Trump's empty threats show he's out of ammo
Trump's turns to empty threats as he runs out of real ammo in his five-month war on Iran.
The latest from Raw Story's Nick Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Trump's turns to empty threats as he runs out of real ammo in his five-month war on Iran.
The latest from Raw Story's Nick Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist.
Dear Democrats,
Since too many people are complaining about you without providing any suggestions on what you could be doing better (other than “DO BETTER FFS!”), I’m here to help. We’re all tired of watching Democrats tweet without really doing anything, or getting into dumb flame wars with MAGA Republicans. Let’s fight smarter!
Before we dive in, I know nobody likes being criticized or hearing the phrase, “You know what you should do?” When someone tries that with me, my immediate instinct is never to do whatever it is, because I’m a stubborn Taurus woman who hates being told what to do, like most women. But in this case, I must insist on telling you what to do, because it’s what you should do.
Not to humblebrag (and yet also to brag like a man with a track record like mine would be allowed to brag about), but I have a long, long history of offering my ideas to people (men) in positions of power who laughed at me, but then made a lot of money from my ideas — but never kicked down any scratch or gave me credit.
Non-political examples from my real life include:
*Telling my first (male) radio boss in 1994 that Radiohead and Beck weren’t one-hit wonders
*Telling my last (male) radio boss in 2006 that creating social media accounts for our station and streaming our signal online were essential for us to stay relevant [I also helped to create and named the station’s annual holiday concert series, which continues to be its biggest annual moneymaker]
*Telling Dave Grohl in 2002 that if he wouldn’t cover my favorite song (“Heroes” by David Bowie) with Foo Fighters at Coachella ahead of their impending rumored breakup, then he needed to write me a song just as good. Dave then wrote “Times Like These,” which is just a rewrite of “Heroes,” and while he didn’t laugh at me, the Foo Fighters also never broke up, and I’m pretty sure I’ll never get any credit for it.
Then there’s my entire Twitter political history, getting blocked by Trump and so much of MAGA, and all of the things I’ve written about how Democrats need to fight the Trumpublicans better. It led one of my followers to dub me Dublin “NosTARAdamus,” even though I’m more of a Cassandra when it comes to the political side of my predictions.
Most importantly, I was a guest of then-DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison at our 2024 convention in Chicago, and I got myself there with all of two days’ notice, because I’m a magical human with amazing connections. I even met Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta and his husband, and Rep. Kenyatta told me he read my tweets.
I’m tired of giving away my ideas for free, but I’m equally tired of not getting anywhere when it comes to getting Democrats to listen to me. Short of running for office (never happening, I’d be a nightmare of a candidate), I can either keep screaming my ideas into the abyss, or I can try to get the DNC to at least put me somewhere on the payroll as a consultant.
The number one thing I’ve been screaming about (besides never understanding why no one challenged the 2024 election results, but we’ll circle back in a sec) since January 2025 is how much the party needs our own press secretary.
A Democratic Press Secretary could easily set themselves up at the Capitol and hold a daily briefing to fact-check whatever KKKaroline Lie-vitt had just lied about. An immediate Democratic response every day, similar to the State of the Union response, would have an impact. Every member of the press would cover it, including the right-wing media, because they’d try to make content with gotcha questions. It would be the party’s best opportunity to get the truth out before the lies can take hold.
And it would be a chance to show the American people what Democrats are actually doing to combat the barrage of awful from the Trump regime. Instead of tuning out the way Trump wants us to, more people would tune in because they’re starving for the truth, along with something to hope for.
We need to see more Democrats bringing back some dignity to their offices, and we have the perfect model with Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), a new contender for the 2028 ticket.
I’m also very proud of my Oregon Democratic delegation, who’ve collectively fought for all of the right things, yet fly under the radar despite their consistently strong performances. We also have an out and proud lesbian Governor, Tina Kotek, who could really use more support from the party right now, as could the record number of women (51!) currently running for Governor in their own states.
Here’s the free advice I’m offering right now, but I’m not kidding when I say you need to reward those of us out here trying to keep/put as many Democrats in Congress in November, even as the GOP is doing everything to cheat.
That’s all you get for now. You know how to get in touch.
Love,
Tara
Dr. Anthony Fauci sat before Sen. Rand Paul's committee on Wednesday morning and, for the first time in four decades and hundreds of congressional appearances, refused to answer a single question, outsmarting the smarty-pants Paul.
He invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times. Good for him.
The melodramatic Paul even had one of Fauci's own lawyers physically removed from the hearing room.
After the hearing, the “I’m never wrong” and loathsome Paul was on camera promising a contempt vote next week and musing aloud about whether a presidential pardon can even shield Fauci from prosecution.
The hearing, if that's what you want to call it, was an absolute farce. Republican members of the committee took aim at Fauci personally. Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno was especially offensive, firing expletives at Fauci in a performance that bordered on unhinged.
Paul said the hearing was about the origins of COVID. Almost none of the questions and accusations from the holier-than-thou GOP members had anything to do with that subject.
This sham of a hearing was never really about gain-of-function research. It was about Rand Paul getting in front of TV cameras to once again take shots at humiliating a retired scientist, physician, and Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient.
Paul just can't get over the fact that there is a more respected, thoughtful, and admired doctor in Washington than him. He simply cannot let it go. He has been chasing Fauci for six straight years.
And it's worth naming what this actually is.
It's Rand Paul's Big Lie.
Just as Donald Trump has spent six years insisting the 2020 election was stolen from him, despite dozens of court losses, audits, recounts, and investigations finding no evidence of widespread fraud capable of changing the outcome, Paul has spent six years insisting Anthony Fauci is a criminal mastermind who lied his way through a pandemic.
Both claims have been investigated to death. Both keep getting revived anyway, not because new evidence demands it, but because Trump and Republican leaders believe they still energize the MAGA base.
Trump's obsession with "they stole the election" is personal because he cannot stand losing. Republican leaders have long believed that resentment among voters drives turnout. So even now, Trump keeps trying to resurrect the 2020 election fraud narrative.
It doesn't matter that the claim has been litigated and rejected over and over again. Frankly, many Republican voters don't seem to care much anymore. They have more pressing concerns, like paying for groceries and gas, and being lied to by Trump — again — that he wouldn’t start useless wars.
Republicans are trying the same thing with Fauci, dangling him in front of the base as the villain who represents masks, lockdowns, and everything people hated about the pandemic.
They want voters to stay angry. But most Americans have more urgent concerns, and many people, regardless of party, don't want to relive one of the darkest periods of their lives. Most would rather talk about how to prepare for the next pandemic than endlessly rehash the last one, especially when so much of the conversation is built on distortion.
The truth is that Dr. Fauci was often the voice of reason when there wasn't much of one anywhere else in Washington. Donald Trump stood at the White House podium and mused about injecting bleach into the human body.
Was Fauci right about everything? No. Nobody was. It was a once-in-a-century pandemic, with scientific understanding evolving in real time. Fauci responded to the evidence as it developed and made recommendations based on what was known at the time.
