The true vandal of DC caught red-handed
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
That subhead of mine is certainly repetitive of me (me, me), but how can you not be repetitive in the distinctly repeated world of Donald J. Trump (Trumped, Trumped)? I mean, twice already and who really knows what’s to come?
Here’s the question nobody seems to be asking right now, though: What country will Donald Trump attack next? Yes, at the moment, he’s still wildly wound up in his Iran war/truce/peace/or you name it (tomorrow). Yesterday, it was, of course, Venezuela, and next week it might be Cuba or Greenland, or who on (or off) this planet knows where? And I haven’t even mentioned his military’s ongoing bombing runs in Somalia, which are barely noticed in the mainstream media here. And who knows what I’ve forgotten or what to expect in this increasingly bizarre world of ours from the president who swore repeatedly in his third election campaign that he would never, never, never go to... yes, of course, war?
Hey, only the other day, Secretary of War (a title which, of course, couldn’t be blunter in the age of You Know Who) Pete Hegseth warned that “what happens with the future of Cuba is in the hands of the president of the United States and the leadership of Cuba. No matter what, the Department of War is going to be prepared and postured for any possible contingency.”
Ah, yes, any possible contingency except one, of course: victory (which, since the Second World War, just hasn’t been in the American vocabulary) or, for that matter, peace. I mean what could possibly go wrong in a world that now, remarkably enough, has its first trillionaire, Donald Trump’s (sometimes) buddy Elon Musk? (On that, Senator Elizabeth Warren commented all too aptly: “I want to be clear: This is not just some fluke. It is a feature of a rigged economy.”)
What, in fact, could possibly go wrong on such a rigged planet? I’m sure Donald Trump and Elon Musk couldn’t imagine. What could go wrong on a world in which no American president ever seems to realize that wars are simply never to be won by this country, no matter its power and the ever-ballooning size of the Pentagon budget, now possibly heading for -- ah, yes, talking about trillionaires! -- $1.5 trillion yearly (and, no, that is not a typo), if Donald Trump has anything to say about it? And in Congress, mind you, that’s still referred to as “defense” spending.
What could possibly go wrong when launching a war on Iran, a country that’s slightly less than 6,500 miles from Washington, D.C.? That’s so much less dumb of Donald Trump than Vladimir Putin’s decision to launch a disastrous war right on his country’s border with Ukraine. At least, Iran is so far away that you could ask: Whose lives could possibly be disturbed by it (other than Iranians, their neighbors, or of course, anyone who drives a car or a truck that isn’t electric and has had to pay for the gas that hasn’t been making its way through the Strait of Hormuz these days, months, or for all we know years)?
In fact, here’s a suggestion for President Trump: at only 6,500 miles, Iran really shouldn’t be considered quite far enough from Washington to truly, truly count as the world’s best enemy. What about Pakistan instead, since it’s 7,000 miles away? Wouldn’t that make better sense? Especially since, as Zia ur-Rehman of the New York Times reported recently, with the planet heating up as distinctly as it is, one district in southern Pakistan hit a record 124.7 degrees Fahrenheit as May ended. And you (and Donald Trump) know just what that means: ever more Pakistanis will feel that they have to leave their country and head elsewhere and why not head for the United States of America, only 7,000 miles away? So, Donald, how about starting another war there and while you’re at it, as wars do so effectively, pour yet more fossil fuels into the atmosphere, ensuring that Pakistan will indeed get ever hotter (and hotter and hotter) even faster (and faster and faster)?
And honestly, to ask a perfectly realistic question: if President Trump can’t continue to stack up wars one atop another, how in the world will he ever get Congress to pass his next Pentagon budget for that $1.5 trillion? We certainly need another war (or two or three) for that to happen and, honestly, Greenland’s too damn cold and minimally populated and Cuba’s too close and a mere island to truly count.
Wait! Let’s look at the positive side of things for a moment. With Trump and crew ready to fossil-fuelize this planet in striking ways, as the Department of War has made clear, “President Donald J. Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth are ushering in a new era characterized by peace through strength.” And what more could you ask for than that, though “peace,” of course (because definitions matter) should be “war” and “strength” should mean another 1.5 trillion taxpayer dollars for the Pentagon to blow on yet more disastrous conflicts globally, right?
Who could possibly disagree with such a definition of peace? Anyone who does deserves to be sent to Iran, Greenland, or Cuba, just to find out what peace truly feels like.
Yes, give our president full credit. He lends “brink” new meaning and what could possibly go wrong on a planet distinctly on the brink of... well, who knows quite what but nothing good -- that indeed did just get its first trillionaire. I can’t imagine, can you?
And given all of that, let me end on a little more upbeat news. As the BBC recently reported, “The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has declared that El Niño conditions are now under way in the tropical Pacific [Ocean], with sea surface temperatures having risen sharply in recent months.” And even better, assume that it could prove to be “a so-called ‘super’ El Niño,” and even possibly “among the strongest ever recorded.”
So, count on this: our planet is going to get hotter and hotter and hotter. And Donald Trump is still doing his damnedest to shut down green energy of any kind and make more war. So, what could possibly go wrong when we have a president at the brink (of who knows what) and a planet at the brink (of who knows what’s next)?
Referring to the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall, Minnesota governor Tim Walz commented on X: “Found an imaginary problem, said only they could fix it, didn’t listen to experts, hired buddies who grifted millions, failed miserably, bragged how great it went. The entire Trump presidency in a nutshell.” (Walz could have added: “blamed others for his failure, conjured up a conspiracy, then prosecuted them.”)
One remarkable aspect of Trump’s horrendous reign is how many crises and problems he’s brought on himself—created them out of thin air. Then he brags about how well he’s handled them. And when they go wrong—as they inevitably do—he casts blame on others or on his political opponents.
Four examples from the last few days:
I. The Return of Operation Metro Surge
US prosecutors in Minnesota on Tuesday announced charges against 15 people they say conspired to “violently oppose immigration law enforcement.”
But when repeatedly questioned by the press, US Attorney Daniel Rosen failed to describe a single example of injuries to federal agents.
Rosen has a dubious track record with this kind of prosecution. In the months after “Operation Metro Surge,” launched by the Trump regime last December, federal prosecutors charged three dozen Minnesotans in a first wave of cases allegedly involving assaulting or impeding federal immigration agents. Most were dismissed or downgraded.
So why is Minnesota’s US attorney announcing new charges? Rosen’s predecessor as US attorney, Joseph Thompson, said he doesn’t understand it. “I think most people, on both of the sides of the political aisle, viewed [Metro Surge] as a disaster for the administration,” Thompson told The Wall Street Journal. “Why you would want to go back and re-litigate this is beyond me.”
One clue lies in the timing of the new charges—coming just two weeks after the John F. Kennedy Library awarded its 2026 Profiles in Courage Award to the people of the Twin Cities for their resistance to Operation Metro Surge.
A bipartisan committee praised the community for defending constitutional rights and demonstrating civic courage:
“Tens of thousands took to the streets to peacefully protest federal overreach and threats to immigrant families and constitutional protections, while others documented enforcement activity and alerted neighbors to federal agents’ presence. Faith leaders organized demonstrations, community groups built rapid-response networks, labor leaders and small business defended workers, and volunteers provided critical support and resources. Across religious, racial, and political lines, a broad coalition of residents of the Twin Cities and surrounding suburbs united in peaceful resistance despite violent confrontation and real personal risk, defending their neighbors’ rights and strengthening the national movement to protect American democracy.”
