ICE deploys maximum force to keep airports safe
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Nick Anderson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Friends,
No one knows what Trump is going to do from minute to minute, least of all Trump. But it’s looking ever more likely he’ll be exiting Iran within days, declaring his “excursion” into it (as he’s termed his war) a major victory — and then changing the subject.
On Friday, Trump posted on his social media site that “we are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East.”
What objectives? He never said what they were to begin with.
And, on Monday, he announced a pause in bombing attacks as he claimed representatives of the U.S. and Iran were having productive conversations.
He’s about to wind down and exit because he doesn’t give a damn about anything except maintaining his wealth and power — and the war is now costing him both.
It’s hurting his financial backers in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar — whose wealth has been seriously diminished by the war and whose vulnerability has been exposed.
It’s p---ing off Trump’s wealthy political backers at home — who are getting pummeled as the U.S. stock market sinks under the weight of the war.
It’s infuriating American voters, as gasoline sells for nearly $4 a gallon — causing Republicans to become ever more anxious about a political backlash in the midterm elections. Most were elected on Trump’s coattails in the 2024 election, in which Trump promised to reduce prices and avoid foreign entanglements — rather than do the exact opposite.
So, forget regime change. Forget freedom for Iranians. Forget “obliterating” Iran’s nuclear capabilities (which Trump claimed he accomplished last June).
Trump will say he vanquished Iran’s military and defense capacities, destroyed its economy, and decapitated its leadership.
Job over. Mission accomplished. Iran obliterated (again).
Right now, though, he has to save face. Iran has rejected Trump’s threat that if it doesn’t open the Strait of Hormuz by Monday night, the United States will strike Iranian power plants. Iran says if the U.S. attacks Iran’s power plants, it will attack energy, information technology, and desalination facilities across the Gulf.
So Trump will do some more bombing this week. He’ll then leave the job of opening the Strait to other countries, claiming that the U.S. doesn’t need it because we produce enough oil on our own (which is untrue because oil prices depend on the global market, and U.S. refiners depend on foreign grades of crude).
And he’ll leave the bombing of Iran to Benjamin Netanyahu, who’d rather continue striking Iran and Hezbollah’s strongholds in Lebanon than stand trial in Israel for bribery and corruption. (Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Friday that the military campaign in Iran would “escalate significantly” this week.)
So what will America have gotten out of Trump’s “excursion”? Zilch. Actually, less than zilch because in many ways we’re worse off than when it started. We’ve lost blood and fortune.
Thirteen U.S. service members have been killed, and the war has cost the U.S. an estimated $18 billion so far, not counting the costs to American consumers of higher-priced energy and food.
The regime in Iran has changed, but there’s been no “regime change.” And the change that’s occurred has been toward a harder, more nationalist, more belligerent Islamic state.
Iran is still hiding its enriched uranium and is presumably more determined than ever to turn it into nuclear warheads.
Trump and Israel may crow about destroying Iranian launchers and missile stocks, but Iran is firing even more ballistic missiles and drones across the Middle East now than it did a week ago — launching new missile attacks on Israeli cities and damaging key energy installations in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates.
On Friday, Iran launched intermediate-range ballistic missiles at the U.S.-U.K. Diego Garcia military base 2,500 miles away. That’s far enough to hit much of Europe.
Iran figures that political and economic pressures are mounting against Trump faster than they are mounting against Iran. While Iran uses cheap drones to disrupt global supply chains, it’s generating huge profits on its sale of oil (mostly to China), reportedly $8.7 billion in additional oil profits since the war began, driven by a $47 per barrel increase in prices compared to pre-war levels.
Forget Iran negotiating with the U.S. over ending the war. Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the Iranian Parliament’s foreign affairs and defense committee, says any talks with the U.S. are off the agenda as Tehran “focuses on punishing the aggressors.”
Other Iranian leaders are demanding as conditions for ending the war massive reparations from the U.S. and the expulsion of American military from the region.
They’re also talking about transforming the Strait of Hormuz into an Iranian toll booth controlling a third of the world’s shipborne crude oil.
We have no way of knowing whether America will now be more vulnerable to Iran-sponsored terrorism, but the risk seems greater than before Trump launched his war.
All told, there has been no American victory here, only tragedy — although the sociopath in the Oval Office will surely claim victory and lie through his teeth about what he has accomplished.
Make no mistake: This will be a surrender. As Vermont Republican Senator George Aiken suggested in 1966 when the U.S. found itself mired in another unwinnable war, Trump’s only real course of action now is to “declare victory and get out,” which I expect him to do momentarily.
Donald Trump lied us into a war with Iran that now threatens to ignite the globe. He’s been named multiple times in the Epstein files. He made a shocking joke in the White House, speaking with the Prime Minister of Japan last Thursday, about Pearl Harbor, provoking an international incident. He attacked Venezuela and is now threatening Cuba. And whatever Vladimir Putin wants, Trump gives him.
The man is poison. But it sure as hell didn’t begin with him.
Our country has been poisoned for decades now, and if we don’t remove the poison and start using the antidote, America may soon be completely unrecognizable as a “free” nation. It’s taken around 50 years, but we’re now at the point of maximum crisis.
First came the poison of big money corrupting politics.
Back in 1971, Lewis Powell thought he saw a communist threat in Ralph Nader. Literally: he named him in his infamous manifesto, the Powell Memo, arguing that calls to regulate auto safety with seat belts and soft dash boards (Nader’s book Unsafe At Any Speed) were simply the first steps toward a socialist takeover of America.
“Perhaps the single most effective antagonist of American business,” Powell wrote, “is Ralph Nader, who — thanks largely to the media — has become a legend in his own time and an idol of millions of Americans.”
Nader (who wrote the Foreword to my book The Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream) and people like Rachel Carson, with the environmental movement her book Silent Spring had inspired, threatened, Powell believed, the core of America’s free enterprise system.
Regulation, Powell (a tobacco lawyer) asserted, was just step one to a total Stalinist takeover of America.
“The overriding first need,” Powell wrote, “is for businessmen to recognize that the ultimate issue may be survival — survival of what we call the free enterprise system, and all that this means for the strength and prosperity of America and the freedom of our people.”
The following year Richard Nixon put Powell on the Supreme Court, where he personally authored the 1978 Boston v Bellotti decision that claimed billionaire and corporate money in politics wasn’t bribery or corruption (as it had been under the law since the founding of the republic) but merely an exercise of First Amendment-protected free speech. Money wasn’t money: it was speech.
That decision greased the path for the later doubling down with Citizens United, and produced a tsunami of corporate money that flooded into the GOP in 1980 (at the time the Democrats were largely funded by labor unions; their embrace of corporate money would come in 1992 with Bill Clinton’s “New Democrats”), floating Ronald Reagan and his neoliberal Reagan Revolution into power.
Since then, big business and billionaires have discovered that the investment of a few million dollars into buying politicians can produce billions or even trillions in returns. When morbidly rich hedge fund guys poured a million or so dollars into Kirsten Sinema’s coffers, for example, she demanded changes to the Inflation Reduction Act that saved them fourteen billion.
That’s one hell of a return on investment, and similar deals are made every day now: the entire GOP and the “corporate problem solver” Democrats are all in on the scam.
Whether it’s money from fossil fuel, big pharma, big chemical, big banking, big airlines, big telcom, big tech, or any other billion-dollar industry in America, the entire GOP and a handful of those “problem solver” Democrats in the House and Senate have their hands out. Literally, no other developed country in the world allows this democracy-killing corruption that five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized.
Next came poisonous memes designed to turn working people against each other.
The morbidly rich, and the corporations that made them that way, hate labor unions, aka “democracy in the workplace.” Unions reduce their profits and inhibit their ability to maximally exploit their workers; unionized workers also demand accountability, a word anathema to corporations.
Reagan promoted the idea that “union bosses” were exploiting union members for their own advantage and, even though the argument made no sense (unions don’t have stock or bonus systems like corporations, so “union bosses” get a salary just like everybody else), it was picked up by the media that was, itself, run by corporations unhappy about being unionized.
TV shows in the 1980s and 1990s routinely featured corrupt or mobbed-up “union bosses” as parts of their plots, while state after state adopted “Right To Work For Less” legislation, authorized by a Republican Congress over Harry Truman’s veto in 1947, that makes it difficult for unions to survive.
Right-wing radio and Fox “News” echoed the message, and, since Reagan’s election, we’ve seen union representation go from about a third of all Americans to around 10 percent in the private workplace today.
Along with the poisoning death of our unions came the destruction of the American middle class. When Reagan came into office some estimates put the middle class — a single family’s wage-earner being able to buy a home, a car, take a vacation, put kids through school, and save for retirement or have a pension — at around 60 to 65 percent of American families. Today it’s under 45 percent.
Conservatives then set about poisoning American race relations.
This is not to say everything was hunky dory, but in the 1960s and 1970s we were making real progress. Politicians from both parties — with the broad support of the American people — passed Voting- and Civil Rights laws, we made good faith efforts to integrate schools and workplaces, and even television shows in the 1990s, led by Norman Lear’s genius, brought positive portrayals of non-white and queer people to straight white people’s TV screens in a big way for the first time.