Mistakes were inevitable. The lesson should be to learn from them, not scapegoat one person for an entire global pandemic.
The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic spent two years investigating the nation's response to COVID-19 and issued a final report intended to serve as a roadmap for Congress, the executive branch, and the private sector to prepare for future pandemics.
So what has the Trump administration done to prepare for the next one?
It has largely scaled back federal pandemic preparedness infrastructure by downsizing coordinating offices, moving to withdraw from international health organizations, and shifting attention away from many of the recommendations meant to strengthen future responses.
The administration is doing something similar with election security. Elections need protection, yet the Justice Department's election integrity capacity has been hollowed out.
Pandemics require preparation, yet HHS has spent the past year being gutted through mass layoffs, with roughly a quarter of its workforce eliminated at one point, cybersecurity and public health experts pushed out, and biodefense specialists warning that America is now less prepared for the next outbreak, not more.
Those are the real scandals.
Those are the hearings Congress should be holding.
Why is the administration ignoring the lessons of COVID instead of making sure we're ready for the next pandemic?
Why is Rand Paul more interested in what Dr. Fauci wrote in his personal diaries than in the life-threatening cuts this administration has made to America's pandemic preparedness?
Instead of strengthening the systems that failed us in 2020, Republicans are recycling a conspiracy theory about one man.
Rand Paul's crusade against Anthony Fauci has become his own version of the Big Lie: a story kept alive not because the facts support it, but because the GOP thinks vilifying Fauci is a winning strategy.
While Paul and Donald Trump keep looking backward for villains, the country grows less prepared for the next crisis, health or election-related — waiting just over the horizon.
The sheer stupidity and blind ambition of Todd Blanche had him thinking proximity to Donald Trump would lead him to the promised land. Instead, Blanche is headed to the depths of nullity.
On Thursday, Donald Trump said he may pull Blanche's nomination for a full-time attorney general post, not because he lost faith in his little errand boy, but to try to maneuver around and outlast two Senate Republicans, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, who won't confirm Blanche without written guarantees that a controversial $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund is truly dead.
It now appears that Trump will keep Blanche in the acting role, let Cornyn and Tillis exit Congress in January, then resubmit the nomination to what he hopes will be a friendlier Senate. Cornyn wasn't having it, firing back that he and Tillis aren't the only Republicans uneasy about the settlement.
Trump clearly has his head buried in the sand of flattering sycophancy because it appears no one has told him the Senate could very likely fall into Democratic hands after the midterm elections. And if that happens, Blanche's rise to the top will quickly become a slippery slide to the bottom.
Blanche's days at the helm of the Justice Department are now dictated by the calendar. Under DOJ succession law, Blanche's authority as Deputy Attorney General lets him run the department as Acting AG without a Senate vote, but only for so long — 210 days.
Which means that sometime in February 2027, Trump is betting he can use that window to wait out his critics. If Republicans control the Senate in January, Trump would presumably re-nominate Blanche. If Democrats win the Senate, well, Trump will have to bid adios to Blanche.
And if the latter happens, Blanche doesn't fall back on a distinguished legal career. He falls back on nothing. Where does someone like Blanche go? Because if he's been this compliant to Trump so far, Katy, bar the door, as my grandfather would say, for what's about to come in the next 210 days.
Blanche, with nothing left to lose and a boss demanding loyalty, fealty, and lawsuits, can be more dangerous than he's been so far.
Blanche already has a track record that makes him unsellable once he leaves the Justice Department. A federal judge, Kathleen Williams, tore into the IRS settlement he orchestrated for Trump, which includes the anti-weaponization fund, calling it basically a sham designed to manipulate the courts.
And she didn't stop there.
She sent her ruling to the New York State Bar, where Blanche is licensed, adding another demerit to an ethics complaint already filed by more than 100 former federal and state judges who accused him of running the DOJ like Trump's personal law firm.
He should also have an ethics complaint filed against him for his woefully inept and, I feel, illegal oversight of the Epstein files. Illegal because he violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which, to me, is only a starting point. The cover-up is always worse than the crime, as the old axiom most likely holds true in the Epstein saga.
And just as a person, he proved to be a real slimeball by alienating the Epstein survivors, who said he was short-tempered and dismissive when he was forced to meet with them.
As a professional slimeball, he's pursuing retaliatory investigations against Trump critics like James Comey, the civil rights organization the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the silly criminal subpoenas to New York Times journalists in retaliation for a critical investigative piece detailing severe security concerns regarding Trump's new Air Force One. The case was, of course, withdrawn.
Sorry to say, but Blanche's unethical, illegal, and crazy behavior is likely only to get worse, because this guy has got to know he's finished after his acting stint. He will basically be at the beck and call of his client, Donald Trump.
That's what makes the next 210 days rather scary. If Blanche's new motto is, "There's no coming back from this anyway," then the incentive is to go all in on whatever Trump wants. We haven't seen anything yet.
And when this ends, whenever and wherever it ends, where exactly does Blanche go? Big law firms don't want partners under active bar investigation backed by more than a hundred judges. Can you imagine? Corporate clients don't want the lawyer who got a federal judge to refer him for disciplinary review.
If Blanche thinks he's somehow going to come away from this with a bright future, he only needs to look at what happened to the other attorneys who hitched their wagons to Trump: Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and Alina Habba, to name a few. Does anyone know what they're up to? Exactly.
Once celebrated attorneys, they're now examples of how bar licenses and reputations become casualties of the same sycophancy Blanche is wrapped up in now. His warped mentality probably has him thinking that serving Trump personally is somehow also serving the country professionally.
Even Pam Bondi, whom Blanche replaced, didn't escape Trump's legal curse. There is no version of this where the loyalty pays off. Trump is a loser, and if you tie yourself to him, you lose too.
Maybe Blanche believes he's different. Maybe he believes his prosecutorial record and law firm pedigree will insulate him where they didn't insulate the others. Just kidding. The man has to be smart enough to realize he's in the process of digging his own grave, so he might as well give it all he's got.
Oh, and if the Democrats do take the Senate, Blanche will be a target, and so will the judicial system, because Blanche has broken the law.
Blanche's legacy is already shattered. And the next 210 days will be a water slide into irrelevance.
[Writer’s Note: This is an open letter to MAGA, which in and of itself might be a fool’s errand since they don’t usually read anything longer than social media posts. But maybe someone who loves someone who’s MAGA will see this, and maybe we can start figuring out a better way to reach them, since nothing has worked as of yet.]
Dear MAGA,
I’ve tried to get through to you in multiple ways over the last decade. Despite the way you’ve treated me and anyone else who votes for Democrats, I remain fascinated by the groupthink mentality you deploy as a protective shield against the truths about Trump that don’t sit well with you.
A recent incident within my own social group has led me to consider a different tactic with you. I talked to someone far outside the group (okay, it was my Mom), and she began her reply with, “As an outsider who’s just making an observation, this is what it looks like to me.”