Trump is presumed to have a grudge against the John F. Kennedy Profiles in Courage Award because last year’s award went to his former vice president, Mike Pence, for explicitly resisting Trump’s demands to overturn the 2020 election results on January 6, 2021.
II. Trump’s Unending War in Iran
On Sunday, negotiators for Iran and the United States met in Switzerland for a little over an hour. No progress was made. Iranian negotiators insisted on an end to the war between Israel (a US ally) and Hezbollah (an Iran-backed militant group in Lebanon) as a condition for further talks, according to Iranian state media.
The talks were also strained by Trump’s renewed threats against Iran. Fox News reports that Trump, in an interview, said he had spoken with Iranian officials Saturday night and warned them not to close the Strait of Hormuz. “You close it, and you won’t have a country,” Fox said, quoting Trump. “You won’t even make it back to your f—ing country.”
The Iranian delegation in Switzerland decided to suspend the talks due to Trump’s threats, according to Nour News, which is affiliated with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. IRIB, Iran’s state broadcaster, said it was unclear if the talks will resume.
Iran’s lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said on social media that the United States should be careful about issuing threats, adding that Iranian armed forces were prepared to respond. “No matter how much they talk, it is we who act,” he wrote.
Iran says the strait is once again closed. World oil prices are again rising.
One Republican senator described the war in Iran and the sputtering peace talks as “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”
Trump continues to look for a way out, at least for himself. “If it works out, I’m going to take the credit,” Trump said of the peace agreement, only half in jest. “If it doesn’t work out, I’m blaming JD.”
III. Prices Continue to Rise
On Sunday, Trump celebrated Father’s Day with a social media post touting that the USUS has the “BEST ECONOMY EVER.”
“Happy Father’s Day!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Our Country is doing GREAT. Record Jobs Numbers and Stock Market, BEST ECONOMY EVER! Greatest Military in the World, by far. We are WINNING on all fronts, WINNING LIKE NEVER BEFORE. GOD BLESS YOU ALL!!!”
Inflation in May increased to 4.2 percent, its highest point in three years, with the food index seeing a 3.1 percent increase over the past year and a nearly 4 percent bump in energy prices. Wages are not rising as fast, which means most Americans are becoming poorer.
The latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll released last week shows that only 33 percent of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the economy, his lowest point in both of his terms and 3 points lower than former president Biden at his all-time low.
Trump has long dismissed “affordability” as an issue Americans are concerned about, saying last week that affordability is a “fake word, made up by the Democrats.“
IV. The Reflecting Pool Worsens
All of which brings us back to the Reflecting Pool. Two weeks ago, Trump declared that his decision to repaint the Pool “American Flag blue” was not simply a “paint job” but “highly sophisticated material, industrial strength, that could last for 100 years.” The dark blue paint that Trump insisted on is now peeling, and green algae are returning.
But the blue paint is now peeling and the algae are back.
On Friday night, Trump blamed “Radical Left Lunatics, most likely Dumocats [sic], who have spent their lives trying to ruin our Country” for “some real problems with Vandalism at the beautiful Reflecting Pool” and linked it to the etching of “8647” into the grass on the National Mall days earlier, adding that law enforcement is investigating.
Then on Saturday, Trump doubled down, claiming that “multiple individuals” had taken “some form of knife or blade, and put a 250 foot long gash into the beautiful facade of what took so much work, competence, and money to build and complete. These are very serious crimes having to do with the destruction of National Monuments. Years in jail! Work will begin immediately on its repair.”
So far, five people have been arrested for vandalizing the Reflecting Pool, according to Trump officials. But the evidence against them is weak at best. For example, former Olympic canoe racer David Hearn, 67, was arrested after he touched a flap of blue material partially detached from the bottom of the pool. Hearn, who says he has a background in material science, told CNN he checked out the pool after reading reports of algae in the water and paint or sealant peeling off the bottom. “I didn’t vandalize anything,” Hearn told The Washington Post. “I didn’t destroy or break or peel anything. By the time I realized what was going on, I was being put in handcuffs.”
Yet the Reflecting Pool’s new blue surface isn’t plastic like a typical pool lining, which can be cut. It’s a coarse coat of dark blue paint. It’s peeling because the paint job—done by a Trump donor who had been given the no-bid contract—was obviously done badly, as well as being way over budget. And the algae have returned not because of vandalism but because the dark blue paint has trapped more heat, rapidly creating a friendly habitat for the algae.
As Tim Walz says, it’s the entire Trump presidency in a nutshell.
The thing that’s always stood out to me about Donald Trump, besides his cruelty and utter incompetence, is that he’s just so sad and hostile. He comes across as a man who has never experienced a legitimately cheerful moment, aside from the schadenfreude he appears to derive from the misery he inflicts on others.
Take his behavior at the G7 summit this week. He secreted the vibe of a man hellbent on taking revenge against those around him, and all of the other world leaders took note. At this event, and similar to previous ones, he was treated as if he had the plague while, at the same time, seeming disconnected from the moment.
During the group photos, while the others chatted and interacted with one another animatedly, Trump was detached, staring straight ahead as if in a deluded trance. It wasn’t just that they were all rejecting him. He appeared to be rejecting himself, so uncomfortable in his own saggy skin that it proved jarring to look at.
Several of my friends sent around one photo of Trump, surrounded by the leader group, looking beleaguered, stiff, awkward, like his own barren island, his arms stiffly at his side and a grim expression lining his face. The contrast with the others couldn’t possibly have been more stark. It was actually stunning.
“Is that A.I.?” my wife asked.
“No, it’s real,” I assured her.
“What the hell is wrong with him?” she then asked.
“Well, everything,” I assured her.
The thing is, this had nothing to do with Trump’s health. It wasn’t about bruises on his hands or the pallor in his appearance. It was just about a man who looked utterly out of his element simply having to socialize with other humans who were not predisposed to bow at his feet. He looked almost shellshocked.
None of this would matter, of course, if this guy were not the most powerful human being in the world. He appears desperately unhappy, deliriously angry at everyone and everything, immeasurably out of touch with the citizens he represents. He appears hellbent on pushing the hostility he feels onto a world that he believes continues to hold him in such contempt which is, in fact, self-fulfilling. The heartache and suffering he inflicts emanates from his own poverty of the soul.
The damage Trump inflicts daily on the country and the world can be traced to this gnawing resentment he carries around, this chip on the shoulder that’s more like the Rock of Gibraltar. He is getting vengeance for the mound of disrespect that follows him around and inspires him to lash out over slights both actual and merely perceived.
We don’t need to guess about this stuff. It’s etched all over his face. It’s attached to his very DNA. He makes not even the thinnest attempt to be friendly, engaging, gracious. Think about that. The very idea that Trump would consistently demonstrate courtesy is unimaginable.
What we’re dealing with here is a tired, cranky old man who lacks the energy to even feign cheerfulness. He can’t practice civility because he’s too busy snarling.
Imagine having so many people in your life who don’t actually like you in the slightest, who in fact hate you, but feel as if they have to pretend you’re terrific because of all the horrible things you can do to them if you don’t. If you’re Trump, what a lonely place that must be, even if it’s an island of his own creation. He conveys such negativity, intimidation and aggression that being close enough to breathe the same foul air has to be traumatic in itself.
This is the kind of crap you need to spout in order to stay on this man’s good side: “He and I are very, very close. And when you think about what you would deem a best friend in your life, he is definitely one of those guys.”
That was UFC President and CEO Dana White. Imagine how much sucking up it requires to say something so outrageous, because it’s not possible for anyone to actually feel a genuine closeness to such a bloated bag of pomposity.
