Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'

Fani Willis tells Jim Jordan he's either 'ignorant' or 'abusing' his 'authority'
Jim Jordan, Fani Willis (Photos via AFP)

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis sent another letter to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and the House Judiciary Committee rejecting his demands.

The two have exchanged letters over the past month as Jordan demands access to her entire case against Donald Trump and the 18 other co-defendants in the racketeering case in Georgia. In her first letter, Willis hit Jordan, who has never passed the Bar Exam or practiced law, for lacking a "basic understanding of the law."

"Your letter makes clear that you lack a basic understanding of the law, its practice and the ethical obligations of attorneys generally and prosecutors specifically," she wrote.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

In her new letter, she similarly knocks Jordan's lack of legal experience and information.

"A charitable explanation of your correspondence is that you are ignorant of the United States and Georgia Constitutions and codes," the first paragraph says. "A more troubling explanation is that you are abusing your authority as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary in attempt to obstruct and interfere with a Georgia criminal prosecution."

She went on to say that he might be protected by the speech and debate clause, but his behavior is still offensive to the rule of law.

"We have already written a letter—which I have attached again for your reference—explaining why the legal positions you advance are meritless. Nothing you've said in your latest letter changes that fact," she continued.

Jordan tried the same move with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, to no avail. In that case, Bragg sued Jordan, accusing him of a "brazen and unconstitutional attack" on the prosecution of Trump and a "transparent campaign to intimidate and attack" the district attorney.

"…Rather than allowing the criminal process to proceed in the ordinary course, Chairman Jordan and the Committee are participating in a campaign of intimidation, retaliation, and obstruction," Bragg said in the suit.

"First, they indict a president for no crime. Then, they sue to block congressional oversight when we ask questions about the federal funds they say they used to do it," Jordan said.

Jordan then held a "field hearing" where he complained about Bragg from New York and has been silent since.

See a screen capture of the letter below or at the link here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) was flailing for as much distance as possible as President Donald Trump moves to impose draconian new tariffs on Canada, according to a Politico report on Tuesday.

Collins, a top target for Democrats in a battleground Senate race, represents a state that directly borders the Canadian Maritime provinces.

“I have voted repeatedly against the Canadian tariffs,” said Collins in a statement to Politico. “Maine and Canada’s economies are very intertwined. A lot of our blueberries, our potatoes, our lobster, our lumber are harvested in Maine, processed in Canada and then come back. I don’t want to see the tariffs on the books.”

Bobby Charles, the GOP's nominee for governor, concurred with Collins.

“As Governor, Bobby will always prioritize Maine, even if that means taking a position contrary to the national elites of his party,” Vincent Harris, a senior strategist for Charles, told Politico in a statement.

If elected, Charles said he will travel to Washington to argue against Trump's tariffs.

Trump's new scheme, enacted under a controversial and hardly-ever-used 1930 tariff law, would put 50 percent import taxes on a range of Canadian products.

All of this comes amid a massive shakeup of the Maine Senate race, with Democrats pressuring their nominee Graham Platner to withdraw over credible allegations of sexual assault, and coalescing instead around state lawmaker Troy Jackson.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The Department of Justice has dropped a case against a special education aide whom it publicly shamed, per a court filing.

According to a court filing published by Politico legal reporter Josh Gerstein on Tuesday, the Department of Justice asked a federal judge to dismiss its case against Christina Rank, a special education aide from Minnesota.

Gerstein noted in a post on X that former Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly named Rank in a January X post. Rank's name showed up first in a list of 16 people who were arrested amid protests in Minneapolis in response to killings by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

According to Bondi's January post, Rank and the others in the list were arrested under federal laws for "assaulting, resisting or impeding certain officers and employees."

Shortly after Bondi's post, a federal judge expressed fury toward Bondi for publishing the names and mugshots of the 16 protesters in a social media post. Judge Dulce J. Foster said in a Minneapolis federal court that she was "deeply disturbed" by the move, adding that sharing images of people who are presumed innocent "is not something that the court condones."

However, the DOJ's latest court filing requests that charges be dropped against Rank, a 25-year-old who made headlines after being violently detained and then named by Bondi. According to the DOJ, it didn't have enough evidence to charge her, and it asked the court to dismiss the case "with prejudice," meaning it can't be refiled.

"Upon a further review of the evidence and affidavit in support of the complaint, the government does not believe that probable cause for assault exists," the DOJ court filing reads. "Based on a lack of probable cause and in the interest of justice, the government requests this case be dismissed."

Former Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield was indicted by state prosecutors two years ago on allegations he stole campaign funds and used them for luxuries like a $32,000 Bahamas getaway — and now new details have emerged about the ordeal.

The Detroit News published new accounts of how Chatfield's former aides spilled the beans in court on the outrageous revelations.

Former Chatfield Chief of Staff Rob Minard told Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's prosecutors "that Chatfield used a private jet to travel to a golf resort in South Carolina in November 2020, that he would 'pocket' campaign contributions that came in the form of cash and that he would orchestrate 'extravagant partying,'" said the report. His travels "featured trips with lobbyists, the use of a private jet, a yacht rental in Miami, gambling, poolside cabanas and bottle service."

An attorney who attended Minard's meeting with prosecutors last year said that "Minard told us that Lee Chatfield always had to stay in the most expensive hotels and eat at the most expensive restaurants."

Minard and his wife Anne have both taken plea deals for filing false tax returns and obtaining money under false pretenses, as part of the investigation.

Not all the money went to these vacations, noted the report — some just went into Chatfield's bank account.

"Rob Minard told investigators that Lee Chatfield and his wife, Stephanie, would 'pocket' money from campaign donors that came to their house in the form of cash," noted reporter Craig Mauger.

Chatfield has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. He faces 13 felonies.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}