Opinion

Fearmongering? A troubling aspect behind John Roberts' presidential immunity decision

Like many of you, I’ve been going over Chief Justice John Roberts’ presidential immunity decision, trying to understand the distinction it sets out between “official” acts of a president, which are immune from prosecution, and “unofficial” acts, which are not immune. And I wanted to share with you a particularly troubling aspect.

Having served in the Justice Department soon after Richard Nixon sought to use the department to go after the people on his “enemies list,” I was struck by Roberts’s assertion that a “president may discuss potential investigations and prosecutions with his Attorney General and other Justice Department officials …” and that “the Attorney General, as head of the Justice Department, acts as the President’s ‘chief law enforcement officer’ who ‘provides vital assistance to [him]…”

Keep reading... Show less

The best evidence yet for why we need to tax wealth

If Donald Trump takes power this November (perish the thought), he’ll owe his victory in no small part to one of the richest Americans alive in 1920: Pittsburgh banker and industrialist Andrew Mellon, who was treasury secretary for Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover.

I’ve noted this before, but it bears revisiting now because Timothy Mellon — Andrew’s grandson — has just donated $50 million to a super PAC supporting Trump, according to new federal filings. It’s among the largest single disclosed contributions — ever.

Keep reading... Show less

It's official: The Supreme Court's Imperial Presidency is now here

They did it. The Supreme Court handed a massive victory to Donald Trump in this so-called “immunity” case, and it will probably take a year or more before there’s even a chance he’ll be held to trial for trying to overthrow the 2020 election and, thus, the government of the United States.

As feared, the six Republicans on the Court essentially threw Trump’s sedition case back to the lower court (with caveats) where there will be numerous decisions to make — which are all further appealable, resetting the case so Trump can drag things out for another year or more — about whether the crimes he’s committed are “official” or “private/personal” acts.

Keep reading... Show less

How The Onion’s founding editor finds humor in the dismal age of Trump

Sometimes this election seems a lot more dangerous and existential than just a scary Joe Biden-Donald Trump debate, as parodied by The Onion.

As the presidential rematch bounces between an edgy legal thriller and a Stephen King horror story, a good laugh is perhaps the best medicine.

Keep reading... Show less

'Paid in blood': How the loss of Supreme Court legitimacy can lead to political violence

Americans are gearing up to celebrate the Fourth of July, and their thoughts are most likely on how many hot dogs to buy for the cookout and whether a family member needs to go stake out a good spot to watch the parade and fireworks.

While the holiday is focused on revelry, July Fourth actually commemorates a solemn moment in the country’s history, when it declared independence from the colonial power Great Britain. The institutions of government imagined by the founders and their successors over the following decades – among them the presidency, Congress, the departments of State and Treasury, the Supreme Court – have retained their authority and legitimacy for more than 200 years, weathering challenges from wars both internal and abroad and massive economic, political and social upheaval.

Keep reading... Show less

Give me the stuttering old man over the racist, sexist, lying fascist

This is a bottom up election.

No, our choice at the top — President Joe Biden — does not inspire.

Keep reading... Show less

Federalism for Dummies: How to survive Supreme Court stupidity without losing your mind

I love the “For Dummies” book series. They can teach an old dog new tricks without making the old dog feel stupid, although, I admit, “Getting Out of Debt For Dummies”” wasn’t particularly useful. (Turns out one must spend less than one earns; if they had just written that on the cover I’d be $18.79 closer to my financial goals.)

But the series pretty much answers all of life’s questions, from how to stop killing houseplants to understanding the basics of astrophysics.

Keep reading... Show less

Why I'm sticking with Joe Biden

If you dropped in here today hoping I would throw rocks at Joe Biden for his performance in this week's presidential debate, you can move along. Four months out from the most important election of our lifetimes, I simply have no damn time for that reactionary childishness, silliness, or you.

If you are looking for that kind of toxic write, I’ll be the bigger man and point you to The New York Times and The Washington Post where their ace columnists are currently falling all over themselves, and using their keyboards like steam shovels to bury Biden for good.

Keep reading... Show less

MAGA tilt in southern Oregon may not be tightly locked down

Conservative southern Oregon, often an afterthought for many other Oregonians, may be the most politically dynamic large area in Oregon.

Few other areas show as much potential for political change.

Keep reading... Show less

JOE BIDEN MUST DROP OUT

In its 20-year history, Raw Story — the largest independent U.S. progressive news site — has never issued an editorial, let alone endorsed a political candidate. But given the events of last night’s presidential debate, that history must change today.

When you’re president, your main job is to make good decisions and keep the country running smoothly and safely, both domestically and internationally.

Keep reading... Show less

If you want to see what the GOP has in store for the rest of America, visit the Old South

Today is the first Biden-Trump debate and many Americans are wondering how each will articulate their ideas for the future of America.

Republicans have a very specific economic vision for the future of our country, although they rarely talk about it in plain language: they want to make the rest of America look and function just like Mississippi. Including the racism: that’s a feature, not a bug.

Keep reading... Show less

As debate approaches, presidents are blamed for events over which they have little control

Presidents are blamed for just about everything – especially during an election season. As the presidential debates of 2024 begin, the blame game is certain to be part of the spectacle. But presidents are not really responsible for as many things as voters, journalists or political opponents try to blame them for.

For the first time since 1912, a former president is a party’s presumptive nominee, running against the incumbent. Both men – Donald Trump and Joe Biden – have records from their time in the Oval Office of actions they have taken or not taken, and of problems they have been blamed for, whether they had any control over them or not.

Keep reading... Show less

To win the debate, Biden just needs to be Biden

The first debate is Thursday, so naturally, the Washington press corps is busy setting expectations for Joe Biden, most of them high enough to match the feeling of suspense that editors and producers want to create to attract that most coveted of all commodities: your attention.

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace offered a representative sampling of what’s been offered so far this week: “He has to come in there and punch [Trump] in the face with his own boasts. Trump boasts about things that are traitorous. Trump boasts about things that are disgusting. Trump boasts about grabbing women between the legs. And if Biden doesn’t go in there and punch him in the face, with his own things that he’s proud of, the [debate] is lost before it starts.”

Keep reading... Show less