The Trump White House is widely viewed as a joyless place of competitive angst and paranoia. No animals are running around, there is no music, no cultural events, no relaxed social gatherings. In their place are things like the violence of the UFC outrage. Human beings pummeling each other is his idea of a good time. It is an environment where perpetual tension and grievance hold court.
This rampant negativity is one reason why I believe Trump is deteriorating physically. His default about everything is rage. That has to take its toll.
Contrast all of this carcinogenic rancor with the positive energy and delight that greeted the dedication ceremony for the grand opening on Thursday of the Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago. Besides the Obamas, all three living former Presidents and First Ladies were there. You’ve got to believe the only event that would inspire all eight to gather in the same space to honor Trump would be his funeral.
The Obama Center celebration featured warm, genuine words about the Obamas; a gathering of real stars; and eloquent, articulate speeches from Barack and Michelle about the country they love despite it all. A tour of the center campus showed not tacky gold plating everywhere your eye went but a museum featuring digital exhibits about the Obama Presidency, a basketball court, a branch of the city’s public library and acres of green space.
It felt like a nostalgic throwback to a time when the American presidency was draped in class and distinction rather than greed and fake patriotism. The Obamas remain the epitome of cool. The Trumps stand small as paragons of criminality.
It remains a tragic shame that the nastiest American who ever lived somehow continues to preside as its leader. Come back, Barack, come back!
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
In one of his most astonishingly oblivious moments, President Donald Trump may have revealed more about himself — his honest, true beliefs regarding his “talents” and place in history — than at any point in his public life. During an interview with Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman for their forthcoming book, Trump proudly offered what he called an “expert historian’s” impression of his raw fortitude. As you might guess, Trump bragged he topped a list of history’s most powerful rulers.
Now, that cringe you already feel is more than warranted. Presidents and other leaders are rarely measured by raw power alone. Nixon was an extremely powerful president in many ways, and you know how that played out. But everyone understands that this particular president sees power for power’s sake as the gold standard — the measure of the job. Prepare for that cringe to evolve into rage upon learning of the leaders he “trumps,” so to speak. “Our” president believes he tops a list that includes Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler.
Sweet Jesus.
With the possible exception, and only to a degree, of Napoleon, every other ruler on that list accrued power by killing people in the sole furtherance of “more power,” and thus killed even more people as both a means of expanding and keeping it. Looked at another way, Trump excitedly showed Swan and Haberman a list he believes puts him atop history’s greatest monsters.
Well, that fits. And it is scary AF.
Because there is nothing wrong with seeking power if it’s in the pursuit of something worthy. Martin Luther King Jr. surely sought every ounce of authority that his gentle hands could hold, but made non-violence his most powerful ally to accrue, well, power. To the extent that the United States even approaches racial equality, at least in written law, we owe it in large part to MLK Jr., who sacrificed his life for it, and that’s pretty damned powerful, especially given his influence extended far beyond this nation’s boundaries. King’s words and message are remembered today at least as much as any American president’s — the most “powerful man in the world.” Gandhi is cut from the same cloth, to use an apt metaphor, and took on an entire empire and subcontinent.
The West defeated Soviet Communism without firing a direct shot, a pretty impressive power move. And yes, part of the “fall” owed itself to an American President in Ronald Reagan, whose main tactic was to militarily spend the U.S.S.R. into oblivion — the Soviets unable to keep up. But Reagan couldn’t have succeeded without the real power of a fairly humble but stubborn and infinitely brave Polish shipyard worker named Lech Wałęsa, and an even more humble Polish Pope in John Paul II, who both stood up to communism on moral grounds, smothering a communist empire unable to keep up.
There is also power over our day-to-day lives that we all but take for granted now. Alan Turing ushered in the idea of “computation,” but Steve Jobs gave the average person the desire to even have one at home, and that was just the first act; he then changed how the world does nearly anything, bringing about the smartphone. Ideally, Steve Jobs’ “power” will infinitely impact your life more than anything Donald Trump ever does… ideally, no guarantee. Elvis Presley forever altered the role music plays in our lives.
Power comes in many forms. Whoever came up with high definition television deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, but I digress.
Given we’re sure that Trump is talking about national leaders, we can circle back to that category and ably come up with many who managed to accrue far more power with far less brutal killing. George Washington founded this nation by fighting a king who wouldn’t peaceably deal with the colonies. Abraham Lincoln almost personally kept this nation together for four years, certainly killing a lot of people in a war that he would have given up everything to avoid except for continued slavery. And FDR not only kept this nation’s head above water during the worst worldwide depression since the Dark Ages, but he also invented modern economic liberalism in America, and then went on to rally a nation to defeat Hitler. That is a pretty powerful guy.
The story gets even Trumpier. He told Swan and Haberman that he got the list at a golf benefit with Gary Player, handed to him as a paper put together by a noted historian. But when Swan and Haberman investigated the matter further, the “report” had been put together by golfer Gary Player’s caddy. But the list's scholarly authority couldn’t matter less. It’s Trump’s reaction to having his name among those names that takes one’s breath away.
We weren’t in the room and thus can’t know how the conversation went, but wouldn’t it have been wonderful to hear Trump’s response to a follow-up: “Mr. President, why would you even want to be on this list? This is essentially a list of ‘worst people in human history.’”
Pity. Because it’s tough to predict how Trump would’ve talked himself around that one, probably something along the lines of, “But see? I’m more powerful than them, and I’m one of the most loved men in…”
It should go without saying that a president should enter that office committed to doing the best he or she can for the American people — do that, and the power takes care of itself. Lincoln saved the Union. FDR brought us Social Security and led us through World War II. Lyndon B. Johnson made us a greater society by bringing in Medicare and Medicaid and signing the Civil Rights Act (and yes, got a lot of Americans killed in Vietnam, duly noted). Ronald Reagan did open up a real dialogue with the U.S.S.R. that helped lead to communism’s downfall (I don’t need a primer on all the horrid things Reagan also did). George W. Bush — for all his innumerable faults — got this nation through the first month after 9/11 with bravery, resolve, and love toward American Muslims, not a single act of vigilantism. Barack Obama made universal healthcare an expected right, perhaps saving millions of lives. Pretty powerful.
If one really wants to get cynical, look to Mitch McConnell, who engineered the process by which we have a Supreme Court that managed to give Trump a free pass with respect to criminality, steal a woman’s right to control her body, and disenfranchise Black Americans in the South. Pretty powerful.
Donald Trump effected the first violent transfer of power in American history, and perhaps therein lies a clue to his “formidability.” Like Khan, Stalin, and Hitler, Donald Trump is out to get all he can personally get in his name as American president, whether it is semi-invading Venezuela, dropping billions in bombs in Iran (killing a school full of little girls), threatening war over Greenland, and this new “thing” with Cuba — and that’s just on the international scale. At home, Trump has organized masked stormtroopers marching around the country, rounding up brown people, changed the structure of Congress, put his name and face on money, and strongly considered suspending habeas corpus to do it, avoiding courts altogether. If there is a secret sauce to Trump’s power, it is that he is constrained only by balancing what he can get away with at no personal cost.
And, to be sure, if you have the most powerful military force ever amassed on the planet and the personal fealty of nearly every Republican in government to back domestic efforts, that affords someone an enormous amount of power. But if Trump has proven anything, it is that he seeks power to improve his fortunes, and only his fortunes. In that respect, he most certainly is right at home with Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Hitler, etc.
