Alex Murdaugh court clerk triggers mistrial claim after being accused of tainting jury

Alex Murdaugh court clerk triggers mistrial claim after being accused of tainting jury
Alex Murdaugh Mugshot

Attorneys for convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh have accused a South Carolina court clerk of tampering with the jury and have demanded a new trial and a federal investigation.

Defense attorneys filed a 65-page motion accusing Colleton County clerk of court Rebecca Hill of telling jurors “not to believe Murdaugh’s testimony and other evidence presented by the defense [and] pressuring them to reach a quick guilty verdict," reported The Daily Beast.

"[Hill] even misrepresented critical and material information to the trial judge in her campaign to remove a juror she believed to be favorable to the defense," the filling added.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

The jury needed just three hours of deliberations to convict Murdaugh of killing his wife Maggie and son Paul at the family's hunting estate in July 202 and he was sentenced to two life terms in prison. He also faces 100 separate charges of fraud and drug trafficking.

The appeal accused Hill of speaking with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt or innocence and inventing a story about a Facebook post in an effort to remove a juror. The filing alleges that she intervened to make money off the trial.

"Ms. Hill did these things to secure for herself a book deal and media appearances that would not happen in the event of a mistrial," Murdaugh's attorneys claims. "Ms. Hill betrayed her oath of office for money and fame.”

The defense motion claims that several jurors spoke with them about Hill's conduct, saying that at least one of them said they believed her comments mean that Murdaugh was guilty, but the clerk of court flatly denied the allegations of wrongdoing.

“It’s totally not true,” Hill said. “This is crazy.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

FBI Director Kash Patel pledged to investigate agents who caught Russians trying to frame Democrats before 2020, a new report reveals.

According to national security writer Marcy Wheeler, an unsigned, undated letter attributed to Patel is the "centerpiece" of a propaganda push, and she flagged in a Wednesday post on her legal blog emptywheel that it was notably not written on FBI stationery.

In the letter, Patel says he "immediately disbanded" the bureau's Foreign Influence Task Force upon taking over as director, and that his team is now probing whether the unit improperly zeroed in on informants tied to the Bidens.

"We remain concerned that defensive briefings to Congress may have been overly focused on just Biden and Ukraine rather than the balanced picture of all foreign threats," the letter reads.

Patel added that although "these alleged activities occurred during a different era within the Bureau," his team is "firmly committed to identifying, investigating, and holding accountable all abuses."

The task force is the same unit that flagged efforts by John Solomon and Rudy Giuliani to launder foreign influence operations targeting Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 vote, according to Wheeler. The letter's premise, she wrote, rests on a spreadsheet from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that was released by Bill Pulte. It also revives claims from discredited informants, including Alexander Smirnov.

The influence campaign lands as Patel prepares for a reported trip to Moscow and St. Petersburg on October 14-15 and just weeks before the midterms.

Wheeler mentioned that a Russian outlet with a history of airing material from the FSB, the Russian security service, published a piece that openly speculated this week about Patel receiving kompromat on Democrats and serving as a backchannel to Vladimir Putin.

"They're just promising to do Russia's bidding in plain sight," Wheeler wrote.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A Texas judge appointed by President Donald Trump launched an "unusual and extraordinary" attack on elections, according to a new report.

Democracy Docket reported on Wednesday that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a ruling that blocked key parts of Texas' voter suppression law. The ruling protects provisions that were previously found to violate federal protections for voters with disabilities.

"It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud," Judge Andrew Oldham wrote in a decision that Democracy Docket described as an "unusual and extraordinary attack" on mail-in voting loaded with unsupported claims. "That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself."

Democracy Docket noted that fraud involving mail-in ballots is "exceedingly rare," and research has not found evidence that it produces widespread voter fraud.

The appeals court reversed the lower court's decision in full. The ruling is considered a win for anti-voting Texas Republicans in their fight over Senate Bill 1, according to Democracy Docket. Oldham wrote that the Fifth Circuit has been "playing an exhausting game of Whac-A-Mole to correct the district court's mishandling of this case."

The ruling affects restrictions on mail-in voting and voter assistance, including rules requiring some voters to provide an identification number that matches state records, requirements for people who help voters cast ballots, and limits on paid voter assistance and canvassing.

"The bulk of the plaintiffs' claims fail for lack of standing," Oldham wrote about arguments made by voting rights and civil rights groups. "One fails on the merits. But none justifies interference with the State Legislature's efforts to prevent voter fraud and to protect election integrity."

A federal district court blocked nine provisions of SB 1 in March 2025. It found that the bill violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Oldham cited a 2014 federal district court opinion stating that mail-in ballots are "not secure," according to Democracy Docket.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement about American citizenship quickly backfired as online critics pointed out how his boss proved him wrong.

In a Wednesday post on X, Rubio slammed what he called "Birth Tourism," which is often brought up in MAGA circles, and pushed President Donald Trump's talking point about immigrants coming to the United States to have babies.

"American citizenship is not for sale," Rubio wrote. "But elaborate birth tourism rings are profiting off the exploitation of America's laws -coaching foreigners to defraud the U.S. visa system, arranging travel and housing, and even forging documents, all to enable foreign nationals to obtain citizenship for their children."

The post went on, with Rubio announcing a "Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force" set up by the State Department that has revoked "more than 600 visas from foreign nationals across the globe" in the past month.

However, critics also lined up to point out that Rubio's main thesis was disproven by Trump's own policies, namely the gold card visa program that would allow someone to come into the U.S. for $5 million, even though the program has mostly been stalled.

"Tell me more about the Trump gold card," former GOP operative Rick Wilson wrote in response to Rubio's post. "Citizenship is quite literally for sale."

"The first sentence is not true," wrote former GOP congressional staffer Sofia Kinzinger. "Donald Trump offered a pathway to U.S. citizenship to those willing to pay $5 million for his 'Trump Gold Card.'"

"It's literally for sale," agreed progressive news personality Alex Cole, adding a picture of the visa with the header "The Trump Gold Card is Here."

Similarly, the official press office account for Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked Rubio, "You sure about that?" while adding a picture from the State Department's website saying, "The Trump Gold Card is Here."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}