First came Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” openly welcoming southern white racists into the GOP. Next, tragically, in 1988 George HW Bush proved that appealing to white racism could still win elections with his notorious Willie Horton ads, setting the stage for two generations of race-baiting Republican politics that reached its zenith with Donald Trump’s racist declaration about “Mexican rapists” when he announced his candidacy in 2015.
The GOP continues this strategy today, promoting racial and religious fear and hate with Muslim bans and ICE raids, generating hysteria about Brown refugees and fighting to block any true portrayals of American racial history in our schools.
Hustlers, with help from the GOP, poisoned Christianity next.
Reagan’s campaign hired born-again alcoholic George W. Bush to work out a deal to integrate the evangelical movement — which prior to 1980 was non-political and even supported abortion rights — into the GOP. Jerry Falwell became the face of this church-and-state merger, spewing his own brand of poison.
The week after 9/11, Falwell and Pat Robertson solemnly agreed on TV that the attack on the Twin Towers was merely their god’s punishment for America tolerating “sin.”
"What we saw on Tuesday,” Falwell said on Pat Robertson’s TV show, “as terrible as it is, could be minuscule if, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve.”
Robertson replied:
“Jerry, that's my feeling. I think we've just seen the antechamber to terror. We haven't even begun to see what they can do to the major population.”
Falwell then doubled-down:
“The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad.
“I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularise America, I point the finger in their face and say, ‘You helped this happen.’”
Robertson, nodding vigorously, added:
“I totally concur, and the problem is we have adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government.”
And now we have evangelists like the newly reinvented Mike Flynn — a convicted and pardoned secret foreign agent who spied on us from within the White House — traveling the country today calling, essentially, for replacing our democracy with an authoritarian “Christian” government like in Russia and Hungary (and Germany and Italy in the past).
“If we are going to have one nation under God,” Flynn tells audiences repeatedly, “which we must, we have to have one religion. One nation under God, and one religion under God, right?”
Forget about the teachings of Jesus in The Sermon on the Mount and the Parable of the Goats and Sheep in Matthew 25; get yourself an AR-15 like Flynn recently strutted with on-stage. And let’s do something about all those Jews and Muslims, like Nick Fuentes recommends!
The NRA and weapons manufacturers then poured the poison of guns across our land.
Using the money Republicans on the Supreme Court authorized with the Bellotti and Citizens United decisions, combined with Scalia’s twisted Heller decision, the Supreme Court and the NRA have unleashed an epidemic of gun violence in America.
The average of all countries in the world is 9.86 guns per 100 civilians. The United States is highest in the world at 120.5 guns per 100 people. Yemen, which is in the middle of a war with Saudi Arabia and dealing with an internal insurgency, comes in second at 52.8.
No other nation is even close; even Afghanistan and Iraq average around 20 deadly weapons in the hands of every hundred people. European and Asian countries range from 10 to as low as 1 gun per hundred people.
Over on Fox “News,” one brilliant idea to deal with the slaughter of our children in our schools was to issue “Ballistic Blankets” to every school. This is how sick and twisted the Republicans taking money from the gun industry and their allies have become.
Twenty years ago, car accidents were the leading killer of children and youth: today it’s guns. This year, almost 11 out of every 100,000 children died from guns while only 8 per 100K died from car crashes. Nothing in America kills more of our children than the 400,000,000+ guns in which our country is awash (and that have made billions for the weapons industry).
White Supremacists are doing their best to poison our police and military.
There’s an active movement among white supremacist groups to spread the poison of fascism, racism, and hate to the government employees who carry the authority to legally kill people. As ABC News reported last March:
“Based on investigations between 2016 and 2020, agents and analysts with the FBI's division in San Antonio concluded that white supremacists and other right-wing extremists would ‘very likely seek affiliation with military and law enforcement entities in furtherance of’ their ideologies, according to a confidential intelligence assessment issued late last month.’”
And the epicenter for this appears to be Stephen Miller’s ICE.
“Semi-Fascist” MAGA Republicans are poisoning our system of governance.
Former President Biden rightly called out the MAGA faction of the Republican Party; they are actively working to undermine our republic and replace it with their beloved autocratic strongman models of Orbán’s Hungary, Bolsonaro’s Brazil, and Putin’s Russia. They’re even promoting Hungary and Orbán on Fox “News,” doing fawning specials live from Budapest featuring the Big Man himself.
In multiple Republican-controlled states, legislators have made it harder to vote — particularly for low-income people, minorities, and college students — while openly working to terrorize Black voters. Ron DeSantis paraded a group of mostly Black “illegal voters” in Florida, while Texas politicians have promoted far and wide their arrests of Black “felon voters.”
It’s all about trying to terrify Black people away from the polls, if less severe efforts like outlawing “Souls to the Polls” by ending Sunday voting aren’t enough to swing elections to the GOP.
The Brennan Center documents how:
“As of January 14, legislators in at least 27 states have introduced, pre-filed, or carried over 250 bills with restrictive [voting] provisions.”
Dozens are now law, and next is their SAVE America Act, which they don’t expect will pass but they will point to when Democrats win this coming November, claiming those victories were the result of fraud.
Meanwhile, Republican appointees on the Supreme Court let Republican secretaries of state cancel the voter registrations of over 20 million Americans in the last dozen years with their Ohio decision.
The Supreme Court has also allowed Republican secretaries of state to reduce the number of voting machines and voting locations, particularly in Black, Hispanic and college town neighborhoods, to force people wanting to vote into long, discouraging lines.
And they’re poisoning our social and news media.
In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, “write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?”
Vice President Wallace’s answer to those questions was published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan.
“The really dangerous American fascists,” Wallace wrote, “are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way.”
As if he had a time machine and could see the “conservative” media landscape today, Wallace continued:
“The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money and more power.”
Today CNN is about to be taken over by a hard-right nepo-baby billionaire just like CBS and TikTok (which has banned my show). There’s a network of “nearly 1300” websites purporting to be those of local newspapers but that are really rightwing propaganda operations, and dozens of actual rightwing “local” newspapers that are often stuck for free in people’s mailboxes.
Putin, Trump, Orbán, Xi, and other autocrats and rightwing billionaires are trying to poison democracies worldwide.
Donald Trump famously embraced autocrats, dictators, sheiks, and killers while snubbing leaders of democracies and working to destroy NATO and the United Nations. His family has taken in billions from the Middle East as he pursues a war against Iran that Netanyahu, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE have lobbied American presidents to undertake for over a generation.
Meanwhile, Russian and Chinese intelligence services run disinformation campaigns that fill social media with lies and information designed to tear democracies apart; they’re having considerable success in their efforts, including putting Trump in the White House in 2016 and 2024, and pushing through Brexit.
Republicans in Congress are even openly opposing Ukraine in that nation’s valiant battle against Russia’s terror campaign: most recently it was 11 Republican Senators and 57 Republican members of the House who proudly voted with Putin over America and Ukraine.
Rand Paul, who secretly carried a stash of documents (from Mar-a-Lago’s bathroom?) to Russia on behalf of Donald Trump to hand-deliver to Putin’s intelligence service, even argued that we should end the Espionage Act, while his Republican colleagues were demanding Congress defund the FBI.
This November we can deliver the antidote to all this GOP poison.
This isn’t the first time “conservative” racists and fascists have poisoned America.
The oligarchs of the Confederacy did it in the first half of the 19th century, and progressive President Abraham Lincoln defeated them in the Civil War.
And the first third of the 20th century was haunted by the rise of the Klan and the Republican Great Depression, until progressive President Franklin Roosevelt declared political war on them, saying, “[T]hey hate me, and I welcome their hatred!”
As FDR and his Vice President Henry Wallace showed us, the most effective way to reverse the effects of fascist poison in the bloodstream of our body politic is for progressives to take power and put both the nation and the middle class back together.
FDR, Truman, and Eisenhower — two Democrats and a Republican — renewed the faith of the American people in the government our Founders created and many died to give us.
They taught us that civic engagement — voting and participating in our political system — is the best antidote to fascist poison.
Forty-plus years of Reaganism, as I lay out in my book The Hidden History of Neoliberalism: How Reaganism Gutted America, is best remedied by purging right-wing poisoners from political power and then taking active steps to rebuild our nation.
Steps that Republicans and a handful of sellout Democrats have fought tooth-and-nail in their service to spreading the fascist poison of giant monopolies and the morbidly rich. They profit from keeping working peoples’ wages and benefits low, exploiting student debt, and forcing our public schools into crisis with bizarre anti-DEI laws and book bans.
This year will feature, more than any time since the Civil War, an unprecedented referendum on democracy. Fully sixty percent of Americans will have an “election denier” Trump-humping Republican on the ballot this November.
Time is short and both the danger of fascism and the opportunity to renew America are at our doorsteps.
Double-check your voter registrations (they can be challenged by Republicans even in Blue states) and do everything you can to wake up friends and neighbors to this very real danger to our republic. And get out on the streets on the 28th for No Kings Day!
FCC Chairman and apparent Goebbels fanboy Brendan Carr is suggesting the radio and TV broadcasters he regulates should begin airing more “pro-America” content. What he means, of course, is pro-Trump.
This illustrates a much larger reality: Republicans want a top-down, hierarchical political and economic system. Democrats want a bottom-up system with maximum participation and broad sharing of society’s wealth. Who is right?
