Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'

Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'
Jim Jordan, Fani Willis (Photos via AFP)

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis sent another letter to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and the House Judiciary Committee rejecting his demands.

The two have exchanged letters over the past month as Jordan demands access to her entire case against Donald Trump and the 18 other co-defendants in the racketeering case in Georgia. In her first letter, Willis hit Jordan, who has never passed the Bar Exam or practiced law, for lacking a "basic understanding of the law."

"Your letter makes clear that you lack a basic understanding of the law, its practice and the ethical obligations of attorneys generally and prosecutors specifically," she wrote.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

In her new letter, she similarly knocks Jordan's lack of legal experience and information.

"A charitable explanation of your correspondence is that you are ignorant of the United States and Georgia Constitutions and codes," the first paragraph says. "A more troubling explanation is that you are abusing your authority as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in attempt to obstruct and interfere with a Georgia criminal prosecution."

She went on to say that he might be protected by the speech and debate clause, but his behavior is still offensive to the rule of law.

"We have already written a letter—which I have attached again for your reference—explaining why the legal positions you advance are meritless. Nothing you've said in your latest letter changes that fact," she continued.

Jordan tried the same move with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, to no avail. In that case, Bragg sued Jordan, accusing him of a "brazen and unconstitutional attack" on the prosecution of Trump and a "transparent campaign to intimidate and attack" the district attorney.

"…Rather than allowing the criminal process to proceed in the ordinary course, Chairman Jordan and the Committee are participating in a campaign of intimidation, retaliation, and obstruction," Bragg said in the suit.

"First, they indict a president for no crime. Then, they sue to block congressional oversight when we ask questions about the federal funds they say they used to do it," Jordan said.

Jordan then held a "field hearing" where he complained about Bragg from New York and has been silent since.

See a screen capture of the letter below or at the link here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Two Senate Democrats have launched an effort to reign in President Donald Trump’s war powers following his recent use of the United States military to target suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean.

Trump recently ordered two deadly strikes on suspect drug traffickers; once on Sept. 2, and another on Monday, killing at least 14 people. The strikes have been widely condemned by experts as amounting to state-sanctioned murders, whereas the Trump administration has defended the strikes as justified given Trump’s designation of drug traffickers as terrorists.

The two Senate Democrats, Sens. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Tim Kaine (D-VA), filed a joint resolution on Friday challenging Trump’s authority to order strikes outside of responding to an “imminent armed attack,” and demanded that such strikes were “illegal” and “must stop,” according to a report Friday from the New York Times.

“While we share with the executive branch the imperative of preventing and deterring drugs from reaching our shores, blowing up boats without any legal justification risks dragging the United States into another war and provoking unjustified hostilities against our own citizens,” Schiff said in a statement. “This unauthorized and illegal use of our military must stop.”

Trump has championed his use of the military in targeting suspected drug traffickers, proclaiming the vessel’s occupants to be associated with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. According to multiple Trump officials speaking on the condition of anonymity, however, the vessel had actually reversed course away from American shores prior to being struck, raising further doubt as to whether Trump had any legitimate authority to carry out the strike.

“President Trump has no legal authority to launch strikes or use military force in the Caribbean or elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere,” Kain said in a statement, while adding the Trump administration has refused to release “basic information” about the strikes to members of Congress.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A legal expert accused U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro of knowingly violating her code of conduct by bringing unwinnable cases before grand juries.

The former Fox News host chosen by President Donald Trump to oversee prosecutions in the District of Columbia has had nearly a dozen cases dismissed since National Guard troops were deployed there, and CNN's Elliot Williams said Pirro had made a stunning admission when she declared "I don't care about the numbers."

"It's not just the mere fact that it's 11 cases," said Williams, a former federal prosecutor. "That number means nothing, it's 11 out of 50, nearly a quarter of cases that have been brought since that period have been dropped in some way. That's either by the office deciding not to bring charges, or a grand jury or a judge saying they're not valid."

Pirro has responded to criticism about her brief tenure as D.C.'s top prosecutor by saying it was her job to prosecute, even if the cases are weak, and Williams was astonished.

"Prosecutors ought to be bringing cases aggressively, they ought to be trying to charge people, but within the confines of the law," Williams said.

Pirro explicitly said "I don't care about the numbers" of cases that fell apart, and Williams said that violated her professional standards.

"Fine, your job is to prosecute, but the U.S. Attorney manual, which is the guidebook for her job, makes clear that prosecutors need to bring what are called 'readily provable offenses,'" Williams said. "If they don't think they can win, they shouldn't be bringing the case. So she's acknowledging that some of these cases they're brining are just junk."