Last, to the extent one ever needed more concrete evidence as to the danger in mixing self-glorification within a uniquely undereducated man, the fact that Trump is proud to head up this list is Exhibit “A,” and all that would ever be needed to demonstrate that he lacks the emotional IQ to even understand the position he holds. The fact that it didn’t occur to Trump, “What if fifty years from now, someone reads a list about history’s most powerful leaders, and Donald Trump is alongside Stalin, Hitler, and Genghis Khan — is that bad branding?” should scare us all. Not that we weren’t already scared.
Nor are we surprised.
Check that. Some of us are indeed surprised, surprised only in the way Trump continues to find astonishingly original ways to evidence his true weakness. Leaders who seek power as the goal in and of itself are, by definition, some of the most dangerous figures in history. Leaders who dare to dream so powerfully of all that good that can be done if one only had the power are some of history’s most revered leaders, as they selflessly work to get it done. MLK Jr., Nelson Mandela, Susan B. Anthony, Cesar Chavez, Isaac Newton, Carl Jung, St. Francis of Assisi, Shakespeare… The list of history’s most powerful people who never sought “power” itself, merely propounded ideas so powerful they still impact us today, is a list to which one should aspire.
It is doubtful that anyone, even the most hardened MAGA, is surprised by the slot into which Trump most comfortably slid himself. The only somewhat surprising — and worrying thing is his obliviousness as to what it says about him, near and long term.
Indeed, history will have a lot of powerful things to say about Donald J. Trump and, perhaps topping the list, will be that from day one, he sought evermore personal power as both goal and measure.
Pretty weak.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, former editor at Occupy Democrats, political consultant, author, attorney, and single parent girldad, please follow on Bluesky and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com
Friends,
To you fathers, and to those of you who have or have had fathers, Happy Father’s Day.
For the next 135 days, our first and most important goal is to end Republican control of Congress, thereby limiting Trump’s reign of criminality, corruption, cruelty, and treachery.
This is a moral imperative for every one of us who believes in a decent society.
I know, I know — you’re exhausted. You’ve been doing everything you can to fight this regime — to protect the vulnerable, stop the bigotry, end the violence at home and abroad — and you feel worn out. I often feel the same.
But we have no choice. Trump is getting crazier and more dangerous by the day.
A few congressional Republicans are showing a bit of backbone, especially those who aren’t running again because Trump has supported their opponents in a Republican primary (Texas Senator John Cornyn, Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, and Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie).
But most of the GOP in Congress are as cowardly and shameful as any group of politicians has ever been in American history. They should all be swept out of office.
This means we must keep fighting even harder over the next 135 days — ensuring that Democratic candidates have our support (money, time, and energy),** that every qualified voter is registered, that Trump and his neofascist goons don’t interfere in our voting system, and that November 3rd’s blue wave is so large as to overwhelm any attempt by Trump to meddle.
More than 6,000 of you answered my Office Hours question this past week about your most important criterion for supporting congressional candidates in the midterms (I used Maine’s Graham Platner as an illustration).
Over half of you (53 percent) listed taking back control of Congress as most important, 34 percent said it was a candidate’s personal opposition to Trump and the monied interests, and 8 percent of you said a candidate’s history and character were most important. (Five percent cited other criteria.)
Among comments that elicited the most positive responses from you were these:
Chris Lemon: “There’s no second place prize in an election. Furthermore, the moral high ground is a cold windswept place with bad cell phone reception. Getting rid of the GOP is the only goal at this point, or should be. A few years back, I was talking to some folks who were going to vote for Jill Stein instead of H.Clinton. I asked if they were familiar with Ralph Nader’s presidential campaign. None of them knew the name. Sometimes you just want to cry.”
Mike Hammer: “I live in Maine and there is some questioning, some soul-searching about Platner’s character. The big picture is how we begin, at this time to take our country back and understand the damage that Susan Collins has brought by voting MAGA or with Trump was 95% of the time. There’s no law stating that we have to love Platner but that doesn’t mean we can’t vote for him. Time will tell.”
Mary Jean Holt: “I am an old, white Maine woman, faithful democrat from my youth (Republican), and 85 today. WHAT is WRONG with people? Platner is an excellent candidate, IMHO. I live with (and through the Vietnam War) a Vietnam Vet, married 61 years and know the harm that stupid, deadly wars do to all of us. I give Graham Platner a lot of credit, his wife, too. Just wish he’d trim up that beard a bit. Besides Bernie says he’s OK and I have Never disagreed much with Bernie, nor AOC.”
Diana Seidel: “I’m also an old white woman (78) living in Maine and will happily, enthusiastically vote for Platner. He speaks to all the issues I care about.”
Stephen: “I’m a native Mainer, so the Platner question is more than theoretical. Àfter hearing the accusations, the stories, the rumors, and Graham’s own story of personal growth, recovery, and redemption, I have no difficulty giving him a chance. I think the negative image surrounding him is at least as much a product of the media jackals eager to create a scandalous story as it is to the actual facts. I also think there’s an element of social snobbery at work. News pundits and others, look at Platner from their corporate offices and see a guy who’s rough around the edges who they can’t imagine being capable of being a Senator.”
Susan Borden: “There is the possibility that some see in Platner’s story qualities of character one would like more of - the ability to modify one’s behavior in favor of creating a kinder, fairer, more sustainable world/country/community.”
** I’ve listed below the candidates for Senate and House that in my humble opinion both need and deserve your support (for more information, click on their names).
That support isn’t limited to money (although the links below are for funding). It can be volunteering: to write postcards to constituents in the state or congressional district, to phone them, even to go to the state or district (if you don’t already live there) and ensure that voters are registered and have all the information they need about how to vote and whom to vote for.
IMHO, these candidates for the U.S. Senate most need and deserve your support:
In Georgia: Jon Ossoff
Ohio: Sherrod Brown
Maine: Graham Platner
Texas: James Talarico
North Carolina: Roy Cooper
Iowa: Josh Turek
Michigan: Depending on the result of the August Democratic primary, either Abdul El-Sayed (a Bernie Sanders-endorsed doctor who supports Medicare for All and getting Big Money out of politics), or Rep. Haley Stevens (a so-called “moderate” Democrat who is receiving major financial support from AIPAC). I favor El-Sayed, but if Stevens is selected, I’m 100 percent for her.
For the House, your support can mean most to these candidates:
AZ-1: Depending on the outcome of the July 21 primary, I’m for either Amish Shah or Marlene Galán-Woods.
CA-45: Derek Tran
FL-14: Kathy Castor
ME-2: Matt Dunlap
MI-10: My favorite is Christina Hines, but I’d take Tim Greimel or Eric Chung over any Republican (the primary there is August 4).
NJ-09: Nellie Pou
NY-19: Josh Riley
OH-9: Marcy Kaptur
If you sat down and tried to invent the worst possible person to put in charge of negotiating with the Islamic Republic of Iran — and obviously Donald Trump doesn’t count — you'd have no recourse but to choose JD Vance.
If you didn’t know, and he takes every single opportunity to tell you, he’s the vice president of the United States. And your worst expectations will be met, because he’s leading the way when it comes to negotiating with the wily and wicked Iranian government.
Vance, remember he’s the vice president, is fresh off a book tour for Communion, his memoir about finding his way to Catholicism. I am a lifelong Catholic and, like the Iran negotiations, if I have to invent the worst possible person to explain Catholicism to me, it would again be JD Vance.
This joke of a negotiator and deity is now the face of the most consequential American diplomacy with Iran since arguably 1979. And this joke of a man and his reborn righteousness is now tasked to talk down a regime that has spent four decades building its identity around resisting and rebelling against American foreign policy.
It's hard to imagine a worse match of temperament to task.