The topic of the conversation doesn’t matter. She prefaced what she was about to say to lay the groundwork for me to hear a different answer from the one I wanted. I also knew she was going to offer me advice that wasn’t going to sit well with me. This doesn’t make her wrong or a bad person. It makes her someone outside of the situation who can see things in a way I couldn’t. She didn’t change my mind, but she did make me pause before deciding what to do next.
I know that’s hard to believe just based on my Twitter history, especially since Trump blocked me in August 2015 and has never unblocked me, but I’m honestly here to help as someone who’s been an outsider from up close this entire time, MAGA.
Since I suffered your horrific cyberharassment during the 2016 campaign, I feel uniquely qualified to discuss your behavior. Those of you who claim to be “good Christians” gave this Jewish woman plenty of reasons to never have forgiveness in my heart for any of you.
Not cool, MAGA.
See, what had happened was, Trump gave you all a green light when you started wearing those red hats back in 2016. Once you were allowed to dump all of your issues on your chosen scapegoats, it was easy for Trump to keep breadcrumbing you by yelling things like “FAKE NEWS!” when something true was said about him.
So he could keep you on the hook, to keep grifting you. I’m sorry, but it’s true.
You voted for him for reasons that actually ended up hurting you as much as the rest of us. Some of you can admit this, but too many of you just haven’t suffered enough personally from his tariffs or his egregious cuts to all of the agencies that keep America functioning. You were mad that Barack Obama wore a tan suit while being a melanated President, yet you don’t care that Trump has demolished Washington, D.C., and turned the Oval Office into the tackiest Hobby Lobby in Moscow.
I understand wanting to belong to a group, especially if you’ve often felt alone in the past. Being a part of MAGA made you feel accepted for qualities which had caused others to reject you. But ALL groupthink is bad, even in groups created for good reasons.
There’s a reason it bothers you when people call you a cult, MAGA. It’s because you exhibit all of the behaviors of a religious cult: Your whole ideology is centered around your extreme devotion to Trump, who’s been able to use social media to manipulate you into near-total submission. Cults use specific behavioral patterns to break down individual autonomy and establish complete social control, which explains the widespread social media campaigns from paid agitators repeating the same lies over and over until enough of you shared them and believed them. Trump’s strategy of overwhelming Democratic strategists worked in 2016 because no one had ever seen anything like MAGA online before.
The biggest example of this manipulation was, of course, January 6th. Too many of you still refuse to call it what it was, and Trump’s pardons will never erase the facts of the day.
MAGA, as someone who is outside of your situation, I’ll always see your behavior in a very different way than you do. I see it as you hurting yourselves, whether you’re aware of it or not, and there’s really no reason for you to keep suffering for someone who’s made it abundantly clear that he couldn’t care any less about you. Haven’t you noticed that he keeps taking things away from you, mostly your money? Did you know that it costs the average American family in a Red State nearly $6,000 more to live this year than it cost before Trump’s tariffs?
The questions I asked in 2016, 2020, and 2024 are still valid, MAGA.
Before Trump, would you have voted for a convicted felon?
Before Trump, would you have accepted any Epstein Bestie as the GOP’s presidential nominee in 2012 instead of Mitt Romney?
Before Trump, would you have let anyone fracture your family over politics?
I don’t know those answers, but I’d love to believe you wouldn’t have done those things.
Because you didn’t, before Trump.
I don’t know how you’re going to make it up to the people you hurt after Trump is gone. Because first, you’re going to have to make it up to yourselves.
You were conned, MAGA. You were hurt and lied to and grifted, and I’m sorry that all happened to you. You hurt others because you didn’t realize you were mad at Trump for hurting you.
Once you understand that, I hope you can begin to heal from Trump, along with the rest of us.
It’s just so weird how Republicans just can’t stop reliving and relitigating 2020.
When they’re not crying about election fraud without any proof (darn those unhackable mailed-in paper ballots!) or denying that January 6th was an insurrection, they’re whining about *checks notes* not enough people dying from the Coronavirus, as a desperate attempt to distract from their participation in the biggest political coverup in American history.
Republicans know that Trump’s manufactured war with Iran won’t stop us from talking about the Epstein Files, and it certainly won’t reverse President Joe Biden’s legitimate victory in 2020, no matter who won’t say so during their Senate confirmation hearings.
Republicans also know the Epstein Files will never go away, especially not when Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is in violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and has been ordered to either unredact more of the files or explain why they must stay blacked out, all thanks to a real lawyer who hasn’t sold herself to Trump.
Katie Phang brought a lawsuit against Blanche, who is legally obligated to “appear with specific unredacted Epstein files, emails, and documents no later than 3 p.m. EST on Thursday, July 30th,” as she told independent political content creator Aaron Parnas. “But most importantly, Blanche must come and show his work, meaning he has to bring documentation that supports his representations that the redactions that have occurred were done so to protect victims, which we know is really the only permissible exemption that's allowed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act."
We know Todd Blanche’s real answer is always, “Because Daddy Trump did a bad bad thing and I’m protecting him because I love him more than America,” but he won’t say that, and neither will the rest of Trump’s compromised KKKlown KKKabinet. I’m not entirely sure what happens to the Acting Attorney General of the United States if he violates a federal judge’s order, but anyone else would be arrested on the spot. Blanche should already be in prison with the rest of the Republican Party (minus Thomas Massie) but, for now, they still have the Congressional majority and can waste time and taxpayer money on political theater.
That’s why Republicans scraped the bottom of their very empty arsenal on Wednesday by restaging an old chestnut, “Let’s Scapegoat Dr. Fauci!”
If anyone in the first failed Trump administration had had the sense of a goat, they would’ve realized that COVID-19 was the political opportunity of a lifetime. Had Trump spoken as frankly to the public as he did with Bob Woodward in February 2020, he would’ve won in November by a landslide after saving the lives of millions of registered voters.
Instead, both he and Woodward remained silent, each for their own reasons that resulted in earning millions while Americans were dying by the thousands. As a result, the esteemed Dr. Anthony Fauci became Trump’s favorite scapegoat six years ago when the good doctor — who was first appointed as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) by President Ronald Reagan (A REPUBLICAN, y’all) in 1984 — simply told Americans how to protect themselves from COVID-19.
Like, how dare he do his job, right?
But since Dr. Fauci said things that were in direct opposition to what Trump was telling the public, MAGA decided he was the Devil. The anti-vaxxers ramped up their propaganda exponentially, sharing home remedies that killed them rather than saving them.
Anyway, Trump’s egregious mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak clearly still embarrasses him more than having to pay E. Jean Carroll $5.6 million a couple of weeks ago or his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, as evidenced by his casual shrug at the White House Correspondents Dinner as journalists accepted awards for reporting on the Epstein Files.
And so the Whitest KKKids U Never Wanted to Know put on a show for Trump to keep the media from remembering that his name is mentioned in the Epstein Files nearly as much as Jeffrey Epstein’s.
I really hate summer reruns, don’t you?