Donald Trump just went on a rant about economics, oil, and Iran that has massive implications for the future of our nation. At the same time, a new study was published about how people lived in Mesoamerica before the European conquest that shows as many as half of all those ancient societies lived democratically and had a relatively egalitarian distribution of wealth.
It seems like these are separate, disconnected stories, but they’re not. And the tale they both tell gives us a major insight into the future of America, for better or worse, depending on the political decisions we make between now and November.
The stakes are getting higher every day, and it’s critical that we all understand how cultural and political evolution and world history led us to this dangerous and opportune moment.
We tend to think of economies and political systems as separate things, but in reality they’re deeply intertwined. Both either can be fragile or resilient, and that fragility or resilience most often depends on their relationship to each other.
Resilience is the ability of a governmental system or an economy to weather stresses without “breaking.” It’s the key to understanding everything that’s happening today in both politics and economics.
One of the best and most widely cited analyses of the difference in resilience between democracy and autocracy, for example, is the paper by Wolfgang Merkel & Anna Lührmann titled Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges published in the peer-reviewed journal Democratization.
Noting that, “Illiberalism and authoritarianism have become major threats to democracy across the world,” they point out that:
“The more democracies are resilient on all four levels of the political system (political community, institutions, actors, citizens) the less vulnerable they turn out to be in the present and future.”
As I document in my book, The Hidden History of American Democracy: Recovering Humanity’s Ancient Way of Living, democracy is the default system for nearly every species of animal and the historic majority of human societies prior to the so-called Agricultural Revolution.
And America’s Founders — having actually seen it being lived out by Native people — believed in it. Franklin, Adams, and Jefferson all wrote about their experiences with the “Indians” extensively, and the lessons they learned from them that made their way into our Constitution.
From Putin’s disastrous attack on Ukraine to the governments of Iran and Afghanistan being controlled entirely by a small subset of religious men, we see the calamitous consequences of rule by the few.
Thus, we find that democracy — a system of decision- and rule-making that most efficiently encompasses the collective wisdom of the group — is a survival system every bit as important as technology, science, and economics.
Democracy doesn’t rule out leadership or hierarchies of wealth or power. Rather, it specifies that the power determining how those hierarchies are formed, maintained, and determined — who’s in charge, in other words — comes from, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “the consent of the governed.”
And we get there through voting.
This use of voting-based democracy to establish and maintain the resilience — the survival potential — of a group, tribe, nation, or even animal species is so universal that it’s not limited to human beings.
In the Declaration of Independence’s first paragraph, for example, Jefferson wrote that “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” compelled America’s Founders to reject British oligarchy and embrace democracy.
It got him into a fight with the Declaration’s main editor, John Adams, who thought it should say “the Christian God,” but Jefferson prevailed. His deist friends like George Washington, Dr. Benjamin Rush, and Ben Franklin knew what he meant: nature and “God” interpenetrated each other, and they saw the result of that in the democracy — the balancing systems that produced ecological resilience — played out in nature.
And, I discovered when researching my book, Franklin in particular believed after decades of experience working with Native American tribes that those rules of nature are as universal to humans as they are to all other animals on earth.
But was he right? Is nature actually democratic?
Biologists Tim Roper and L. Conradt at the School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, England, studied this issue in animals.
We’ve always assumed that the alpha or leader animal of the herd or group makes the decisions, and the others follow, like human kings and queens of old. The leader knows best, we believe: he or she is prepared for that genetically by generations of Darwinian natural selection, or ordained by an omnipotent sky god.
But it turns out that there’s a system for voting among animals, from honeybees to primates, and we’ve just never noticed it because we weren’t looking for it.
“Many authors have assumed despotism without testing [for democracy],” Roper and Conradt noted in Nature, “because the feasibility of democracy, which requires the ability to vote and to count votes, is not immediately obvious in non-humans.”
Stepping into this vacuum of knowledge, the two scientists decided to create a testable model that “compares the synchronization costs of despotic and democratic groups.”
They and their research group discovered that when a single leader (what they call a despot) or a small group of leaders (the animal equivalent of an oligarchy) make the choices, the swings into extremes of behavior tend to be greater and more dangerous to the long-term survival of the group.
Wrong decisions, they hypothesized, would be made often enough to put the survival of the group at risk because in a despotic model the overall needs of the entire group are measured only through the lens of the leader’s needs.
With democratic decision-making, however, the overall knowledge and wisdom of the entire group, as well as the needs of the entire group, come into play. The outcome is less likely to harm anybody, and the group’s probability of survival is enhanced.
“Democratic decisions are more beneficial primarily because they tend to produce less extreme decisions,” they note in the abstract to their paper.
Britain’s leading mass-circulation science journal, New Scientist, looked at how Conradt and Roper’s model actually played out in the natural world. They examined the behavior of a herd of red deer, which are social animals with alpha “leaders.”
What they found was startling: red deer always behave democratically. When more than half the animals were pointing their bodies at a particular water hole, for example, the entire group would then move in that direction.
“In the case of real red deer,” James Randerson noted, “the animals do indeed vote with their feet by standing up. Likewise, with groups of African buffalo, individuals decide where to go by pointing in their preferred direction. The group takes the average and heads that way.”
This explains in part the “flock,” “swarm” and “school” nature of birds, gnats, and fish.
With each wingbeat or fin motion, each member is “voting” for the direction the flock, swarm or school should move; when the 51% threshold is hit, the entire group moves as if telepathically synchronized.
Dr. Tim Roper told me:
“Quite a lot of people have said, ‘My gorillas do that, or my animals do that.’ On an informal, anecdotal basis it [the article] seems to have triggered an, ‘Oh, yes, that’s quite true’ reaction in field workers.”
I asked him if his theory that animals — and, by inference, humans in their “natural state” — operating democratically contradicted Darwin.
He was emphatic:
“I don’t think it is [at variance with Darwin]. … So the point about this model is that democratic decision-making is best for all the individuals in the group, as opposed to following a leader, a dominant individual. So we see it as an individual selection model, and so it’s not incompatible with Darwin at all.“
Franklin and Jefferson were right. Democracy, it turns out, is the norm in nature’s god’s animal kingdom, for the simple reason that it confers the greatest likelihood the group will survive and prosper.
When democracies begin to drift away from this fundamental principle, and those who have accumulated wealth and the political power typically associated with it acquire the ability to influence or even control the rule-making process, democracy begins to fail. It becomes rigid and fragile.
When this process becomes advanced, democracies typically morph first into oligarchies (where we largely are now because five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized political bribery in Citizens United) and then Putin-like dictatorships (where Trump, DeSantis, and the other wannabee autocrats in the GOP want to take us).
Similarly, research on pre-European-contact Mesoamerican societies published by archeologists Gary M. Feinman and David M. Carballo validates the extensive claims by America’s Founders that I cited in my Democracy book: the most resilient and longest-surviving aboriginal and indigenous societies were also the most democratic.
Citing a 2018 study they’d published of 26 pre-contact Mesoamerican cities, the researchers were every bit as explicit about humans as had been Conradt, Roper and Randerson about the red deer:
“We found that more than half of them were not despotically ruled and that the more collective political centers had greater resilience in the face of droughts and floods, and warfare or shifts in trade. Cities that addressed their social challenges using more collective forms of governance and resource management were both larger and somewhat more resilient than the cities with personalized rulership and more concentrated political power.”
Digging deeper into the archeological record in the five years since that publication, they wrote:
“In a later study that included an updated and expanded sample of 32 well-researched Mesoamerican cities, we found that centers that were both more bottom-up and collective in their governance were more resilient.”
Thus, the kind of bottom-up democracy advocated by Democrats — where the largest number of people can vote, pluralism is encouraged, and the will of the people is respected even when it means your party loses power — has sustained America through most of our history (and has been continuously improved, in fits and starts, through the progressive enfranchisement of African Americans, women, and naturalized immigrants).
On the other hand, restricting democracy (as the MAGA GOP is committed to with their SAVE Act) by making it harder to vote, concentrating political power from the top-down, and using hate and demonization of racial, religious, and gender minorities to acquire and hold political power leads a society straight toward autocracy, fascism, and — most importantly in this context — a loss of cultural, political, and societal resilience.
The legacy of Reagan’s rejection of classical Adam Smith economics and adoption of trickle-down neoliberalism, along with GOP big lies about non-citizens voting and the “virtue” of high-minded “brilliant” billionaires making our decisions for us, made America less resilient and more vulnerable to being shattered by internal or external shocks.
They shook our confidence in government so severely that we elected a populist psychopath as president simply because he promised to “drain the swamp.”
Americans knew something was very, very wrong; they just hadn’t figured out that it all began decades ago with Reagan’s completely reordering the American economy and the GOP consciously deciding to exploit racial hate, homophobia, and misogyny as a political weapon.
America is now, with the upcoming No Kings marches and this November’s election, on a new and brighter course, one that comports with a genuine scientific and historic understanding of how to build and maintain resilient societies and economies.
Now all we have to do is work like hell to help America reject the fascists and re-embrace democracy.
The Hartmann Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Don’t give Joe Kent any kind of a pass just yet, because he’s still MAGA. And he’s about to become even more dangerous than he already was.
The DNI was under a microscope on Wednesday in the wake of the unexpected resignation letter bombshell released by the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent.
