 'no' in this circumstance. Each of you play a necessary role -- you're at the pinnacle of Michigan's democracy -- you're the endgame of the statewide elections for 2020."
Thomas went on to say that after 5.5 million people have exercised their right to vote, it's the Board's responsibility to make the results "which are already widely known, official."
Power-hungry Republicans do not fear Trump — it’s worse than that
There’s a presumption at work among members of the Washington press corps that needs rethinking. That presumption is this: the Republicans, especially those in the Senate, fear the wrath of voters who have balled up their identities with the rise and fall of Donald Trump. For this reason, all the Republicans, with rare exception, stand in silence while the president prosecutes what must be called an attempted coup d’etat.