With a performance straight out of the worst dinner theater on the Florida panhandle, lead Bad Actor, Russian asset Sen. Rand Paul kicked off the fascist farce with a monologue full of the most obvious projection language and double talk ever to be entered into the historic record.
The former self-credentialed ophthalmologist had Dr. Fauci’s lawyer removed from the hearing, even though the lawyer had every right to be there with his client.
Dr. Fauci and his family were targeted and threatened by MAGA so badly that President Biden pardoned him as one of his last acts in office to protect him from what Republicans are trying to do right now. In one of the more obtuse moments of the hearing, Not-A-Real-Doctor Rand Paul told Dr. Fauci that a pardon “doesn’t rewrite history… It is the refusal to admit error that destroys trust. That loss of trust may be your most damaging legacy.”
And if that wasn’t ridiculous enough, “Ayn” Rand Paul threatened to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt for invoking the 5th Amendment over 100 times during the hearing, while completely ignoring the Trump Crime Family’s love of the 5th Amendment.
Trump invoked the 5th over 450 times in the fraud case brought against him by another one of his favorite scapegoats, New York Attorney General Letitia James. Eric Trump topped that by taking the 5th over 500 times in the same case.
We are now under 100 days until the midterms, and Republican strategists and GOP leaders have all come to the same conclusion for their caucus: keep Donald Trump's name out of your mouth, and ostensibly keep him off the campaign trail.
Operatives close to the White House are reportedly telling incumbents and challengers alike — privately, one assumes, so the boss doesn't find out — to stop echoing his line on the Iran war, stop defending his economic numbers, and build their own case to voters instead.
They'd be fools to attach themselves to him, even in some red districts where inflation has really come home to roost. Trump's almost “worst ever” approval rating is in the mid-30s and sinking. The war is closing in on half a year old, with no clean end in sight.
Gas prices are up, "affordability" is the word Democrats have successfully claimed as their own, and every additional minute Trump spends talking is, by the party's own admission, a minute of bad news for candidates trying to get their messages through and survive in November.
It all sounds reasonable and doable, except for the fact that one variable in this equation is petulant and predictable. When you tell Donald Trump no, or that he needs to be managed, nothing in the man's history suggests he knows how to do that.
What's actually coming down the pike for Republicans isn't pretty and will make their plans look like chop suey. Does anyone say that anymore? Well, we can say it literally, because if Trump’s economic chaos continues, the only thing Americans will be able to afford to eat are cheap cans of chop suey.
Trump is heading into the fall with a wish list that has absolutely nothing to do with food prices, reality or what's on voters' minds. He's obsessed with the SAVE Act, which is a loser in the Senate.
He is still gunning for funding for his anti-weaponization fund, eager to provide updates about his gilded ballroom, and determined to sell the Iran war as successful when everyone, except he and Hegseth, knows it's a catastrophic failure.
Standing between Trump and all of it is a small but real bloc of his own party. Jilted Sens. John Cornyn and Bill Cassidy have shown they're willing to buck him now that the chains are off after Trump sank their re-election hopes.
Sen. Thom Tillis has already called parts of Trump's agenda "theater" and made clear he isn't interested in absorbing the blowback from ramming through election-law changes months before voters go to the polls.
In the House, Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie is making it his life's mission to buck his party when it counts and say no. Individually, none of them can stop Trump, but together they can make his life miserable by blocking the SAVE Act, trying to rid the bill, once and for all, of the anti-weaponization funding, and denying him the permission and funds to keep the Iran war going.
And that is exactly the problem, because a boxed-in Trump doesn't respond well to being told "no." Instead, he has a long history of reacting by getting louder, angrier, and, in his current demented state, more demented.
In 1990, he opened the Trump Taj Mahal on a mountain of junk-bond debt after financial advisers warned him the numbers didn't work for the economy at the time. When an analyst went public predicting the casino would fail, Trump's answer was to fire the analyst. The Taj Mahal missed its debt payments within months and was in bankruptcy court within the year.
And who could forget Trump's insistence on promoting his favorite drug, hydroxychloroquine, from the White House podium? After federal scientists told him, repeatedly and on the record, that there was no evidence it did anything for COVID-19, he took it upon himself to play doctor and tout the drug's nonexistent benefits.
He kept pressuring regulators to protect its emergency authorization right up until the clinical trials came back and the FDA had to reverse course in public.
And more recently, when military and intelligence officials warned that an open-ended bombing campaign in Iran risked a war with no exit, he launched it anyway, relying on his "gut instincts" and, most assuredly, his spoiled brat persona to try to prove he knew more than military generals.
Being told "no" has never once made Trump smaller. It has always made him bigger, louder, and more determined to prove the people telling him no were wrong. And what's wild about the whole thing is that Trump has always been wrong, even though he thinks he's always been right, which is yet another reason why he will ignore the word "no."
Each of the examples above shows that Trump takes the word "no" as a personal insult, and hearing "no" from his own party, which he built and claims to have rescued, is going to be too much for him to handle.
He is going to hit back publicly, make it all about him, loyalty to him, and betrayal of him, and remind everyone watching that he is the one being wronged.
While the GOP insists on message discipline on the campaign trail, off the trail it will be Trump trying to derail it all. He will try to drag the entire midterm conversation back onto his issues, his war, his ballroom, and his enemies list, precisely the topics his own party is begging him to avoid, and at the exact moment voters are trying to decide whether they can afford their groceries, gas and chop suey.
Watch how he will repeat ad nauseam that "affordability" is a Democratic hoax, because Trump can't be wrong, even when it could sink his own party's control of Congress and put his whole agenda, and behavior, at risk.
Democrats should hope that Trump keeps being exactly who he has always been: an undisciplined and pertinacious Trump who can't let a single "no" go unanswered.
There are plenty of things I’ve never understood about the people who’ve chosen loyalty to Donald Trump over the United States of America. I don’t have the space to list every single reason he never should’ve been allowed to run again in 2020, let alone 2024, but let's remain in the present for now.
Trump is so far gone at this point, both physically and mentally, that anyone with eyes can see it for themselves. And yet, there’s an entire political party keeping its head in the sand rather than admit to what we’ve all been subjected to for the last 11 years.
I truly cannot comprehend how anyone is still proudly broadcasting their support for an obviously sundowning convicted felon adjudicated rapist who has vandalized Washington, D.C. to make America look as weak as possible on the global stage on our 250th birthday.
The last week alone has provided multiple examples of why any remaining Trump loyalists need to somehow recover their pre-2015 memories and remind themselves of what the American president is supposed to represent.
Friday’s shambolic appearance at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner was just the latest example of what a global embarrassment Trump is, as well as how far the “legacy media” has fallen. When he wasn’t dozing off on the dais or doing a weird thing with his mouth that many people were saying is Adderall and/or cocaine related, Trump delivered another rambling speech that relied on his usual litany of bullying, bragging, and bull.
A room full of journalists and other members of the media sat there and took more of his verbal abuse and lies instead of walking out on him. No one stood up and yelled “LIAR!”