Tulsi “Hillary Told Us All About You” Gabbard was being grilled by the Senate Intelligence Committee and lied under oath yet again when being questioned by my Senator, Ron Wyden (D-OR). Senator Chutzpah here is the embodiment of “Speak softly and carry a big stick,” because he definitely stuck it to Tulsi.
It’s been fascinating to watch the MAGA reaction to Kent’s resignation unfold on Twitter, because Joe Kent wasn’t even on their radar before they were told what to say about him in their tweets.
The official message from the White House was, “Kent is a liar who was always weak on national security,” which is a weird thing to say about the person you hired to help oversee our national security. Another L for the world’s least successful businessman
Before Tuesday, Kent had been a MAGA darling and special favorite of Trump’s ever since they met at Kent’s wife’s Dignified Transfer in 2019, one of the few times Trump met the coffins of service people killed in action during his first term. Kent soon joined the Trump 2020 campaign and was a full-on America First MAGA mouthpiece, whom I dubbed “Rand Paul Lite” early on thanks to their resemblance in both looks and disregard for the truth.
After Trump lost the 2020 election, Kent positioned himself to run for Congress in Washington’s 3rd District — where I lived from 2001 until 2022 — to challenge then-Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA), who had fallen out of favor with Trump after she voted for his second impeachment. Herrera Beutler famously testified that she was with Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-FL, via Trump’s alimentary canal) in his office on January 6, 2021, when he called Trump at the White House and begged him to call off the MAGA crowd that was attempting to break into his office window.
“Well, Kevin,” Trump told him, “I guess some people are more upset about the election results than others.” And then hung up on him.
Ah, 2021, a time when Republicans quietly told the truth about Trump once he left office. That was a real thing that the media also fumbled back then.
In September 2021, I was writing for the now-defunct website Hill Reporter when I heard that then-Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) was being dispatched to appear with Joe Kent in Vancouver to boost his campaign. The full story has been archived, and once you’re done here, I’d appreciate it if you could take the time. But I’ll give you the Cliff’s Notes version here.
I’d arranged for an interview with both Gaetz and Kent for Labor Day via Kent’s campaign manager. We were set to meet at a coffee shop ahead of a planned private fundraiser, which would be followed by a rally at the Clark County Fairgrounds. The morning of the interview, I was told Gaetz wasn’t available, but Kent was still a go.
I was fully prepared, but Kent wasn’t ready for my competence. Kent, his tattoo sleeves partially covered by shirtsleeves even in the warm weather (SUS!), told me everything I needed to know about him by not answering the questions I asked him during our 40-minute interview, in which I repeatedly nailed him with these pesky things I brought with me called FACTS. We were only a couple of minutes in before he remarked, “Wow, I usually get softball questions.”
“Yeah, I don’t play softball,” I quipped.
My questions were enough for his campaign manager, who was furiously texting during the interview. Before the promised hour I’d arranged had elapsed, our conversation was cut short by Matt Braynard, a MAGA strategist and devoted J6er.
But I’d gleaned some very important info, mainly that there were already plans to challenge the results of the 2022 midterms, a full 14 months before a vote had been cast.
The fundraiser had been moved from a skate park (Matt Gaetz + teenagers = Bad Optics) to a private residence. Even though Kent had denounced the violence of January 6th in our interview, these were the kinds of bumper stickers on the cars of those who were welcome inside--unlike myself and my pal/bodyguard, Eugene.
There was also a heavy presence of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers at the very small rally, which wasn’t advertised, to both avoid protests as well as to keep the crowd to just “their” people--who threatened me.
Matt Gaetz quote-tweeted this from his then-official Congressional Twitter account. He used MAGA virtue signaling words like “triggered” and “Karen,” and then took his harassment of an American citizen even further by doing a segment about me on his “Firebrand” podcast. A sitting member of Congress used his platform to encourage his followers to “seek out” my social media, which they definitely did. What followed were weeks of targeted harassment, both online and off. Aside from getting multiple rape and death threats via every platform, there were calls and texts. Someone used Facebook Messenger to claim someone was on the way to film themselves killing me. Two hours later, a car was parked outside my apartment, and someone was taunting me from a burner phone, screaming, “COME OUTSIDE, TARA!”
Which I did not.
Law enforcement did nothing, not then and not when I reported being followed around town. House Ethics did nothing. The Florida Bar did nothing. Those tweets and two Firebrand episodes are still live.
Gaetz no longer has the protection of Congress, and I can only hope he’ll face charges for sex trafficking teenagers.
As for Joe Kent, keep your eye on him. Watch his friendship with Tucker Carlson. He’s still got those Nazi tattoos. He’s still dangerous, thanks to what he knows and what he believes. I’ve seen how he operates, up close and all too personal.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another just won the Oscar for Best Picture. It’s a multi-generational saga of political resistance. It’s a film about people fighting for something real, even when the odds are against them. It’s bloody, messy, and violent.
And then there’s the Trump administration’s version: One Lie After Another, a violent, bloody, and worse-than-messy narrative. No Oscars. No standing ovations. A zero percent on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics are panning it across the globe, and audiences are screaming back at the screen. And unlike Anderson’s film, this one is costing actual lives.
Since Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28, 2026, the Trump administration has subjected the American public to what can only be described as a thick, opaque fog of disinformation.
Every press briefing and gaggle, every social media post, every breathless statement from an interview or podium has been a performance of fabrication.
It’s a disaster of a disaster movie, with an ending that is sure to be an epic disaster.
The lies come so quickly and often — like the poof, parody, and slapstick of a Naked Gun movie — all delivered deadpan. Because of that frequency, we’ll cite just one lie from the main characters.
It begins with the offensive trailers. The Trump administration blended real war footage with video game, movie, and cartoon clips, and even athletes, to promote the war in Iran. Critics, including Pope Leo and former NFL players, condemned it, accusing the White House of reducing tragic human conflict to a video game and sanitizing it into propaganda.
The movie, which is a bloody reality, is far worse. There’s no “spoiler alert” for this review since the lies told about this war will live in infamy.
Donald Trump is the star, executive producer, casting agent, costume designer, and scriptwriter. He leads with more lies, falsehoods, and fairy tales than can fit into a single take.
Throughout, Trump lies constantly, often contradicting one lie with another. It’s his way of confusing the viewer, stripping away any semblance of rationality, and muddying the plot at every turn.
He delivered one of the dumbest statements a sitting president has ever made about a war he started. On March 10, Trump said Iran was responsible for a missile strike that killed schoolchildren in Minab, Iran, and claimed Iran possessed American-made Tomahawk missiles.
The problem? Tomahawks are U.S.-manufactured precision weapons available only to the United States and a small number of close allies. Iran doesn’t have them. Iran has never had them. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the accusation “beyond asinine.”
And since he’s the star, one more:
On March 16, Trump told reporters he was “shocked” that Iran retaliated by targeting U.S. allies in the Gulf. “Nobody expected it,” he said. Nobody—except the intelligence community, regional analysts, allied governments, and anyone who has spent fifteen minutes studying Iranian strategic doctrine since 1979.
It’s one of the many reasons preceding presidents avoided this path.
His co-star, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who would be an extra in Animal House, has been firing off fibs fast and furious, so much so that even his flag pocket square seems to wilt in real-time.
In one of the most stomach-churning moments of this already grim production, Hegseth claimed that parents and spouses of service members killed in action, “family after family,” encouraged him to “finish” the Iran operation.
One father, whose son died in the early stages of Operation Epic Fury went public to say he had never had such a conversation with Hegseth. Lying about families of the fallen may be the most loathsome act in the entire film.
And it’s not an isolated scene. This administration repeatedly invokes the grief of military families to justify decisions those families never endorsed. At one point, Hegseth even chastised the media for covering troop deaths instead of the “success” of the mission.
His wicked insincerity is the only thing resembling consistency in his performance.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio brings his own flair. When mediators in back-channel negotiations, reportedly making real progress on a new framework just before the bombs fell, described where talks had stood, Rubio dismissed the entire effort as “failed negotiations.”
Reporters who dug deeper found the opposite: multiple intermediaries said a deal had been closer than at any point in the previous two years. Rubio either didn’t know, or knew and said the opposite anyway. He also contradicted Trump about the reason for the war, which means one of them was lying, or both.
Not to be outdone, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has wandered into scenes where he clearly doesn’t belong.
On March 19, Bessent claimed the U.S. was not targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, a statement directly contradicted by reports of strikes on Kharg Island’s oil hub. The claim also conflicted with reporting about military activity near the Strait of Hormuz, another attempt to mislead the public.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright deserves his own credit line for a performance combining false optimism with spectacular self-contradiction, sometimes within the same breath.
Wright declared on television that the war would “certainly” end within weeks and that gas prices would fall along with it.
Here we are approaching four weeks with no end in sight, and gas prices are up roughly a dollar per gallon, and climbing.
When pressed, Wright conceded in the same interview that “there are no guarantees in wars at all,” apparently unaware he had just demolished his own prediction.
White House negotiator Steve Witkoff has a cameo. On March 7, Witkoff claimed Iran was “probably a week away” from acquiring industrial-grade material for a nuclear weapon, despite prior claims that Iran’s capabilities had been “obliterated” months earlier.
