Unhinged teacher threatens to behead girl who asked about his Israeli flag: witnesses

Unhinged teacher threatens to behead girl who asked about his Israeli flag: witnesses
Warner Robins Middle School

A Georgia teacher allegedly threatened to behead a middle-school student for commenting on his Israeli flag.

Benjamin Reese, a seventh-grade social studies teacher at Warner Robins Middle School, allegedly became angry Dec. 7 when the girl asked about the flag as students were leaving after class and said she found it offensive.

He followed her into the hallway and told the student he was Jewish and had family members who live in Israel, reported WMAZ-TV.

"You don't make an antisemitic comment like that to a Jew," Reese said, according to another faculty member.

The girl responded negatively but did not raise her voice, the faculty member said, and Reese allegedly threatened to drag the student outside and brutally murder her.

"You mother-----ng piece of s--t, I'll kick your a--," Reese said, according to multiple witnesses. "I should cut your mother-----ng head off."

Witnesses said Reese returned to his classroom cursing and yelling that she should not speak that way to a Jew, and he allegedly continued making violent threats.

ALSO READ: Mention ‘Liz Cheney 2024’ and things get very, very awkward on Capitol Hill

"I will drag her a-- into the parking lot, slit her f----ng throat and kill her," Reese said, according to witnesses.

A deputy who was at the school interviewed multiple witnesses, including teachers and students, but Reese at first denied speaking to anyone when questioned by the principal.

Reese then said a student was offended by the Israeli flag, which he believed was antisemitic, but he denied saying anything racist and claimed to have spoken to another teacher about the issue.

The deputy led Reese back to his classroom, but he kicked a doorstopper in an aggressive manner.

Reese invoked his civil rights and refused to answer the deputy's questions, but he was arrested based on witness allegations and charged with making a terroristic threat and cruelty to children.

Watch video of the report below or at this link.

Georgia teacher accused of threatening to behead student over comment about Israeli flag www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Conservative legal activist Mike Davis floated an aggressive immigration crackdown this week if the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration on birthright citizenship, including a call to prioritize the detention and deportation of women of childbearing age.

Davis, a prominent ally of President Donald Trump who heads the Article III Project, framed his posts around the expectation that the high court will rule against the administration's position. He accused the justices in advance of preparing to "lawlessly" extend birthright citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants.

In one post, Davis wrote that if the court "lawlessly pretends we fought a Civil War and passed subsequent laws to give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens, we must ramp up third-country detainments and mass-deportations."

"With no mercy," he added.

He then went further, singling out a specific group as a target.

"We must start with birthing-aged women," Davis wrote, closing the post with a single word: "Adios."

In a related post, Davis reiterated the framing, declaring that the Supreme Court was "going to lawlessly give away birthright citizenship to illegally aliens" and that the response should "make the top priority birthing-aged women."

That post was attached to a message from Homeland Security official Markwayne Mullin, who had touted the administration's deportation efforts as targeting "illegal alien criminals" including "rapists, murders, pedophiles, and gang members."

Davis is no fringe figure in the movement. He has been floated for senior legal roles in Trump's orbit and has positioned himself as an enforcer for the administration's most combative legal positions.

His suggestion that deportation efforts should begin with women based on their reproductive capacity drew immediate attention on X.

The Supreme Court has not yet issued its ruling in the birthright citizenship case.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A spat between two Supreme Court justices is putting Trump’s plans in jeopardy, a legal expert noted.

Justice Samuel Alito looks poised to stay on as a counterweight to Justice Sonia Sotomayor after their "wacko interaction" spilled out into public view, Michael Popok said during a recent episode of the Unprecedented podcast.

Sotomayor read her "powerful dissent" to Alito's majority opinion on an asylum case, Popok noted.

"So Alito was done reading his summary of his decision, and next up was Sotomayor, and she read big portions of her dissent, and really, I mean, accused the court of being heartless, of comparing it to that famous ship that was turned away by numerous countries filled with Holocaust survivors," Popok explained.

Popok and his guest host, legal analyst Dina Doll, also brought up that Trump is hoping Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas will step down, opening the way for him to add a new conservative justice or two before the midterms.

"Honestly, I thought after that interaction, maybe Alito will not step down this summer because I think he sees himself as this necessary person, probably, to combat Sotomayor right now," Doll said. "It's just the ego in him."

Doll continued, "Somebody like that thinks that they need to be in charge, that nobody else can carry the mantle."

Trump Sweats as Alito Refuses to Leave Supreme Court Early?! | Unprecedented Podcast by Legal AF

Read on Substack

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton went after Vice President JD Vance Saturday over his comments downplaying the Watergate scandal, using the moment to land a pair of pointed jabs at both the vice president and the Republican Party.

Clinton was responding to a New York Times report headlined "Vance Downplays Watergate and Compares Himself to Nixon." According to the story, Vance argued that the scandal which ended Richard Nixon's presidency would amount to "like a 12-hour news story" if it unfolded today, and suggested the "deep state" had been responsible for taking Nixon down.

Clinton's first swipe took aim at Vance's grasp of the history itself — and at his administration's record on book bans.

"Maybe Vance doesn't know this history because it's in one of the books his administration banned," she wrote.

Her second was aimed at the broader Republican Party, drawing a contrast between the lawmakers of the Watergate era and those serving today.

"The difference between Watergate and now is that back then, Republicans actually did something about a law-breaking president," Clinton wrote. "Today, they only roll over for their cult leader."

The reference points to the bipartisan reckoning that followed the Watergate break-in, when Republican leaders ultimately pressed Nixon toward resignation rather than defend him through impeachment proceedings.

Vance's reported framing inverts that history, casting Nixon less as a president brought down by his own conduct than as a target of unelected government forces — a narrative that echoes the grievance politics central to the current administration.

Clinton, a frequent and unsparing critic of President Donald Trump and his allies, has shown little hesitation in needling the administration on social media, and her latest post folded two of the left's recurring criticisms — book bans and Republican deference to Trump — into a single response.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}