Analysis of the tortured syntax in Trump's New York Times interview suggests mental decline or emotional stress
Overall, Trump was more articulate than he has been in some recent appearances, an important reminder than his tortured syntax might reflect not mental decline but emotional stress: He seemed comfortable with the reporters. Nevertheless, the workings of Trump’s mind, as inferred by experts who have described their observations to STAT since January, shone through:
This was a quick pivot from a brief answer to a question about working with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Trump instead used the question to extol his own knowledge. It’s an example of what psychologists call “compulsive more-than behavior”: a deep need to never feel even slightly less than others in terms of knowledge, intelligence, power, or popularity. That need often arises when someone finds the idea that he could fall short of anyone on virtually any measure a profound threat to his sense of self. Psychologist John Montgomery of New York University and other experts all cautioned that they have never spoken to Trump, but are drawing inferences from his past behavior and public statements.
This account of Trump’s speech in Poland on July 6 came in response to a question about his trip to Paris a week later. The “greatest speech ever” claim fits with psychologists’ view that Trump displays signs of a narcissistic personality. (Although some psychiatrists assert that he has narcissistic personality disorder, Trump shows no signs of the “distress” or “impairment” that such a diagnosis requires.) A key facet of that personality type is grandiosity, an exaggerated sense of one’s own importance, specialness, and success. Later in the interview, Trump said he had “done more than” any other president in his first five months in terms of legislation and other accomplishments.
Perceiving unfairness is a common trait of people who see enemies everywhere. Here, and also when he announced last month that the U.S. would pull out of the climate accord, Trump insisted that he had been saddled with a bad deal. Allowing oneself to be taken advantage of is a sign of weakness, something people who need constant reminders of their superiority cannot bear. Solution? “Get out.” The allusion to his core supporters “loving” what he did suggests the need for adulation that characterizes people with narcissistic personalities.
Macron was so critical of Trump’s rejecting the Paris climate treaty that he publicly invited U.S. scientists to move to France. People with an inflated sense of self-worth are often blind to the negative views that others hold about them.
See above. It’s not clear from the transcript, or even the tape of the interview, whether Trump is making a joke at his own expense. Macron told reporters in May that his handshake with Trump at their meeting that month was symbolic, showing that France would not bow to the U.S.
Psychologists believe that people who are deeply threatened by feeling “less than” protect themselves by asserting to others (and themselves) that they are in fact “greater than.”
From the late 1980s to 2017, Trump’s sentences have become shorter and syntactically simpler. He uses more words of fewer syllables, and the percentage of unique words out of total words has fallen, indicating that he repeats himself more. These are standard measures neurologists use to assess the complexity of speech, which can fall along with the cognitive decline that typically marks normal aging but also disease-related cognitive impairment.
The “headaches” are those he got after the outcry over his firing of FBI Director James Comey. That led to the naming of a special prosecutor to investigate the alleged Russia collusion, arguably a serious threat to Trump. Refusing to acknowledge error or even missteps — the firing was, instead, “great” — is common in people who need to be right because admitting a mistake threatens their fragile self-image, which is often at the root of a narcissistic personality.
Trump's New York Times interview is a window into his psyche
President Trump's interview this week with the New York Times made headlines for his revelation that he would never have chosen Jeff Sessions as attorney general if he had known Sessions would recuse himself from the Russia investigation. Here at STAT, however, we combed through the transcript of the Oval Office interview for something else: examples…
However, his prediction offers little comfort at a time when many venerable norms and rules of political life are being rewritten or ignored. No matter what explanation he might offer, any move by President Trump to pardon Donald Jr., Kushner or Manafort would not only hamper the Russia investigations, it would also deliver another serious blow to 
The big question moving forward is whether such a deal is possible on taxes, infrastructure, the border wall and other major parts of President Trump’s legislative agenda. In my opinion, tax reform is the item that is most likely to become law. But Republicans’ failure on health care could foreshadow an inability to bridge the moderate-conservative divide on other major issues as well.