No one defended CNN’s Kaitlan Collins when Trump once again attacked her for not smiling, because he’s disgusting.
It seemed that only Lone Wolf Blitzer was capable of telling the truth about Trump while standing right in front of him.
We certainly can’t expect Jake Tapper to report on Donny Dementia’s deterioration, especially not after he begged Trump for another interview after chatting with him on CNN about Lindsey Graham’s death.
Remember Lindsey Graham? Yeah, I also thought it was weird that Mitch McConnell didn’t issue a statement about his death.
Anyway, the Republican Party of old would be reeling right now upon learning that their leader finally paid the woman he sexually abused and defamed the $5.6 million he’s owed her for the last three years, with interest. But their silence is their compliance, standing with an adjudicated rapist whose name appears in the Epstein Files at least 38,000 times, rather than incur his wrath in a social media post.
This is how far our alleged leadership has fallen. They spend their time trying to out-bully each other on Twitter to please their molting MAGA masochist, lest he reveal whatever blackmail he has on all of them.
We can blame Ronald Reagan for a lot of things when it comes to the present-day GOP. Still, I think it’s safe to say he wouldn’t have tolerated the thrice-married, philandering, five-time draft-dodging Epstein bestie Donald Trump as a candidate, let alone stood for him falling asleep behind the Resolute Desk.
America is a joke on the global stage as the world watches this addled toddler fall and fail. Yet, no one stands up to the Cowardly Lyin’ fraud who bankrupted his own casinos in Atlantic City while laundering money for the Russian mob.
It’s EXHAUSTING to be a thinking, caring person in a media landscape that avoids accountability out of fear of retaliation. Ooh, what’s he going to do, block you on Twitter, Peter Doocy? Even though that’s a violation of a citizen’s First Amendment rights?
Oh wait, Trump doesn’t care about upholding the Constitution. Which I’ve known all along, but more specifically, since August 28, 2015, the day Trump blocked me on Twitter.
Yea verily, the ultimate Twitter Badge of Honor.
When Trump was first sued by the Knight-Columbia Institute in 2017 over multiple First Amendment violations on social media, it applied to anyone he blocked after he was inaugurated. But then they also decided that he should be forced to unblock anyone who’d been blocked when he was just a candidate and was still blocked.
Including lil’ ol me, Dear Reader.
I can’t say for sure how any of it went down, of course. But I like to imagine him sitting behind the then-empty Resolute Desk and being given a list of Twitter accounts to unblock, then begrudgingly unblocking them. “Fine,” he grumbles, going down the list, until he reaches my account. “Oh no, not that one!” Trump harrumphs, “She’s MEAN!”
I’m blocked to this day, and I’m also blocked on his Instagram. That’s how petty this “POTUS*” actually is.
I’m all of five feet tall, and I weigh maybe a buck five or six. If you passed me on the street, you’d clock me as a petite woman with a head of silver hair, and therefore not a threat. I like to say I’m reactive, because I don’t wake up every day wondering who I can piss off. It’s more like, What is he trying to get away with today and how can I help cut through that lie on top of the other lies?
So “legacy media,” please LEARN FROM ME (you too, Democrats) and learn how to stand up for yourselves while standing up to Trump.
It’s really not that hard.
You ask him a question based on facts. It doesn’t matter what it is, he won’t like it. Everyone else on the press line pushes for a response/answer and stands up for each other when Trump bullies them.
Repeat as necessary.
EVERYONE has to stop tolerating his mistreatment. Trump should be pressed by the press to answer questions or they need to walk out on him.
Friends,
I want to start today with a warning about “charitable giving” and end with a primer on wealth inequality. The two are closely related, as I’ll explain.
We’re on the cusp of the biggest gusher of “charitable giving” in history. Beware.
We tend to think of “charitable giving” as unambiguously good because we equate “charities” with organizations that help the poor and equate “giving” with generosity. But both assumptions are wrong.
In fact, the “giving” is actually a giant tax loophole that provides the super-rich a means of dramatically cutting their tax bills while quietly funding their own priorities.
And “charities” under the tax code include elite universities, fancy opera houses, cultural palaces frequented only by the richest of the rich, and nonprofit “think tanks” devoted to right-wing causes.
The problem is that every dollar of “charitable giving” means substantially fewer dollars paid in taxes, because donors deduct their “charitable giving” from their taxable incomes. This tax loophole is especially big and lucrative for the super-rich.
According to the Institute for Policy Studies, up to 74 cents of every dollar donated to charity would have been paid as taxes. In 2022 alone, charitable giving resulted in $73 billion in lost tax revenue.
Here’s the thing. Taxes finance public goods such as public education, scientific research, roads and bridges, nutrition and healthcare for lower-income Americans, and clean water and clean air.
But the “charitable” tax deduction taken by the super-rich finances things that the super-rich want, such as Ivy League universities and culture palaces.
This means a lot of “charitable giving” results in more money for organizations that cater to or do the bidding of the rich, and less for things we all need. Behind the facade of “charitable giving” is a profoundly anti-democratic tax loophole that allows the super-wealthy to effectively substitute their priorities for what would otherwise be public priorities.
Which brings me to the upcoming gusher of “charitable giving” — the consequence of the AI boom and the largest IPOs in history.
Thousands of people with shares of Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX, and other AI-related companies have seen, or soon will see, the value of their shares soar into the stratosphere. That means gigantic capital gains.
You don’t need a degree in high finance to understand that these capital gains could also result in big tax payments. If you sell, say, $10 million worth of stock, you could easily face a tax bill exceeding $3.5 million.
Unless you reduce that tax bill through your “charitable giving.”
Hence, the upcoming gusher in charitable giving. According to some estimates, it could be more than $100 billion a year.
Consider: The seven founders of Anthropic, which is expected to have an enormous IPO as soon as this fall, have each pledged to give away 80 percent of their wealth, which is estimated to be about $90 billion. Anthropic also has a philanthropic matching program, which would mean another $60 billion in funds earmarked for giving. Nan Ransohoff, who heads public goods at the payment processor Stripe, estimates that these will generate between $37 billion and $100 billion to charities annually.
Add in the newly rich created by SpaceX, whose IPO has spawned an estimated 4,400 millionaires (and some 400 employees now worth more than $100 million), as well as OpenAI’s IPO, which is likely to create as many more millionaires and multimillionaires, and you’re talking really big money — and huge incentives for making tax-deductible “charitable contributions.”
Don’t get me wrong. I consider the nonprofit sector of the economy enormously important. I just don’t want the nation’s priorities to be set by the moneyed interests. Their massive political donations already give them extraordinary power.
One reform would be to limit the definition of “charities” — that is, the sort of contributions that warrant tax deductions — to places and institutions that actually serve the poor.
Another reform would be to reduce the tax deduction for “charitable contributions” and increase the capital gains tax rate on very high incomes. (At the very least, raise the capital gains tax rate to match the tax rate on ordinary income.)