I don’t know about you, but I had to pick myself up off the floor when I watched Vance’s press conference from the White House on Thursday. When asked what qualifies him to sit across from Iranian officials, Vance told reporters Joy Behar — who interviewed him on The View earlier in the week — is "way tougher than the Iranians," and that the two are "best friends now."
To say that statement was baffling, bizarre, and ridiculous would be the understatement that trashes all understatements.
Never mind that Behar, and her cohorts at The View, spent the interview grilling him over Trump calling the affordability crisis "a hoax" while Vance scrambled to spin it. The idea that sparring with an 83-year-old daytime talk show host is preparation for negotiating Iran's nuclear program is the kind of line that should disqualify a student from a high school Diplomacy 101 class.
All I could think was that the Iranian delegation heard that quote — they hear everything — and jumped up and down at the prospect of going toe to toe with a neophyte negotiator.
Negotiators who have outlasted six American presidents being told their toughest opponent in Washington uses Joy Behar as his measuring stick. It's not really an insult to Behar. In my previous career as a media relations guy for Kmart and Sears, we had several opportunities to interact, and Behar is as lovely as she is sharp and quick-witted.
But tougher than Iran? It sounds like a self-deprecating remark Behar would make about herself.
But those words from Vance are shocking. It's an admission. If you need a co-host of The View to prep you for the Strait of Hormuz, you've already lost the negotiation before it started.
None of this would really matter much if Vance were just a motormouthed mouthpiece, which he is on his best days. But this? He's leading the actual talks, alongside Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, for an agreement that's supposed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restart nuclear inspections, and release frozen Iranian funds during a 60-day window before a final deal gets signed.
Vance has spent days insisting the money picture is being overstated, even as Iran's own Revolutionary Guard puts out its own numbers. They are going to twist him in so many directions, and it should worry all of us that Vance is way over his head.
It would help if Vance had any real track record here. He doesn't. The late Richard Holbrooke spent decades in the foreign service before he hammered out the Dayton Accords for Bill Clinton. Zalmay Khalilzad built a career across Republican and Democratic administrations before George W. Bush sent him to broker political settlements in Baghdad.
And who led President Obama’s successful Iran nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA? His secretary of state, John Kerry, who was a U.S. senator for 28 years and chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee before President Obama appointed him to his Cabinet.
And Ambassador Wendy Sherman, who worked in the State Department and served as President Bill Clinton’s North Korea policy coordinator, handling early negotiations regarding their nuclear and ballistic missile programs.
And J.D. Vance? He spent two years in the Senate, wrote a book about converting to hillbillies and Catholicism, and went on The View. Can’t think of much else.
By the way, Vance's Catholicism tells him a lot about sin and redemption. It tells him very little about Qom.
Many Republicans — and Fox News — seem aghast at the danger, grumbling now about a war powers vote nobody in the GOP had the spine to force when the strikes started. And now they’re biting their nails and trying to bite their tongues about the Iran deal.
And they served two years with Vance, so they know the horror of which they speak.
Trump bombed Iran without congressional authorization, Congress did nothing, and now the administration that has bungled this from the start chooses to send its most combative, least diplomatically tested official the job of ending a war and signing an agreement?
Trump outrageously told Axios that Iran unconditionally surrendered. So if that’s what he and Vance think, they haven’t read the fine print of the Memorandum of Understanding signed this week.
Floating words like "surrender" to describe a deal that looks more lopsided by the day is a great place for JD to begin negotiations — I’m being facetious, of course.
It's reminiscent of how Trump kept calling the new Reflecting Pool a triumph right up until the algae bloomed and the paint started to peel. Vance can narrate this as a historic win for as long as he wants. The cracks are already showing, and his false diplomatic veneer will peel off faster than the reflecting pool.
The real risk isn't just that Vance fails. It's how. Iran has sixty days to extract concessions from a man with no negotiating record and a touchy temper. Remember when he ridiculously lectured Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office?
And, remember, he has that annoying habit of constantly describing himself as "the vice president of the United States." Iran will be fed up with that brag after one hour.
If this deal collapses — or worse, holds together! — the fallout will land squarely on Vance, not Trump. Is Trump trying to set him up for failure and doom his chances at the presidential nomination in 2028?
If Vance, just one last reminder that he’s the vice president of the United States, hopes an Iran deal becomes his calling card for 2028, he’s way out of his league. Just ask Joy Behar.
Many of us have spent years convincing ourselves that President Donald Trump was one scandal away, one slip of the tongue, one fall on Air Force One, one essential predicate from ouster based on a buffet of underlying reasons, any one of which would take down a normal president.
Fair warning, but here comes another prediction, and this one promises something different, something both new and tangible — actually, a few somethings.
Everyone lumped within a certain Gen-X demographic forever remains conversant in School House Rock and thus knows that 3 Is a Magic Number. But it will be more physics, along with some magic, as we watch three waves conjoin into the long-feared and impossible to predict rogue wave, the type that really does sink ships. Three waves of varying degrees, all meeting at the right time and place, and destined to do so during a long-predicted summer storm.
Your doubts and natural cynicism are noted and well-founded. But let your cool-factor abate momentarily because these three waves approach with elegant timing.
From the left, port side, horizon, comes the most obvious: an economy on the brink. And as much as we may wish that such pain was unnecessary, this column has long noted that a broken economy not only changes everything but has become tragically needed, especially when dealing with someone who assumes a clean getaway after shooting a person on Fifth Ave.
A second wave comes from aft and will catch Trump no matter how hard he steams ahead. His increasing age and frailty are now media staples; even the analysts at Fox News no longer try to hide the concerns. Ironically, Trump himself put his age front and center during his UFC fight "national event" on his 80th birthday.
Yes, yes, fine. You have every reason to clap back: "Thanks. Give us something new because those issues have been hanging around for a while now."
Fair enough. We move to issue three, creating the magic number and thus conditions, and the underlying basis for a nation about to go rogue, this one headed from the starboard right, the political right.
The red brigade in Congress has largely had it with Trump as he increasingly transforms into a liability and, even more importantly, they seem less afraid to talk about it. The irony is as delicious as pizza when noting that the man almost solely responsible for MAGA's rise is now weighing them down as an anchor.
The divergence of the hard right political force is real and intensifying. Whereas members in the Senate and Congress once needed Trump at least as much as he needed them, not only is that need gone, but turning into a headwind. Trump surely feels invulnerable, probably having "run" his last election, he dedicates the entirety of his effort toward enriching himself financially and engraving his greatness in our nation's monuments.
Note the reporting on this very site on Congress seeing Trump himself as having gone rogue. A quote from a senior GOP staffer in the Senate:
"People are p— the f— off that prices are too high and things are too expensive. I'm just not sure the president really cares or if he's really in tune with what's going on on Capitol Hill."
So naive it all but hopscotches to adorable. One wants to gently whisper as you would give an eight-year-old bad news, "Hey? He never cared about Capitol Hill or its dynamic; he cared about himself, and to the extent he needed you to further himself, he cared about how you did it."
Trump no longer needs them on Capitol Hill. He no longer needs their legislation, nor their protection. He figures he's untouchable. And it's not like he keeps his priorities a secret: ballrooms, UFC birthdays, insider trading, pardons for rich guys (Wonder why?), getting in and out of wars, he obviously spends precious little worry about his precious red Congress, less about affordability, more about all he can now afford.
They say that Trump has personally made two billion dollars since being elected, likely doubling his previous net worth. It would be hard to overstate just how little he cares about the fact that you can walk out of a grocery store carrying two small bags and one less $100 bill.
