Anger as National Parks grant free access on Trump's birthday — and end it for MLK day

Anger as National Parks grant free access on Trump's birthday — and end it for MLK day

“Why is MLK Day not worthy of a fee-free day anymore?”

That’s what Kati Schmidt, communications director for the National Parks Conservation Association, wondered in an email to SFGATE, which reported Thursday on the National Park Service’s recently announced free admission days for 2026.

“That has become a day of service throughout the country as well as celebrating an American hero who has several park units celebrating his legacy,” Schmidt noted of the federal holiday honoring Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. each January.

In addition to MLK Day, three other previously free days were left off the US Department of the Interior’s announcement last week about “resident-only patriotic fee-free days.” Visitors will now have to pay park fees on National Public Lands Day, the anniversary of the Great American Outdoors Act—which President Donald Trump signed in 2020—and Juneteenth.

In 2021, Congress passed and then-President Joe Biden signed legislation designating Juneteenth as a federal holiday to commemorate the end of slavery in the United States. After returning to the White House in January, Trump declined to recognize it on this past June 19.

As SFGATE reported:

“This policy shift is deeply concerning,” said Tyrhee Moore, the executive director of Soul Trak Outdoors, a nonprofit that connects urban communities of color to the outdoors. “Removing free-entry days on MLK Day and Juneteenth sends a troubling message about who our national parks are for. These holidays hold profound cultural and historical significance for Black communities, and eliminating them as access points feels like a direct targeting of the very groups who already face systemic barriers to the outdoors.”Moore told SFGATE that his organization works to push back against “these kinds of systemic attempts that disguise exclusion as administrative or political decisions.”
“Policies like this reinforce inequalities around access and visibly show how systems can create obstacles that keep communities of color from feeling welcomed in public spaces,” he said.

Olivia Juarez, public land program director at the advocacy group GreenLatinos, said in a statement that “we condemn the omission of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, Juneteenth, National Public Lands Day, and the anniversary of the Great American Outdoors Act from the list of free entrance days.”

“The Great American Outdoors Act permanently funded the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which enhances outdoor recreation access for all people from national public lands to neighborhood parks,” she pointed out. “These observances are patriotic days that celebrate freedom and safety in the outdoors. They should be celebrated as such by removing a simple cost barrier that can make parks more accessible to low-income households.”

Other critics have ripped the free day decisions as “truly disgusting” and “literally the sort of thing dictators do.”

Journalist Jennifer Schulze said: “I love our national parks but don’t go on his birthday. Find a state park to visit instead.”

Along with the free admission changes, the Trump administration is under fire for putting the president’s face on the new “America the Beautiful” annual passes—a display that may be illegal—and for hiking prices for foreign visitors to national parks.

Utah-based Juarez and GreenLatinos California state program manager Pedro Hernández both denounced price hikes for noncitizens—a move that notably comes as the administration pursues Trump’s promise of mass deportations.

“By imposing higher fees on people without state-issued ID,” Hernández said, “the Trump administration is advancing a xenophobic policy that disproportionately harms vulnerable populations like international students, newly arrived immigrants, and families seeking asylum.”

“This approach eviscerates the true meaning of public lands and sends a clear, exclusionary message that our most cherished national parks have become yet another pay-to-play system,” he added. “People should be welcomed—not priced out from our public lands.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

The security of the US grows weaker by the day as some of the highest-profile members of Donald Trump’s cabinet are spending too much time playing to the MAGA crowd for “clicks’ and adulation, and not taking their jobs seriously.

Appearing on MS NOW with host Ali Velshi, former Naval College professor Tom Nichols, who has called for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s immediate firing, added DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel to his list of the worst offenders in Trump’s rogues’ gallery of officials.

Coming as Hegseth and Noem are running into trouble with lawmakers and the courts, host Velshi called what is going on within the administration “a mess" based upon recent reports of inner turmoil and chaos.

“Yeah, this is what happens when you don't actually lead a movement,” Nichols agreed. “I know that the MAGA faithful think of themselves as a movement, as a political force, but in fact it's a cult of personality surrounded by a bunch of very childlike grifters who are acting like kids who've been let loose in a candy store.”


“One of the things that's so striking about all these people is not just how amateurish they are, but how completely unfocused they are. They seem to have no other interest in — when you mention the president's agenda, Ali — who would, who could know what that is? The agenda seems to be line your pockets. Please, Donald Trump, don't get fired. And you know take the private, take the government jet to go see your girlfriend.”