What Trump and his cast have produced in recent weeks is something else entirely - a chaotic, improvised, fact-free performance that has confused allies, emboldened adversaries, and left the American public with no reliable way to understand a war being waged in their name.
Zero stars. Do not recommend.
And the most unfortunate part: this is one film we can’t walk out of.
It’s reassuring to know that if you have brown skin and happen to be dead, it’s no longer OK to be a suspected pedophile.
I only wish the same were true for those who are white and living.
The lesson we learned from the news that broke this week in The New York Times is that Cesar Chavez, for decades hailed as a Latino civil rights champion and farm labor icon, had instantly plummeted from grace with a sickening thud. The extraordinary Times investigation featured interviews with dozens of sources and uncovered multiple victims of rape, sexual abuse, and grooming of teen and preteen girls — including fellow labor leader Delores Huerta (still with us at 95).
With his name suddenly toxic, momentum quickly built to erase Chavez’s name from schools, streets, and parks as well as change the handle of Cesar Chavez Day (March 31 annually) in California to Farmworkers Day, and essentially expunge him from history.
Heartbreaking though it is, these rapid steps are entirely justified. We can’t just go around venerating presumed sexual criminals no matter their other accomplishments for the greater good – even if they were somehow to become, say, President of the United States.
Chavez never bragged that he could get away with walking up and grabbing women by the genitalia. He didn’t live long enough to be named in the Epstein Files. But the charges by women – two of whom were still young girls when Chavez allegedly raped or molested them – have a sufficient ring of truth to demolish his legacy despite his having been deceased for more than 30 years.
You see, women don’t typically come forward with serious accusations of sexual assault absent legitimacy. This is not to say they never make it up, but it’s exceedingly rare.
In the case of Chavez, the accusers had nothing to gain by coming forward and much to lose in terms of peace of mind and life harmony. No doubt they’ve been threatened since the story broke, likely multiple times. Their moral compass demanded that they speak up in the hope they finally would be believed after so many years.
So, let’s bag the fiction that these women are somehow cashing in, or are insane, or mere troublemakers. No, they are simply courageous beyond measure. Nothing more, nothing less.
Now that it’s been decided Chavez’s reputation should rightly be in tatters, it’s essential that we examine, by comparison, the ongoing aggrandizement of our president – a man accused of equal or perhaps even greater abuse by multiple women, many of whom were young girls at the time of the alleged crimes.
I’m just going to come right out and say this: the chances that these women are all somehow lying about what was done to them by Trump both inside and outside the Epstein universe are close to zero. This is a man, after all, who proves daily that he has not the thinnest acquaintance with the truth and has boasted openly about his fondness for casual sexual attacks.
Oh, and he’s also a convicted felon 34 times over. Plus, a jury in 2023 found him liable of sexually abusing a woman, and then defaming her.
In no universe should we be expected to believe him over them. The only thing separating him from the same fate as Chavez is a credulous cult of blindly loyal MAGA supporters and a craven/corrupt Republican Party.
The Associated Press identified more than 130 locations or objects in at least 19 states named after Chavez, including libraries, boulevards, community centers, and public parks. All are expected to be renamed, the process having already begun.
Trump, meanwhile, shamelessly moves forward with his campaign to plant his name and likeness all over the United States, like a pit bull marking its territory. There’s Trump Tower, Trump International Hotel and Tower, Trump Plaza, Trump National Golf Club, and President Donald J. Trump Boulevard in Palm Beach, FL.
More controversially, Trump attached his name to the Kennedy Center and the United States Institute of Peace – the latter a name desecration that grows more ironic by the day. And now there’s been approval to put Trump’s disgusting likeness on a 24-carat gold commemorative coin to tie in with America’s 250th anniversary. This is to say nothing of his proposed ballroom monstrosity.
The idea of ramping up Trump’s personalization and veneration while his sycophantic Department of Justice steadfastly shields him and his cronies from exposure in the Epstein Files remains a despicable stain on this country. Next time someone assures me no one is above the law, I’ll chuckle and ask them to prove it.
We all live in the hope that once Trump is gone – either out of office or dead – his name will be deleted like Chavez’s soon will be. The Trump Kennedy Center will go back to being the Kennedy Center. The ballroom project will be scrapped. The mere mention of Trump’s ubiquitous name will be seen as blasphemous, and it will disappear into oblivion.
There is precedent for this.
Return with me to Germany in 1945. Soon after the Nazi empire fell, the rush was on to systematically denazify the nation. Every monument, statue, and bust of Hitler was removed. Streets, plazas, squares, and institutions that bore his name were rechristened. Many Nazi buildings were demolished, while others were repurposed or destroyed.
The fact that everyone is moving so quickly on Chavez while there is an overall fear and reluctance to even properly investigate Trump for his alleged criminal behavior leaves me wondering how much racism comes into play here. You know the Republicans are positively gleeful in their takedown of a man long held up as a hero of the left, even if he was loudly opposed to illegal immigration.
Republicans continue to pretend, at least publicly, that Trump remains innocent of ever having forced himself on a woman, much less a child. But there’s no question in my mind that if we could hear their whispers in private, a far different story would be told. And sooner or later, it will.
Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.
Friends,
Yesterday, Trump said that he’d do whatever is necessary to ease the oil crisis. He also assured America that the crisis “will be over soon.”
BS.
The problem isn’t just that Iran has blocked the Strait of Hormuz. It’s also that Iran, Israel, and the United States have all inflicted — and continue to inflict — serious damage to the oil and gas infrastructure of the Middle East. This damage will take months if not years to repair.
At one point on Thursday oil prices jumped to $119 a barrel before falling back to around $111 a barrel — all but guaranteeing that the price of gas at the pump will continue to rise, as will the prices of many other products and services indirectly affected by oil prices.
What we are now witnessing is one of the grossest military and political blunders in modern history.
It’s not hard to understand why Trump is trapped in Iran. He doesn’t listen to anyone outside his small circle of sycophants who tell him what he wants to hear.
But there’s something else. Iran has adopted an asymmetric war strategy that’s working.
I’m indebted to Marty Manley for uncovering a fascinating historical fact that sheds light on what Iran is doing. During the Korean War, U.S. Air Force Colonel John Boyd came up with a theory of competitive decision-making that shaped American military doctrine for a generation. He called it the OODA loop: Observe, Orient, Decide, Act.
Boyd found that victory doesn’t go to the side with more firepower. It goes to the side that cycles through the OODA loop faster — observing what’s changing, orienting to its meaning, deciding what to do, and acting before its adversary does.
Get inside your opponent’s loop, Boyd reasoned, and you don’t just outpace him. You break his ability to form a coherent picture of the war he’s fighting.
Manley observes that Iran has adopted Boyd’s approach. Iran hasn’t needed to match American firepower; it’s needed only to generate economic and political problems for Washington that outrun Washington’s ability to orient, decide, and act.
Iran has gotten inside Trump’s OODA loop because Iran has responded to U.S. airstrikes by widening the war horizontally — attacking tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, launching drones and missiles at Gulf state oil and gas infrastructure, provoking the U.S. and Israel to destroy even more of that infrastructure, hitting Amazon data centers in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain (causing regional outages for banking, e-commerce, and cloud services), and squeezing other choke points that the global economy depends on.
Iran’s leaders — veterans of asymmetric wars in Iraq and Syria — are applying the same asymmetric logic to Trump’s war. Inexpensive drones, short-range missiles, and sea mines can have the same effect that IEDs had in Iraq — only with far greater strategic impact, because they disrupt global supply chains.
What has Washington done? Dropped more bombs and launched more missiles.
On Wednesday Israel struck at the crown jewel of Iran’s energy industry — the giant South Pars gas field that Iran shares with Qatar and is by far the largest in the world. (Israel says Trump gave the attack his blessing; Trump says he didn’t.) Iran quickly retaliated with an attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan Industrial City, the world’s largest liquefied natural gas facility.
The attacks have sent the global oil benchmark soaring and prompted a mad scramble in Washington. Trump threatens “to blow up the entirety” of Iran’s South Pars gas holdings if Iran attacks Qatar again. His treasury secretary says the U.S. will consider lifting sanctions on millions of barrels of Iranian oil.
Since he and Israel began bombing Iran, Trump’s strategy has been entirely reactive. Iran is generating problems for Washington faster than Washington can contain them — a clear sign that Iran is inside Trump’s OODA loop.
Trump and Israel assumed that overwhelming airpower would either compel Iran to surrender or trigger regime change. But neither has happened. The regime seems more entrenched and bellicose than ever.
As Iran continues to block the Strait of Hormuz and attacks its Gulf neighbors’ oil and gas infrastructure, the cost-benefit ratio continues to shift against Trump: Economic and political pressures are mounting on Washington faster than they are on Tehran.
Sure, Iran is hurting — but, as Manley argues, Iran can sustain its counteroffensive more easily and longer than the U.S. can sustain economic damage to Iran. An Iranian Shahed drone made of styrofoam and powered by a motorcycle engine, for example, costs orders of magnitude less than the precision missiles sent to intercept it or the economic havoc it causes when it ignites a tanker, data center, or desalination plant.
In addition, the longer Trump’s OODA loop stays broken, the more bad consequences occur that no one in the Trump regime anticipated. Trump’s war in Iran is now being led by Israel rather than the other way around, and Trump has no easy way to alter this power imbalance.