But it's just that sort of arrogance coupled with a self-satisfied attitude that will trip him up because — don't doubt, he is not invulnerable, seemingly all-powerful dictators have fallen before, and when it happens, it often happens, it can often come with blinding speed. Oh, and the problems usually start within, and among the loyalists the leader took for granted.
Those loyalists on Capitol Hill appear to be seething:
"Between the Pulte nominations and anti-weaponization fund, the White House has definitely gone rogue and instead pushed priorities without talking to Congressional leadership," ... bringing up that Trump hasn't even seemed to consult Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD).
"We're begging the White House to focus on issues to help Republicans in the midterms. But it feels like it's falling on deaf ears."
Right.
Not deaf so much as distracted. If newly minted trillionaire Elon Musk called, Trump would be all ears, discerning everything. The staffer did hit it right in noticing that the priorities have diverged. Yes, yes, Trump was always in it for himself, of course. But there was a time when he needed those in Congress far more, even those red-hatted wonders at rallies, all filling a need.
Now his needs have narrowed to legacy and looting. Anyone who thinks that the $1.776B slush fund wouldn't come with a finder's fee going into his pocket needs their education examined, and the portion that prohibits the IRS or DOJ from prosecuting or even investigating his tax issue is said to be worth $100 million in back taxes avoided.
Looting is working lovely.
And legacy? How about that ballroom? There is likely no issue that bothers the Republican caucus in Congress more than Trump's obsession with his ballroom.
Now, imagine being a purple Republican congress critter on the campaign trail facing a farmer who tills up this question: "What are you doing about a war in Iran that has pushed my fertilizer costs up 60%, diesel for my combine up 50%, groceries up in ways I can't count, and all I hear the president talking about is that the war will end next week and the ballroom?"
Damn.
Next person up mentions that they want to build a data center in what had been reserved parkland just outside the city, guaranteed to dirty the water, be noisy, and drive up electric rates 50%. The Congressman knows he has to defend an inauguration picture with Trump, Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg.
And that's when our Congressman/woman gets pretty angry about the record to defend, enough to start talking about it — out loud, and in public, just as we see above. And that's different, that's the wave that creates the crash over the bow.
Take all three factors, and it's enough to bring him down. But please hold off the bombs in the comments because I'm not talking about impeachment, I'm talking about possible resignation.
No doubt, Trump loves the trappings of being president: that cool helicopter, everyone calls him "Sir," he likes to bomb people, he likes the money, all that. But if and when the GOP starts to turn hard on him, which, set aside the cool-factor momentarily, if the GOP turns, suddenly the presidency is nowhere near as much fun. Picture a new Congress asking tough Epstein questions, with Republicans increasingly wanting to know why they're left to come up with excuses.
Trump — the man always in it for himself— sees real trouble on the horizon with fewer friends to batten down the hatches. Perhaps he uses a convenient medical issue as a graceful exit. "For the good of the country." How big of him, a martyr to the end. Red tears, "He always put the country first."
And that's what it really gets down to, right? Three things are coming together at the perfect time; the presidency isn't fun anymore. An economy nose-diving and all the fury that goes with it, advanced age he can no longer hide, cankles, bruising, a cognitive catastrophe as certainty, and his soldiers on Capitol Hill no longer following orders. Three things, each critical, and three is a magic number.
Magic enough to create a rogue wave of the type that sinks even the unsinkable.
Jason Miciak is a Raw Story Columnist former Editor at Occupy Democrats, a political consultant, attorney, author, and single parent girldad. Follow him on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com.
For the first time in 53 years — and for the first time in many of our lifetimes — the New York Knickerbockers are world champions.
They achieved the ultimate goal in sports and now stand alone atop basketball's Mount Olympus.
This gritty, ridiculously talented, never-say-die bunch won 13 straight playoff games, tying an NBA record before finally stumbling at home against San Antonio in a game remembered almost as much for the chaos outside Madison Square Garden as for what happened on the court. Depending on who you ask, the culprit was poor defense, bad luck — or the appearance of a certain individual whom superstitious fans have since blamed for jinxing the team.
Hexes aside, no sooner had the Knicks hoisted the Larry O'Brien Trophy than speculation began swirling about a visit to the White House.
Within minutes of the buzzer, I posted:
"Congrats @NYKnicks! Please don't ruin it by visiting the White Supremacist House!”
Then I waited.
Because we all knew this moment was coming.
Because our president has to make moments like this about him.
And now it's here. And so is the reckoning. For a team. For a city. For a country.
The Knicks are facing a decision that extends far beyond basketball.
On one side sits tradition: championship teams have long been invited to the White House regardless of who occupies it. On the other sits conscience: the reality that the majority of Americans view the current administration as, to put it mildly, fundamentally at odds with the values they, as well as our founding fathers, hold dear.
Complicating matters further is the fact that the Knicks are owned by a man who has been an outspoken supporter of a president whose behavior seems to embody the opposite of the qualities we associate with champions: humility, character, grace, and dignity.
Which raises the question:
What does a championship team owe tradition when tradition collides with principle? And duty?
Because whether they accept the invitation or decline it, the decision will resonate far beyond Madison Square Garden. Especially when you consider that no NBA championship team has visited the White House during the Trump era. If nothing else, should they go, the Knicks would be breaking a decade-long streak.
For whatever reason, the NBA has been the exception. Across most of the sports world—professional and collegiate alike—teams from The Dodgers to The Panthers to The Hoosiers, and many more, have eagerly accepted invitations to this White House. Whether it's a desire to honor tradition, avoid controversy, or simply enjoy a once-in-a-lifetime experience, the result is the same: a photo opportunity that inevitably becomes political.
For those who view this administration as morally bankrupt, those images carry a different message. They signal acceptance. Endorsement. Normalization.
To them, these athletes’ willingness to break bread with this poor excuse for a president also confirms a sad truth: that these role models apparently have no issue with the message they’re sending to the kids who idolize them — “being a bully is not only okay, it can lead to the White House.”
Take the recent example of the U.S. men's hockey team. Fresh off an incredible Olympic victory, several players found themselves embroiled in controversy after laughing at remarks many viewed as misogynistic and disrespectful toward the women's team. What should have been a moment of pure celebration instantly became something else. Forever.
That's the risk.
A single visit to shake this toxic man’s hand can alter the conversation around an achievement forever. Is it worth it, New York?
Let’s face it, Donald Trump is the kind of guy to whom, if you gave him a plastic replica of the Larry O’Brien trophy, would go around telling everyone he won the NBA championship, too.
Perhaps Knicks owner James Dolan supports a man like Trump because both men have one thing in common: They are the epitome of fragile, petty, power-hungry billionaires.
After all, like Mr. Trump, Mr. Dolan’s desire for total control has been well documented; be it his countless lawsuits against anything and anyone who challenges him, or banning Knick fans from the Garden simply for shouting “Sell the team!” Going as far as to install facial recognition security cameras to keep the undesirables out. Heck, a friend of mine who’s a well-known sports writer told me he can’t write anything ‘bad’ about the Knicks because Dolan keeps a ‘hit list’ of his enemies and will subsequently ban him from all MSG events, permanently. Sound familiar?
Donald Trump is a man whose blatant racism has been on full display going back decades. Whether it was discriminating against Black tenants in the '70s, calling for the execution of the Central Park Five in the '80s — and refusing to apologize when they were acquitted, or the now infamous “Good people on both sides” vitriol. We’re now supposed to believe this man gives a damn about these players? About the city that booed him into oblivion less than two weeks ago?
Looking at it from another angle, should the Knicks have lost, which response do you think would’ve been more likely to come from this president?
“We’ll get ‘em next year, boys! You fought the good fight! Be proud!”