- YouTube youtu.be

Given Republicans' breathtaking control of the federal government, there are precious few opportunities for Democrats to leave their mark. But a real opening lies just ahead, and Dems must be ready to go to the mat, forcing the GOP to shut the entirety of the government down on Sept. 30 if they don't honor Democratic demands.

Nothing less than the framing of the stakes for the 2026 elections, combined with longstanding expectations for subsidized health care and a minimal social safety net, is at stake. Last time, Dems cratered. They no longer have that luxury.

Back in March, as the current spending bill approached, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), along with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), John Fetterman (D-PA), and a few others, made almost no effort before caving in to Republican demands, out of fear of what President Donald Trump and Elon Musk (and DOGE) might do with "emergency powers" that might flow from a shutdown.

The bill went through with nearly every Republican cut in place. Since then, and as Project 2025 unfolds, we've been given a masterclass in how fiercely Trump seizes shocking levels of executive power even absent an emergency.

Trump is going to Trump without regard to exigencies. Inaction in hopes of normalcy is dangerously naive.

The current Republican bill guarantees cuts to Obamacare subsidies, Medicaid funding, FEMA funding, and other cuts that hurt poor and middle-class Americans. If Republicans stay in line, the bill will pass the House. It must be stopped in the Senate.

This gives the Democrats a unique opportunity to invest heavily in the right messaging, starting now to get out in front.

This week, Rep. Rose DeLauro (D-CT) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), the leading Democrats on spending matters, said Republicans “walked away from negotiations and are now threatening a shutdown by trying to jam through a funding bill on their terms alone.”

That was a good start. From here, Team Blue must stand firm, with resolute focus on our increasingly expensive American lives.

It is the right time to do it. Trump is still polling poorly at about 43 percent approval and has been seen as "extreme" throughout his second term. Team Red on Capitol Hill is nothing more than a distribution center for Trump Inc., headquartered just down Pennsylvania Avenue. The GOP is Trump. The coming shutdown is about him, period — not Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) or John Thune (R-SD), or House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).

It is about "the Trump cuts" or the "Trump money grab." Brand it. Personalize it. He deserves it.

To be sure, one takes a massive risk in shutting the government down during a period of economic uncertainty. A shutdown could slow the economy further. Thus, Democrats must stand tall and say that they must stop cuts to these social programs precisely because the economy is slowing and may turn downward in the near future.

Lingering economic worries will make Trump's cuts that much more devastating. Hold the line.

What Democrats can't do is get into a fight that looks like they are shutting the government down over politics. Playing the usual politics, whether about issues such as Voter ID or just obstructing to obstruct, is a loser. Dems must singularly and clearly stand their ground over the cost of the Republican bill to ordinary Americans, and not get into the weeds.

The GOP "money grab" must be the sine qua non of the Blue.

It will not be easy. But this is the perfect opportunity to paint Trump as an extremist, one trying to tear every remaining shred of government support from Americans' hands. Note the economic risk by screaming that Trump is doing all he can to run the economy into the ground as it is, with tariffs, layoffs, inflation — especially grocery prices. Pound on the need to help Americans, "more now than ever."

What Democrats cannot do is fold again, as they did in March. Chances to really improve American lives are so rare in this political dynamic that they must be seized when presented.

It will take some real political skill, but it most certainly can be done. Simply message that Dems won't consider anything that hurts ordinary Americans. Don't even mention any potential riders. Color Trump as the bad guy, stealing from the poor, willing to shut the government down to grab even more.

Trump owns the GOP with a totality that takes one's breath away, but that allows the Dems to make this personal. Whatever happens, it will be them against "Trump" and his demands. Talk about hospital closures, rising health care costs, and disaster relief. Put it all in the context of a very uncertain and somewhat painful economy, the Trump economy.

Do not back down. If we have learned anything under Trump's rule, it is that he will make things worse. He will use every inch of rope, grab powers heretofore unknown to exist, and lash out at minorities, women, LGBTQ Americans, immigrants, and the poor. He will do that anyway. There is no reason to let that concern get in the way of stopping this bill.

Republican cuts are deeply unpopular, so make Trump eat them. Make it such that Trump has to take the hit. He is the one who wants to hurt Americans so badly that he's willing to shut the government down in order to do it. And then let all the consequences shower onto him.

But for the love of God, stand up and be counted for once. Hold the line. Force them to shut it all down, over "a bill that enables Trump's money grab."

  • Jason Miciak is a former Associate Editor at Occupy Democrats, author, and American attorney. He can also regularly be found on Politizoom
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}