The war has also shifted the power balance between Russia and Ukraine, with Russian oil revenues potentially doubling as U.S. weapons stocks become depleted.
So what’s next for the U.S.? Is there any way out for Trump?
He could put “boots on the ground” in Iran and attempt to seize Iran’s stockpile of approximately 970 pounds of 60 percent enriched uranium — enough to produce multiple nuclear weapons if further enriched. If he could pull this off, a major feat.
But this would be a particularly dangerous move in terms of American lives lost. It could even risk an accidental nuclear explosion.
Moreover, no one knows where the enriched uranium is being stored. In the wake of U.S. and Israeli strikes last June, it’s likely in deep underground tunnels near Isfahan and other secure locations, but the International Atomic Energy Agency can’t verify the exact locations or status of the stockpile due to lack of access to bombed sites.
What about returning to the diplomatic table? As Richard Haass points out, Trump hardly gave diplomacy a chance before launching his war. U.S. envoys Witkoff and Kushner blended maximal positions — effectively demanding an end to Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missile force, and support for proxies — with minimal time for negotiation.
Haass notes the stark contrast between this process and the administration’s apparently endless willingness to give Russia the benefit of the doubt and compromise Ukraine’s interests.
If Trump returned to negotiations now, from a position of demonstrated military capability rather than exhaustion, Iran might be forced to reorient and respond to an adversary that did something unpredictable.
The problem is that the Trump regime has repeatedly reneged on his promises to Iran, so Tehran has no reason to believe any offer Trump makes.
So, presumably for the foreseeable future, Iran will remain in Trump’s OODA loop, Trump will remain trapped in Iran, and American consumers will be trapped by soaring energy prices.
In one of my most elaborate undercover operations for BBC Newsnight, I got my hands on the secret plans for the invasion. Nope, not Trump’s attack on Iran. It was 2004 when I conned the Heritage Foundation and a James Baker operative into handing over the elaborate 323-page plan to keep the oil flowing from Iraq. The plan was secretly drafted BEFORE George W. Bush invaded.
In 2004, The State Department had told me that no plan existed for handling Iraq’s oil. I didn’t buy it. If we invaded California, we’d certainly have a plan for oranges and action films.
With lots of luck, with lots of bluff and BS, I got my hands on the confidential scheme. Here it was, the smash-and-grab plan for Iraq’s oil written in secret at the direction of oil industry bigshots headed by Baker, Bush Sr’s Secretary of State who, as a lawyer, represented Exxon and the Saudi monarchy.
At the time, when I reported it on BBC, it was a scandal. (Correction: the story was front-page news everywhere BUT the USA where it was buried.)
I’m only bringing up 20-year-old history to tell you that, while Bush’s hidden plan for the oil fields of Iraq evidenced greedy secret scheming to grab Iraq’s oil industry, at least we could say this: EVEN GEORGE BUSH HAD A PLAN.
So no, I have not uncovered Trump’s secret plans for the invasion of Iran, or his plan to protect the world’s oil supply, BECAUSE TRUMP HAS NO PLAN. Even the Wall Street Journal, a loud booster of the attack on Iran, was shocked that our trillion-dollar defense and intelligence apparatus did not seem to know that the choke point at the Strait of Hormuz would seize the world’s economy by the throat.
In fact, before Bush invaded Iraq, he had TWO plans. One was 101 pages long drafted by neo-cons in the Defense Department (with help from the Heritage Foundation) to “privatize” (that is, seize) Iraq’s oil fields. Kudos to the Wall Street Journal for getting that document and sharing it with me.
However, oil companies were furiously opposed to seizing Iraq’s oil, so the oil men drafted a 323-page counter-plan.
And what a plan it was. The State Department and Big Oil were pushing for what they called, “an invasion disguised as a coup,” with one of Saddam Hussein’s generals taking over. The 101st Airborne would be in and out in three days.
In fact, the State Department had a secret hugger-mugger in Walnut Creek, California, where, as OPEC consultant Falah Aljibury told me, he “auditioned” several of Saddam’s generals to act as replacement dictator.
Amazingly, once I got the oil industry plan, I reviewed it with Philip Carroll, the former CEO of Shell Oil USA, who had been appointed, under pressure from the oil industry, by Bush to take charge of Iraq’s oil fields. Carroll slammed the neo-con claim that “privatization [of Iraq’s oil] is a no-brainer.” Carroll said, “it would only be thought about by someone with no brains.”
Why did Shell and Exxon NOT want Iraq’s oil fields? Because, as a Saudi official explained to me, that would kick Iraq out of OPEC and, indeed, the OPEC cartel’s power would be crushed. The Texas oil bosses knew: We don’t want Iraq’s oil, we want Iraq to stay in OPEC to LIMIT Iraq’s production and keep the price of oil at $50+ a barrel.
Oil corporations don’t want oil, they want PROFITS. Keeping most of Iraq’s oil in the ground per direction of OPEC, keeps prices high. Those oil fields today remain, technically, in the hands of Iraqis. Oil companies work by “Production Sharing Agreements” which give Big Oil the profits without the headache of ownership and keeps the OPEC cartel sitting happily on its spigots.
But Iran is different. I can’t find the secret plans for Trump’s attack on Iran because it seems there are none. It seems that “Secretary of War” Pete Hegseth and our massive intelligence agencies haven’t looked at Google Maps. I thought these guys read the Bible, in which Jesus clearly said, “It is as difficult for a rich man to get into heaven as it is to get an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz.” I may not have that quote exactly, but you know what I mean.
Trump is right, that the war is nearly over. Because the Ayatollahs have won. While we can revel in Trump’s nose being rubbed in the vomit of his own self-created defeat, let us not forget that it is the people of Iran who are paying the price of Trump’s hubris, of Netanyahu’s fever dreams of Iranians rising up against their mullah masters.
The Guardian reports that, this year, Iran gunned down over 30,000 of its own citizens, unarmed, nearly ten times the number of Americans killed on September 11, 2001. Now that Trump and Hegseth have discovered the Strait of Hormuz, they must realize they are checkmated. And that they will sell out the Iranian people to the untender mercies of the religious fascists in return for some baloney deal to limit Iran’s nuclear bomb program.
Uncovering Dubya Bush’s plan for Iraq’s oil, the auditions for a new dictator, the oil industry, Saudi and OPEC control over Iraq’s oil output made me sick at heart. But the only thing more evil than a secret plan is to have no plan at all. I am sick when I hear Mr. Chickenhawk “bone spurs” draft dodger Trump tell the Iranians to rise up, unarmed, against the murder-crats.
When Trump does his TACO, as he always does, we will witness the Islamic Revolutionary Guard begin the mass arrests, whippings and executions that are all too predictable. You know and I know that Trump is going to sell them out. All because he had no plan, just a momentary rush from his testosterone and Adderall injections. An empty, bloviating sack of a man, with small hands and a small heart.
There may have been no more honest action in this administration than when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted the Pentagon was predicated on war, tossing aside former assumptions that it engaged only in "defense." And here we are.
Only one year into his term, President Donald Trump ordered troops into a war without an articulable argument as to an Iranian threat, never mind justification proven by fact. Appropriately, the result ensures Trump's eventual personal demise, but sadly, too, the destruction of the American public's hard-earned global goodwill. But struggle back anyway.
Trump will eventually go, but unlike the first term, the war now vitiates any chance that decent nations forgive and forget, not this time. Of course, this is what happens when unserious people plow forward in a seriously dangerous and unforgivable cause.
Hegseth spends news conferences berating media coverage, before taking notice of the bodies of service members, all because even in war, content is seriously king.
Absolutely, the vast majority of the American public understands the administration's motivation with drone-like precision. Our Secretary of "War," under our president's predation, desperately needs an outlet to ensure his "bro" followers concentrate on it all being alpha-cool.
The White House supports that same need with video memes, "pow" — straight out of video games, literally. To be sure, the world, too, despondently sees the same mystifying behavior, one enjoyed by far too many of our fellow citizens, a "real action" movie that plays out to horrified audiences elsewhere.
A most serious war by the most unserious people ensures well-deserved consequences, ones as unbounded as imprecise, impossible to predict.
But again, here we are. Indeed, momentarily and embarrassingly, embrace exactly where we are, the world sure does. A president in a ballcap over bodies.
Trump looks absurd wearing that white baseball cap during the transfer of the fallen U.S. soldiers pic.twitter.com/n8sS0AlXY6
— Russian Market (@runews) March 7, 2026
A "Secretary of War" obsessed with the media play:
Defense Secretary Hegseth used his press conference on Trump's war on Iran to browbeat the press & weigh in on CNN's ownership: "More fake news from CNN ... the sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better"(Hegseth spent more time attacking media than he did on US casualties)
[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 13, 2026 at 8:52 AM
The wartime president dancing the night away:
Iraq War Veteran Crow: Trump announced the start of this war with Iran at Mar-a-Lago. He talked about the fact that service members were going to die. Then he literally walked behind the curtains to his private club and he hosted a million dollars a plate dinner and dance party that night.
[image or embed]
— FactPost (@factpostnews.bsky.social) March 2, 2026 at 5:56 PM
An insulting Orwellian assurance, higher gas prices, all needed to bring gas prices down.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt argued Tuesday that the US' war with Iran will deliver lower gas prices for Americans over the "long term," despite the recent surge in energy costs around the globe.