Or
“Just like their weak mayor, the Knicks are losers. They couldn’t handle the pressure and they choked. Pathetic. And have you seen Jalen Brunson’s wife? Is she a man?”
Men like James Dolan and Donald Trump represent the antitheses of what champions are made of. Both were gifted their companies by their fathers, both have demonstrated rancid pettiness and cruelty throughout their lives, and both refuse to lose with grace and dignity. After all, one of them is still trying to redo the 2020 election.
The Knicks' championship belongs to New York. It belongs to the fans who waited more than half a century for this moment. It belongs to the players who sacrificed, bled, and battled to bring a title back to the Garden. It definitely does not belong to either of these men who have a knack for making everything all about them.
Incidentally, you could even say the Knicks won in spite of James Dolan, as he’s had complete control of the team for 27 years, yet only has one title to show for it.
The question now is, not whether a trip to Washington enhances that legacy or distracts from it. It’s how bad will it tarnish this incredible decades-in-the-making victory?
Because once that photograph is taken, it doesn’t just become part of the story. It becomes the story.
Forever.
And the world is watching.
Speculating on the basis for President Donald Trump's political and personnel moves is done only at one's peril. The man's mind, always a complex mix of paranoia, confidence, and confusion, is never linear, always leveraged, all in his personal favor.
Despite that reality, it is gravely important to speculate on the reasons that Trump would take on virtually the entirety of the GOP Senate Caucus to install Bill Pulte as acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI), doing so after pulling Pulte's original nomination to quell GOP outcry — in favor of the more experienced Jay Clayton.
Clayton was set to face a Senate hearing Wednesday, but Trump effectively cancelled that in favor of keeping Pulte in place as "acting DNI" — and did it in the middle of the night before the hearing.
The move may sound to some more like mundane Washington political play, but it is actually earth-shakingly unprecedented and done with such rushed recklessness as to represent something deeply nefarious — a Trump move of the type he's made before, but this one on a level that threatens nearly every move made against everything threatening Trump.
It belies Trump's fear of a possible future, while indicating a fierce willingness to fabricate facts needed to avoid the failure of collapse.
Now we're back to speculating as to what Pulte's real responsibility will entail, and doing so knowing the danger of getting lost in unnecessary specifics. The logical start is a focus on Trump's greatest fear looming on the horizon. The biggest — by far — is a wave election in which Democrats suddenly control Congress and all the inherent investigative power, picking apart the administration, act by act, deals for value-added deals, dollar for dollar, favor for favor.
And everyone already knows Trump's response to such an election: "Rigged!"
Right. Except it's tough to effectively scream rigged when states control the election process in a manner unique to each jurisdiction. If one is going to fight results added up nationally, one needs a national issue, perhaps international, and remember, Trump is the same guy who came up with a theory that Venezuela altered voting machines, and some say used Elon Musk's Starlink to "play" with the returns from precincts to state officials. Both the Venezuela and Starlink theories are untrue, but the truth never mattered less when Trump claims "rigged!"
What better way to concoct a national basis for doubting the results of a blue wave than a Director of National Intelligence, able to pick apart international attempts to alter our elections (Which do occur, largely with no success), and offer up a "basis" for the result, one that couldm— at the very least — hold up suits in court challenging the elections, or — even worse — give Trump the reason to declare the election null and void, refusing to recognize the results, even as the new members are seated and fully in control of Congress.
That the Constitution doesn't allow Trump to make such a move is a cute counterargument, worth less than a value meal at McDonald's.
Anyone thinking that such speculation is too "out there" is likely the type who doubted Trump would do anything to stop a loss in 2020. Shocking even the experts who DID predict something, Trump organized a brutal attack on the Capitol, an attempted coup that, had it happened in some poor Latin American country or former Soviet Republic, would be seen as an act of civil war within the nation — that it was so "bizarre" and foreign here in the U.S., it played more as an "inconvenience" as it failed.
One of this nation's most shameful days is now seen as a sign of strength on the hardened right — and they're ready again, awaiting only instruction.
Pulte has proven he'll play ball in whatever way Trump directs. The sum total of Pulte's work in this administration has been his aggressiveness at the FHFA, attacking Trump enemies like Letitia James, proving to Trump that Pulte is a guy “who will do what I need, no questions asked.”
To be sure, there'd be a tidal wave of "questions asked" when and if Pulte comes up with some "intelligence," throwing the entirety of 2026 results into chaos, which favors Trump and only Trump — the only "True North" in the Trump administration. The fact that such accusations would be all but laughably false couldn't matter less. Nothing about "Rigged" ever came with facts, only a need.
Of course, there is also the "smaller stuff," like the Epstein investigation, or serious reviews of Trump's financial moves. What better counter than to assert that "America's enemies" are planting information to weaken "the American president"?
But now we're back to speculating as to specifics, and that's not only nearly impossible but also nearly entirely irrelevant. Trump wants the wholly unqualified but unquestionably loyal MAGA man in charge of the nation's intelligence, and he's willing to do it over and above a near revolt by the Republican Senate Caucus.
That some reason compels this decision is as obvious as the risk. For some reason, Trump has determined that the benefit of having his man in that position outweighs the risk of a Senate revolt. Perhaps already portending a willingness to ignore Congressional chaos as little more than a nuisance, as he aggregates all power in the White House.
Watch this move — call Senators, create our own revolt. Something bad is brewing, and Trump keeps elevating the bad by the month. This one stands out, as innocuous as it may seem at first glance, with nation-shaking ramifications when examined.
It is that bad and worth your every effort.
Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, past Editor at Occupy Democrats, political consultant, attorney, and single parent girldad. Please follow on Bluesky, and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com
Overcompensation is a hell of a thing.
Donald Trump knows he’s not universally beloved or widely respected like Barack Obama and Joe Biden are, and his entire miserable existence is one of constantly trying to make up for everything he wishes he had. Which is why he’s always making things up about himself that he wishes were real.
It’s why he used to call in to talk radio stations in New York pretending to be his own PR person, “John Barron.” No one would say the things about him that he wished were true, so he did it himself. That’s also where his famous “Many people are saying” thing comes from — because no one was actually saying whatever came next. It was the propaganda he wanted to see in the world, because he didn’t see what he really wanted when he looked in the mirror.
Over the last 11 years, we’ve watched him use the techniques he learned from his dual Daddy Replacements, Roy Cohn and Vladimir Putin. They taught him how to talk about himself like the person he wanted to be, not the loser he was. They taught him to keep repeating the same lies over and over until everyone believed them. There was a point where Trump crossed the Rubicon from knowing he was lying to not caring that he was lying, and then he learned how to use blackmail to compromise his former critics, and here we are.
Trump knows he isn’t respected on the global stage, unlike his two Democratic predecessors, as evidenced by the way he’s behaved and has been treated at the G7 summit this week. Every other world leader has represented like the adults they are, while Trump, fresh from his lame birthday party slapfest that barely made a blip in the TV ratings, was sluggish, hoarse, and seemed fully lost every time the cameras were on him.
It’s just so embarrassing. Look how weak he is. Listen to how weak he sounds. No wonder he railed against Barack Obama every chance he got, just days after a UFC fighter yelled out, “Michelle Obama is a man!” after thanking Jesus for helping him win his not-at-all-gay all-male slapfest in a cage while wearing the smallest and not-at-all-gay white booty shorts.
Trump calling Barack Obama a “son of a b---h” at the G7 is the kind of pettiness we've come to expect from the pettiest PAB in history.