And by all means let’s get rid of the “stepped-up-basis-at-death” tax rule, which now allows families to escape all capital gains by leaving appreciated assets to their heirs. For example, consider someone who got OpenAI stock for almost nothing and watched its value explode, and then contributed enough of it to charity to allow her to make a nice living off it without paying any capital gains taxes. She gave the remaining shares to her children when she died. The kids can then sell those shares for what they’re worth at the time of her death — say, hundreds of millions of dollars — yet pay zero capital gains on it.
These three reforms are, or should be, no-brainers. There’s simply no economic or political justification for allowing the super-rich — even the nouveau AI riche — to get giant tax breaks by financing things they prioritize.
Granted, reforms like these don’t stand a chance under Trump or his lapdogs in Congress. (And, sad to say, too many Democrats are also dependent on campaign donations from the moneyed interests.) But these are high on my list for what must be done.
I am so done with this whole Mitch McConnell thing.
We’re now past six weeks of this ridiculous crap, and the silence surrounding the Kentucky senator’s condition long ago eclipsed the point of disturbing to become completely absurd and intolerable. But that just seems to be the Republican way. All we get are vague justifications and likely manipulated “proof of life” photos rather than actual explanations.
Has McConnell been struck mute? Is he in a fugue state? Is he deceased? If the answers to all three are “No,” then there is zero reason why he shouldn’t be able to appear in a video to explain what the hell is actually going on with him.
Yet not even the disempowered Democratic Kentucky governor, Andy Beshear, has been able to communicate with or receive a genuine update on McConnell’s condition.
This thing all began on June 14, when paramedics reportedly responded to a brief loss of consciousness from a fall at McConnell’s home. His office issued a fuzzy statement that day about a subsequent hospitalization, without explaining more.
And there hasn’t been a whole lot that’s made sense since. A couple of people independently reported phantom 20-minute conversations with the senator during which he was supposedly sentient and alert, but evidently not so much that he could actually communicate with the outside world.
Then on July 12 came The Photo That Launched a Million Memes. The one with a smiling McConnell sitting up in a hospital bed dressed in a red-checkered shirt, a copy of that morning’s Washington Post in his lap, his sometimes-devoted wife Elaine Chao by his side. The photo’s authenticity was purportedly confirmed, but who among us really believes that?
Somehow, a clarifying statement from McConnell’s office on Monday, designed to update us on the senator’s condition, managed to clarify nothing at all. It noted that he wouldn’t be returning to work this week, while quoting him as saying, “I’m still working hard to get back to my full schedule of work in the Senate and in Kentucky, keeping up with my intense physical therapy per my doctors’ orders. Unfortunately, that means I won’t be able to make it to Fancy Farm, Kentucky this Saturday.”
An accompanying statement noted that McConnell was “not yet medically cleared” to leave the mysterious rehab facility where he was being treated. It also featured the obligatory smiling photo of him being comforted by his wife.
If we don’t trust the legitimacy of anything going on here, of course, it’s their own damn fault. The Republicans have shown themselves to be lying sacks of garbage, and this McConnell mystery fiasco pours more fuel atop that.
We’ve since heard that McConnell is now mostly afflicted only with a mild case of pneumonia. But if that’s all it is, I’ve never heard of a case of pneumonia that prevents you from going on camera.
You know who would never allow this insanity to move forward were the situation reversed and it was a Democrat pulling this disappearing act? Mitch McConnell, that’s who. Say what you will about the man being (having been?) a duplicitous, cheating scoundrel who plays (played?) by no one’s rules but his own; he doesn’t (didn’t?) take any of this kind of crap from anyone.
Meanwhile, Governor Beshear has been neutered by his Republican-controlled state legislature into oblivion. We’ve all heard about how the party is stalling any announcement or info about McConnell until August 3, the date after which an immediate special election can’t be called to fill the seat. But who knows what the real motive here is?
Some people obviously know what’s going on, and they aren’t saying a word. It’s just unbelievable. How can this be legal? It’s obviously not moral or ethical – further evidence that this rogue cult does whatever it wants and always seems to get away with it.
Like so much that’s happened during the Trump years, this is completely unacceptable. And yet the Democrats, even as they scream and shout to try to change up the narrative, accept it.
We’re all being institutionally gaslit with outrageous political theater. Every carefully worded statement about the health of a man who has vanished from view seems engineered to answer every question except the one everyone is asking. It’s as if the Republicans have invented a new medical specialty: strategic ambiguity.
Imagine applying a similar standard of non-information in other areas of life
Your airline pilot pauses on the runway for 15 minutes without saying a word. A flight attendant gets on the PA and calmly says, “Our pilot has consulted with experts and remains fully committed to today’s flight.”
The surgeon who is about to perform your colonoscopy freezes during pre-op for half an hour before you’re put under anesthesia. No one bothers to tell you what’s going on.
“Everything OK?” you finally ask.
A hospital publicist enters the room to assure you, “The doctor appreciates your concern and looks forward to continuing a distinguished career.”
Your Uber driver steers your car into a lake. It begins filling with water.
“What happened?” you ask.
“The vehicle remains operational,” comes the reply from the nonplussed driver.
At some point, language itself becomes parody. And that’s where we’re at now with the McConnell debacle.
When someone occupies one of the most consequential positions in American government, as McConnell does – helping shape policy, judicial appointments, budgets, and the lives of 342.7 million Americans – the public has a legitimate interest in knowing whether that person can perform the job. We deserve to know whether or not that person is comatose or still drawing breath. That’s democracy.
Instead, we’re handed the political equivalent of a shrug.
We’re all just expected to ignore what we can plainly see while accepting the official explanation that somehow manages to explain nothing.
It’s the same exhausting script over and over: trust us, don’t ask questions, your eyes are mistaken, Senator McConnell is on the road to recovery. If he isn’t, we’ll let you know when we feel like it.
It’s really a masterpiece of misinformation, manipulation and deception on a grand scale, designed to keep us all in the dark. The McConnell situation is much like the one surrounding the war in Iran. Covertness and subterfuge carry the day, and so a senator’s condition is turned into a spectator sport. Information is withheld just enough to keep speculation alive, then the press and public are scolded for speculating.
The whole thing clearly is designed to drive us all stark-raving bonkers. Chaos, after all, is the point. And so in the case of McConnell, we’re left groping for answers that are as elusive as the gatekeepers themselves.
If the senator is healthy enough to continue serving, which seems highly unlikely, explain why he’s not around. If he isn’t, say why. If the situation is evolving, tell us. Adults can handle complexity. It honestly shouldn’t be this difficult.
What we can’t reconcile is an endless procession of half-truths and non-truths in which reality itself is treated as classified information.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as a scoreboard in the background displays "Trump 45" and "Trump 47", referring to Trump as the nation's 45th president and his bid to become the 47th president, during a rally in Greensboro, North Carolina, U.S. October 22, 2024. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as a scoreboard in the background displays "Trump 45" and "Trump 47", referring to Trump as the nation's 45th president and his bid to become the 47th president, during a rally in Greensboro, North Carolina, U.S. October 22, 2024. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
There’s a hypothesis I can’t shake after years of observations.