Read more: https://t.co/HHI5TM8b51 pic.twitter.com/whFOklQVmP
— CNN (@CNN) March 10, 2026
See?
The world sure sees.
Of course, we soothe ourselves knowing Trump can't last. Indeed, again, the war ensures he likely falls even sooner. Just know, the world remains unsoothed knowing that the American voters who put these men in place do last, and again, unserious voters usher in the most serious result. "We" don't trust these people, nor do they.
But the global community's response — redirecting trade, shifting alliances, and abandoning assumptions — that reaction will last much longer than an impending national political solution. Dems will surely get their mid-term blue wave; meanwhile, the world will just wave.
But as undeniable and inevitable the result may be, Americans must expend every effort to at least minimize the extent. It is awfully tempting to just give up. It's done. We're gone, at least from where we were. But it can always get worse — always, the result more impactful and enduring unless abated, however that may be done.
Perhaps the only good news in all this is that unserious people who wage war without real analysis are just as vulnerable to paper bombs from files, revolts over coffins, or simply the public exhaustion that simply bursts forth in unanticipated ways, all against an administration just as flat-footed, just as politically unaware and unserious. Movements and cults stand impervious to pushback right up until they're not, and are, by definition, even more impervious to resurrection.
Trump and Hegseth seem astonished that Iran closed the Hormuz Straight, paralyzing the transport of energy across the globe. Assuredly, they'll be no less astonished if and when the American public's rage — one born of hard work and faith — paralyzes any dodge, any cover-up, freezing the situation in place. Nowhere to go.
See? The world will see that, too. And, no, they won't forgive and forget, the consequences cascading, exact end results unforeseeable. But the struggle to crawl back must begin somewhere, so let it start now, at least in some way.
The Trumpers tell us this all avoids Iran's nuclear threat. Fine. Force them to prove it and call your Congressional representative again. Because the administration is not ready to meet that demand straight up.
We know the administration wanted a diversion from Epstein revelations. Not fine. Save some focus on the Epstein matter because their every action, every speech, all of it, belies a resulting fear of their demise. Call your Congressional representative again.
Protest the war, project our seriousness, share the world's shock. Vote for God's sake... at least demand it. Congress definitely hears that message, even a third time.
The most serious action by the most unserious people, all of it unsustainable, consequences just as assurable, remains inevitable. Meet it all with serious action, still, because the world depends on us, even as it backs away. Rest assured.
It's all just so awful. But they've laid their seed of destruction, rest also assured.
Because war to avoid talk of rape? Well, these unserious "war fighters" finally found a battle way too serious. Make that call — the world is listening.
Jason Miciak is a former associate editor of Occupy Democrats and a Rawstory writer at large. He is an author, American attorney, and single-parent girldad. He can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com, on "X" @jasonmiciak, and please follow on Bluesky, currently seeking beta readers for his newest novel, soon to be released.Last week, we watched a US-made Tomahawk missile murder more than 160+ Iranian school children. We watched in horror, helpless to stop the incoming massacres as the US and Israel carpet-bombed Iran, then Lebanon, displacing millions of people from their homes. The pure, unrelenting terror continues to unfold. We are shocked and devastated, but we are also enraged — because for every bomb the US and Israel drop, a bunch of men in cushy offices profit off all the death.
There is an urgent need to identify and address the burgeoning war profiteers that are leading the world headfirst into planetary destruction. War does not end in Venezuela or Iran. It will continue until all avenues are exhausted, until there are no resources left to plunder because they have destroyed everything.
I call your attention to Peter Thiel, founder of military tech company Palantir, who just last week visited with Japan’s prime minister last week and was dubbed “America’s shadow president” across Japanese media. I call your attention to Ethan Thornton, founder of Mach Industries, who is attempting to create dangerous hydrogen-powered weapons (and almost killed a coworker in the process). I call your attention to Rob Slaughter, cofounder of Defense Unicorns, whose company has “built the software backbone of the War Department” (and whose surname is rather apt). And I call your attention to Palmer Luckey, self-proclaimed “radical Zionist” and founder of Anduril, a military tech company that supplies the U.S. military with AI and autonomous weapons.
There are many more corporate executives selling weapons and making a killing off of killing. But today we are going to talk about Anduril founder Palmer Luckey, the Tony Stark wannabe who so very badly wants to believe he’s the good guy. Recently, after CODEPINK launched a petition calling him out for his crimes, he claimed that he’s actually saving lives.
This is how war profiteers have always tried to sell war to people. It’s for the greater good! If we don’t kill them, they will probably try to kill us at some much later date! As much as they want us to believe that their pre-emptive wars of aggression are necessary, the truth is we don’t need to security dilemma ourselves into functioning like soulless robots; we’re actually evolved humans who can participate in dialogue, the great human superpower. It’s not a hard conclusion to draw: murder is not the solution to a disagreement with your neighbor, just as systematic murder is not the solution to a disagreement with another nation.
Besides, we all know war isn’t about saving American lives. Instead, American lives are spent carelessly to accomplish elite agendas, and then veterans are discarded like broken utensils. Tell us, Luckey, whose lives were saved by slaughtering civilians in My Lai in 1968 or in Haditha in 2005? Whose lives were saved by taking out every hospital in Gaza? Whose lives were saved by bombing 160+ school children in Iran?
No, murder is not about saving lives, just as war is not about accomplishing everlasting peace. It’s about men in safe, cushy offices far away from the battlefield amassing as much wealth as possible before they have to join the rest of us as dirt in the ground.
You can tell our petition bothered Luckey, because a few minutes later, he tweeted this:
It’s certainly an odd argument to make — that Anduril should never have had the opportunity to exist. It’s almost a direct admission of guilt, if you think about it. A shrugging of responsibility for Anduril’s existence, as if Luckey didn’t build the company himself from the ground up. It’s the world’s fault for needing Anduril, right? He’s just another cog in the machinery of fate. Helpless, unable to withstand his destiny of building murder machines. It’s funny how these war profiteers want all the recognition for what they make until they start getting recognition for the consequences of what they make. Well, we should never have existed anyway!
Luckey also wonders why the media thinks he wants tech to be more involved in the military, as if those words haven’t repeatedly come from his own mouth. He’s been rather urgent about advocating for advanced military tech to counter Russia, China, and Iran, even going so far as to actively prepare for a “simultaneous conflict” by developing advanced, rapid-production military systems. He’s an especially big fan of war on China, and instated a “China 27” strategy, which states that Anduril won’t design and produce any new weapons that won’t be ready by 2027 — the date the War Department set on war with China.
Last year, Anduril secured a $99 million US Air Force contract for autonomous software and a ten-year, $642 million Marine Corps contract for counter-drone systems. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth visited Anduril’s headquarters, where he proclaimed: “We are rebuilding the Arsenal of Freedom.”
Anduril, now valued at nearly $31 billion, was named after the Lord of the Rings sword, “Flame of the West,” a fitting title for a tool of the imperial West’s perpetual exploitation and murder of innocents abroad. The company is also responsible for the “border protection system” of lasers and identification software, inspired by Trump’s dream for a border wall, and has released new wearable headsets that Luckey claims “turn soldiers into superheroes.”
Fact of the matter is, Luckey likes to think of himself as a type of superhero or Lord of the Rings character, bumbling through an adventure, taking down bad guys, and stacking up points. But in doing so, he’s treating reality as a sort of faraway game, entirely detached from human suffering. It’s not all that different from what the White House is doing—just check out this recent White House tweet, which compared the bombing of Iran to a Wii sports game.
War profiteers like Luckey are all the same. They exist in some fantastical bubble, getting high on the idea that they’re helping save-the-world, while the government takes their fresh-baked drones and missiles and sends them to schools, hospitals, and residential buildings to take out unsuspecting families, destroy infrastructure, and wreak widespread destruction. But the truth is — even if it’s deep-deep-down in the dark voids of their souls — Luckey and friends know exactly which part they’re playing and choose not to care.
What does Luckey do with his blood money other than enthusiastically participate in a “B-boys club” group chat (B as in billionaire)... Well, he has amassed quite the collection of vehicles, including a 1969 Ford Mustang, a Tesla Model S, a 2001 Honda Insight, a 1967 Disneyland Autopia car, a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter, a 1985 ex-Marine Corps Humvee, a Mark V Special Operations Craft, two submarines, and multiple motorcycles, among many others. … I wonder if we converted USD to human lives, how many people had to die for Luckey to afford each vehicle?
It’s a simple equation: more war means more money for war profiteers. So it’s really no surprise Luckey is hellbent on war with China, which would make him billions and could afford him another few submarines for his imaginary underwater adventures. The U.S. has invested trillions of dollars into preparing for war on China ($3.4 trillion to be exact, a number larger than the total amount spent on 20 years of war in Afghanistan). Every incremental increase to the War Department budget is justified with the same reason: we need to counter China, we need to counter China, we need to counter China. China has become the ultimate war budget enhancer, and all the slippery politicians and war profiteers have taken advantage of it.
Unfortunately, war is the main driver of U.S. technological advancement. So instead of developing advanced technology to improve infrastructure, build high-speed railways, and raise the standard of living, the tech industry is creating headsets for soldiers to optimize killing during battle. They are making autonomous robot drones that pick their next targets according to data sets, rather than valuing human life. They are using AI to draft battle strategies and risking escalation to unforeseen, unredeemable heights.
Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, China… These nations are not the enemies of ordinary people in the U.S. Our enemies are internal: the war profiteers, the ruling class, the “B-boys club” members, and the military tech founders. It is the ruling elites who drive war, all for profit. And it is always the people who suffer. Even now, we suffer as all our taxpayer money is funneled into new contracts with companies like Anduril instead of supporting the health and well-being of the American people. And so overseas, children are murdered, so guys like Palmer Luckey can add to their rare car collections.
Instead of pointing at manufactured enemies overseas, we must confront all the war profiteers in the United States, driving us into more war. Their power rests solely on one thing: convincing us that they are the good guys, and that innocent people in Iran, Lebanon, Venezuela, China, and elsewhere are bad and deserving of death. Let’s make sure Palmer Luckey knows that we will never let him get away with profiting off murder.
Friends,
Let me stipulate to five things:
First, Artificial Intelligence is a tsunami bearing down on human beings at a remarkable speed.
Second, AI has the potential to make life on this planet better in many ways, but if unregulated, it could do terrible things including ending human life altogether.
Third, huge sums are being spent on AI by governments (especially the U.S. and China) and by private tech corporations.
Fourth, the incipient AI industry has already become a major political force in the U.S., supporting candidates who pledge not to regulate it and opposing candidates who intend to regulate it.
Finally, the Trump regime and its puppets in Congress don’t want to regulate it. That’s partly because the regime and its puppets are rife with corruption and conflicts of interest. Several of key officials have personal investments in AI and want it to be as profitable as possible.
Now, given all this, I think we should all be grateful that at least one prominent AI corporation — which has developed one of the most successful AI systems — is requiring that any purchaser of it agree not to use it for doing bad things. Specifically, it is prohibiting users from utilizing its AI to surveil American citizens or create automated weapons uncontrolled by human beings.
I’m referring, of course, to Anthropic and its CEO and founder Dario Amodei.
Enter Pete Hegseth, Trump’s “Secretary of War” and one of the most incompetent people ever to become a member of a president’s cabinet.
He and the Trump regime have come to rely on Anthropic’s AI. As Trump’s war has entered its third week, the U.S. military is using it to help analyze intelligence.
But Hegseth and the regime hate the fact that Anthropic has put the two above-mentioned conditions on its use.
So they’ve blacklisted Anthropic from future defense contracts, calling it a “supply-chain risk” (a label previously used only to bar foreign companies that posed risks to national security). Because the U.S. government is such a huge purchaser of AI, that blacklisting is almost a kiss of death for Anthropic.
What did Anthropic then do? It didn’t back down. Instead, it sued the regime, accusing the Pentagon of punishing it on ideological grounds and arguing that the regime is violating its First Amendment rights.
Yesterday, the Trump regime defended its decision in court — calling Anthropic an unacceptable risk to national security because it could disable or alter its technology to suit its “own interests” in a time of war.
The regime also argued that it has the authority to choose vendors, and Anthropic has no right to “unilaterally impose contract terms on the government.”
So who has the best argument here?
When we’re dealing with a gigantic force (AI) that must have guardrails to ensure it’s used in ways consistent with the common good, and the government refuses to supply such guardrails, a courageous private AI corporation and CEO should have the right to impose them as a condition for using its product.
As nearly 150 retired federal and state judges wrote in their amicus brief supporting Anthropic: “no one is trying to force the Department to contract with Anthropic. Instead, Anthropic is asking only that it not be punished on its way out the door.”
Exactly.
By the way, when did you last hear of former judges, appointed by both Republicans and Democrats, submit an amicus brief on behalf of a private company against the government?
Tech companies and their employees have also filed legal briefs in support of Anthropic. Even Microsoft, a major investor in Anthropic’s competitor OpenAI, filed a friend-of-the-court brief. Thirty-seven engineers and researchers from OpenAI and Google, including Jeff Dean, Google’s chief scientist, have also filed a brief supporting Anthropic.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Democracy and Technology filed a brief, arguing that Anthropic was protected by the First Amendment in speaking up against the Pentagon about its A.I. technology.
What we have here is one the clearest examples so far of countervailing powers — a leading corporation, a federal court, former federal judges, other tech companies and their engineers, and civil society nonprofits — joining together to confront a rogue and corrupt regime on an issue of extraordinary importance to the future.
It should be a comfort to us all that even when the normal processes of democracy are taken over by a tyrannous regime, such countervailing powers are still able and willing to rally for the common good.
Granted, it is a small comfort. But in these dark days, even small comforts must be celebrated. Tyranny cannot succeed where people refuse to submit to it.
As a gay man, let me tell you what I didn’t do when I read the news that U.S. intelligence has reportedly briefed Donald Trump that Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is probably gay.
I didn’t laugh.
Apparently, a lot of people in that room did. According to reports, a senior intelligence official “hasn’t stopped laughing about it for days.” Trump himself found it amusing. The whole scene, powerful white men, sitting around and chuckling over the idea that the next ruler of the Islamic Republic might be gay. It played out like a punchline to a joke where being gay is the thing that makes a man less than a man.
Because if this story is true, it is one of the most revealing, tragic, and dangerous pieces of intelligence to surface in years, and almost nobody is saying what it actually means.
Let’s start with what's obvious to most of us — that Iran brutally executes gay people. The Islamic Republic has, for decades, hanged gay men from cranes, imprisoned them, and subjected them to forced surgery under the grotesque pretense of “correction.”
Being gay in Iran isn’t some misdemeanor. It’s a capital offense. It’s deadly. And now we’re being told that the man who stands to inherit this system, who would be charged with upholding Iran’s religious law and moral authority, may himself be the very thing his regime has spent years trying to eradicate.
That is a sick joke. Not a funny one. Mojtaba Khamenei is despicable and evil, perhaps more so than his father, some have said.
If you want to understand the psychology of political homophobia, the kind that destroys and kills, look at what it produces at the top. We have seen this pattern before: in the American religious right, where men thundered from pulpits about the sin of homosexuality, only to be exposed as being with a male escort. Hypocrisy isn’t incidental to this system; it is baked into it.
In the Catholic Church, an institution that punished gay seminarians while sheltering powerful men living double lives. In Chechnya, where Ramzan Kadyrov presided over concentration camps for gay men.
The closet doesn’t just destroy individuals. In the hands of a dictatorial theocracy, it becomes an instrument of ruthless power. Because when a man cannot be what he is, and rises within a hierarchy that despises what he is, he has two choices: either run for the hills or double down.
In authoritarian regimes, they double down. And, they overcompensate. They become the most ferocious enforcers of the very laws that condemn them. Every act of state-sponsored torture, mutilation, and murder against gay Iranians may be, in some perverse and devastating way, tied to a system that cannot tolerate the truth of its own leaders.
But here’s where it gets more complicated, and perhaps more dangerous. Because the question isn’t just who Mojtaba Khamenei is in private. The question is what Washington does with this intelligence. Because intelligence like this cuts in multiple directions, and none of them lead to clean outcomes.
On one hand, you could leak it into Iranian internal channels and let it detonate inside the clerical establishment that rules the country. If the men around him believe he is living in violation of the very laws he is sworn to enforce, they are unlikely to look the other way.
But that’s questionable because, if American intelligence has this information on Khamenei, surely others in positions of power in Iran know it too.
If so, then as a leader cornered by that kind of exposure, Khamenei may lash out. And in regimes like this, lashing out often means lots of blood.
But here is the other edge of that sword. If the United States outs the Supreme Leader of Iran as gay in order to destroy him, then we have just told the entire world that being gay is a weapon, and a tool of humiliation to be deployed against your enemies.
And that sends a message that would also result in lots of blood.
We will have confirmed, in the most official way possible, that being gay is something so shameful, so delegitimizing, that it can bring down a government. And that message will not stay contained within Iran. It will echo in every authoritarian state where queer people are already living on the edge of survival.
The men around Trump making that calculation are the same men who have spent years dismantling protections for LGBTQ Americans, banning trans kids from sports, rolling back federal nondiscrimination rules, and treating queer identity as something suspect or expendable.
They would be weaponizing queer identity abroad while devaluing it at home. The laughter isn’t surprising when you consider the worldview behind it, and the assumption that being gay is inherently lesser, inherently ridiculous.
And what about gay Iranians? They are the ones actually living under this system. They are the ones at risk.
A campaign built on exposing Khamenei’s sexuality does not liberate Iranians. It endangers them. A regime under siege doesn’t become more humane — it becomes more brutal. It tightens its grip. It looks for enemies within.
Somewhere in Tehran, there are gay men and women who wake up every morning in fear of their government. They are human beings with families, with love, with lives they are trying to hold together. They are not intelligence assets. They are people living inside one of the most suffocating closets in the world.
And that’s why the laughter matters.
Because what was treated as an immature joke in that room is, for millions of people, a matter of life and death. The same fact that made powerful men laugh could, in the wrong hands, become the justification for more executions, more imprisonments, more hangings, more mutilation and more lives erased.
This is not a punchline. It is a precarious moment, one that demands seriousness, restraint, and an understanding of the human cost.
I didn’t laugh. And neither should anyone who understands what is really at stake here.
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.