Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'

Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'
Jim Jordan, Fani Willis (Photos via AFP)

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis sent another letter to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and the House Judiciary Committee rejecting his demands.

The two have exchanged letters over the past month as Jordan demands access to her entire case against Donald Trump and the 18 other co-defendants in the racketeering case in Georgia. In her first letter, Willis hit Jordan, who has never passed the Bar Exam or practiced law, for lacking a "basic understanding of the law."

"Your letter makes clear that you lack a basic understanding of the law, its practice and the ethical obligations of attorneys generally and prosecutors specifically," she wrote.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

In her new letter, she similarly knocks Jordan's lack of legal experience and information.

"A charitable explanation of your correspondence is that you are ignorant of the United States and Georgia Constitutions and codes," the first paragraph says. "A more troubling explanation is that you are abusing your authority as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in attempt to obstruct and interfere with a Georgia criminal prosecution."

She went on to say that he might be protected by the speech and debate clause, but his behavior is still offensive to the rule of law.

"We have already written a letter—which I have attached again for your reference—explaining why the legal positions you advance are meritless. Nothing you've said in your latest letter changes that fact," she continued.

Jordan tried the same move with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, to no avail. In that case, Bragg sued Jordan, accusing him of a "brazen and unconstitutional attack" on the prosecution of Trump and a "transparent campaign to intimidate and attack" the district attorney.

"…Rather than allowing the criminal process to proceed in the ordinary course, Chairman Jordan and the Committee are participating in a campaign of intimidation, retaliation, and obstruction," Bragg said in the suit.

"First, they indict a president for no crime. Then, they sue to block congressional oversight when we ask questions about the federal funds they say they used to do it," Jordan said.

Jordan then held a "field hearing" where he complained about Bragg from New York and has been silent since.

See a screen capture of the letter below or at the link here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) clashed with Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Tuesday during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing over what Van Hollen described as a "pattern" of mistruths from DHS.

Van Hollen challenged Mullin about previous statements former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem made about cases involving Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, an immigrant in Maryland who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador last year, and Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse who was shot and killed by immigration agents during a confrontation with Border Patrol agents amid protests in Minneapolis, Minnesota, this year. Van Hollen claimed there was a "pattern" of untruths offered by the previous DHS administration.

Things got heated when Mullin attempted to refute Van Hollen's claim.

"I do want to say something to you," Mullin said to Van Hollen as his time for questions expired. "We arrest about 1,900 people a day ..."

Van Hollen interrupted Mullin and asked the committee chair, Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), if she would allow more time for questions so the two could finish their conversation. Mullin continued uninterrupted.

"I was answering what you said was a pattern!" Mullin said. "You made an accusation that there was a pattern ..."

"Mr. Secretary, I went on! There was a pattern," Van Hollen shot back.

Mullin and Van Hollen then got into a heated back-and-forth about the definition of a pattern.

"Let's get out the dictionary!" Van Hollen said amid the crosstalk.


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche dashed any remaining hopes that the Trump administration would move forward with its plan to create a $1.776 billion so-called "anti-weaponization" fund to pay claims to people who say they were wrongfully prosecuted by the government.

"We are not moving forward with the fund," Blanche told the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.

Last week, the Trump administration proposed creating an anti-weaponization fund as part of a settlement agreement with the IRS over a case stemming from the 2019 leak of Trump's tax returns.

The fund faced immediate and intense criticism from Democrats and Republicans after multiple of Trump's allies said they would seek payments from the fund.

CNN's Paula Reid, the network's chief legal affairs correspondent, described Blanche's statements as an "interesting about-face" during a segment on Tuesday's broadcast of "The Arena."

Patrick De Haan, a renowned oil industry analyst, had a dire warning for the American public on Tuesday as the Strait of Hormuz closure continues to pressure global oil supplies.

"Tomorrow, U.S. distillate inventories will likely fall under 100 million barrels for the first time in over 20 years, exacerbated by high exports due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz," he wrote in a post to X.

In other words, he said, "this is a powder keg waiting to go off if a deal to reopen the Strait doesn't happen soon."

The Strait of Hormuz carries around 20 percent of the world's entire global oil trade, as well as a number of other critical raw materials. It has been effectively impassible for months since the U.S. war with Iran flared up.

Trump administration officials insist that the pressure on oil supplies, and with it rising gas prices, is worth the objectives they are attempting to accomplish in Iran, but both lawmakers and the voting public are not convinced, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio getting a cold reception in a hearing earlier in the day.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}