Alabama Republicans are getting bad at politics.
So far, that hasn’t threatened their hegemony. The party controls all state offices; holds seven of the state’s nine congressional seats and enjoys supermajorities in the Alabama Legislature.
For that, the GOP can thank an opposition that for the better part of 16 years has been weak, underfunded and divided. It’s like watching a high school baseball team take the field against a sixth-grade rec squad whose coaches are screaming at each other.
No need for brilliant skill. Swing the bat and jog the bases while the ball rolls past the fielders and toward the outfield fence.
But playing weak opponents can weaken your grasp of the fundamentals. And two developments this month felt like unforced errors.
A pair of Republican congressmen — Gary Palmer of Hoover and Robert Aderholt of Haleyville — went out of their way to announce their support of a federal bill that would ban transgender women from joining the Daughters of the American Revolution.
If your reaction to that sentence was “huh?” well, it was mine too. I hate to describe what’s happening, because it implies there’s a good-faith disagreement that requires the mediation of Congress. There isn’t. It’s just another instance of bigots demanding the imposition of bigotry.
Here’s a summary. Leaders of the Daughters of the American Revolution said in 2023 that they would welcome transgender people who meet their membership requirements. As is the now-tedious inevitability, a few gonad obsessives lost their minds. Earlier this month, about 60% of the delegates at a DAR conference (called a “Continental Congress”) voted to keep the policy. The people who lost now want Congress to intervene.
Good for the DAR for preserving common decency. There is zero issue with transgender people being in the organization. A responsible official might turn away from the hate and toward issues like grocery prices, healthcare costs and the quality of education.
Yet Palmer and Aderholt consider this issue just as important as those, if not more so. They think this niche obsession is a winner. Maybe with Alabama’s identity-obsessed, lickspittle conservative media. The rest of us may properly scratch our heads.
Then there’s Tommy Tuberville’s stampede toward data centers.
The Republican gubernatorial nominee told Alabama sheriffs that he opposed statewide moratoriums on data centers; that concerns about their community impacts were “bullcrap” and that China drove opposition to them. He stuck with this argument (and the ludicrous Chinese connection) in later comments to a Huntsville TV station.
Tuberville was taking his cues from President Donald Trump, who attacked New York for creating a statewide moratorium on data centers. The U.S. senator has always played Smithers to Trump’s Burns, so that’s not surprising.
But it’s one thing for Tuberville to make the case for data centers in his read-the-assignment-minutes-before-class kind of way. Politics 101 demands that you acknowledge the widespread concerns the projects are sparking in Alabama, over power consumption and environmental effects.
Here’s a non-exhaustive list of Alabama communities that have seen strong local opposition to data centers or moved to ban them: Bessemer. Pinson. Wilsonville. Cullman. Birmingham. Mobile. Leeds. Homewood. Fairfield. Nationwide, more Americans oppose having data centers in their neighborhoods than support them.
This is not manipulation by a foreign government. These are citizens in an ostensible democracy voicing their concerns. A sensible politician would not antagonize people packing town halls and organizing against data centers.
Yet Tuberville feels comfortable not only dismissing the critics, but impugning their motives. Even in a place like Cullman, not known for green politics or liberal ideas. If the Republican gubernatorial nominee thinks data centers are the future, he has to acknowledge the concerns. You won’t make data center opponents more comfortable with the facilities by calling them stooges.
In the DAR example, we have a willful ignorance of Alabama’s needs. In data centers, we have an open opposition to them. And in both, there’s a seeming disconnect between the politicians and the voters.
But this isn’t the only example from Team Red. There was the odd move to rename the Gulf of Mexico 15 months after Trump likely forgot that he ever raised the issue. Or responding to outrage over Alabama’s high power bills by kneecapping the state’s electric regulatory commission. Or the all-Republican Supreme Court confidently ending IVF treatments in the state without considering the political consequences. In each case, you see a party paying more attention to donors or its weird obsessions than what’s happening beyond them.
I doubt this will lead to any profound change in November. The Republicans’ institutional advantages are significant. The Democrats are playing from behind.
Yet the state GOP keeps committing errors in a year where the national trends are against them. And when the opposition might be showing signs of life.
It may not be enough to deny Republicans victory. But it’s keeping Democrats in the game. And making the score closer than the GOP might prefer.
If you’ve been finding yourself swooning lately over the clips of Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) calmly and methodically bulldozing Republicans facing Senate questioning, welcome to the “Senator My Boo” Club, my friends.
Movie-star handsome and charismatic, Ossoff was given the moniker by political powerhouse influencer Qondi Ntini, who’s turned “political thirst” into a movement that’s been reframing the way Democratic men run for public office. Her social media accounts reflect a timeline of consistently supporting both Ossoff and his fellow Georgia Senator, Rev. Raphael Warnock, always keeping to the facts while centering the thirst. Not just for good-looking men in leadership (though it’s just true that Democrats have the looks on lockdown), but the thirst for truth and equality in both the government as well as the rest of the country.
And the Ossoff Thirst is very real, y’all. It’s not just the matinee idol looks, though.
Jon Ossoff is a Jewish Democrat who doesn’t take money from AIPAC and tells the truth about Israel at a time when antisemitism is raging like never before.
Thanks to his tough stances on Israel while also holding the Trump regime accountable, Ossoff has emerged as a new dark horse contender for president in 2028, despite his claims of “not being interested” in running. While Democrats need him in that Senate seat, Ossoff would have a clearer path to the presidency should Democratic gubernatorial nominee Kesha Lance Bottoms win in November. His replacement could be sworn in by January, and then Jon Ossoff could very well be on the path to become the first Jewish President of the United States.
We are a nation starved for goodness and truth from our leadership, and Jon Ossoff represents that in multitudes. His calm and patient grilling of Trumpsimp Jay “Whatever You Say, Boss” Clayton last week during his Director of National Intelligence confirmation hearing over the 2020 election set off shockwaves that sent Democratic women into a swoon.
“Isn’t it humiliating to be unable to answer this question?” is one of the best questions anyone has ever asked any Republican when it comes to their full fealty to Trump and the 2020 election. They cannot say Joe Biden won, and Jon Ossoff knows why.
While we were collectively still dreaming of a Ossoff presidential run, he made our case for us again on Tuesday. As the Ranking Democratic Member of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, Ossoff grilled egregiously underqualified Punch-Drunk Pete “Low-T” Hegseth over the Department of Defense's multiple failures in Iran. Watching Ossoff pummel Petey Pull-Ups is the kind of knee-weakening swoon-worthy stuff Democratic women have been waiting for.
*fans self*
Ossoff can also handle the media on the fly. Or in this case, the strut.
Democrats who aren’t the biggest fans of Gov. Gavin “Studly” Newsom’s emergence as the 2028 frontrunner have started getting very loud about the possibility of supporting a ticket anchored by Ossoff. One thing Ossoff shares with Newsom--aside from a “great head of hair” (as my Jewish mom would say)--is that he triggers Trump, garnering one of the weakest nicknames in the overgrown dumb bully’s litany of weak nicknames for his opponents.