The false bravado posturing is all part of the show for MAGA. Bullying is weakness, not strength. Bullying is rooted in jealousy, growing out of the low self-esteem that all bullies feel, yet can’t quite name. They can’t stand to see anyone they’ve deemed as “less than” succeed, and they also can’t possibly ever be wrong on the internet. It’s honestly impressive that they can even hold their phones with those heavy chips on their shoulders.
Trump’s obsession with the Obamas is similar to his obsession with the Bidens, because he knows they’re beloved and respected on the world stage. Except it’s worse with the Obamas, because they set off every racist trigger he’s got under his thin skin.
MAGA loves it, because they’ve been allowed to be free-range racists for the last 11 years, along with all of the other “-isms” and “-phobias” they deny having. Their fixation with the Obamas long predates Trump’s own assault on our political norms. An early proponent of Twitter, the petty, short-fingered vulgarian was at the forefront of the birtherism BS, demanding Barack Obama’s “longform birth certificate” and always emphasizing that the President’s middle name is Hussein.
That’s just one racist trope Trump and MAGA still use, along with misgendering Michelle out of pure jealousy and spite. Michelle and Melania have nothing in common other than having the same first initials and the title of first lady. But only one has behaved like an actual lady in public, and it’s not the former nude model whom Trump met thanks to his pal Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump is also fixated on the Obamas’ shared track record of success, both in and out of the White House. He hates always being compared to a Black man and coming up short, literally. Shoelifts McCankles can’t hoist himself out of a chair by himself these days, another reason why he’s jealous of Barack and his basketball skills.
Conversely, the Obama Presidential Library is opening to the public in his hometown of Chicago, and this video of the Best First Couple EVER has gone viral for simply showcasing their connection and real love for each other.
MAGA doesn’t have a happily married First Couple or a tight-knit, loving first family to emulate. Both Presidents Obama and Biden are fantastic fathers who have set the standard for being supportive parents while living under the world’s biggest microscope. MAGA can’t stand their goodness, because none of them had a good example of parenting in their own homes.
They compare the Obamas to apes and won’t leave Hunter Biden alone. Since every accusation is a confession in Trumpworld, MAGA fabricated false accusations about President Biden abusing his daughter, Ashley, with Project Veritas going as far as creating fake entries in her stolen diary. Because Trump is in the Epstein Files and used to brag about wanting to date his preferred daughter, Ivanka.
MAGA is boosting a clearly weakened Trump at a time when we’ve learned his entire staff is involved in the Epstein Files cover-up. They got mad when Michelle Obama planted a vegetable garden, but are still making excuses for Trump's Epstein connection while celebrating the vulgar destruction of our White House.
All because Trump’s racist parents taught him how to be a terrible person instead of just loving him. All because he’s in the Epstein Files. All because Trump is jealous of a Black man with whom he can never truly compete.
And he knows it.
Overcompensation is a hell of a thing.
Why, oh why does everyone jump through hoops when Donald Trump announces yet another deal with Iran? It’s become such a joke that when “breaking news” notifications pop up on my phone these days, I always say to myself, “Trump’s touting another Iran deal.”
Only a fool would believe Trump when he says a deal is “complete.” Because once again, the man who wrote The Art of the Deal, or more accurately, paid Tony Schwartz to write it, says a deal is done. It is set to be signed this Friday in Geneva, and the entire world is responding the way it always does: by believing something Trump says and breathing yet another sigh of relief.
This war has been a shambolic, haphazard pigsty of epic proportions. Come to think of it, didn’t J.D. Vance go to Pakistan to sign a deal? Or was it Marco Rubio? Or was it Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff? Or did they all go together? Or did they go to Qatar?
See what I mean?
Yes, I know there was a preliminary deal signed on Monday, but...
Here’s what we supposedly have. The U.S. and Iran say they’ve reached an agreement to end more than 100 days of war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, lift the U.S. blockade — and God knows what it'll do about Iran’s nuclear program.
Trump stated over the weekend and on Monday that Iran no longer wants to pursue nuclear weapons. That comment defies explanation and forces you to let go of any sense of reality.
The formal signing is scheduled for Friday in Switzerland, mediated by Pakistan and Qatar. I guess you have to invite them at this point. Maybe everyone thinks the third time is a charm? Or is this the fourth attempt to sign a deal?
Trump is telling reporters the actual text of the memorandum “may not be released until after Friday.” Which means nobody knows what the hell they are going to sign on Friday because, just like the war, this so-called memorandum is a shambolic, haphazard pigsty.
But details are leaking. There are reports that Iran will receive a whopping $300 billion for reconstruction. Only an idiotic fool would hand this intensely crooked regime that absurd amount of money,
And Trump says the Strait of Hormuz will be open. But it appears there’s a significant diplomatic dispute over Iran's plan to charge commercial vessels, because the strait’s territorial waters belong exclusively to Iran and Oman,
Tehran asserts it has the legal right to co-manage the waterway and levy charges
Who can trust either side? And more pointedly, who can trust Iran to begin with, let alone trust them to sign something 72 hours away? Then there’s Netanyahu, who you’d think might have an opinion on a deal involving his own backyard. Yet his office released a statement clarifying that Israel isn’t even a party to it.
Iran says one thing. Trump boasts about another. Iran says what Trump says isn’t true. Israel and Lebanon exchange fire. Iran makes an irrational, late stage demand. American officials say that’s not how any of this works.
And on and on.
If this all feels familiar, it’s because we’ve watched this before. Donald Trump has always, from his earliest days, failed to shepherd lasting deals to successful completion.
Back in 1983, a younger Donald Trump bought himself a football team, the New Jersey Generals, and by 1986, it all went bankrupt.
He decided the USFL’s best move was to challenge the NFL head-on in court with an antitrust lawsuit Trump was sure would force a merger or a massive payout.
He testified. He guaranteed victory. He bloviated. And the USFL did, technically, win. A jury found the NFL had acted as a monopoly. The prize? One dollar, tripled to three under antitrust law.
The league folded within days, and Trump walked away from the wreckage of a deal he’d personally engineered with nothing to show for it but failure.
And 40 years later, we have the same mess, but with much bigger stakes, and still the same failure of a man trying to win. He will lose. He always does.
That’s the Trump pattern. Announce it loudly, skimp on the details, let everyone else clean up later. A “very strong memorandum of understanding,” that Trump himself admits is “a little conceptual,” is not a peace deal.
This reminded me of the September 2024 presidential debate, when pressed on his decade-long promise to replace the Affordable Care Act, Trump famously blurted out, “I have concepts of a plan.” Doesn’t that sound familiar to “a little conceptual?”
One wonders what happened to those “concepts?”
Finally, there’s one aspect of this fragile deal that could kaput the whole thing: Trump’s Truth Social ramblings, attacks, and verbosity.
His short fuse and fat, fast fingers could blow the whole thing apart. If Iran makes a noncommittal statement, or if someone says Trump is TACO’ing again, or doing what Obama did with this shoddy Iran deal, Trump won’t be able to control himself. He will flail.
And Iran will say, OK, if that’s how you feel, we ain’t signing. The bottom line is that Iran has Trump over a barrel because he wants to put the war “in the rear view mirror.”
But that looks more and more impossible as Friday looms. Late on Tuesday, the Trump mouthpiece New York Post editorial board posted a column titled, “Trump’s Iran deal gives the Islamic Republic big wins upfront — and America nothing."
Now, if by some miracle this “nothing” deal gets signed Friday without incident, the real test starts the next day, with 60 days of negotiations over the issues that actually matter. Run by Trump’s gut, they will surely fall apart, just like his New Jersey Generals exactly 40 years ago.
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.