He continued, “One of the things that's so striking in this report is, is how adolescent, how juvenile all three of these examples are. You have someone who is in charge of the Department of Homeland Security, you know, playing cowgirl dress up. You have the FBI director whining, ‘Well, I get to have a girlfriend. I can go see my girlfriend, can't I? I mean, it's so cringe-inducing.”

“And you've got the secretary of defense, you know, acting like a kind of bully who's been put in charge of his high school and just wants to yell at all the teachers and saying things like, ‘I've been exonerated, when in fact he hasn't. The opposite has happened because he's reasoning and arguing like he's about 12. This is really bad,” he added.

- YouTube youtu.be

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Republican megadonor Hal Lambert squirmed Saturday when pressed on the Trump administration’s potentially “illegal” boat strikes in September that critics say may have constituted a war crime, refusing to answer a direct question multiple times during an appearance on CNN’s “Table for Five.”

“They hit the boat the first time, and they're obviously trying to kill the people on the boat, that's the whole purpose of bombing things!” Lambert said, defending the Trump administration’s actions.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has faced renewed scrutiny this week after a whistleblower alleged that he had directly ordered a follow-up strike on a suspected drug-carrying vessel off of the coast of Trinidad in September, a strike allegedly designed to kill two survivors clinging to the wreckage.

Lambert’s defense of the Trump administration was soon challenged by MediasTouch contributor and political commentator Adam Mockler, who reminded Lambert that of all sea vessels intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard in fiscal year 2024, about 27% of them carried no narcotics.

“The Coast Guard has admitted they interdicted 212 boats since 2024 with no violence, nothing happening, and basically one in four of those boats had no drugs on them,” Mockler said.

“So I want to ask you, would you be okay striking boats if there's a one-in-four chance that there's no drugs on the boat?”

Lambert immediately deflected, and instead began citing overdose statistics, a deflection that Mockler quickly shut down.

“Do you want to answer my question?” Mockler pressed.

“No, I'm going to give you some facts!” Lambert fired back.

“No, you should answer my question! Trump claims to care about drugs, yet he pardoned the former Hondorun president, and I have to sit across from you [claiming] Trump is doing this to save Americans,” Mockler said. “When I ask you a question, I want you to answer: if there's a 25% chance that there [are] no drugs on one of these boats, are you okay with striking them?”

Lambert then moved to question the source for the 25% figure, asking where it came from.

“The Coast Guard,” Mockler bluntly said.

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino was raked over the coals on Saturday morning for changing his tune on the Washington, DC, pipe bomber after spending years spreading conspiracy theories that have now fallen flat after an arrest.

As a podcaster, the now-senior FBI official claimed the attempted attack was an “inside job,” telling his fans, “It is a Democrat insider or an anti-Trump lunatic who was trying to stop on Jan. 6, four years ago, the Republicans from objecting to the election. So they figured if they planted a bomb there that they could rush into the Capitol and go, ‘Stop the objections! Kamala Harris was almost killed by you!’”

After the arrest of alleged bomber Brian Cole Jr., a 30-year-old Virginia man who reportedly told investigators he thought Trump was the victim of election theft, Boingino confessed to Fox News personality Sean Hannity, “Listen, I was paid in the past, Sean, for my opinions, that’s clear, and one day, I’ll be back in that space. But that’s not what I’m paid for now. I’m paid to be your deputy director, and we base investigations on facts.”

That brought about a wave of ridicule from the hosts of MS NOW’s “The Weekend,” as an exasperated co-host Jonathan Capehart asked the New York Times’ Glenn Thrush, “Make it make sense.”

“Basically, what he said is that everything that he said prior to becoming deputy director of the FBI was for money and popularity and to improve his standing in the MAGA community, to which he will presumably soon return,” Thrush replied.

“You know, some of our reporting and some misreporting has shown that Bongino, who has gotten into fights with everybody in the administration,” he elaborated. “He he tore into Susie Wiles, the [White House] chief of staff, and Susie Wiles’ friend, Pam Bondi, the attorney general, a few a few months back. And that has earned him scorn, so he is very likely to be gone by mid-January.”

He added that the “bottom line” is that, “...it could shift Trump. Trump makes the decisions and everything whether or not people come or go.”

- YouTube youtu.be


{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}