“Os(jerk)off” is about what you’d expect from the least creative low-IQ person to ever nap behind the Resolute Desk. When “Osshole” was right there, too.
It’s fine, what do I know about politics or basic creativity?
Anyway, it’s obviously about much more than Jon Ossoff’s looks. It’s also about Trump losing Georgia in the 2020 election and never being able to prove otherwise, BECAUSE HE LOST. His rambling, shambolic speech that was supposed to finally expose 2020 election fraud only served to expose himself and the Russian interference in both 2016 and 2020. It’s also renewed conversations about the legitimacy of the 2024 election, but in the interest of staying on topic while maintaining my blood pressure, let’s stick to Ossoff triggering Trump, and therefore, MAGA.
We know it’s not Jon Ossoff’s fault that then-Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger wouldn’t help Trump steal votes in the Peach State, and as Trump plans a visit there to whine more about losing, Ossoff is clear about the old guy’s obsession with him.
“If there’s one person who committed election fraud in Georgia, it’s Donald Trump when he dialed up our state’s senior most election official, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and tried to bully him in a recorded phone call to, quote, find the exact number of votes Donald Trump needed to win in a state that he had lost,” Ossoff told CNN’s Jake Tapper during an interview last week.
(Sidebar: Where’s your book on Trump’s obvious mental and physical decline, Jake?)
As a Jewish American (albeit an atheist), I’m watching the conversation about a possible Ossoff 2028 run with extra interest. I can’t help but wonder if this country is ready to elect a Jewish President when it hasn’t evolved enough to elect a woman of color —or any woman — yet.
But Jon Ossoff checks so many boxes for a Democratic President that I hope he does have that path cleared for him. He doesn’t seem like the kind of guy who’d waste time on juvenile Twitter flame wars or allow his campaign to devolve into AI trickery or whatever tactics others are deploying to trigger the Deplorables.
Jon Ossoff would bring dignity back to the Oval Office in a way the entire world needs, not just the American people. I’m pretty sure a President Ossoff wouldn’t bulldoze D.C. to please Putin or try to compromise the entire Democratic Party by using blackmail and threats. Candidate Ossoff would bring back the kind of elevated political discourse we once had, which contained a level of respect between opponents rather than bullying.
It would be, in the parlance of my people, a mitzvah.
It’s hard to believe that we’re less than two months away from the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, that horrible day when war arrived at our doorstep.
One thing that’s always stuck in my head was the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers onboard the four jets that wreaked such deadly havoc were citizens of Saudi Arabia. This doesn’t necessarily mean that kingdom had an active hand in the terror, and the 9/11 Commission found no evidence that the Saudi government knowingly funded or directed the attacks.
But it still makes you wonder.
I bring this up now because you may have heard that Trump this week approved a landmark 30-year deal to provide the Saudis with the civilian nuclear program they had long sought. It gives U.S. companies a monopoly on developing a nuclear infrastructure for the Arab country without the necessity of requiring monitoring and inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency to make sure the “peaceful” use of nuclear fuel isn’t enriched for a weapon.
If it sounds like a horrible idea, that may be because it is. No oversight to keep a rogue nation in line? What could possibly go wrong besides everything?
But of course, money talks, and that’s something the oil-rich Saudi Arabia has in outrageous abundance. It’s the only language that Trump understands, and the deal would be worth billions in contracts to U.S. firms that work in nuclear technology.
And of course, this is a giant victory for the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, better known as MBS, who has long vowed to build a nuclear weapon if Iran is permitted to. It’s frankly difficult to argue with this logic, even if Trump’s much-repeated reason for his war is to stop Iran from making nukes.
What’s the difference between Iran and Saudi Arabia having a nuclear weapon? Several billion dollars, that’s what. The deal with the Saudis pretty much guarantees that nuclear nonproliferation is out the window in the Middle East for the foreseeable future.
But let’s get back to MBS for a moment. He is the key to this whole deal, and his relationship with Trump is at the center of it. The president basically sees the guy as a living, breathing ATM who has access to so much wealth that Trump is willing to look past the fact he’s a murderous swine.
It was a little under eight years ago that a Saudi journalist, dissident, author, columnist and editor named Jamal Khashoggi entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to obtain documents for his upcoming marriage. He never left. He was assassinated and carved into pieces by a bone saw, and all suspicion fell on MBS for having approved the operation to murder Khashoggi for his critical assessment of the Saudi government.
MBS denied any involvement. But we might imagine that this incident would stain the relationship between America and Saudi Arabia. And that assessment would be wrong. Trump for one never thinks less of someone who dismembers a journalist and in fact has disparaged other journalists for making MBS feel uncomfortable in press briefings.
When Trump traveled to Riyadh in 2025 and stood beside MBS, he smiled broadly while declaring of him, “I like him a lot. I like him too much.” Indeed, we all know how Trump feels about vicious leaders. These are his people. His cup of admiration runneth over.
There is also too much money at stake for Trump to ever seriously question his buddy about something so minor as a nuclear agreement. He is literally selling out the world’s safety. Just look at how handsomely his relationship with the kingdom has paid off for his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
It was in 2021 that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) committed $2 billion to Kushner’s private equity firm, Affinity Partners. It’s been emphasized by Kushner that this is an investment in the fund, not a personal payment to him, except for the fact that the fund is him. He owns Affinity and his firm collects management fees. Senate investigators estimated in 2024 that Affinity had accrued roughly $87 million in fees from the Saudi government to date.
Then this past March, Kushner – while working purportedly as a Mideast envoy – in his spare time spoke with potential investors from PIF about raising an additional $5 billion for Affinity. Do I even need to mention that PIF is led by MBS?
It thus goes without saying that this nuclear pact stinks of nepotism and payoffs. The interest conflicts are glaring and multitudinous. You think that when there are billions of dollars of family money at stake, the extended Trump family is going to worry about inspections and keeping Saudi Arabia from developing nukes when that’s already their stated goal?
This is how graft and corruption puts the world at risk. It extends far beyond personal accountability. The only thing keeping the kingdom from enriching its own nuclear fuel to create weapons is its own assurances.
Are we really supposed to trust the Saudi energy ministry’s promises of “cooperation on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy”? It carries roughly as much credibility as anything Trump himself says, which is basically zero.
Again, as with everything this crooked administration does, it all comes down to cold hard cash. We hear that Trump and his family already have enriched themselves to the tune of several billion bucks, and I think that’s a ridiculously conservative estimate. In fact, I believe that by the time his presidency has mercifully run its course, his profit will be in the tens of billions.
Considering how clearly we understand that Trump cares solely about himself, he’s got to be thinking, “I’m 80. Why should I concern myself with future nuclear bombs? I’ll be dead already, so it doesn’t matter to me if the world blows itself up a million times over.”
That’s what should really terrify us all.
(Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.)
Copyright © 2026 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.