'Could get very ugly': Legal experts focus on final day of Fani Willis hearing

The final day of hearings in the complaint against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and a prosecutor on her team, Nathan Wade, began with legal analysts predicting that the arguments against her have failed to prove she should be disqualified.

The issue was whether Willis hired Wade because of their relationship and then benefited from his gifts to her. Law professor Joyce Vance said lawyers for Donald Trump and his co-defendants in the Fulton County RICO case have failed to prove that.

"Legal proceedings often turn on the burden of proof," she wrote on social media. "Here, it’s the defendants who bear that burden. And as salacious as the proceedings have been, they seem to have fallen short. You can’t prove something through a witness who won’t testify to it, and Bradley wouldn’t," she said referring to Terrence Bradley, Wade's former divorce attorney and law partner who was called to give evidence.

Meanwhile, she explained, Bradley had a motive to lie about it and badmouth Wade: she said he left the law practice after an allegation of sexual assault was made against him.

"Texts show he lured the defense lawyer in, but abandoned his claims about the relationship when it came to his testimony on the stand," wrote Vance.

ALSO READ: ‘Leave the drama to them:’ Mother of Lauren Boebert’s grandson speaks out

Fellow law professor Anthony Michael Kreis outlined what he was looking for on the final day of the hearing.

"(1) Arguments over the conflict standard," he wrote on social media. "(2) Is the locus of the argument around when the relationship ended? (3) What does Judge McAfee do with the recent affidavits? (4) Does everyone agree that Terrance Bradley is a liar? And, if so, (it basically has to be) how does that factor into arguments?"

"Finally, is the defense going to lean into an argument Willis and Wade did not testify with candor to the court? That could get very ugly. I’ll be looking for any signal from Judge McAfee if that takes center stage."

You can watch the hearing in the video below or at the link here.

Fani Willis hearing live stream | Arguments on motions to disqualify www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board weighed in on Monday over the rapidly accelerating collapse of the Heritage Foundation.

A longtime haven for far-right legal scholars and the birthplace of President Donald Trump's Project 2025 agenda, Heritage has been in freefall ever since its president, Kevin Roberts, defended Tucker Carlson's interview with neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes, triggering a mass exodus of scholars who revolted over the organization's flirtation with antisemitism.

"Some 15 or more Heritage employees, including the leaders of three prominent policy departments, are jumping to the Advancing American Freedom foundation that the former Vice President established in 2021," wrote the board. "The defectors include the leaders of Heritage’s most important policy shops: The Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, the Center for Data Analysis, and the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies."

These particular defections are remarkable, the board continued, because Edwin Meese, the legendary former attorney general for Ronald Reagan who is now in his 90s, endorsed the move of his namesake center himself.

Moreover, wrote the board, the cracks were beginning to show even before the Fuentes scandal broke the camel's back.

"Heritage once supported free trade; now it is protectionist," wrote the board. "It once supported a robust American foreign policy; Heritage purged its defense hawks two years ago. Heritage was a supporter of the originalist judicial revolution and the rule of law; now it defends Mr. Trump’s expansion of executive power, whether or not it has a constitutional basis."

"Heritage might still play a role under new leadership, but its board has been slow to appreciate the internal dissatisfaction," the board concluded. "A think tank is fundamentally a collection of people and donors who believe in certain ideas and principles. Heritage abandoned its principles; it is losing its people, and soon there might not be much left to donate to."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump is planning to recall 30 diplomats from posts that are typically left in place following a presidential administration because they are considered "apolitical" and replace them with MAGA loyalists, according to a new report.

The Guardian reported on Monday night that the diplomats would not be fired, but instead would be reassigned to other posts. The report added that the move is part of the Trump administration's goal of uprooting the "deep state."

Africa would be the continent hardest hit by Trump's move, according to the report. The administration plans to recall ambassadors from Somalia, Niger, and Congo, all of which are covered by Trump's current travel ban. The move would also impact foreign service officials in Egypt, Algeria, Slovakia, Montenegro, Armenia, and North Macedonia, according to the report.

Former foreign service officials and the union representing diplomats bashed the Trump administration for the move.

“This is a travesty,” said one former senior official who had spoken with ambassadors set to be reassigned, told the outlet. “It’s random, no one knows why they were pulled or spared.”

The American Foreign Service Association, the union that represents diplomats, added that the diplomats were being "penalized" for simply doing their jobs.

“The department must explain how these actions promote fairness for those who were recommended but not reached promotion this year and will now face challenges as others have been promoted ahead of them," the union said.

Read the entire report by clicking here.

Colorado-based shoemaker Crocs, Inc. slapped the Trump administration with a $54 million lawsuit, claiming the president overstepped his authority with emergency tariffs that have cost the company hundreds of millions over the last two consecutive quarters.

The footwear giant filed the suit Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York City, naming U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Denver Business Journal reported. Trump administration officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, were also named in the action seeking $54 million in tariff refunds.

The lawsuit challenges the administration’s emergency tariffs, arguing that the law Trump cited in his April order does not authorize the president to levy tariffs and that the so-called national emergency was not a genuine emergency and did not involve an “unusual or extraordinary threat,” the lawsuit states, as per the Business Journal.

The company is hoping to recover the $54 million in duties it has already paid, plus interest. It also wants to protect itself from future unauthorized tariffs should the Supreme Court rule that they, in fact, were illegal. Since 2019, Crocs has begun to dial back Chinese production and warned that continued high tariffs could prompt a full relocation of its production.

Crocs is the latest major corporation to challenge Trump-era tariffs, following similar suits from Costco, Revlon, and Kawasaki Motors.

The hundreds of millions of dollars lost by Crocs is a major reversal of years of steady profitability, the Business Journal added in its Monday report.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}